[01:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: makedumpfile (focal-proposed/main) [1:1.6.7-1ubuntu2.4 => 1:1.6.7-1ubuntu2.5] (core)
[04:13] <tsimonq2> vorlon: ubuntu-cdimage> .
[04:14] <vorlon> tsimonq2: ?
[04:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-ed25519-compact [riscv64] (noble-proposed) [2.0.4-1]
[04:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-ed25519-compact [amd64] (noble-proposed) [2.0.4-1]
[04:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-ed25519-compact [armhf] (noble-proposed) [2.0.4-1]
[04:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-ed25519-compact [s390x] (noble-proposed) [2.0.4-1]
[04:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-ed25519-compact [arm64] (noble-proposed) [2.0.4-1]
[04:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-ed25519-compact [ppc64el] (noble-proposed) [2.0.4-1]
[04:18] <vorlon> Eickmeyer: ummm edubuntu-desktop-raspi has no dependencies
[04:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted edubuntu-meta [arm64] (noble-proposed) [24.04.1]
[04:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted edubuntu-meta [armhf] (noble-proposed) [24.04.1]
[04:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libcbor [i386] (noble-proposed) [0.10.2-1.1ubuntu1]
[04:22] <vorlon> tsimonq2: ah, I see mail, thanks
[04:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libcbor [amd64] (noble-proposed) [0.10.2-1.1ubuntu1]
[04:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libcbor [armhf] (noble-proposed) [0.10.2-1.1ubuntu1]
[04:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libcbor [riscv64] (noble-proposed) [0.10.2-1.1ubuntu1]
[04:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libcbor [arm64] (noble-proposed) [0.10.2-1.1ubuntu1]
[04:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libcbor [s390x] (noble-proposed) [0.10.2-1.1ubuntu1]
[04:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libcbor [ppc64el] (noble-proposed) [0.10.2-1.1ubuntu1]
[04:23] <Eickmeyer> vorlon: *sigh* germinate populated, so apparently there's more work to do. It should have ubuntu-desktop-raspi as a sole dep.
[04:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pgrouting [amd64] (noble-proposed) [3.5.1-1build1]
[04:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pgrouting [armhf] (noble-proposed) [3.5.1-1build1]
[04:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pgrouting [riscv64] (noble-proposed) [3.5.1-1build1]
[04:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pgrouting [arm64] (noble-proposed) [3.5.1-1build1]
[04:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pgrouting [s390x] (noble-proposed) [3.5.1-1build1]
[04:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pgrouting [ppc64el] (noble-proposed) [3.5.1-1build1]
[04:25] <Eickmeyer> vorlon: s/ubuntu-desktop-raspi/ubuntu-raspi-settings
[04:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted futuresql [source] (noble-proposed) [0.1.1-0ubuntu1]
[04:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: futuresql [amd64] (noble-proposed/none) [0.1.1-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[04:35] <Eickmeyer> vorlon: Got it fixed for next upload.
[04:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: futuresql [arm64] (noble-proposed/none) [0.1.1-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[04:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: futuresql [s390x] (noble-proposed/none) [0.1.1-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[04:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: futuresql [ppc64el] (noble-proposed/none) [0.1.1-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[04:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: futuresql [armhf] (noble-proposed/none) [0.1.1-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[04:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: futuresql [riscv64] (noble-proposed/none) [0.1.1-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[05:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added pyrsistent to i386-whitelist in noble
[05:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added python-greenlet to i386-whitelist in noble
[05:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added python-psutil to i386-whitelist in noble
[07:47] <LocutusOfBorg> hello, please NBS-proposed cleanup postgresql-15-pgrouting, postgresql-15-pgrouting-doc, postgresql-15-pgrouting-scripts
[08:07] <LocutusOfBorg> ubuntu-archive ^^
[08:29] <cpaelzer> on it ...
[08:33] <cpaelzer> Ack, I see the -15- packages from 3.5.1-1 while https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pgrouting/3.5.1-1build1 is the right one
[08:34] <cpaelzer> ...-15-.. binaries of 3.5.1-1 are only in -proposed, those I'm removing
[08:34] <cpaelzer> done
[08:35] <cpaelzer> should get this aspect out of https://ubuntu-archive-team.ubuntu.com/proposed-migration/update_excuses.html#pgrouting
[08:37] <cpaelzer> We also discussed in the MIR meeting yesterday that postgresql16 can be promoted to main as it is just a rename, checking ...
