| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted fortunes-it [amd64] (noble-proposed) [2.0-1] | 04:26 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-prettyprinter-interp [amd64] (noble-proposed) [0.2.0.0-2] | 04:26 | |
| LocutusOfBorg | src:gcc-xtensa-lx106 is a source package not producing any binaries FYI (src:gcc-xtensa provides them) | 06:51 |
|---|---|---|
| sudip | complete newbie question, I am assuming "Unapproved" means the upload was unapproved and was not accepted in jammy-proposed. but what does "no packageset" mean ? | 08:53 |
| LocutusOfBorg | not a newbie question, and I'm not even sure I'll provide an accurate answer | 08:53 |
| LocutusOfBorg | "no packageset" should mean that is not a package that is inserted into packagesets | 08:54 |
| LocutusOfBorg | e.g. we have packagesets for core packages, for i386 whitelisted packages and so on | 08:54 |
| LocutusOfBorg | so, if it is inside a packageset it means (probably) some extra care is needed, because it might affect iso generation, i386 builds and so on | 08:54 |
| LocutusOfBorg | e.g. consider an SRU from version X to X.1 for a package that is in i386 packageset. The version X.1 introduce a build dependency on a little rust library, some kb of simple stuff. | 08:55 |
| LocutusOfBorg | this means no-go for release point of view, because rust is not available on i386, so the SRU is not acceptable because it will introduce a FTBFS on one arch. | 08:56 |
| LocutusOfBorg | (this means disable rust library on i386 and reupload, or something else) | 08:56 |
| sudip | ok | 08:56 |
| sudip | I think I understand. but then getmail6 was unapproved. any idea why.. | 08:57 |
| LocutusOfBorg | that said, I hope somebody with a Release Team hat will properly answer :) | 08:57 |
| LocutusOfBorg | which pocket? | 08:57 |
| sudip | Unapproved: getmail6 (jammy-proposed/universe) [6.18.4-2 => 6.18.4-2ubuntu1] (no packageset) | 08:57 |
| LocutusOfBorg | all the SRU fixes for *stable* goes in unapproved queue | 08:57 |
| LocutusOfBorg | they need to be checked and unblocked by a Stable Release Manager | 08:58 |
| sudip | ahhh.. ok... then its normal.. Unapproved for noble is then a matter of concern | 08:58 |
| LocutusOfBorg | sometimes also stuff for development (e.g. noble) goes in unapproved, specially when we are in alpha/beta freeze, like during iso generation | 08:58 |
| LocutusOfBorg | so, if you upload something that has no packageset, it goes straight into the archive, otherwise it needs manual unblocking | 08:59 |
| LocutusOfBorg | because it might probably mean "retrigger a new iso" | 08:59 |
| LocutusOfBorg | or maybe it stays in unapproved until the iso is out, then it gets accepted, depending on the kind of fix | 08:59 |
| sudip | right, like we have freeze in Debian | 08:59 |
| LocutusOfBorg | freeze in Debian is not "forbid to upload" but "forbid to go in testing" | 08:59 |
| LocutusOfBorg | in Ubuntu is a little bit different, but same concept | 09:00 |
| sudip | yes, migration freeze | 09:00 |
| LocutusOfBorg | and in Debian the freeze is for all packages, in Ubuntu there is some relaxing for stuff that is not seeded, nor in particular packagesets | 09:00 |
| sudip | ok | 09:01 |
| LocutusOfBorg | but also we have migration blocks in Ubuntu like Debian does | 09:01 |
| LocutusOfBorg | so at the end, can anybody please look at unapproved SRU queues? :) | 09:01 |
| LocutusOfBorg | also virtualbox is waiting there since months | 09:02 |
| sudip | thanks LocutusOfBorg for explaining :) | 09:02 |
| LocutusOfBorg | sudip, w.r.t. your patch... | 09:02 |
| LocutusOfBorg | I would like to have some versioning like 6.18.4-2ubuntu1.20.04.1 or whatever | 09:03 |
| LocutusOfBorg | but looks like we already have an higher version, and nobody ever uploaded that 6.18.4-2ubuntu1 in the archive | 09:03 |
| LocutusOfBorg | but sometimes it happens, you add "ubuntu1" and then you discover the same version was already uploaded for a subsequent suite, and your upload gets rejected | 09:04 |
| LocutusOfBorg | adding ubuntuX.Y suffix is handy | 09:04 |
| LocutusOfBorg | that said, the upload is probably fine | 09:06 |
| sudip | but why 6.18.4-2ubuntu1.20.04.1? I thought 6.18.4-2ubuntu1.22.04.1 will be more appropriate given that its for Jammy. | 09:07 |
| doko | LocutusOfBorg: I'm confused, should gcc-xtensa-lx106 be removed? | 09:18 |
| LocutusOfBorg | only the source, not the binaries | 09:18 |
