[04:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted fortunes-it [amd64] (noble-proposed) [2.0-1]
[04:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-prettyprinter-interp [amd64] (noble-proposed) [0.2.0.0-2]
[06:51] <LocutusOfBorg> src:gcc-xtensa-lx106 is a source package not producing any binaries FYI (src:gcc-xtensa provides them)
[08:53] <sudip> complete newbie question, I am assuming "Unapproved" means the upload was unapproved and was not accepted in jammy-proposed. but what does "no packageset" mean ?
[08:53] <LocutusOfBorg> not a newbie question, and I'm not even sure I'll provide an accurate answer
[08:54] <LocutusOfBorg> "no packageset" should mean that is not a package that is inserted into packagesets
[08:54] <LocutusOfBorg> e.g. we have packagesets for core packages, for i386 whitelisted packages and so on
[08:54] <LocutusOfBorg> so, if it is inside a packageset it means (probably) some extra care is needed, because it might affect iso generation, i386 builds and so on
[08:55] <LocutusOfBorg> e.g. consider an SRU from version X to X.1 for a package that is in i386 packageset. The version X.1 introduce a build dependency on a little rust library, some kb of simple stuff.
[08:56] <LocutusOfBorg> this means no-go for release point of view, because rust is not available on i386, so the SRU is not acceptable because it will introduce a FTBFS on one arch.
[08:56] <LocutusOfBorg> (this means disable rust library on i386 and reupload, or something else)
[08:56] <sudip> ok
[08:57] <sudip> I think I understand. but then getmail6 was unapproved. any idea why..
[08:57] <LocutusOfBorg> that said, I hope somebody with a Release Team hat will properly answer :)
[08:57] <LocutusOfBorg> which pocket?
[08:57] <sudip> Unapproved: getmail6 (jammy-proposed/universe) [6.18.4-2 => 6.18.4-2ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[08:57] <LocutusOfBorg> all the SRU fixes for *stable* goes in unapproved queue
[08:58] <LocutusOfBorg> they need to be checked and unblocked by a Stable Release Manager
[08:58] <sudip> ahhh.. ok... then its normal.. Unapproved for noble is then a matter of concern
[08:58] <LocutusOfBorg> sometimes also stuff for development (e.g. noble) goes in unapproved, specially when we are in alpha/beta freeze, like during iso generation
[08:59] <LocutusOfBorg> so, if you upload something that has no packageset, it goes straight into the archive, otherwise it needs manual unblocking
[08:59] <LocutusOfBorg> because it might probably mean "retrigger a new iso"
[08:59] <LocutusOfBorg> or maybe it stays in unapproved until the iso is out, then it gets accepted, depending on the kind of fix
[08:59] <sudip> right, like we have freeze in Debian
[08:59] <LocutusOfBorg> freeze in Debian is not "forbid to upload" but "forbid to go in testing"
[09:00] <LocutusOfBorg> in Ubuntu is a little bit different, but same concept
[09:00] <sudip> yes, migration freeze
[09:00] <LocutusOfBorg> and in Debian the freeze is for all packages, in Ubuntu there is some relaxing for stuff that is not seeded, nor in particular packagesets
[09:01] <sudip> ok
[09:01] <LocutusOfBorg> but also we have migration blocks in Ubuntu like Debian does
[09:01] <LocutusOfBorg> so at the end, can anybody please look at unapproved SRU queues? :)
[09:02] <LocutusOfBorg> also virtualbox is waiting there since months
[09:02] <sudip> thanks LocutusOfBorg for explaining :)
[09:02] <LocutusOfBorg> sudip, w.r.t. your patch...
[09:03] <LocutusOfBorg> I would like to have some versioning like 6.18.4-2ubuntu1.20.04.1 or whatever
[09:03] <LocutusOfBorg> but looks like we already have an higher version, and nobody ever uploaded that 6.18.4-2ubuntu1 in the archive
[09:04] <LocutusOfBorg> but sometimes it happens, you add "ubuntu1" and then you discover the same version was already uploaded for a subsequent suite, and your upload gets rejected
[09:04] <LocutusOfBorg> adding ubuntuX.Y suffix is handy
[09:06] <LocutusOfBorg> that said, the upload is probably fine
[09:07] <sudip> but why 6.18.4-2ubuntu1.20.04.1? I thought 6.18.4-2ubuntu1.22.04.1 will be more appropriate given that its for Jammy.
