| === Guest1721 is now known as ogra | ||
| === cpaelzer_ is now known as cpaelzer | ||
| * cpaelzer lights the campfire for the MIR meeting | 15:29 | |
| dviererbe | o/ | 15:29 |
|---|---|---|
| cpaelzer | travellers of the world back from sprints, let us ssee how much has piled up | 15:29 |
| cpaelzer | #startmeeting Weekly Main Inclusion Requests status | 15:30 |
| meetingology | Meeting started at 15:30:00 UTC. The chair is cpaelzer. Information about MeetBot at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/meetingology | 15:30 |
| meetingology | Available commands: action, commands, idea, info, link, nick | 15:30 |
| cpaelzer | Ping for MIR meeting - didrocks joalif slyon sarnold cpaelzer jamespage ( eslerm dviererbe ) | 15:30 |
| cpaelzer | I'm early, you ahve time | 15:30 |
| jamespage | o/ | 15:30 |
| cpaelzer | but I wanted to get the ping out early :-) | 15:30 |
| cpaelzer | ih dviererbe, hi jamespage | 15:30 |
| slyon | o/ | 15:30 |
| cpaelzer | new release, new auto-sync surely lots of new $%&/( | 15:30 |
| cpaelzer | so let us get started | 15:30 |
| cpaelzer | #topic current component mismatches | 15:30 |
| cpaelzer | Mission: Identify required actions and spread the load among the teams | 15:30 |
| cpaelzer | #link https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/component-mismatches-proposed.svg | 15:30 |
| cpaelzer | #link https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/component-mismatches.svg | 15:30 |
| cpaelzer | the non proposed shows postgresql-16 | 15:31 |
| cpaelzer | that is a transition being worked on by athos | 15:31 |
| cpaelzer | but a bit later in the cycle | 15:31 |
| cpaelzer | so we will see it a few more times | 15:31 |
| cpaelzer | Anyway, this won#t be a new MIR as it is just source rename | 15:31 |
| cpaelzer | so once athos asks, we can promote it under the condition it did not dramatically change | 15:32 |
| cpaelzer | in -proposed we have | 15:32 |
| mirespace | o/ | 15:32 |
| slyon | libio-prompter-perl is assigned to a collegue in Foundations. | 15:32 |
| cpaelzer | a bunch of libmail-dkim-perl which is from mirespace that just logged in | 15:32 |
| slyon | I uploaded python-keyring earlier today, to downgrade Recommends->Suggests, so that should be resolved, soon. | 15:32 |
| cpaelzer | and thanks slyon for knowing that the prompter-perl is already been worked on in your team | 15:32 |
| cpaelzer | double thanks for that slyon | 15:32 |
| cpaelzer | I see llvm-toolchain-17 at the end of the postgresql tree | 15:33 |
| sarnold | good morning | 15:33 |
| cpaelzer | slyon: that is usually also all going to main as doko updates toolchains | 15:33 |
| cpaelzer | do you happen to know more about it? | 15:33 |
| cpaelzer | and finally, not new but since jamespage said hi - jaraco.text and dependencies - how will this continue? | 15:34 |
| slyon | cpaelzer: I saw a question about llvm-toolchain-17 being in universe recently... But I think there wasn't an answer yet from the toolchains squad. | 15:34 |
| jamespage | let me page that back in... | 15:34 |
| cpaelzer | slyon: I think we pick up the llvm set as default, hence it should be in main | 15:36 |
| jamespage | pydantic as some required TODO's - I'll get those sorted out | 15:36 |
| cpaelzer | slyon: this isn't urgent, maybe by next week you have an info what the way forward for noble shall be there | 15:36 |
| cpaelzer | so we can pass athos to use that or another llvm | 15:36 |
| cpaelzer | thanks jamespage | 15:36 |
| cpaelzer | that feels like there is progress everywhere | 15:36 |
| cpaelzer | mirespace: did you want to speak about libmail-dkim-perl ? | 15:36 |