| LocutusOfBorg | gcc-xtensa produces the same binaries, but higher version | 09:18 |
| bluca | morning SRU team (tjaalton + vorlon according to wiki), any chance for a quick review of https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/jammy/+queue?queue_state=1&queue_text=libsolv pretty please? | 09:28 |
| bluca | it's for https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libsolv/+bug/2043625 which is needed to unbork our systemd upstream ci jobs on github - tia! | 09:29 |
| -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Launchpad bug 2043625 in libsolv (Ubuntu Mantic) "libsolv: lack of zstd support makes it impossible to create SUSE Tumbleweed/Fedora Rawhide chroots with zypper/dnf" [High, In Progress] | 09:29 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libsolv [source] (mantic-proposed) [0.7.24-1ubuntu0.23.10.1] | 09:51 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libsolv [source] (lunar-proposed) [0.7.23-1ubuntu0.23.04.1] | 09:52 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libsolv [source] (jammy-proposed) [0.7.20-1ubuntu0.22.04.1] | 09:52 | |
| bluca | thank you! | 09:53 |
| tjaalton | bluca: done | 10:10 |
| === seb129 is now known as seb128 | ||
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected distro-info [source] (jammy-proposed) [1.1ubuntu0.2] | 10:48 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted backport-iwlwifi-dkms [source] (mantic-proposed) [11289-0ubuntu1.23.10.1] | 10:58 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: spdlog [amd64] (noble-proposed/universe) [1:1.12.0+ds-1] (i386-whitelist) | 11:15 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: spdlog [i386] (noble-proposed/universe) [1:1.12.0+ds-1] (i386-whitelist) | 11:15 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: spdlog [arm64] (noble-proposed/universe) [1:1.12.0+ds-1] (i386-whitelist) | 11:16 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: spdlog [ppc64el] (noble-proposed/universe) [1:1.12.0+ds-1] (i386-whitelist) | 11:16 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: spdlog [armhf] (noble-proposed/universe) [1:1.12.0+ds-1] (i386-whitelist) | 11:18 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: spdlog [s390x] (noble-proposed/universe) [1:1.12.0+ds-1] (i386-whitelist) | 11:18 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: suitesparse [ppc64el] (noble-proposed/main) [1:7.3.1+dfsg-2] (ubuntu-desktop) | 11:19 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: suitesparse [amd64] (noble-proposed/main) [1:7.3.1+dfsg-2] (ubuntu-desktop) | 11:20 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: suitesparse [s390x] (noble-proposed/main) [1:7.3.1+dfsg-2] (ubuntu-desktop) | 11:20 | |
| ginggs | LocutusOfBorg, tsimonq2, jbicha, bdrung: the apport/armhf migration-reference failed successfully | 11:22 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: software-properties (xenial-proposed/main) [0.96.20.11 => 0.96.20.12] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server) | 11:23 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: spdlog [riscv64] (noble-proposed/universe) [1:1.12.0+ds-1] (i386-whitelist) | 11:24 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: update-manager (xenial-proposed/main) [1:16.04.17 => 1:16.04.18] (core) | 11:29 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: suitesparse [arm64] (noble-proposed/main) [1:7.3.1+dfsg-2] (ubuntu-desktop) | 11:31 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: suitesparse [armhf] (noble-proposed/main) [1:7.3.1+dfsg-2] (ubuntu-desktop) | 11:31 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gdal [amd64] (noble-proposed/universe) [3.8.0+dfsg-1] (kubuntu) | 11:35 | |
| LocutusOfBorg | ginggs, I'm happy for the failure! :D | 11:37 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gdal [s390x] (noble-proposed/universe) [3.8.0+dfsg-1] (kubuntu) | 11:42 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gdal [ppc64el] (noble-proposed/universe) [3.8.0+dfsg-1] (kubuntu) | 11:43 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gdal [armhf] (noble-proposed/universe) [3.8.0+dfsg-1] (kubuntu) | 11:58 | |
| LocutusOfBorg | gir1.2-tepl-6 : Depends: gir1.2-amtk-5 (>= 5.8) but 5.6.1-2 is to be installed | 12:01 |
| LocutusOfBorg | jbicha, what happened to gedit? | 12:01 |
| LocutusOfBorg | same in debian | 12:09 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gdal [arm64] (noble-proposed/universe) [3.8.0+dfsg-1] (kubuntu) | 12:12 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: suitesparse [riscv64] (noble-proposed/main) [1:7.3.1+dfsg-2] (ubuntu-desktop) | 12:22 | |