[09:18] <doko> LocutusOfBorg: I'm confused, should gcc-xtensa-lx106 be removed?
[09:18] <LocutusOfBorg> only the source, not the binaries
[09:18] <LocutusOfBorg> gcc-xtensa produces the same binaries, but higher version
[09:28] <bluca> morning SRU team (tjaalton + vorlon according to wiki), any chance for a quick review of https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/jammy/+queue?queue_state=1&queue_text=libsolv pretty please?
[09:29] <bluca> it's for https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libsolv/+bug/2043625 which is needed to unbork our systemd upstream ci jobs on github - tia!
[09:29] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Launchpad bug 2043625 in libsolv (Ubuntu Mantic) "libsolv: lack of zstd support makes it impossible to create SUSE Tumbleweed/Fedora Rawhide chroots with zypper/dnf" [High, In Progress]
[09:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libsolv [source] (mantic-proposed) [0.7.24-1ubuntu0.23.10.1]
[09:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libsolv [source] (lunar-proposed) [0.7.23-1ubuntu0.23.04.1]
[09:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libsolv [source] (jammy-proposed) [0.7.20-1ubuntu0.22.04.1]
[09:53] <bluca> thank you!
[10:10] <tjaalton> bluca: done
=== seb129 is now known as seb128
[10:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected distro-info [source] (jammy-proposed) [1.1ubuntu0.2]
[10:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted backport-iwlwifi-dkms [source] (mantic-proposed) [11289-0ubuntu1.23.10.1]
[11:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: spdlog [amd64] (noble-proposed/universe) [1:1.12.0+ds-1] (i386-whitelist)
[11:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: spdlog [i386] (noble-proposed/universe) [1:1.12.0+ds-1] (i386-whitelist)
[11:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: spdlog [arm64] (noble-proposed/universe) [1:1.12.0+ds-1] (i386-whitelist)
[11:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: spdlog [ppc64el] (noble-proposed/universe) [1:1.12.0+ds-1] (i386-whitelist)
[11:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: spdlog [armhf] (noble-proposed/universe) [1:1.12.0+ds-1] (i386-whitelist)
[11:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: spdlog [s390x] (noble-proposed/universe) [1:1.12.0+ds-1] (i386-whitelist)
[11:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: suitesparse [ppc64el] (noble-proposed/main) [1:7.3.1+dfsg-2] (ubuntu-desktop)
[11:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: suitesparse [amd64] (noble-proposed/main) [1:7.3.1+dfsg-2] (ubuntu-desktop)
[11:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: suitesparse [s390x] (noble-proposed/main) [1:7.3.1+dfsg-2] (ubuntu-desktop)
[11:22] <ginggs> LocutusOfBorg, tsimonq2, jbicha, bdrung: the apport/armhf migration-reference failed successfully
[11:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: software-properties (xenial-proposed/main) [0.96.20.11 => 0.96.20.12] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server)
[11:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: spdlog [riscv64] (noble-proposed/universe) [1:1.12.0+ds-1] (i386-whitelist)
[11:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: update-manager (xenial-proposed/main) [1:16.04.17 => 1:16.04.18] (core)
[11:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: suitesparse [arm64] (noble-proposed/main) [1:7.3.1+dfsg-2] (ubuntu-desktop)
[11:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: suitesparse [armhf] (noble-proposed/main) [1:7.3.1+dfsg-2] (ubuntu-desktop)
[11:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gdal [amd64] (noble-proposed/universe) [3.8.0+dfsg-1] (kubuntu)
[11:37] <LocutusOfBorg> ginggs, I'm happy for the failure! :D
[11:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gdal [s390x] (noble-proposed/universe) [3.8.0+dfsg-1] (kubuntu)
[11:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gdal [ppc64el] (noble-proposed/universe) [3.8.0+dfsg-1] (kubuntu)
[11:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gdal [armhf] (noble-proposed/universe) [3.8.0+dfsg-1] (kubuntu)
[12:01] <LocutusOfBorg>  gir1.2-tepl-6 : Depends: gir1.2-amtk-5 (>= 5.8) but 5.6.1-2 is to be installed
[12:01] <LocutusOfBorg> jbicha, what happened to gedit?