| slyon | ACK | 15:36 |
| mirespace | no progress on that yet, sorry | 15:37 |
| cpaelzer | ok, but AFAIR all we reviewed so far were ok with a few small required todo's | 15:37 |
| cpaelzer | one question on "is this a dup" which has been answered | 15:37 |
| mirespace | _checking..._ | 15:38 |
| cpaelzer | and you mentioned that you'll cut the longer dependency tree to a short one | 15:38 |
| cpaelzer | feel free to bring that up not or in the final AoB section | 15:38 |
| cpaelzer | I'm going on with the agenda for now | 15:38 |
| cpaelzer | #topic New MIRs | 15:38 |
| mirespace | but that's for libmail-dmarc-perl, not for dkim-perl | 15:38 |
| cpaelzer | Mission: ensure to assign all incoming reviews for fast processing | 15:38 |
| cpaelzer | #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/?field.searchtext=&orderby=-date_last_updated&field.status%3Alist=NEW&field.status%3Alist=CONFIRMED&assignee_option=none&field.assignee=&field.subscriber=ubuntu-mir | 15:38 |
| cpaelzer | I see | 15:38 |
| cpaelzer | which is just what we see in the new queue right now | 15:38 |
| sarnold | hehe | 15:38 |
| mirespace | yes | 15:38 |
| cpaelzer | https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libemail-abstract-perl/+bug/2037405 | 15:38 |
| -ubottu:#ubuntu-meeting- Launchpad bug 2037405 in libemail-abstract-perl (Ubuntu) "[MIR] libemail-abstract-perl (libemail-sender-perl dependency as libmail-dmarc-perl dependency)" [Undecided, New] | 15:39 | |
| cpaelzer | https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libemail-sender-perl/+bug/2037389 | 15:39 |
| -ubottu:#ubuntu-meeting- Launchpad bug 2037389 in libemail-sender-perl (Ubuntu) "[MIR] libemail-sender-perl (libmail-dmarc-perl dependency)" [Undecided, New] | 15:39 | |
| cpaelzer | https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libthrowable-perl/+bug/2037392 | 15:39 |
| -ubottu:#ubuntu-meeting- Launchpad bug 2037392 in libthrowable-perl (Ubuntu) "[MIR] libthrowable-perl (libemail-sender-perl dependency as libmail-dmarc-perl dependency)" [Undecided, New] | 15:39 | |
| cpaelzer | all three look for a reviewer | 15:39 |
| mirespace | that's three can be on hold | 15:39 |
| cpaelzer | or mirespace are you telling me this will be even less? | 15:39 |
| cpaelzer | on hold because we should be waiting for that dependency changes you mentioned? | 15:39 |
| mirespace | all the 11 dependencies that I narrowed for dmarc are already reviewed, except the ppal libmail-dmarc-perl itself | 15:39 |
| mirespace | yes | 15:40 |
| cpaelzer | ok | 15:40 |
| cpaelzer | I'll mark them incomplete for now based on that | 15:40 |
| cpaelzer | that removes them from the list until you'd change that | 15:40 |
| mirespace | I could verigy with the test on both packages (dmarc-perl and spamassasin) that we can go with 11 packages for MIR, and move the rest to suggeted | 15:40 |
| mirespace | thatnkyou | 15:40 |
| cpaelzer | we all appreciate the effort to not give us another 40 packages to review | 15:41 |
| mirespace | :) | 15:41 |
| sarnold | yes :) | 15:41 |
| slyon | very much so! | 15:41 |
| cpaelzer | the one on libmail-dmarc-perl is ongoing - right? | 15:41 |
| cpaelzer | https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libmail-dmarc-perl/+bug/2023971 | 15:41 |
| -ubottu:#ubuntu-meeting- Launchpad bug 2023971 in libmail-dmarc-perl (Ubuntu) "[MIR] libmail-dmarc-perl" [High, Incomplete] | 15:41 | |
| cpaelzer | incomplete and waiting for you | 15:41 |
| mirespace | yes, I have a draft for the template and working on a dep8 package to include the mnaual verification for the functionality with the 11 packages | 15:42 |