[08:42] <LocutusOfBorg> thanks!!!
[08:42] <LocutusOfBorg> cpaelzer, subscribe team
[08:42] <LocutusOfBorg> + promote :)
[08:43] <cpaelzer> sure, but first check if it all looks sane
[08:48] <LocutusOfBorg> missing build on armhf: osm2pgsql (from 1.9.0+ds-1)
[08:49] <LocutusOfBorg> can we also do something for this? it is now 64bit only package... so a removal on release pocket is needed (already done in sid)
[08:54] <cpaelzer> postgresql 16.1-1 is only in proposed, and all but the -dev package are usually in main. Confirmed it is just a source rename but behaves the same.
[08:54] <cpaelzer> We were already subscribed as a team as part of https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/postgresql-16/+bug/2044074
[08:54] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Launchpad bug 2044074 in postgresql-16 (Ubuntu) "[MIR] postgresql-16" [Undecided, New]
[08:54] <cpaelzer> btw athos ^^ FYI
[09:20] <cpaelzer> LocutusOfBorg: that is https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1051212 and yes it seems we need the same
[09:20] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Debian bug 1051212 in ftp.debian.org "RM: osm2pgsql [i386 armel armhf] -- ROM; 32bit architectures not supported" [Normal, Open]
[09:21] <LocutusOfBorg> ta!
[09:21] <LocutusOfBorg> hopefully we will sort out postgresql-16 by today
[09:21] <cpaelzer> that would be awesome
[09:21] <cpaelzer> I expected december, that would be more than a week earlier
[09:22] <cpaelzer> athos had a bug for the audit trail of the promotion, thanks (https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/postgresql-16/+bug/2044074)
[09:22] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Launchpad bug 2044074 in postgresql-16 (Ubuntu) "[MIR] postgresql-16" [Undecided, Fix Committed]
[09:23] <cpaelzer> let us wait another round of publishing and proposed migration and look how things look then ...
[11:23] <LocutusOfBorg> cpaelzer, postgresql-16/amd64 in main cannot depend on libllvm17 in universe
[11:23] <LocutusOfBorg> sigh
[11:33] <athos> I'm a bit late for the party, I suppose o/
[11:34] <athos> LocutusOfBorg: IIUC from the MIR logs from yesterday, we want to depend on the default llvm and there is a pending discussion to promote llvm-17. Is this correct, cpaelzer?
[11:37] <LocutusOfBorg> yeah I guess so
[11:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected update-manager [source] (jammy-proposed) [1:22.04.17]
[11:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: update-manager (jammy-proposed/main) [1:22.04.16 => 1:22.04.17] (core)
[11:48] <cpaelzer> LocutusOfBorg: it was mentioned yesterday that foundations looks into llvm-17 soon and it mght be promoted
[11:49] <LocutusOfBorg> ack
[11:49] <LocutusOfBorg> I don't know, but I don't have that message :/
[11:49] <LocutusOfBorg> maybe different chan...
[11:50] <cpaelzer> was in ubuntu-meeting
[11:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected update-manager [source] (focal-proposed) [1:20.04.10.18]
[11:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: update-manager (focal-proposed/main) [1:20.04.10.17 => 1:20.04.10.18] (core)
[12:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected update-manager [source] (bionic-proposed) [1:18.04.11.21]
[12:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: update-manager (bionic-proposed/main) [1:18.04.11.20 => 1:18.04.11.21] (core)
[12:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected update-manager [source] (xenial-proposed) [1:16.04.18]
[12:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: update-manager (xenial-proposed/main) [1:16.04.17 => 1:16.04.18] (core)
[12:42] <LocutusOfBorg> oh... indeed :)
[13:37] <cpaelzer> LocutusOfBorg: discussions led to doko telling me it is done, thanks to him! And we can wait for the next round of proposed migration to see what else might block
[13:42] <LocutusOfBorg> wxwidgets3.2 migrated!
[13:42] <LocutusOfBorg> yay!
