[07:12] <sergiodj> adrien: hey! I've noticed that gnutls28 is blocked on proposed because there are some dep8 tests that assume TLS 1.0 will be available. could you take a look into it, please?
[07:17] <adrien> sergiodj: argh; I thought these were passing! I'll have a look as soon as I can but it might be only starting tomorrow
[07:18] <sergiodj> yeah, ISTR running its dep8 when I sponsored, but apparently I didn't :-/.  thanks!
[07:22] <adrien> I think the reason is that the behavior change is caused by a change in /etc/gnutls/config and therefore it doesn't apply before the package is installed; it's been a bit annoying to test
[07:23] <adrien> thinking more about it, we might want to do things differently so that these tests still run but that's for another day
[07:24] <sergiodj> well, that's what dep8 tests are for, so I think things are working as expected in this case, right?
[07:24] <sergiodj> (unless I misunderstood what you said)
[07:32] <bittin> Started adding some Swedish to 24.04 now
[07:35] <adrien> what I meant is that we want to disable TLS 1.0 and 1.1; the tests are therefore expected to fail; but at the same time, the code is still there and a system administrator could re-enable them
[07:36] <adrien> for TLS 1.0 and 1.1, that's mostly rethorical but the same thing could occur for things that are less clear cut (that's related to something I've been working on)
[07:41] <adrien> the global question is how to have stricter defaults that disable some protocols/algorithms, but still test them because they make sense for a number of situations
[07:46] <sergiodj> we could have a test to make sure that the protocols are disabled as intended, and then another to test whether reenabling them works
[07:52] <adrien> the thing I've been working on involves system-wide configuration changes (I'll be giving a lightning talk at the engineering sprint this afternoon) and some things like that will probably be needed across all the configuration profiles if this goes forward
[07:58] <adrien> I think I need an ethernet cable to be able to do testing here
[09:13] <andersson1234> bluca: are you still getting 500's for your upstream systemd tests? My guess is no so I just want to check you're all good.
[10:29] <adrien> after a bit of debugging and finally noticing a left-over apt proxy setting on my system, I could reproduce and fix the issue; I'll be busy with other things this afternoon so it'll probably have to wait for tomorrow; current diff can be seen at https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/qCFp7VxVwZ/ and there might be some changes esp. regarding the first hunk
[11:32] <schopin> @pilot in
=== ChanServ changed the topic of #ubuntu-devel to: Archive: open | Devel of Ubuntu (not support) | Build failures: http://qa.ubuntuwire.com/ftbfs/ | #ubuntu for support and discussion of Focal-Mantic | Patch Pilots: schopin, juliank
[11:32] <juliank_> @pilot out
=== juliank_ is now known as juliank
[11:32] <juliank> @pilot out
=== ChanServ changed the topic of #ubuntu-devel to: Archive: open | Devel of Ubuntu (not support) | Build failures: http://qa.ubuntuwire.com/ftbfs/ | #ubuntu for support and discussion of Focal-Mantic | Patch Pilots: schopin
[11:33] <schopin> I'm not going to do *active* pilot stuff because we're right in the middle of an internal event at Canonical, but I'll still be available to try and answer questions :)
[15:05] <tsimonq2> schopin: <3
=== justThanks is now known as justTesting
=== justTesting is now known as justThanks