| cpaelzer | once you think this one is ready for us unassign yourself and set it back to NEW please | 15:42 |
| cpaelzer | that sounds good mirespace | 15:42 |
| cpaelzer | if ever unsure just come by here again | 15:42 |
| mirespace | ok, thanks | 15:42 |
| mirespace | I'll do | 15:42 |
| cpaelzer | this is the easiest way to coordinate on this | 15:42 |
| cpaelzer | ok, new bugs handled by all of that | 15:42 |
| cpaelzer | #topic Incomplete bugs / questions | 15:42 |
| cpaelzer | Mission: Identify required actions and spread the load among the teams | 15:42 |
| cpaelzer | #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/?field.searchtext=&orderby=-date_last_updated&field.status%3Alist=INCOMPLETE_WITH_RESPONSE&field.status%3Alist=INCOMPLETE_WITHOUT_RESPONSE&field.subscriber=ubuntu-mir | 15:42 |
| dviererbe | sorry can I throw in dotnet6? | 15:42 |
| cpaelzer | which is exactly here | 15:43 |
| cpaelzer | in the incomplete list dviererbe | 15:43 |
| cpaelzer | the others have been mirespace stack of packages | 15:43 |
| dviererbe | Yes | 15:43 |
| cpaelzer | I've seen some dotnet updates out of the riga discussions | 15:43 |
| cpaelzer | for all of you https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dotnet6/+bug/2023531/comments/13 | 15:43 |
| -ubottu:#ubuntu-meeting- Launchpad bug 2023531 in dotnet6 (Ubuntu) "[MIR] dotnet6" [Undecided, Incomplete] | 15:43 | |
| cpaelzer | TL;DR no more so special/weird, and therefore fitting more nicely into existing patterns | 15:44 |
| dviererbe | correct | 15:44 |
| cpaelzer | dviererbe: do you happen to know what is left open? | 15:44 |
| cpaelzer | and once they are supposed to be done, what steps are then the next? | 15:44 |
| dviererbe | As far as I am aware we only had left recommends | 15:44 |
| dviererbe | One strong recommends was smoke test during build time | 15:45 |
| cpaelzer | I remember | 15:45 |
| cpaelzer | https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dotnet6/+bug/2023531/comments/4 has the full initial list | 15:45 |
| -ubottu:#ubuntu-meeting- Launchpad bug 2023531 in dotnet6 (Ubuntu) "[MIR] dotnet6" [Undecided, Incomplete] | 15:45 | |
| cpaelzer | dviererbe: so without that special behavior - is your SRU exception now approved. Or are you saying you do not even need one at all anymore? | 15:46 |
| dviererbe | This is part of why I am here. We do not request an exception anymore. | 15:47 |
| dviererbe | Therefore I wanted to ask if you still want an formal ack by the SRU team? | 15:47 |
| cpaelzer | so you will process these under https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#Other_safe_cases - third bullet I guess | 15:48 |
| cpaelzer | and not an exception | 15:48 |
| cpaelzer | and no more "remove support later" as we ahve read | 15:49 |
| dviererbe | Yes | 15:49 |
| dviererbe | The support of dotnet packages should now behave as any other package | 15:49 |
| cpaelzer | I think we no more need a formal exception acked, but as a final confirmation I'd like to have one of the SRU members state on the MIR bug that this isn't a way to bypass the rules :-) | 15:49 |
| cpaelzer | does that make sense | 15:49 |
| cpaelzer | I know that everyone agreed in Riga, but the audit trail available to others lacks that | 15:50 |
| cpaelzer | unless we blindly believe your updates :-) | 15:50 |
| dviererbe | That is fine :) | 15:50 |
| cpaelzer | after that I think we are good | 15:50 |
| cpaelzer | I'll keep it open to recheck all TODO's tomorrow | 15:50 |
| cpaelzer | to ensure we haven't missed one | 15:50 |
| cpaelzer | once myself and an SRU member are good | 15:50 |
| cpaelzer | we can start promoting it | 15:50 |
