| RAOF | Sure, let me take a look. | 00:25 |
|---|---|---|
| RAOF | liushuyu : Ooof, that's a lot. Looks mostly good to go. Something that looks strange, though, is that the package depends on llvm-17 but sets various environment variables to llvm-16 paths? | 02:34 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: openpyxl [amd64] (noble-proposed/universe) [3.1.2+dfsg-4] (no packageset) | 05:21 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added oem-sutton-adelaide-meta to canonical-oem-metapackages in focal | 07:54 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added oem-sutton-adelaide-meta to canonical-oem-metapackages in jammy | 07:54 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gallery-dl (jammy-backports/universe) [1.25.8-1~bpo22.04.1 => 1.26.3-1~bpo22.04.1] (no packageset) | 07:57 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: oem-sutton-adelaide-meta (jammy-proposed/primary) [22.04~ubuntu1] | 08:04 | |
| ricotz | seb128, could you reject the libreoffice 4:7.5.8-0ubuntu0.23.04.1~bpo22.04.1 from unapproved queue for jammy-backports. -- https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/2042811 | 08:50 |
| -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Launchpad bug 2042811 in libreoffice (Ubuntu) "[BPO] libreoffice 7.5.8 for jammy" [Undecided, Fix Released] | 08:50 | |
| ricotz | hello SRU team, please take a look at https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/2044019 | 09:35 |
| -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Launchpad bug 2044019 in libreoffice (Ubuntu Mantic) "[SRU] libreoffice 7.6.3 for mantic" [Medium, In Progress] | 09:35 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted liquidsoap [amd64] (noble-proposed) [2.2.2-1] | 09:53 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted liquidsoap [armhf] (noble-proposed) [2.2.2-1] | 09:53 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted liquidsoap [riscv64] (noble-proposed) [2.2.2-1] | 09:53 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted lxqt-themes-extra [amd64] (noble-proposed) [1.0-0ubuntu1] | 09:53 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted openpyxl [amd64] (noble-proposed) [3.1.2+dfsg-4] | 09:53 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted liquidsoap [arm64] (noble-proposed) [2.2.2-1] | 09:53 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted liquidsoap [s390x] (noble-proposed) [2.2.2-1] | 09:53 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted qtilitools [amd64] (noble-proposed) [0.1.1~git20231009-0ubuntu1] | 09:53 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted liquidsoap [ppc64el] (noble-proposed) [2.2.2-1] | 09:53 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted openpyxl [amd64] (noble-proposed) [3.1.2+dfsg-3] | 09:53 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: sddm-conf [amd64] (noble-proposed/universe) [0.2.0~git20231105-0ubuntu1] (no packageset) | 12:43 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: sddm-conf [armhf] (noble-proposed/universe) [0.2.0~git20231105-0ubuntu1] (no packageset) | 12:43 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: sddm-conf [arm64] (noble-proposed/universe) [0.2.0~git20231105-0ubuntu1] (no packageset) | 12:43 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: sddm-conf [ppc64el] (noble-proposed/universe) [0.2.0~git20231105-0ubuntu1] (no packageset) | 12:43 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: sddm-conf [s390x] (noble-proposed/universe) [0.2.0~git20231105-0ubuntu1] (no packageset) | 12:47 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: sddm-conf [riscv64] (noble-proposed/universe) [0.2.0~git20231105-0ubuntu1] (no packageset) | 12:55 | |
| fnordahl | ubuntu-archive requesting removal of openvswitch for armhf architecture in Noble on the back of the package being marked 64-bit only in Debian ref: https://salsa.debian.org/openstack-team/third-party/openvswitch/-/commit/b24e3553c87260019da3d335e5f9493cefba6e1d and https://www.mail-archive.com/debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org/msg1941939.html the proposed-migration is currently stuck due to no | 13:09 |
| -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Commit b24e355 in openstack-team/third-party/openvswitch "* Add architecture-is-64-bit, making the package build only for 64 bits and" | 13:09 | |
| fnordahl | armhf build | 13:10 |