| seb128 | LocutusOfBorg, gedit is a text editor and it's in the archive, what's the question about it? | 12:22 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted initramfs-tools [source] (mantic-proposed) [0.142ubuntu15.1] | 12:22 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted sg3-utils [source] (mantic-proposed) [1.46-3ubuntu2.1] | 12:26 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted tmux [source] (mantic-proposed) [3.3a-4ubuntu1] | 12:28 | |
| jbicha | LocutusOfBorg: there is a transition that needs a few more things uploaded from Experimental to Unstable | 12:29 |
| jbicha | seb128: could you review https://code.launchpad.net/~athos-ribeiro/+git/sync-blocklist/+merge/455329 ? | 12:30 |
| seb128 | jbicha, could you get the server team to +1 the request? they own the package and usually take responsability for the postgres transitions so I think we should check with them first | 12:33 |
| LocutusOfBorg | seb128, some of the build-dependencies are in unstable since a week, but they depend on some others still in Debian experimental | 12:33 |
| LocutusOfBorg | and this causes pain in no change rebuilds | 12:33 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted heat [source] (mantic-proposed) [1:21.0.0-0ubuntu2.2] | 12:34 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: firmware-sof (jammy-proposed/restricted) [2.0-1ubuntu4.2 => 2.0-1ubuntu4.4] (no packageset) | 12:34 | |
| jbicha | LocutusOfBorg: bandali is working on the gedit transition ☺️ | 12:35 |
| LocutusOfBorg | oh nice so I move to something else | 12:35 |
| xnox | werid that firmware-sof claims to have no packageset | 12:35 |
| seb128 | jbicha, ah, sorry I though that was a change from your but it's coming from Athos, ok | 12:36 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted magnum-ui [source] (mantic-proposed) [13.0.0-0ubuntu1.1] | 12:37 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gdb [source] (lunar-proposed) [13.1-2ubuntu2.1] | 12:46 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libreoffice [source] (lunar-proposed) [4:7.5.8-0ubuntu0.23.04.1] | 12:52 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected firmware-sof [source] (jammy-proposed) [2.0-1ubuntu4.3] | 12:59 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libvpx [i386] (noble-proposed/main) [1.13.1-2ubuntu1] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist, ubuntu-server) | 13:38 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libvpx [amd64] (noble-proposed/main) [1.13.1-2ubuntu1] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist, ubuntu-server) | 13:39 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libvpx [ppc64el] (noble-proposed/main) [1.13.1-2ubuntu1] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist, ubuntu-server) | 13:39 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libvpx [arm64] (noble-proposed/main) [1.13.1-2ubuntu1] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist, ubuntu-server) | 13:40 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libvpx [s390x] (noble-proposed/main) [1.13.1-2ubuntu1] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist, ubuntu-server) | 13:40 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libvpx [armhf] (noble-proposed/main) [1.13.1-2ubuntu1] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist, ubuntu-server) | 13:41 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted setuptools [source] (lunar-proposed) [66.1.1-1ubuntu0.1] | 13:49 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted firmware-sof [source] (jammy-proposed) [2.0-1ubuntu4.4] | 13:50 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ladvd [source] (jammy-proposed) [1.1.2-1ubuntu1] | 13:53 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected flash-kernel [source] (jammy-proposed) [3.104ubuntu17] | 13:56 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted evince [source] (jammy-proposed) [42.3-0ubuntu3.1] | 14:01 | |
| sudip | tjaalton: regarding #2042720, is it possible to reject that please.. its completely my mistake, that was my first Ubuntu contribution and I was still struggling to understand the difference between Debian and Ubuntu. :( | 14:02 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libvpx [riscv64] (noble-proposed/main) [1.13.1-2ubuntu1] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist, ubuntu-server) | 14:04 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected python-pip [source] (jammy-proposed) [22.0.2+dfsg-1ubuntu0.4] | 14:05 | |
