[02:46] * guiverc has created a few summaries, alas with comments.. [03:58] Bashing-om, arraybolt3 has been re-qualified as lubuntu-dev; no link (tomorrow likely tsimonq2 indicated); but as reported by news dec-2022 (https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuWeeklyNewsletter/Issue765) do we want to post (when/if something to post)... (draws attention to Aaron's stepping down for mantic cycle & rejoining..) [03:58] -ubottu:#ubuntu-news- ::planet:: Podcast Ubuntu Portugal: E272 a Cimeira Que Interessa @ https://podcastubuntuportugal.org/e272/ [03:58] -ubottu:#ubuntu-news- ::planet:: Scarlett Gately Moore: KDE: Krita 5.2.1 Snap! KDE Gear 23.08.3 Snaps and KDE neon release @ https://www.scarlettgatelymoore.dev/kde-krita-5-2-1-snap-kde-gear-23-08-3-snaps-and-kde-neon-release/ [03:58] -ubottu:#ubuntu-news- ::planet:: Ubuntu Blog: What is MLflow? @ https://ubuntu.com//blog/what-is-mlflow [04:00] guiverc: Sure - we can certainly add Aaron to the list :P [04:00] i was really asking if we (news) care.. if it belongs.. no link currently anyway [04:01] we covered first time, which wasn't that lnog ago... [04:01] If I were you, I wouldn't draw attention to him stepping down, just to his requalifying as the stepping down was due to highly personal reasons. [04:01] my thinking exactly (probably) [04:02] guiverc: As he is one of our own - we should do all we can to promote his wellness. [04:02] uwn didn't mention withdraw.. but requalifying etc draws attention towards the self-step-down... [04:03] Yeah, don't even mention it. It wasn't for health reasons, so we don't want to draw attention and make it seem like it was anything more than a hiatus. [04:04] * guiverc suspects I feel as Eickmeyer suggested.. we ignore as covered in issue 765; lp doesn't show any history of step-down requalify etc.. [04:10] Bashing-om, just fyi.. but when Simon does post; it'll probably enter your radar; the main reason for ^ [04:11] guiverc: Background info always "good to have" :P [04:20] Bashing-om: There are some things that are public, and some things that are private. This one is private. I understand your need for journalistic integrity, but this is most certainly a right-to-privacy issue. [04:21] Eickmeyer, my wording is why Bashing-om responded as he did; I should have probably thought first & been more careful with what I said.. Sorry Bashing-om (maybe a PM would have been better too) [04:21] Ah, I undertand. My bad. [04:22] Eickmeyer: There is no integrity in distractful content - I may stray but I hope no error :D [04:25] * guiverc laughs.. red hat folks wearing 'purple hats' (register article..) [04:29] guiverc: I must have glossed over that red hat article - https://www.theregister.com/2023/11/10/snap_without_ubuntu_tools/ caught my attention. [04:30] nah i'm writing summaries so it's one you caught... https://www.theregister.com/2023/11/08/ubuntu_core_desktop_details/ where the red hatters (owned by big blue) are referred to as pupple hatters (as I read it anyway) [04:30] s/pupple/purple/... big blue isn't mentioned; it's IBM [05:58] i think all summaries are done; no read thru except for names/Nouns (as is normal; I'll read what I intended not what i typed this early) [06:03] guiverc: I see what the weekend produces and wrap-up the issue tomorrow - in that process I do some Q&A. [06:08] :) & thanks (as always) Bashing-om [06:09] guiverc: It is just what we do :P [06:15] * guiverc made numerous comments [06:22] guiverc: ^ then you will get numerous REPLY to catch up on :D [06:22] :)