[12:09] <LocutusOfBorg> same in debian
[12:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gdal [arm64] (noble-proposed/universe) [3.8.0+dfsg-1] (kubuntu)
[12:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: suitesparse [riscv64] (noble-proposed/main) [1:7.3.1+dfsg-2] (ubuntu-desktop)
[12:22] <seb128> LocutusOfBorg, gedit is a text editor and it's in the archive, what's the question about it?
[12:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted initramfs-tools [source] (mantic-proposed) [0.142ubuntu15.1]
[12:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted sg3-utils [source] (mantic-proposed) [1.46-3ubuntu2.1]
[12:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted tmux [source] (mantic-proposed) [3.3a-4ubuntu1]
[12:29] <jbicha> LocutusOfBorg: there is a transition that needs a few more things uploaded from Experimental to Unstable
[12:30] <jbicha> seb128: could you review https://code.launchpad.net/~athos-ribeiro/+git/sync-blocklist/+merge/455329 ?
[12:33] <seb128> jbicha, could you get the server team to +1 the request? they own the package and usually take responsability for the postgres transitions so I think we should check with them first
[12:33] <LocutusOfBorg> seb128, some of the build-dependencies are in unstable since a week, but they depend on some others still in Debian experimental
[12:33] <LocutusOfBorg> and this causes pain in no change rebuilds
[12:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted heat [source] (mantic-proposed) [1:21.0.0-0ubuntu2.2]
[12:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: firmware-sof (jammy-proposed/restricted) [2.0-1ubuntu4.2 => 2.0-1ubuntu4.4] (no packageset)
[12:35] <jbicha> LocutusOfBorg: bandali is working on the gedit transition ☺️
[12:35] <LocutusOfBorg> oh nice so I move to something else
[12:35] <xnox> werid that firmware-sof claims to have no packageset
[12:36] <seb128> jbicha, ah, sorry I though that was a change from your but it's coming from Athos, ok
[12:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted magnum-ui [source] (mantic-proposed) [13.0.0-0ubuntu1.1]
[12:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gdb [source] (lunar-proposed) [13.1-2ubuntu2.1]
[12:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libreoffice [source] (lunar-proposed) [4:7.5.8-0ubuntu0.23.04.1]
[12:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected firmware-sof [source] (jammy-proposed) [2.0-1ubuntu4.3]
[13:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libvpx [i386] (noble-proposed/main) [1.13.1-2ubuntu1] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist, ubuntu-server)
[13:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libvpx [amd64] (noble-proposed/main) [1.13.1-2ubuntu1] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist, ubuntu-server)
[13:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libvpx [ppc64el] (noble-proposed/main) [1.13.1-2ubuntu1] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist, ubuntu-server)
[13:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libvpx [arm64] (noble-proposed/main) [1.13.1-2ubuntu1] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist, ubuntu-server)
[13:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libvpx [s390x] (noble-proposed/main) [1.13.1-2ubuntu1] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist, ubuntu-server)
[13:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libvpx [armhf] (noble-proposed/main) [1.13.1-2ubuntu1] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist, ubuntu-server)
[13:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted setuptools [source] (lunar-proposed) [66.1.1-1ubuntu0.1]
[13:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted firmware-sof [source] (jammy-proposed) [2.0-1ubuntu4.4]
[13:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ladvd [source] (jammy-proposed) [1.1.2-1ubuntu1]
[13:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected flash-kernel [source] (jammy-proposed) [3.104ubuntu17]
[14:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted evince [source] (jammy-proposed) [42.3-0ubuntu3.1]
[14:02] <sudip> tjaalton: regarding #2042720, is it possible to reject that please.. its completely my mistake, that was my first Ubuntu contribution and I was still struggling to understand the difference between Debian and Ubuntu. :(
[14:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libvpx [riscv64] (noble-proposed/main) [1.13.1-2ubuntu1] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist, ubuntu-server)
[14:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected python-pip [source] (jammy-proposed) [22.0.2+dfsg-1ubuntu0.4]
[14:05] <tjaalton> sudip: sure thing
[14:06] <sudip> thanks tjaalton, I will prepare another today and ping waveform
[14:06] <tjaalton> ack
[14:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected kernelshark [source] (lunar-proposed) [2.2.0-2ubuntu0.1]