| tjaalton | sudip: sure thing | 14:05 |
| sudip | thanks tjaalton, I will prepare another today and ping waveform | 14:06 |
| tjaalton | ack | 14:06 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected kernelshark [source] (lunar-proposed) [2.2.0-2ubuntu0.1] | 14:06 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gdb [source] (jammy-proposed) [12.1-0ubuntu1~22.04.1] | 14:11 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted irqbalance [source] (jammy-proposed) [1.8.0-1ubuntu0.2] | 14:28 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted trove-dashboard [source] (jammy-proposed) [18.0.0-0ubuntu1.1] | 14:31 | |
| ricotz | tjaalton, thank you for reviewing libreoffice | 14:53 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libreoffice (jammy-backports/main) [4:7.5.7-0ubuntu0.23.04.1~bpo22.04.1 => 4:7.5.8-0ubuntu0.23.04.1~bpo22.04.1] (ubuntu-desktop) | 14:56 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gdal [riscv64] (noble-proposed/universe) [3.8.0+dfsg-1] (kubuntu) | 15:32 | |
| tjaalton | ricotz: np | 15:54 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: firmware-sof (mantic-proposed/main) [2.2.6-1ubuntu1.1 => 2.2.6-1ubuntu1.2] (no packageset) | 16:35 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gdal [amd64] (noble-proposed) [3.8.0+dfsg-1] | 16:55 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gdal [armhf] (noble-proposed) [3.8.0+dfsg-1] | 16:55 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gdal [riscv64] (noble-proposed) [3.8.0+dfsg-1] | 16:55 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libvpx [amd64] (noble-proposed) [1.13.1-2ubuntu1] | 16:55 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libvpx [armhf] (noble-proposed) [1.13.1-2ubuntu1] | 16:55 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libvpx [ppc64el] (noble-proposed) [1.13.1-2ubuntu1] | 16:55 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libvpx [s390x] (noble-proposed) [1.13.1-2ubuntu1] | 16:55 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted spdlog [arm64] (noble-proposed) [1:1.12.0+ds-1] | 16:55 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted spdlog [i386] (noble-proposed) [1:1.12.0+ds-1] | 16:55 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted spdlog [riscv64] (noble-proposed) [1:1.12.0+ds-1] | 16:55 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gdal [arm64] (noble-proposed) [3.8.0+dfsg-1] | 16:55 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gdal [s390x] (noble-proposed) [3.8.0+dfsg-1] | 16:55 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libvpx [i386] (noble-proposed) [1.13.1-2ubuntu1] | 16:55 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted spdlog [amd64] (noble-proposed) [1:1.12.0+ds-1] | 16:55 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted spdlog [ppc64el] (noble-proposed) [1:1.12.0+ds-1] | 16:55 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted suitesparse [amd64] (noble-proposed) [1:7.3.1+dfsg-2] | 16:55 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted suitesparse [armhf] (noble-proposed) [1:7.3.1+dfsg-2] | 16:55 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted suitesparse [riscv64] (noble-proposed) [1:7.3.1+dfsg-2] | 16:55 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gdal [ppc64el] (noble-proposed) [3.8.0+dfsg-1] | 16:55 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libvpx [riscv64] (noble-proposed) [1.13.1-2ubuntu1] | 16:55 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted spdlog [s390x] (noble-proposed) [1:1.12.0+ds-1] | 16:55 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted suitesparse [ppc64el] (noble-proposed) [1:7.3.1+dfsg-2] | 16:55 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libvpx [arm64] (noble-proposed) [1.13.1-2ubuntu1] | 16:55 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted suitesparse [arm64] (noble-proposed) [1:7.3.1+dfsg-2] | 16:55 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted spdlog [armhf] (noble-proposed) [1:1.12.0+ds-1] | 16:55 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted suitesparse [s390x] (noble-proposed) [1:7.3.1+dfsg-2] | 16:55 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: qxmpp [amd64] (noble-proposed/universe) [1.5.5-0.3] (no packageset) | 17:15 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: qxmpp [arm64] (noble-proposed/universe) [1.5.5-0.3] (no packageset) | 17:15 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: qxmpp [armhf] (noble-proposed/universe) [1.5.5-0.3] (no packageset) | 17:16 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: qxmpp [s390x] (noble-proposed/universe) [1.5.5-0.3] (no packageset) | 17:18 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: qemu (mantic-proposed/main) [1:8.0.4+dfsg-1ubuntu3 => 1:8.0.4+dfsg-1ubuntu3.23.10.1] (ubuntu-server, virt) | 17:20 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: qxmpp [ppc64el] (noble-proposed/universe) [1.5.5-0.3] (no packageset) | 17:20 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: qxmpp [riscv64] (noble-proposed/universe) [1.5.5-0.3] (no packageset) | 17:49 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: qtilitools (noble-proposed/primary) [0.1.1~git20231009-0ubuntu1] | 17:58 | |
| tsimonq2 | ^ That's my package, a prereq of sddm-conf. | 18:06 |
| tsimonq2 | I could potentially see a rejection due to the licensing of the file under bin. Probably going to end up being dealer's choice. | 18:07 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: transmission (jammy-proposed/main) [3.00-2ubuntu2 => 3.00-2ubuntu2.1] (ubuntu-desktop) | 18:24 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: transmission (lunar-proposed/main) [3.00-2.1build1 => 3.00-2.1ubuntu0.1] (ubuntu-desktop) | 18:25 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: linux-intel-opt (noble-proposed/primary) [6.5.0-1003.3] | 18:30 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: linux-signed-intel-opt (noble-proposed/primary) [6.5.0-1003.3] | 18:30 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: linux-meta-intel-opt (noble-proposed/primary) [6.5.0.1003.3] | 18:30 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: sddm-conf (noble-proposed/primary) [0.2.0~git20231105-0ubuntu1] | 18:51 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: postgis [s390x] (noble-proposed/universe) [3.3.3+dfsg-2ubuntu2] (no packageset) | 18:57 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted qxmpp [riscv64] (noble-proposed) [1.5.5-0.3] | 19:20 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted qxmpp [amd64] (noble-proposed) [1.5.5-0.3] | 19:20 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted qxmpp [armhf] (noble-proposed) [1.5.5-0.3] | 19:20 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted qxmpp [s390x] (noble-proposed) [1.5.5-0.3] | 19:20 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted qxmpp [arm64] (noble-proposed) [1.5.5-0.3] | 19:20 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted qxmpp [ppc64el] (noble-proposed) [1.5.5-0.3] | 19:20 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted postgis [s390x] (noble-proposed) [3.3.3+dfsg-2ubuntu2] | 19:30 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: postgis [riscv64] (noble-proposed/universe) [3.3.3+dfsg-2ubuntu2] (no packageset) | 19:43 | |
| mitchdz | Where's the proper place for me to retract an SRU exception request? Should I just send another email to the ubuntu-release@lists.ubuntu.com mentioning that I retract the request? | 20:24 |
| === ahasenack_ is now known as ahasenack | ||
| vorlon | mitchdz: that works yes | 21:11 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted firmware-sof [source] (mantic-proposed) [2.2.6-1ubuntu1.2] | 23:00 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: apache2 (mantic-proposed/main) [2.4.57-2ubuntu2 => 2.4.57-2ubuntu2.23.10.1] (i386-whitelist, ubuntu-server) | 23:09 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pg-auto-failover [amd64] (noble-proposed/universe) [2.0-3] (no packageset) | 23:13 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pg-auto-failover [arm64] (noble-proposed/universe) [2.0-3] (no packageset) | 23:15 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pg-auto-failover [s390x] (noble-proposed/universe) [2.0-3] (no packageset) | 23:15 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pg-auto-failover [ppc64el] (noble-proposed/universe) [2.0-3] (no packageset) | 23:15 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pg-auto-failover [armhf] (noble-proposed/universe) [2.0-3] (no packageset) | 23:18 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pg-auto-failover [riscv64] (noble-proposed/universe) [2.0-3] (no packageset) | 23:31 | |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!