[17:25] <tsimonq2> arraybolt3: Are you planning on being back from $holidays this weekend?
[17:25] <tsimonq2> ditto et al.
[17:50] <tsimonq2> arraybolt3: NCR'ed redshift-qt in Debian so it can migrate to testing.
[17:51] <tsimonq2> arraybolt3: Your patch mail is available over Matrix. ;P
[20:09] <tsimonq2> I'm going to spend the time between now and Linux Saloon doing some $dayjob and prepping some notes.
[20:09] <tsimonq2> I don't imagine it'll be too busy, being right after a holiday and all.
[20:11]  * Eickmeyer is taking a break this weekend.
[20:12] <Eickmeyer> Challenging status quo is exhausting
 Indeed
 Breaks are important.
[20:15] <tsimonq2> I'm feeling energetic after two days off, figured I might as well make some cash.
[20:16] <tsimonq2> I migrated redshift-qt over to both Backports repositories, I'm going to throw that in as a Recommends with a followup upload.
[20:21] <Eickmeyer> tsimonq2: Quick question. Why not, for the LTS releases, utilize the official backports repository? I mean, you have a backports team member on the team here.
[20:21] <tsimonq2> Eickmeyer: Freedom. *eagles screeching in the background*
[20:23] <Eickmeyer> tsimonq2: Counterpoint: community and cooperation. *crowd applause*
[20:23] <tsimonq2> Eickmeyer: I don't want to have to ping someone every time I need something released.
[20:23] <tsimonq2> Eickmeyer: I thought you, of all people, would hate having to have things go into a queue. :P
[20:24] <Eickmeyer> Well, yes, but at the same time I see the value in working in the larger scheme of cooperation and community.
[20:24] <Eickmeyer> And it's really quick and painless overall.
[20:24] <tsimonq2> That just seems like a can of worms, tbh.
[20:25] <tsimonq2> It's not like our PPA is closed source.
[20:25] <Eickmeyer> The backports queue tends to be short.
[20:25] <tsimonq2> Still, -1 because I can't emergency-release updates.
[20:25] <tsimonq2> Someone else's queue, someone else's process... our own has worked just fine.
[20:26] <Eickmeyer> Ok. I was just wondering. For Studio, our backports have been mere application updates, so that makes sense for us. It's not like we're maintaining a whole DE.
[20:26]  * tsimonq2 grabs some lunch
[20:26] <tsimonq2> Right
[22:22] <kc2bez> New, for me at least - https://launchpad.net/bugs/2044623
[22:22] -ubottu:#lubuntu-devel- Launchpad bug 2044623 in calamares (Ubuntu) "Lubuntu 24.04 Daily install fails when XFS is selected" [Undecided, New]
[22:44] <tsimonq2> Looking, at a good stopping point.
[22:47] <tsimonq2> Trying with a Secure Boot EFI VM. Let's see if I can at least reproduce it...
[23:22] <arraybolt3> tsimonq2: Probably will be back now that Shabbat is over.
[23:22] <tsimonq2> arraybolt3: No problem whatsoever :)
[23:23] <tsimonq2> arraybolt3: redshift-qt works pretty great, by the way. Thanks.
[23:23] <tsimonq2> https://twitter.com/LubuntuOfficial/status/1728553651378020385 "{
[23:23] <tsimonq2> *:P
[23:23] <arraybolt3> Though I have a fight to finish with openMSX (tl;dr: unit test framework is vendored, vendored framework doesn't work anymore in Debian, packaged framework is too new, so now I have to either migrate the testing framework myself or fix the vendored one)
[23:23] <arraybolt3> Nifty!
[23:23] <arraybolt3> Thanks for sharing!
[23:23] <tsimonq2> Of course :)
[23:24] <tsimonq2> And let me know how I can help. I'll be on Linux Saloon in 1.5 hours, you're more than welcome to join.
[23:24] <arraybolt3> Thanks!
[23:25] <tsimonq2> No worries :)
[23:43] <tsimonq2> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/2044086
[23:43] -ubottu:#lubuntu-devel- Launchpad bug 2044086 in Ubuntu "[needs-packaging] New package request: python-uefivars and ubuntu-boot-test" [Wishlist, Fix Committed]