| dviererbe | sounds good | 15:51 |
| cpaelzer | and you might want to extend this to dotnetX as the same is true for all those versions right | 15:51 |
| cpaelzer | ok, let us go from here and continue with the agenda ... | 15:51 |
| dviererbe | correct. the only exception is dotnet7 in jammy (mentioned in the bug comment) | 15:51 |
| cpaelzer | ack | 15:51 |
| cpaelzer | #topic Process/Documentation improvements | 15:52 |
| cpaelzer | Mission: Review pending process/documentation pull-requests or issues | 15:52 |
| cpaelzer | #link https://github.com/canonical/ubuntu-mir/pulls | 15:52 |
| cpaelzer | #link https://github.com/canonical/ubuntu-mir/issues | 15:52 |
| cpaelzer | nothing new | 15:52 |
| cpaelzer | the suggestion on defining clear deadlines has come up at the sprint | 15:52 |
| cpaelzer | I think everyone was fine, we are waiting for an PR by eslerm or sarnold for that I guess? | 15:53 |
| cpaelzer | objections? | 15:53 |
| slyon | I pushed the "base-sets" story a bit at the Riga sprint. Verdict: We're back to status quo. The toolchains squad won't have resources to maintain important dependencies of those ecosystems in the foreseable future. | 15:53 |
| cpaelzer | https://github.com/canonical/ubuntu-mir/pull/41 might be that PR ... | 15:53 |
| -ubottu:#ubuntu-meeting- Pull 41 in canonical/ubuntu-mir "security: add timeline, contact, and priority info" [Open] | 15:53 | |
| cpaelzer | thanks slyon | 15:54 |
| cpaelzer | do not give up on it though | 15:54 |
| sarnold | I can't recall what specific date we actually converged on, heh | 15:54 |
| cpaelzer | sarnold: eslerm: spelling issues left (or updates to the spelling DB) | 15:54 |
| cpaelzer | the PR has it all | 15:54 |
| cpaelzer | it LGTM except the spelling fixes that are needed | 15:54 |
| cpaelzer | if you can get that updated before next week we can merge it there | 15:54 |
| slyon | same here. +1 on the deadlines PR | 15:54 |
| cpaelzer | #topic MIR related Security Review Queue | 15:55 |
| cpaelzer | Mission: Check on progress, do deadlines seem doable? | 15:55 |
| cpaelzer | Some clients can only work with one, some with the other escaping - the URLs point to the same place. | 15:55 |
| cpaelzer | #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-security/+bugs?field.searchtext=%5BMIR%5D&assignee_option=choose&field.assignee=ubuntu-security&field.bug_reporter=&field.bug_commenter=&field.subscriber=ubuntu-mir | 15:55 |
| cpaelzer | #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-security/+bugs?field.searchtext=[MIR]&assignee_option=choose&field.assignee=ubuntu-security&field.bug_reporter=&field.bug_commenter=&field.subscriber=ubuntu-mir | 15:55 |
| cpaelzer | Internal link | 15:55 |
| cpaelzer | - ensure your teams items are prioritized among each other as you'd expect | 15:55 |
| cpaelzer | - ensure community requests do not get stomped by teams calling for favors too much | 15:55 |
| cpaelzer | #link https://warthogs.atlassian.net/jira/software/c/projects/SEC/boards/594 | 15:55 |
| cpaelzer | we see all of them go through the queues one by one | 15:56 |
| cpaelzer | 3 plus the one expected perl packages left open then | 15:56 |
| cpaelzer | nothing else incoming yet | 15:56 |
| sarnold | this is the best this board has looked in ages :D nice | 15:56 |
| sarnold | alas I've been busy elsewhere, and eslerm is out recently, so our status is pretty stale :( | 15:57 |
| cpaelzer | fair for now | 15:57 |
| cpaelzer | #topic Any other business? | 15:57 |
| cpaelzer | nothing extra by me | 15:57 |
| sarnold | I'll ask around to see if anyone can pick up things, but it's a challenging time of year, heh | 15:57 |