[13:42] <LocutusOfBorg> 2023-11-22 14:34:09 CET	Published	Noble	release	main	devel	1:17.0.5-1ubuntu1
[13:42] <LocutusOfBorg> indeed
[14:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: guice (focal-proposed/universe) [4.2.1-1 => 4.2.1-1ubuntu0.1~20.04] (i386-whitelist)
[14:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: maven (focal-proposed/universe) [3.6.3-1 => 3.6.3-1ubuntu0.1~20.04] (i386-whitelist)
[14:26] <tsimonq2> vpa1977: ^^^^^
[14:27] <tsimonq2> bryceh: https://code.launchpad.net/~orndorffgrant/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/+git/ubuntu-advantage-tools/+merge/455807 > Friendly reminder that, in order to actually get it off the queue, you need to claim the review. ;)
[14:27] <tsimonq2> (Done.)
[14:28] <tsimonq2> (Whoops, meant for -devel.)
[15:33] <LocutusOfBorg> remove-package -m NBS -d ubuntu -s noble -b -y cryptsetup-run libfilezilla40 libmrpt-apps2.10 libmrpt-bayes2.10 libmrpt-comms2.10 libmrpt-config2.10 libmrpt-containers2.10 libmrpt-core2.10 libmrpt-detectors2.10 libmrpt-expr2.10 libmrpt-graphs2.10 libmrpt-graphslam2.10 libmrpt-gui2.10 libmrpt-hwdrivers2.10 libmrpt-img2.10 libmrpt-io2.10 libmrpt-kinematics2.10 libmrpt-maps2.10 libmrpt-math2.10 libmrpt-nanogui2.10 libmrpt-nav2.10
[15:33] <LocutusOfBorg> libmrpt-obs2.10 libmrpt-opengl2.10 libmrpt-poses2.10 libmrpt-random2.10 libmrpt-ros1bridge2.10 libmrpt-rtti2.10 libmrpt-serialization2.10 libmrpt-slam2.10 libmrpt-system2.10 libmrpt-tfest2.10 libmrpt-topography2.10 libmrpt-vision-lgpl2.10 libmrpt-vision2.10 postgresql-15-pgtap
[15:33] <LocutusOfBorg> this is niceeeeeeeeeee
[15:52] <athos> Hi ubuntu-archive, can we add postgresql-16 to the i386 whitelist so we can proceed with its transition?
[16:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected update-manager [source] (xenial-proposed) [1:16.04.18]
[16:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: update-manager (xenial-proposed/main) [1:16.04.17 => 1:16.04.18] (core)
[17:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: django-phonenumber-field [amd64] (noble-proposed/universe) [7.2.0-2] (no packageset)
[17:43] <mitchdz> mdeslaur: I see apache2 has a security update for Mantic. Am I good to make my change onto it now?
[17:57] <mdeslaur> mitchdz: yes! thanks
[18:40] <tsimonq2> mdeslaur: apache2> Ditto with Vim? (cc sarnold ;) )
[18:41] <mdeslaur> tsimonq2: vim? uh let me check if someone is working on vim
[18:42] <tsimonq2> mdeslaur: Thanks :)
[18:44] <mdeslaur> tsimonq2: I don't think anyone is woking on vim
[18:50] <Trevinho> 🔥
[19:22] <Guest45> hi
[19:27] <dobey> adrien: any idea what could have changed between 4ubuntu3 and 4ubuntu4 builds of gnutls28 (since only change there was for internal dep8 tests), that might cause mem errors only on armhf in the gsasl autopkgtests?
[19:27] <dobey> also, seems not very helpful for the autopkgtests that run under valgrind, to not also have dbgsym packages installed…
[19:30] <dobey> is this maybe something we should ask for an admin to hint through?
[19:33] <adrien> dobey: I've been looking at it and mkukri has been looking at failures in other packages that could be related
[19:34] <adrien> it's _possible_ this is caused by another package (like toolchain)
[19:34] <adrien> there was no code change and the same goes for unrar which now fails with similar errors
[19:36] <adrien> I'm waiting for my pi5 to arrive before investigating myself directly (also because I'm kept busy with the analysis of the impact of 64-bit time_t on armhf, but also both topics are about armhf software on arm64 hosts)
[19:37] <adrien> but, hmm
[19:38] <dobey> ok. hopefully can migrate soon so libunistring2 can go away
[19:39] <adrien> that's interesting: 4ubuntu3 didn't trigger the issue, and that's much closer to the mantic version; that's a much narrower gap
[19:43] <dobey> yeah
[19:53] <adrien> ok, so, diffoscope which finally installed with its 230 deps, outputs almost 600k lines
[20:00] <adrien> mkukri has noticed there's an updated binutils and I see that too but he said the changes are not armhf-related
[20:09] <adrien> oh, cflags changed
[20:09] <adrien> -fstack-clash-protection is new
[20:14] <adrien> https://launchpadlibrarian.net/698199352/dpkg_1.22.0ubuntu1_1.22.1ubuntu2.diff.gz mentions "Dpkg::Vendor::Debian: Fix stackclash condition to enable the feature" and links to http://bugs.debian.org/1054583
[20:14] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Debian bug 1054583 in dpkg-dev "dpkg-dev: really enable -fstack-clash-protection on armhf/armel" [Normal, Open]
[20:14] <adrien> tada?
