[02:46]  * guiverc has created a few summaries, alas with comments..
[03:58] <guiverc> Bashing-om, arraybolt3 has been re-qualified as lubuntu-dev; no link (tomorrow likely tsimonq2 indicated); but as reported by news dec-2022 (https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuWeeklyNewsletter/Issue765) do we want to post (when/if something to post)...  (draws attention to Aaron's stepping down for mantic cycle & rejoining..)
[03:58] -ubottu:#ubuntu-news- ::planet:: Podcast Ubuntu Portugal: E272 a Cimeira Que Interessa @ https://podcastubuntuportugal.org/e272/
[03:58] -ubottu:#ubuntu-news- ::planet:: Scarlett Gately Moore: KDE: Krita 5.2.1 Snap! KDE Gear 23.08.3 Snaps and KDE neon release @ https://www.scarlettgatelymoore.dev/kde-krita-5-2-1-snap-kde-gear-23-08-3-snaps-and-kde-neon-release/
[03:58] -ubottu:#ubuntu-news- ::planet:: Ubuntu Blog: What is MLflow? @ https://ubuntu.com//blog/what-is-mlflow
[04:00] <Bashing-om> guiverc: Sure - we can certainly add Aaron to the list :P
[04:00] <guiverc> i was really asking if we (news) care.. if it belongs.. no link currently anyway
[04:01] <guiverc> we covered first time, which wasn't that lnog ago...
[04:01] <Eickmeyer> If I were you, I wouldn't draw attention to him stepping down, just to his requalifying as the stepping down was due to highly personal reasons.
[04:01] <guiverc> my thinking exactly (probably)
[04:02] <Bashing-om> guiverc: As he is one of our own - we should do all we can to promote his wellness.
[04:02] <guiverc> uwn didn't mention withdraw.. but requalifying etc draws attention towards the self-step-down...
[04:03] <Eickmeyer> Yeah, don't even mention it. It wasn't for health reasons, so we don't want to draw attention and make it seem like it was anything more than a hiatus.
[04:04]  * guiverc suspects I feel as Eickmeyer suggested.. we ignore as covered in issue 765; lp doesn't show any history of step-down requalify etc..
[04:10] <guiverc> Bashing-om,  just fyi.. but when Simon does post; it'll probably enter your radar; the main reason for ^
[04:11] <Bashing-om> guiverc: Background info always "good to have" :P
[04:20] <Eickmeyer> Bashing-om: There are some things that are public, and some things that are private. This one is private. I understand your need for journalistic integrity, but this is most certainly a right-to-privacy issue.
[04:21] <guiverc> Eickmeyer, my wording is why Bashing-om responded as he did; I should have probably thought first & been more careful with what I said..  Sorry Bashing-om (maybe a PM would have been better too)
[04:21] <Eickmeyer> Ah, I undertand. My bad.
[04:22] <Bashing-om> Eickmeyer: There is no integrity in distractful content - I may stray but I hope no error :D
[04:25]  * guiverc laughs.. red hat folks wearing 'purple hats'  (register article..)
[04:29] <Bashing-om> guiverc: I must have glossed over that red hat article - https://www.theregister.com/2023/11/10/snap_without_ubuntu_tools/ caught my attention.
[04:30] <guiverc> nah i'm writing summaries so it's one you caught... https://www.theregister.com/2023/11/08/ubuntu_core_desktop_details/  where the red hatters (owned by big blue) are referred to as pupple hatters (as I read it anyway)
[04:30] <guiverc> s/pupple/purple/... big blue isn't mentioned; it's IBM
[05:58] <guiverc> i think all summaries are done; no read thru except for names/Nouns (as is normal; I'll read what I intended not what i typed this early) 
[06:03] <Bashing-om> guiverc: I see what the weekend produces and wrap-up the issue tomorrow - in that process I do some Q&A.
[06:08] <guiverc> :) & thanks (as always) Bashing-om 
[06:09] <Bashing-om> guiverc: It is just what we do :P
[06:15]  * guiverc made numerous <!-- hidden --> comments 
[06:22] <Bashing-om> guiverc: ^ then you will get numerous <!-- hidden --> REPLY to catch up on :D
[06:22] <guiverc> :)