| sarnold | nothing here | 15:57 |
| cpaelzer | sarnold: it will be more challenging in 4 weeks | 15:57 |
| slyon | wrt the LLVM situation: according to the Noble schedule, we're targetting LLVM18 to become the default: https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/noble-numbat-release-schedule/35649 | 15:57 |
| slyon | nothing else from me | 15:57 |
| cpaelzer | sarnold: and it not done before that then it is suddenly close to feature freeze | 15:57 |
| cpaelzer | slyon: fine, but we might need 17 in main until 18 exists for dependencies to move | 15:58 |
| cpaelzer | time is up | 15:58 |
| cpaelzer | thank you all | 15:58 |
| cpaelzer | this was great and lots of things moved forward a little bit | 15:58 |
| cpaelzer | o/ | 15:58 |
| slyon | o/ | 15:58 |
| cpaelzer | last chance | 15:58 |
| cpaelzer | 4 | 15:58 |
| cpaelzer | 3 | 15:58 |
| cpaelzer | 2 | 15:58 |
| slyon | thanks cpaelzer, all! | 15:58 |
| cpaelzer | 1 | 15:58 |
| cpaelzer | #endmeeting | 15:58 |
| meetingology | Meeting ended at 15:58:45 UTC. Minutes at https://ubottu.com/meetingology/logs/ubuntu-meeting/2023/ubuntu-meeting.2023-11-21-15.30.moin.txt | 15:58 |
| dviererbe | Thanks! o/ | 15:59 |
| sarnold | thanks cpaelzer, all :) | 16:01 |
| cpaelzer | sarnold: thanks for silencing the non-alphanumeric warnings | 16:55 |
| cpaelzer | sarnold: but wasn't the issue that blocked you this | 16:55 |
| cpaelzer | Error: README.md:1110:174 ... 184, Error - `Mattermost` is not a recognized word. (unrecognized-spelling) | 16:55 |
| cpaelzer | #42 is merged, that was fine | 16:56 |
| cpaelzer | but it did not fix it to know about "Mattermost" AFAICS | 16:56 |
| amurray | o/ | 20:00 |
| seb128 | hey! | 20:01 |
| seb128 | amurray, you are today's chair according to the wiki | 20:01 |
| amurray | ah yes indeed | 20:01 |
| seb128 | Steve and Robie declined the calendar invite | 20:02 |
| amurray | is sil2100 around or is it just the two of us? | 20:02 |
| seb128 | unsure if Lukasz is around | 20:02 |
| seb128 | let me ping him on mattermost in case he's there | 20:03 |
| seb128 | sil2100, hey | 20:04 |
| sil2100 | hey | 20:04 |
| amurray | #startmeeting Ubuntu Technical Board | 20:04 |
| meetingology | Meeting started at 20:04:58 UTC. The chair is amurray. Information about MeetBot at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/meetingology | 20:04 |
| seb128 | sorry for distracting you from the things you focus on | 20:04 |
| meetingology | Available commands: action, commands, idea, info, link, nick | 20:05 |
| amurray | hey sil2100 | 20:05 |
| amurray | #topic Apologies | 20:05 |
| amurray | robie and steve both sent their apologies via the mailing list | 20:05 |
| amurray | #topic Action review | 20:05 |
| amurray | ACTION: seb128/amurray/sil200 to help drafting the snap-store Ubuntu-specific tracks usage | 20:06 |
| seb128 | I saw you commented there and Robie discussed it with Ken in Riga | 20:06 |
| seb128 | but I think we need to carry over still | 20:06 |
| amurray | yep ok no worries | 20:06 |
| seb128 | I will try to reply to your comment this week though | 20:07 |
| amurray | thanks | 20:07 |
| amurray | #action seb128/amurray/sil200 to help drafting the snap-store Ubuntu-specific tracks usage | 20:07 |
| meetingology | ACTION: seb128/amurray/sil200 to help drafting the snap-store Ubuntu-specific tracks usage | 20:07 |
| amurray | ACTION: rbasak to draft a proposal of the DMB-proposed inactivity expiration policy for TB ratification | 20:07 |
| amurray | I'll carry over robie's tasks | 20:07 |
| amurray | #action rbasak to draft a proposal of the DMB-proposed inactivity expiration policy for TB ratification | 20:07 |
