[00:55] <vpa1977> Hi, would it be possible to check uploads for guice and maven at some point for focal: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/focal/+queue?queue_state=1&queue_text=guice, https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/focal/+queue?queue_state=1&queue_text=maven . They fix LP: #1930541 - maven failing to build anything with Java 17 and up.
[00:55] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Launchpad bug 1930541 in maven (Ubuntu) "[SRU] Maven 3.6.3-1 fails to run with OpenJDK 17" [Undecided, Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1930541
[00:59] <vorlon> vpa1977: "at some point" yes, but on the whole the SRU throughput has been lagging behind over the past month or so due to the engineering sprint + PTO (https://ubuntu-release.kpi.ubuntu.com/d/yIC34LpGk/ubuntu-metrics?viewPanel=6&orgId=1&from=now-90d&to=now) so it may take a while
[01:03] <vpa1977> vorlorn: Thank you!!!
[05:03] <artur> Hello, can someone help to review this SRU ticket? https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/alsa-ucm-conf/+bug/2042902
[05:03] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Launchpad bug 2042902 in OEM Priority Project "ucm2: soundwire: add rt713 SDCA device" [Critical, In Progress]
[05:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: livecd-rootfs (jammy-proposed/main) [2.765.26 => 2.765.31] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist)
[10:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: opendht [amd64] (noble-proposed/universe) [3.0.0-4] (no packageset)
[10:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: opendht [ppc64el] (noble-proposed/universe) [3.0.0-4] (no packageset)
[10:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: opendht [armhf] (noble-proposed/universe) [3.0.0-4] (no packageset)
[10:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: opendht [arm64] (noble-proposed/universe) [3.0.0-4] (no packageset)
[11:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: opendht [s390x] (noble-proposed/universe) [3.0.0-4] (no packageset)
[11:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted opendht [amd64] (noble-proposed) [3.0.0-4]
[11:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted opendht [armhf] (noble-proposed) [3.0.0-4]
[11:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted opendht [s390x] (noble-proposed) [3.0.0-4]
[11:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted opendht [arm64] (noble-proposed) [3.0.0-4]
[11:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted opendht [ppc64el] (noble-proposed) [3.0.0-4]
[14:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libreoffice (mantic-proposed/main) [4:7.6.2-0ubuntu1 => 4:7.6.3-0ubuntu0.23.10.1] (ubuntu-desktop)
[16:26] <vorlon> tsimonq2, teward: what are your thoughts on https://code.launchpad.net/~vorlon/ubuntu-seeds/+git/lubuntu/+merge/449128 ? (which now needs retargeted for noble)
[16:27] <teward> kc2bez: adding you since my availability is spotty due to travel, so if Simon doesnt reply... :P
[16:37] <tsimonq2> vorlon: I'd like to hear RikMills' thoughts but preliminary ack.
[16:48] <RikMills> vorlon tsimonq2: it is completely unsupportable for a release now, so gotta go IMO
[17:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: connman [amd64] (noble-proposed/universe) [1.42-3] (no packageset)
[17:35] <jbicha> Is it intentional that the volume id for noble ISOs is "Ubuntu 24.04 amd64" instead of "Ubuntu 24.04 LTS amd64" ?
[17:35] <jbicha> isoinfo -d -i noble-desktop-amd64.iso
[17:41] <vorlon> jbicha: I wouldn't think so, though I think it's somewhat peculiar we put the release version in there at all for pre-release images.  Let me see what's up
[17:42] <vorlon> jbicha: seems a straightforward matter of CONF.sh missing the "LTS"
[17:43] <jbicha> thanks, I'm updating osinfo-db to recognize Noble and it reads the volume ID
[17:43] <vorlon> jbicha: fix pushed to debian-cd, should be sorted in tomorrow's image
[19:40] <teward> vorlon: burn muon, provided that Lubuntu can seed/ship the corresponding Discover application instead.  you asked for my opinion and that's my opinion (supported by Lubuntu Developers and key other members on Release Managers because it's dead/gone/unsupported).  Not happy that Discover - a heavier application - replaces it, but the only option in the interim.
[19:40] <teward> i'll make my notes as requested on the q as well
[19:40] <teward> (though i'm Lubuntu Team Lead, not Devel Lead / Release managers)
[19:40] <teward> (though i'm Lubuntu Team Lead, not Devel Lead / Release Manager Lead)
[19:41] <Eickmeyer> teward: muon was burned during mantic's cycle? I was told to remove it from Studio's seed.