| ginggs | fnordahl: I suggest to open a bug and subscribe ~ubuntu-archive, e.g. LP: #2031214 | 13:17 |
| -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Launchpad bug 2031214 in rocm-hipamd (Ubuntu) "rocm-hipamd: Please RM s390x binaries" [Undecided, Fix Released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/2031214 | 13:17 | |
| fnordahl | ginggs: ack will do, thx! | 13:18 |
| ricotz | ginggs, hello :), could you reject the libreoffice 4:7.5.8-0ubuntu0.23.04.1~bpo22.04.1 from unapproved queue for jammy-backports. -- https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/2042811 | 13:31 |
| -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Launchpad bug 2042811 in libreoffice (Ubuntu) "[BPO] libreoffice 7.5.8 for jammy" [Undecided, Fix Released] | 13:31 | |
| ginggs | ricotz: hi! sorry, i have no power there (only in devel series). I think you need sru or backports people | 13:34 |
| ricotz | ginggs, ah, ok, no worries :) | 13:36 |
| ricotz | teward, hi :), could you reject as mentioned above? ^ | 13:36 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted sddm-conf [amd64] (noble-proposed) [0.2.0~git20231105-0ubuntu1] | 14:53 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted sddm-conf [armhf] (noble-proposed) [0.2.0~git20231105-0ubuntu1] | 14:53 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted sddm-conf [riscv64] (noble-proposed) [0.2.0~git20231105-0ubuntu1] | 14:53 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted sddm-conf [arm64] (noble-proposed) [0.2.0~git20231105-0ubuntu1] | 14:53 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted sddm-conf [s390x] (noble-proposed) [0.2.0~git20231105-0ubuntu1] | 14:53 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted sddm-conf [ppc64el] (noble-proposed) [0.2.0~git20231105-0ubuntu1] | 14:53 | |
| tsimonq2 | \o\ /o/ \o/ | 14:53 |
| tsimonq2 | (Licensing issues noted, though.) | 14:53 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected yt-dlp [source] (jammy-backports) [2023.10.13-1ubuntu1~bpo22.04.1] | 15:09 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected libreoffice [source] (jammy-backports) [4:7.5.8-0ubuntu0.23.04.1~bpo22.04.1] | 15:10 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted yt-dlp [source] (jammy-backports) [2023.11.16-1~bpo22.04.1] | 15:13 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cockpit-machines [source] (jammy-backports) [302-1~bpo22.04.1] | 15:28 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cockpit [source] (jammy-backports) [305-1~bpo22.04.1] | 15:28 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cockpit-podman [source] (jammy-backports) [81-1~bpo22.04.1] | 15:28 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gallery-dl [source] (jammy-backports) [1.26.3-1~bpo22.04.1] | 15:28 | |
| ricotz | ginggs, another problem, I am hoping the autopkgtests problems on arm* are known? | 15:35 |
| ricotz | e.g. "Error: websocket: bad handshake" | 15:37 |
| ginggs | ricotz: that's for # ubuntu-quality, but I believe it's known and being worked on | 15:38 |
| ricotz | ack | 15:38 |
| teward | ricotz: i dont see any uploads to backports that need rejected did someone else get to it? | 15:52 |
| ricotz | teward, there was some movement in jammy-backports, see above, I assumed that was you ;) | 15:53 |
| ddstreet_away | it was me | 15:53 |
| === ddstreet_away is now known as ddstreet | ||
| teward | nope wasnt me :P | 15:54 |
| teward | ddstreet and mapreri are the other two | 15:54 |
| teward | and f | 15:54 |
| teward | and it makes sense we are all here - upcoming meeting ** | 15:54 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: qemu [armhf] (noble-proposed/main) [1:8.1.3+ds-1ubuntu1] (ubuntu-server, virt) | 23:12 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: qemu [arm64] (noble-proposed/main) [1:8.1.3+ds-1ubuntu1] (ubuntu-server, virt) | 23:13 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: qemu [s390x] (noble-proposed/main) [1:8.1.3+ds-1ubuntu1] (ubuntu-server, virt) | 23:17 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: qemu [ppc64el] (noble-proposed/main) [1:8.1.3+ds-1ubuntu1] (ubuntu-server, virt) | 23:27 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: qemu [amd64] (noble-proposed/main) [1:8.1.3+ds-1ubuntu1] (ubuntu-server, virt) | 23:58 | |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!