| meetingology | ACTION: rbasak to draft a proposal of the DMB-proposed inactivity expiration policy for TB ratification | 20:07 |
| amurray | ACTION: rbasak to follow up on finding consensus on question of test plans for third party apps | 20:08 |
| amurray | #action rbasak to follow up on finding consensus on question of test plans for third party apps | 20:08 |
| meetingology | ACTION: rbasak to follow up on finding consensus on question of test plans for third party apps | 20:08 |
| amurray | ACTION: rbasak to open wider discussion on third-party repo policy | 20:08 |
| amurray | #action rbasak to open wider discussion on third-party repo policy | 20:08 |
| meetingology | ACTION: rbasak to open wider discussion on third-party repo policy | 20:08 |
| amurray | ACTION: seb128 to continue working with SRU, AA, Release, Backporters and Security teams to document their membership process and link to it from https://wiki.ubuntu.com/TechnicalBoard#Team_Delegations | 20:08 |
| seb128 | carry over please | 20:08 |
| amurray | fwiw security team is almost done on this from our side - thanks for kicking this off seb128 | 20:09 |
| amurray | #action seb128 to continue working with SRU, AA, Release, Backporters and Security teams to document their membership process and link to it from https://wiki.ubuntu.com/TechnicalBoard#Team_Delegations | 20:09 |
| meetingology | ACTION: seb128 to continue working with SRU, AA, Release, Backporters and Security teams to document their membership process and link to it from https://wiki.ubuntu.com/TechnicalBoard#Team_Delegations | 20:09 |
| seb128 | ah, nice, and you're welcome! | 20:09 |
| amurray | ACTION: vorlon to write up draft guidelines for packages in the archive that download from the Internet | 20:09 |
| amurray | will carry over | 20:09 |
| amurray | #action vorlon to write up draft guidelines for packages in the archive that download from the Internet | 20:09 |
| meetingology | ACTION: vorlon to write up draft guidelines for packages in the archive that download from the Internet | 20:09 |
| amurray | #topic Scan the mailing list archive for anything we missed (standing item) | 20:09 |
| amurray | #link https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/technical-board/2023-November/thread.html | 20:10 |
| amurray | so we have flavor requests for 24.04 | 20:10 |
| amurray | excuse my ignorance but do we just usually vote on these here? | 20:11 |
| seb128 | right, it just took me a bit to find the reference to what we need to do there since I'm new to it | 20:11 |
| seb128 | it's documented on https://wiki.ubuntu.com/RecognizedFlavors | 20:11 |
| seb128 | 'Guidelines for Tech Board to designate flavor image as LTS' | 20:11 |
| seb128 | reading the guidelines I do feel like there is some investigation work to be done to answer the questions for each flavors | 20:12 |
| seb128 | I'm not familiar enough with the work happening on those flavors to be able to vote now I think | 20:12 |
| seb128 | amurray, sil2100, how do you feel about it? | 20:13 |
| seb128 | I'm happy to spend some time on that this week though and follow up on the list with a summary of my 'investigation' for each though if that helps others | 20:14 |
| amurray | so from our side we at least have to do the "Written confirmation from IS" part | 20:14 |
| sil2100 | I'm fine with more flavors, should we maybe assign one flavor per one TB member to perform the investigation? | 20:14 |
| sil2100 | To spread the workload | 20:14 |
| seb128 | I would not say no to share if others have some time to work on that | 20:15 |
