[12:34] good afternoon everyone [12:34] RikMills: fw 5.113 completed, at the moment, I don't plan to change more things in the packaging [12:35] so please go ahead with the riscv experiments [12:35] also, misc news/info: [12:36] - oxygen-icons tarball was renamed, just updating one file ka-metadata made KA work fine; the metadata is in the frameworks_staging branch btw [12:37] - I have pushed another fix for ppa-build-status, now it should work both with recent and ancient versions of Ubuntu [12:38] - for breeze-icons, I changed the package to not install arch specific cmake files, we were having a lintian warning for a while; if these files are actually needed for anything, they should go to a separate arch-specific package [12:39] santa_: I have conformed it is the riscv64 builder change, rather than any other change in noble, by no change rebuidling the manic kconfig package [12:39] https://launchpad.net/~ci-train-ppa-service/+archive/ubuntu/4979/+sourcepub/15413039/+listing-archive-extra [12:39] it fails in the same way [12:40] ah, I get it, I was going to ask about that [12:40] santa_: ack on breeze-icons [12:40] I will have to open a ticket with LP admins to get this looked at [12:40] have you tried the new fw 5.113 package on riscv, does it fail in the same way? [12:41] santa_: not yet. I will try in the next few days when I can free up a PPA [12:42] or I gues I could pathc in the the 5.113.0 changes to a 5.112.0 build [12:42] *patch [12:43] sure, but imagine the segfault comes from one of the deps [12:43] but it's a good start if you don't have a proper PPA available yet, so please go ahead and experiment [12:45] ci-train PPAs cannot be created now since bileto seems dead. but there are dozens on existing PPAs that the creators don't look to be using. so what I need to do is find one that I am sure I can steal ;) [12:45] s/steal/re-purpose/ [12:46] santa_: and yes, rebuilding the fw stack is the best test [12:46] hahah [12:46] ok [12:48] hopefully will get to that by the end of the week [12:50] so the change in the buildds was: [12:50] qemu buildds -> non-qemu buildds [12:50] ? [12:50] looks that way [12:51] I recall seeing something about them getting real boards etc a while back [12:53] idea is to get riscv64 towards a real release architecture [12:54] if you are going to do that, then you can't acre flavours who use KDE things [12:55] s/acre/screw [12:55] sigh [12:57] ack, I have seen now all the #launchpad messages [12:57] in case the issue persists, things interesting in case we request help from KDE fellows [12:58] - confirm if the change in the buildds is non-qemu -> quemu [12:58] - a shell in a riscv server where someone can reproduce the issue, rebuild and try to fix [13:01] indeed [13:23] Hi all [15:40] so far so good upgraded fw 5.113 (re @IrcsomeBot: RikMills: fw 5.113 completed, at the moment, I don't plan to change more things in the packaging) [15:59] ack, thanks for testing