/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2023/11/29/#ubuntu-release.txt

RAOFSure, let me take a look.00:25
RAOFliushuyu : Ooof, that's a lot. Looks mostly good to go. Something that looks strange, though, is that the package depends on llvm-17 but sets various environment variables to llvm-16 paths?02:34
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: openpyxl [amd64] (noble-proposed/universe) [3.1.2+dfsg-4] (no packageset)05:21
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added oem-sutton-adelaide-meta to canonical-oem-metapackages in focal07:54
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added oem-sutton-adelaide-meta to canonical-oem-metapackages in jammy07:54
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gallery-dl (jammy-backports/universe) [1.25.8-1~bpo22.04.1 => 1.26.3-1~bpo22.04.1] (no packageset)07:57
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: oem-sutton-adelaide-meta (jammy-proposed/primary) [22.04~ubuntu1]08:04
ricotzseb128, could you reject the libreoffice 4:7.5.8-0ubuntu0.23.04.1~bpo22.04.1 from unapproved queue for jammy-backports. -- https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/204281108:50
-ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Launchpad bug 2042811 in libreoffice (Ubuntu) "[BPO] libreoffice 7.5.8 for jammy" [Undecided, Fix Released]08:50
ricotzhello SRU team, please take a look at https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/204401909:35
-ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Launchpad bug 2044019 in libreoffice (Ubuntu Mantic) "[SRU] libreoffice 7.6.3 for mantic" [Medium, In Progress]09:35
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted liquidsoap [amd64] (noble-proposed) [2.2.2-1]09:53
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted liquidsoap [armhf] (noble-proposed) [2.2.2-1]09:53
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted liquidsoap [riscv64] (noble-proposed) [2.2.2-1]09:53
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted lxqt-themes-extra [amd64] (noble-proposed) [1.0-0ubuntu1]09:53
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted openpyxl [amd64] (noble-proposed) [3.1.2+dfsg-4]09:53
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted liquidsoap [arm64] (noble-proposed) [2.2.2-1]09:53
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted liquidsoap [s390x] (noble-proposed) [2.2.2-1]09:53
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted qtilitools [amd64] (noble-proposed) [0.1.1~git20231009-0ubuntu1]09:53
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted liquidsoap [ppc64el] (noble-proposed) [2.2.2-1]09:53
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted openpyxl [amd64] (noble-proposed) [3.1.2+dfsg-3]09:53
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: sddm-conf [amd64] (noble-proposed/universe) [0.2.0~git20231105-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)12:43
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: sddm-conf [armhf] (noble-proposed/universe) [0.2.0~git20231105-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)12:43
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: sddm-conf [arm64] (noble-proposed/universe) [0.2.0~git20231105-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)12:43
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: sddm-conf [ppc64el] (noble-proposed/universe) [0.2.0~git20231105-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)12:43
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: sddm-conf [s390x] (noble-proposed/universe) [0.2.0~git20231105-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)12:47
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: sddm-conf [riscv64] (noble-proposed/universe) [0.2.0~git20231105-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)12:55
fnordahlubuntu-archive requesting removal of openvswitch for armhf architecture in Noble on the back of the package being marked 64-bit only in Debian ref: https://salsa.debian.org/openstack-team/third-party/openvswitch/-/commit/b24e3553c87260019da3d335e5f9493cefba6e1d and https://www.mail-archive.com/debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org/msg1941939.html the proposed-migration is currently stuck due to no13:09
-ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Commit b24e355 in openstack-team/third-party/openvswitch "* Add architecture-is-64-bit, making the package build only for 64 bits and"13:09
fnordahlarmhf build13:10
ginggsfnordahl: I suggest to open a bug and subscribe ~ubuntu-archive, e.g. LP: #203121413:17
-ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Launchpad bug 2031214 in rocm-hipamd (Ubuntu) "rocm-hipamd: Please RM s390x binaries" [Undecided, Fix Released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/203121413:17
fnordahlginggs: ack will do, thx!13:18
ricotzginggs, hello :), could you reject the libreoffice 4:7.5.8-0ubuntu0.23.04.1~bpo22.04.1 from unapproved queue for jammy-backports. -- https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/204281113:31
-ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Launchpad bug 2042811 in libreoffice (Ubuntu) "[BPO] libreoffice 7.5.8 for jammy" [Undecided, Fix Released]13:31
ginggsricotz: hi! sorry, i have no power there (only in devel series).  I think you need sru or backports people13:34
ricotzginggs, ah, ok, no worries :)13:36
ricotzteward, hi :), could you reject as mentioned above? ^13:36
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted sddm-conf [amd64] (noble-proposed) [0.2.0~git20231105-0ubuntu1]14:53
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted sddm-conf [armhf] (noble-proposed) [0.2.0~git20231105-0ubuntu1]14:53
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted sddm-conf [riscv64] (noble-proposed) [0.2.0~git20231105-0ubuntu1]14:53
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted sddm-conf [arm64] (noble-proposed) [0.2.0~git20231105-0ubuntu1]14:53
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted sddm-conf [s390x] (noble-proposed) [0.2.0~git20231105-0ubuntu1]14:53
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted sddm-conf [ppc64el] (noble-proposed) [0.2.0~git20231105-0ubuntu1]14:53
tsimonq2\o\ /o/ \o/14:53
tsimonq2(Licensing issues noted, though.)14:53
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected yt-dlp [source] (jammy-backports) [2023.10.13-1ubuntu1~bpo22.04.1]15:09
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected libreoffice [source] (jammy-backports) [4:7.5.8-0ubuntu0.23.04.1~bpo22.04.1]15:10
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted yt-dlp [source] (jammy-backports) [2023.11.16-1~bpo22.04.1]15:13
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cockpit-machines [source] (jammy-backports) [302-1~bpo22.04.1]15:28
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cockpit [source] (jammy-backports) [305-1~bpo22.04.1]15:28
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cockpit-podman [source] (jammy-backports) [81-1~bpo22.04.1]15:28
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gallery-dl [source] (jammy-backports) [1.26.3-1~bpo22.04.1]15:28
ricotzginggs, another problem, I am hoping the autopkgtests problems on arm* are known?15:35
ricotze.g. "Error: websocket: bad handshake"15:37
ginggsricotz: that's for # ubuntu-quality, but I believe it's known and being worked on15:38
ricotzack15:38
tewardricotz: i dont see any uploads to backports that need rejected did someone else get to it?15:52
ricotzteward, there was some movement in jammy-backports, see above, I assumed that was you ;)15:53
ddstreet_awayit was me15:53
=== ddstreet_away is now known as ddstreet
tewardnope wasnt me :P15:54
tewardddstreet and mapreri are the other two15:54
tewardand f15:54
tewardand it makes sense we are all here - upcoming meeting **15:54
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: qemu [armhf] (noble-proposed/main) [1:8.1.3+ds-1ubuntu1] (ubuntu-server, virt)23:12
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: qemu [arm64] (noble-proposed/main) [1:8.1.3+ds-1ubuntu1] (ubuntu-server, virt)23:13
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: qemu [s390x] (noble-proposed/main) [1:8.1.3+ds-1ubuntu1] (ubuntu-server, virt)23:17
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: qemu [ppc64el] (noble-proposed/main) [1:8.1.3+ds-1ubuntu1] (ubuntu-server, virt)23:27
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: qemu [amd64] (noble-proposed/main) [1:8.1.3+ds-1ubuntu1] (ubuntu-server, virt)23:58

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!