| amurray | as far as the flavors themselves go, I am also not very familiar with any of them so I would also be keen to ask a few more questions - particularly around the level of support offered and how big their teams are to handle it plus how many packages they are looking to support | 20:15 |
| amurray | I'm also happy to take a flavor or two | 20:17 |
| seb128 | same | 20:17 |
| amurray | #action seb128 to follow-up with ubuntu cinnamon on 24.04 request | 20:18 |
| meetingology | ACTION: seb128 to follow-up with ubuntu cinnamon on 24.04 request | 20:18 |
| amurray | #action sil2100 to follow-up with ubuntu studio on 24.04 request | 20:18 |
| meetingology | ACTION: sil2100 to follow-up with ubuntu studio on 24.04 request | 20:18 |
| amurray | #action amurray to follow-up with edubuntu on 24.04 request | 20:18 |
| meetingology | ACTION: amurray to follow-up with edubuntu on 24.04 request | 20:18 |
| amurray | given robie and steve are out, are we happy to assign one to each of them as well in their absentia? | 20:19 |
| amurray | otherwise I can take another if one of you two are happy to also take a second? | 20:19 |
| seb128 | I would rather not assign things to them without asking first, especially that Robie already said he would miss the next meeting | 20:19 |
| seb128 | give me a second one | 20:20 |
| amurray | ok thanks seb128 | 20:20 |
| seb128 | I can always try to trade it with Robie or Steve if needed | 20:20 |
| amurray | #action seb128 to follow-up with ubuntu budgie on 24.04 request | 20:20 |
| meetingology | ACTION: seb128 to follow-up with ubuntu budgie on 24.04 request | 20:20 |
| amurray | #action amurray to follow-up with ubuntu kylin on 24.04 request | 20:20 |
| meetingology | ACTION: amurray to follow-up with ubuntu kylin on 24.04 request | 20:20 |
| seb128 | but at least we have an owner who was there to accept the item meanwhile :) | 20:20 |
| amurray | :) | 20:20 |
| amurray | I don't see anything else on the mailing list | 20:21 |
| amurray | #topic Check up on community bugs and techboard bugs | 20:21 |
| amurray | #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-community/+bugs?field.assignee=techboard | 20:21 |
| amurray | #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/techboard | 20:21 |
| amurray | nothing new here either | 20:22 |
| amurray | #topic Select a chair for the next meeting (next from https://launchpad.net/~techboard/+members) | 20:22 |
| amurray | robie already sent his apologies for the next meeting so will skip him | 20:22 |
| amurray | #agreed next meeting chair: seb128, backup: vorlon | 20:22 |
| meetingology | AGREED: next meeting chair: seb128, backup: vorlon | 20:22 |
| seb128 | +1 | 20:22 |
| amurray | #topic AOB | 20:23 |
| seb128 | none from me | 20:23 |
| amurray | nothing from me either | 20:23 |
| amurray | ok thanks folks | 20:24 |
| seb128 | thanks amurray ! | 20:24 |
| amurray | #endmeeting | 20:24 |
| meetingology | Meeting ended at 20:24:51 UTC. Minutes at https://ubottu.com/meetingology/logs/ubuntu-meeting/2023/ubuntu-meeting.2023-11-21-20.04.moin.txt | 20:24 |
| sil2100 | Thanks amurray, seb128 o/ | 20:32 |
| sil2100 | I go despair a bit more with security-britney | 20:32 |
| sarnold | cpaelzer: hah, I can't recall seeing " | 21:18 |
| sarnold | `Mattermost` is not a recognized word. (unrecognized-spelling) | 21:18 |
| sarnold | cpaelzer: sigh stupid firefox .. I can't recall seeing "`Mattermost` is not a recognized word. (unrecognized-spelling)" before! just the non-alpha ones. I'd love to know if it was there and I missed it entirely, or if that error didn't display when I viewed it! | 21:19 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!