[19:41] <teward> Eickmeyer: Lubuntu was pinged
[19:41] <teward> not you
[19:42] <teward> or do you not read the links from vorlon?
[19:42] <teward> because it's still present because *other flavors* seed it
[19:42] <teward> the commit in question is for LUbuntu
[19:42] <teward> and not Studio
[19:42] <teward> (and my "burn packages" reference is in regards to the Lubuntu Desktop seed PR nothing else)
[19:43] <Eickmeyer> teward: Just trying to be helpful, no need to go off.
[19:44] <teward> Eickmeyer: i've been traveling for 8 hours, i'm grumpy, it's not a ragemode against you i'm just grumpy today
[19:44] <teward> 4 this morning, and 4 so far on my return trip home
[19:47] <teward> though vorlon: that should be retargeting Noble no?  Since mantic is already released
[19:47] <Eickmeyer> teward: It's an old merge request, check the date.
[19:48] <teward> Eickmeyer: it's also what vorlon linked to and if vorlon links a new one i'll happily merge it
[19:48] <teward> though I don't see a noble branch anyways so
[19:48] <teward> (in Lubuntu's seeds)
[19:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: mutter (mantic-proposed/main) [45.0-3ubuntu3.1 => 45.2-0ubuntu1] (desktop-core, desktop-extra)
[20:11] <vorlon> teward: ehm I double-checked because that's part of the archive opening process; yes there's a noble branch
[20:12] <vorlon> teward: and yes it needs retargeting (I mentioned)
[20:15] <mwhudson> vorlon: it's hardly a priority but um http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/indices/ could perhaps see some garbage collection? :)
[20:16] <vorlon> mwhudson: um you'll have to talk to the launchpad team about that
[20:16] <mwhudson> ok
[20:16] <mwhudson> heh it has overrides from warty
[20:16] <vorlon> they've taken away my access to do anything there ;)
[20:16] <vorlon> teward: https://code.launchpad.net/~vorlon/ubuntu-seeds/+git/lubuntu/+merge/456804
[20:18] <vorlon> teward: anyway, you say "provided Lubuntu can seed the corresponding Discover application" - so should muon be *replaced* with something else as part of this MP instead of dropped?
[20:18] <teward> vorlon: ack, i'll merge that next time i have stable signal - about to take the leg of my drive home that takes me into mountainous terrain for the next hour or so
[20:18] <teward> vorlon: it's already in the seed - plasma-discover
[20:18] <teward> we have both i think
[20:18] <vorlon> okh
[20:18] <teward> the only other closest-match is synaptic but i believe we're trying to avoid gtk apps
[20:21] <vorlon> teward: ah ok - if I can get one lubuntuish ack (developer or not) on the new MP then with that rationale, I'm happy to land this
[20:21] <teward> yep i'll put the ack in once i'm back in stable networking.  Want to get home before snow starts >.>
[20:21] <teward> if someone else doesn't ack it first
[20:27] <arraybolt3> I can ack it from here, but I'm waiting on Lubuntu Council quorum (we have +2 votes so var, need +3 or better to proceed)
[20:28] <arraybolt3> *far, not var
[21:00] <arraybolt3> vorlon: Formal ack given on removing muon from the Lubuntu seed.
[21:04] <vorlon> arraybolt3: thanks
[21:21] <guiverc> 23.10 release is still in progress??  https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/mantic-minotaur-23-10-release-status-tracking/37887 says so anyway; maybe edit is required
[21:23]  * Eickmeyer giggles
[21:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: livecd-rootfs (mantic-proposed/main) [23.10.56 => 23.10.57] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist)
[21:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: livecd-rootfs (lunar-proposed/main) [2.828 => 2.828.3] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist)
[21:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: livecd-rootfs (jammy-proposed/main) [2.765.26 => 2.765.32] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist)
[23:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: golang-github-microsoft-dev-tunnels [amd64] (noble-proposed/none) [0.0.25-1] (no packageset)
[23:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: qnetload [amd64] (noble-proposed/none) [1.3.6-1] (no packageset)
[23:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: qnetload [arm64] (noble-proposed/none) [1.3.6-1] (no packageset)
[23:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: qnetload [ppc64el] (noble-proposed/none) [1.3.6-1] (no packageset)
[23:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: qnetload [armhf] (noble-proposed/none) [1.3.6-1] (no packageset)
[23:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: qnetload [s390x] (noble-proposed/none) [1.3.6-1] (no packageset)
[23:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: qnetload [riscv64] (noble-proposed/universe) [1.3.6-1] (no packageset)