[00:25] <RAOF> Sure, let me take a look.
[02:34] <RAOF> liushuyu : Ooof, that's a lot. Looks mostly good to go. Something that looks strange, though, is that the package depends on llvm-17 but sets various environment variables to llvm-16 paths?
[05:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: openpyxl [amd64] (noble-proposed/universe) [3.1.2+dfsg-4] (no packageset)
[07:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added oem-sutton-adelaide-meta to canonical-oem-metapackages in focal
[07:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added oem-sutton-adelaide-meta to canonical-oem-metapackages in jammy
[07:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gallery-dl (jammy-backports/universe) [1.25.8-1~bpo22.04.1 => 1.26.3-1~bpo22.04.1] (no packageset)
[08:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: oem-sutton-adelaide-meta (jammy-proposed/primary) [22.04~ubuntu1]
[08:50] <ricotz> seb128, could you reject the libreoffice 4:7.5.8-0ubuntu0.23.04.1~bpo22.04.1 from unapproved queue for jammy-backports. -- https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/2042811
[08:50] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Launchpad bug 2042811 in libreoffice (Ubuntu) "[BPO] libreoffice 7.5.8 for jammy" [Undecided, Fix Released]
[09:35] <ricotz> hello SRU team, please take a look at https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/2044019
[09:35] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Launchpad bug 2044019 in libreoffice (Ubuntu Mantic) "[SRU] libreoffice 7.6.3 for mantic" [Medium, In Progress]
[09:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted liquidsoap [amd64] (noble-proposed) [2.2.2-1]
[09:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted liquidsoap [armhf] (noble-proposed) [2.2.2-1]
[09:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted liquidsoap [riscv64] (noble-proposed) [2.2.2-1]
[09:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted lxqt-themes-extra [amd64] (noble-proposed) [1.0-0ubuntu1]
[09:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted openpyxl [amd64] (noble-proposed) [3.1.2+dfsg-4]
[09:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted liquidsoap [arm64] (noble-proposed) [2.2.2-1]
[09:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted liquidsoap [s390x] (noble-proposed) [2.2.2-1]
[09:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted qtilitools [amd64] (noble-proposed) [0.1.1~git20231009-0ubuntu1]
[09:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted liquidsoap [ppc64el] (noble-proposed) [2.2.2-1]
[09:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted openpyxl [amd64] (noble-proposed) [3.1.2+dfsg-3]
[12:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: sddm-conf [amd64] (noble-proposed/universe) [0.2.0~git20231105-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[12:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: sddm-conf [armhf] (noble-proposed/universe) [0.2.0~git20231105-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[12:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: sddm-conf [arm64] (noble-proposed/universe) [0.2.0~git20231105-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[12:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: sddm-conf [ppc64el] (noble-proposed/universe) [0.2.0~git20231105-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[12:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: sddm-conf [s390x] (noble-proposed/universe) [0.2.0~git20231105-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[12:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: sddm-conf [riscv64] (noble-proposed/universe) [0.2.0~git20231105-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[13:09] <fnordahl> ubuntu-archive requesting removal of openvswitch for armhf architecture in Noble on the back of the package being marked 64-bit only in Debian ref: https://salsa.debian.org/openstack-team/third-party/openvswitch/-/commit/b24e3553c87260019da3d335e5f9493cefba6e1d and https://www.mail-archive.com/debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org/msg1941939.html the proposed-migration is currently stuck due to no
[13:09] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Commit b24e355 in openstack-team/third-party/openvswitch "* Add architecture-is-64-bit, making the package build only for 64 bits and"
[13:10] <fnordahl> armhf build
[13:17] <ginggs> fnordahl: I suggest to open a bug and subscribe ~ubuntu-archive, e.g. LP: #2031214
[13:17] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Launchpad bug 2031214 in rocm-hipamd (Ubuntu) "rocm-hipamd: Please RM s390x binaries" [Undecided, Fix Released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/2031214
[13:18] <fnordahl> ginggs: ack will do, thx!
[13:31] <ricotz> ginggs, hello :), could you reject the libreoffice 4:7.5.8-0ubuntu0.23.04.1~bpo22.04.1 from unapproved queue for jammy-backports. -- https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/2042811
[13:31] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Launchpad bug 2042811 in libreoffice (Ubuntu) "[BPO] libreoffice 7.5.8 for jammy" [Undecided, Fix Released]
[13:34] <ginggs> ricotz: hi! sorry, i have no power there (only in devel series).  I think you need sru or backports people
[13:36] <ricotz> ginggs, ah, ok, no worries :)
[13:36] <ricotz> teward, hi :), could you reject as mentioned above? ^
[14:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted sddm-conf [amd64] (noble-proposed) [0.2.0~git20231105-0ubuntu1]
[14:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted sddm-conf [armhf] (noble-proposed) [0.2.0~git20231105-0ubuntu1]
[14:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted sddm-conf [riscv64] (noble-proposed) [0.2.0~git20231105-0ubuntu1]
[14:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted sddm-conf [arm64] (noble-proposed) [0.2.0~git20231105-0ubuntu1]
[14:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted sddm-conf [s390x] (noble-proposed) [0.2.0~git20231105-0ubuntu1]
[14:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted sddm-conf [ppc64el] (noble-proposed) [0.2.0~git20231105-0ubuntu1]
[14:53] <tsimonq2> \o\ /o/ \o/
[14:53] <tsimonq2> (Licensing issues noted, though.)
[15:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected yt-dlp [source] (jammy-backports) [2023.10.13-1ubuntu1~bpo22.04.1]
[15:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected libreoffice [source] (jammy-backports) [4:7.5.8-0ubuntu0.23.04.1~bpo22.04.1]
[15:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted yt-dlp [source] (jammy-backports) [2023.11.16-1~bpo22.04.1]
[15:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cockpit-machines [source] (jammy-backports) [302-1~bpo22.04.1]
[15:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cockpit [source] (jammy-backports) [305-1~bpo22.04.1]
[15:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cockpit-podman [source] (jammy-backports) [81-1~bpo22.04.1]
[15:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gallery-dl [source] (jammy-backports) [1.26.3-1~bpo22.04.1]
[15:35] <ricotz> ginggs, another problem, I am hoping the autopkgtests problems on arm* are known?
[15:37] <ricotz> e.g. "Error: websocket: bad handshake"
[15:38] <ginggs> ricotz: that's for # ubuntu-quality, but I believe it's known and being worked on
[15:38] <ricotz> ack
[15:52] <teward> ricotz: i dont see any uploads to backports that need rejected did someone else get to it?
[15:53] <ricotz> teward, there was some movement in jammy-backports, see above, I assumed that was you ;)
[15:53] <ddstreet_away> it was me
=== ddstreet_away is now known as ddstreet
[15:54] <teward> nope wasnt me :P
[15:54] <teward> ddstreet and mapreri are the other two
[15:54] <teward> and f
[15:54] <teward> and it makes sense we are all here - upcoming meeting **
[23:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: qemu [armhf] (noble-proposed/main) [1:8.1.3+ds-1ubuntu1] (ubuntu-server, virt)
[23:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: qemu [arm64] (noble-proposed/main) [1:8.1.3+ds-1ubuntu1] (ubuntu-server, virt)
[23:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: qemu [s390x] (noble-proposed/main) [1:8.1.3+ds-1ubuntu1] (ubuntu-server, virt)
[23:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: qemu [ppc64el] (noble-proposed/main) [1:8.1.3+ds-1ubuntu1] (ubuntu-server, virt)
[23:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: qemu [amd64] (noble-proposed/main) [1:8.1.3+ds-1ubuntu1] (ubuntu-server, virt)