[20:14] <adrien> mkukri: ^ I'll let you try to replicate/disable/whatever that
[20:14] <adrien>  :P
[20:22] <dobey> oh fun
[20:30] <adrien> definitely!
[20:30] <adrien> plus, besides the potential bugs, isn't that something for which we'd want to rebuild everything armhf?
[20:32] <dobey> seems likely it would be necessary to work correctly?
[20:37] <Eickmeyer> adrien, dobey: I hate to be overly pedantic, but this conversation seems like something that really belongs in #ubuntu-devel.
[20:37] <dobey> at this point, i would agree. :)
[20:39] <adrien> a debian-arm@ mailing post says that ubuntu has been enabling this flag for several releases (stated something like 19.xx?) but I couldn't spot it in the amd64 build log of 4ubuntu3 while it is in the build log of 4ubuntu4, so I guess that comment is wrong or at least partially wrong
[20:42] <adrien> and the dpkg-dev upload I outlined above might or might not be the actual exact culprit but the discussion about enabling this in debian started in the debian mailing-lists in august so the change would be very recent anyway; the mails also mention that other distros enabled this flag but these include fedora which doesn't have an armhf port anymore, and opensuse which might or might not have one
[20:42] <adrien> either (really not sure but I somehow doubt it)
[20:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted django-phonenumber-field [amd64] (noble-proposed) [7.2.0-2]
[20:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted futuresql [arm64] (noble-proposed) [0.1.1-0ubuntu1]
[20:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted futuresql [ppc64el] (noble-proposed) [0.1.1-0ubuntu1]
[20:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted futuresql [s390x] (noble-proposed) [0.1.1-0ubuntu1]
[20:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted futuresql [amd64] (noble-proposed) [0.1.1-0ubuntu1]
[20:42] <Eickmeyer> This channel isn't about that though.
[20:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted futuresql [riscv64] (noble-proposed) [0.1.1-0ubuntu1]
[20:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted futuresql [armhf] (noble-proposed) [0.1.1-0ubuntu1]
[20:43] <adrien> so that's all I have to say, and indeed, #ubuntu-devel is more appropriate (unfortunately IRC makes it difficult to split/forward/... discussions)
[20:43] <Eickmeyer> Nothing will get fixed without an appropriate bug report, and IRC conversations will get lost, so if you need something fixed, a bug report is the only way.
[20:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: haproxy (focal-proposed/main) [2.0.31-0ubuntu0.2 => 2.0.33-0ubuntu0.1] (ubuntu-server)
[20:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: haproxy (jammy-proposed/main) [2.4.22-0ubuntu0.22.04.2 => 2.4.24-0ubuntu0.22.04.1] (ubuntu-server)
[21:28] <athos> Hi ubuntu-archive, can we add postgresql-16 to the i386 whitelist so we can proceed with its transition?
[23:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: r-bioc-sparsearray [amd64] (noble-proposed/none) [1.0.12+dfsg-1] (no packageset)
[23:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: r-bioc-sparsearray [armhf] (noble-proposed/none) [1.0.12+dfsg-1] (no packageset)
[23:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: r-bioc-sparsearray [s390x] (noble-proposed/none) [1.0.12+dfsg-1] (no packageset)
[23:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: r-bioc-sparsearray [ppc64el] (noble-proposed/none) [1.0.12+dfsg-1] (no packageset)
[23:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: r-bioc-sparsearray [arm64] (noble-proposed/none) [1.0.12+dfsg-1] (no packageset)
[23:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: r-bioc-sparsearray [riscv64] (noble-proposed/none) [1.0.12+dfsg-1] (no packageset)
[23:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: polymake [armhf] (noble-proposed/universe) [4.11-2] (no packageset)