[14:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gdb [source] (jammy-proposed) [12.1-0ubuntu1~22.04.1]
[14:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted irqbalance [source] (jammy-proposed) [1.8.0-1ubuntu0.2]
[14:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted trove-dashboard [source] (jammy-proposed) [18.0.0-0ubuntu1.1]
[14:53] <ricotz> tjaalton, thank you for reviewing libreoffice
[14:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libreoffice (jammy-backports/main) [4:7.5.7-0ubuntu0.23.04.1~bpo22.04.1 => 4:7.5.8-0ubuntu0.23.04.1~bpo22.04.1] (ubuntu-desktop)
[15:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gdal [riscv64] (noble-proposed/universe) [3.8.0+dfsg-1] (kubuntu)
[15:54] <tjaalton> ricotz: np
[16:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: firmware-sof (mantic-proposed/main) [2.2.6-1ubuntu1.1 => 2.2.6-1ubuntu1.2] (no packageset)
[16:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gdal [amd64] (noble-proposed) [3.8.0+dfsg-1]
[16:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gdal [armhf] (noble-proposed) [3.8.0+dfsg-1]
[16:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gdal [riscv64] (noble-proposed) [3.8.0+dfsg-1]
[16:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libvpx [amd64] (noble-proposed) [1.13.1-2ubuntu1]
[16:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libvpx [armhf] (noble-proposed) [1.13.1-2ubuntu1]
[16:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libvpx [ppc64el] (noble-proposed) [1.13.1-2ubuntu1]
[16:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libvpx [s390x] (noble-proposed) [1.13.1-2ubuntu1]
[16:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted spdlog [arm64] (noble-proposed) [1:1.12.0+ds-1]
[16:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted spdlog [i386] (noble-proposed) [1:1.12.0+ds-1]
[16:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted spdlog [riscv64] (noble-proposed) [1:1.12.0+ds-1]
[16:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gdal [arm64] (noble-proposed) [3.8.0+dfsg-1]
[16:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gdal [s390x] (noble-proposed) [3.8.0+dfsg-1]
[16:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libvpx [i386] (noble-proposed) [1.13.1-2ubuntu1]
[16:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted spdlog [amd64] (noble-proposed) [1:1.12.0+ds-1]
[16:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted spdlog [ppc64el] (noble-proposed) [1:1.12.0+ds-1]
[16:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted suitesparse [amd64] (noble-proposed) [1:7.3.1+dfsg-2]
[16:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted suitesparse [armhf] (noble-proposed) [1:7.3.1+dfsg-2]
[16:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted suitesparse [riscv64] (noble-proposed) [1:7.3.1+dfsg-2]
[16:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gdal [ppc64el] (noble-proposed) [3.8.0+dfsg-1]
[16:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libvpx [riscv64] (noble-proposed) [1.13.1-2ubuntu1]
[16:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted spdlog [s390x] (noble-proposed) [1:1.12.0+ds-1]
[16:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted suitesparse [ppc64el] (noble-proposed) [1:7.3.1+dfsg-2]
[16:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libvpx [arm64] (noble-proposed) [1.13.1-2ubuntu1]
[16:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted suitesparse [arm64] (noble-proposed) [1:7.3.1+dfsg-2]
[16:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted spdlog [armhf] (noble-proposed) [1:1.12.0+ds-1]
[16:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted suitesparse [s390x] (noble-proposed) [1:7.3.1+dfsg-2]
[17:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: qxmpp [amd64] (noble-proposed/universe) [1.5.5-0.3] (no packageset)
[17:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: qxmpp [arm64] (noble-proposed/universe) [1.5.5-0.3] (no packageset)
[17:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: qxmpp [armhf] (noble-proposed/universe) [1.5.5-0.3] (no packageset)
[17:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: qxmpp [s390x] (noble-proposed/universe) [1.5.5-0.3] (no packageset)
[17:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: qemu (mantic-proposed/main) [1:8.0.4+dfsg-1ubuntu3 => 1:8.0.4+dfsg-1ubuntu3.23.10.1] (ubuntu-server, virt)
[17:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: qxmpp [ppc64el] (noble-proposed/universe) [1.5.5-0.3] (no packageset)
[17:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: qxmpp [riscv64] (noble-proposed/universe) [1.5.5-0.3] (no packageset)
[17:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: qtilitools (noble-proposed/primary) [0.1.1~git20231009-0ubuntu1]
[18:06] <tsimonq2> ^ That's my package, a prereq of sddm-conf.
[18:07] <tsimonq2> I could potentially see a rejection due to the licensing of the file under bin. Probably going to end up being dealer's choice.
[18:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: transmission (jammy-proposed/main) [3.00-2ubuntu2 => 3.00-2ubuntu2.1] (ubuntu-desktop)
[18:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: transmission (lunar-proposed/main) [3.00-2.1build1 => 3.00-2.1ubuntu0.1] (ubuntu-desktop)
[18:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: linux-intel-opt (noble-proposed/primary) [6.5.0-1003.3]
[18:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: linux-signed-intel-opt (noble-proposed/primary) [6.5.0-1003.3]
[18:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: linux-meta-intel-opt (noble-proposed/primary) [6.5.0.1003.3]
[18:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: sddm-conf (noble-proposed/primary) [0.2.0~git20231105-0ubuntu1]
[18:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: postgis [s390x] (noble-proposed/universe) [3.3.3+dfsg-2ubuntu2] (no packageset)
[19:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted qxmpp [riscv64] (noble-proposed) [1.5.5-0.3]
[19:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted qxmpp [amd64] (noble-proposed) [1.5.5-0.3]
[19:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted qxmpp [armhf] (noble-proposed) [1.5.5-0.3]
[19:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted qxmpp [s390x] (noble-proposed) [1.5.5-0.3]
[19:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted qxmpp [arm64] (noble-proposed) [1.5.5-0.3]
[19:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted qxmpp [ppc64el] (noble-proposed) [1.5.5-0.3]
[19:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted postgis [s390x] (noble-proposed) [3.3.3+dfsg-2ubuntu2]
[19:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: postgis [riscv64] (noble-proposed/universe) [3.3.3+dfsg-2ubuntu2] (no packageset)
[20:24] <mitchdz> Where's the proper place for me to retract an SRU exception request? Should I just send another email to the ubuntu-release@lists.ubuntu.com mentioning that I retract the request?
=== ahasenack_ is now known as ahasenack
[21:11] <vorlon> mitchdz: that works yes
[23:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted firmware-sof [source] (mantic-proposed) [2.2.6-1ubuntu1.2]
[23:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: apache2 (mantic-proposed/main) [2.4.57-2ubuntu2 => 2.4.57-2ubuntu2.23.10.1] (i386-whitelist, ubuntu-server)
[23:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pg-auto-failover [amd64] (noble-proposed/universe) [2.0-3] (no packageset)
[23:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pg-auto-failover [arm64] (noble-proposed/universe) [2.0-3] (no packageset)
[23:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pg-auto-failover [s390x] (noble-proposed/universe) [2.0-3] (no packageset)
[23:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pg-auto-failover [ppc64el] (noble-proposed/universe) [2.0-3] (no packageset)
[23:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pg-auto-failover [armhf] (noble-proposed/universe) [2.0-3] (no packageset)
[23:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pg-auto-failover [riscv64] (noble-proposed/universe) [2.0-3] (no packageset)