[00:44] <dannf> hey - is it possible to pin a jammy daily ISO build so that it doesn't get reaped until 22.04.4? The kernel on the 22.04.3 ISO has a bug that breaks VGA output on some ARM servers that is fixed in the dailies, and I'd like to be able to test an ISO on the platform and point those users to it until 22.04.4 is available
[01:10] <tsimonq2> dannf: The best advice I would have is to file a bug against ubuntu-cdimage to track; that's how I've requested similar things from the flavor side in the past.
[01:11] <dannf> tsimonq2: ACK, thx
[01:12] <tsimonq2> dannf: Also worth noting: in exceptional circumstances you could ask for an early .4 for that ISO. Or, maybe a 3.1. That's up to ubuntu-release, though.
[01:12] <tsimonq2> (And I'd put your specific request in the bug :) )
[01:20] <dannf> tsimonq2: I'll just note the circumstances and see what they suggest - ta!
[01:30] <dannf> LP: #2045709
[01:30] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Launchpad bug 2045709 in Ubuntu CD Images "jammy server ISO VGA is broken on new ARM servers" [Undecided, New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/2045709
[01:58] <vorlon> dannf: does 22.04.2 work?
=== chris14_ is now known as chris14
[10:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ima-evm-utils [amd64] (noble-proposed/universe) [1.4-1.2] (no packageset)
[10:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ima-evm-utils [s390x] (noble-proposed/universe) [1.4-1.2] (no packageset)
[10:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ima-evm-utils [ppc64el] (noble-proposed/universe) [1.4-1.2] (no packageset)
[10:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ima-evm-utils [armhf] (noble-proposed/universe) [1.4-1.2] (no packageset)
[10:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ima-evm-utils [arm64] (noble-proposed/universe) [1.4-1.2] (no packageset)
[10:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ima-evm-utils [riscv64] (noble-proposed/universe) [1.4-1.2] (no packageset)
[10:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ima-evm-utils [amd64] (noble-proposed) [1.4-1.2]
[10:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ima-evm-utils [armhf] (noble-proposed) [1.4-1.2]
[10:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ima-evm-utils [riscv64] (noble-proposed) [1.4-1.2]
[10:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ima-evm-utils [arm64] (noble-proposed) [1.4-1.2]
[10:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ima-evm-utils [s390x] (noble-proposed) [1.4-1.2]
[10:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ima-evm-utils [ppc64el] (noble-proposed) [1.4-1.2]
[10:58] <tchavadar> Hello team, I need help on speeding up SRU process for flash-kernel (https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/flash-kernel/+bug/2037407). We are planning to release new GM image for board in discussion in the bug so is there a way to speed-up the review? I addressed the previous comments but there is no progress for 4 weeks. I am not sure this is the correct way of asking support on this thou
[10:58] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Launchpad bug 2037407 in flash-kernel (Ubuntu Noble) "[SRU] Add support for AMD-Xilinx Kria KD240" [Undecided, New]
[11:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rtl-sdr [amd64] (noble-proposed/universe) [2.0.1-2] (no packageset)
[11:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rtl-sdr [ppc64el] (noble-proposed/universe) [2.0.1-2] (no packageset)
[11:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rtl-sdr [armhf] (noble-proposed/universe) [2.0.1-2] (no packageset)
[11:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rtl-sdr [s390x] (noble-proposed/universe) [2.0.1-2] (no packageset)
[11:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rtl-sdr [arm64] (noble-proposed/universe) [2.0.1-2] (no packageset)
[11:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rtl-sdr [riscv64] (noble-proposed/universe) [2.0.1-2] (no packageset)
[11:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rtl-sdr [amd64] (noble-proposed) [2.0.1-2]
[11:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rtl-sdr [armhf] (noble-proposed) [2.0.1-2]
[11:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rtl-sdr [riscv64] (noble-proposed) [2.0.1-2]
[11:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rtl-sdr [arm64] (noble-proposed) [2.0.1-2]
[11:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rtl-sdr [s390x] (noble-proposed) [2.0.1-2]
[11:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rtl-sdr [ppc64el] (noble-proposed) [2.0.1-2]
[14:16] <dannf> vorlon: no, it wasn't a regression - it was just a bug discovered late
[14:18] <dannf> it's due to the driver for the emulated VGA in the BMC - 4327a6137ed4 drm/ast: Fix ARM compatibility
[14:19] <dannf> but apparently it causes memory corruption, so even serial installs are impacted
[14:23] <tsimonq2> dannf: The only additional thought I'll add (for now) is, the LTS dailies are built with the proposed pocket enabled. That's turned off in time for point releases. If y'all did decide to pin a daily, please remember to ask someone to turn that off before you mint an image. :)
[14:24] <tsimonq2> (IIRC that's a crontab within ubuntu-cdimage, and it's flipping a bit.)
[14:25] <dannf> tsimonq2: good call
[14:26] <tsimonq2> https://git.launchpad.net/ubuntu-cdimage/tree/etc/crontab - so if I'm reading this correctly, line 34 (or similar) needs PROPOSED=0 added as a suffix to the command.
[14:26] <tsimonq2> (FYI for flavors if you're curious when exactly your dailies are kicked off. ^^^)
[14:28] <tsimonq2> Side note...
[14:28] <tsimonq2> "DIST=jammy for-project ubuntu-server cron.daily-preinstalled --live; DIST=jammy SUBPROJECT=live PROPOSED=0 for-project ubuntu-server cron.daily-live --live"
[14:28] <tsimonq2> Did someone miss a PROPOSED=0?
[14:31] <tsimonq2> Okay, so I'm misunderstanding this from the Git commit history. I do seem to recall cowboy edits though... so yeah, I'd just put it in the bug.
[14:35] <tsimonq2> Driveby MP which makes point release weeks easier: https://code.launchpad.net/~tsimonq2/ubuntu-cdimage/+git/ubuntu-cdimage/+merge/456975 (not married to it)
[15:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: s390-tools (mantic-proposed/main) [2.29.0-0ubuntu2 => 2.29.0-0ubuntu2.1] (core)
[15:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: s390-tools-signed (mantic-proposed/main) [2.29.0-0ubuntu2 => 2.29.0-0ubuntu2.1] (core)
[15:17] <dannf> tchavadar: It looks like you're still in need of a sponsor for the upload, is that right?
[15:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: s390-tools (noble-proposed/main) [2.29.0-0ubuntu2 => 2.29.0-0ubuntu3] (core)
[16:17] <vorlon> bluesabre: re-ping re: xubuntu jammy image sizelimits
[16:30] <tchavadar> dannf: yep I am. In first phase Dave looked at the changes and made some comment and then I addressed the issues. But I was waiting for his feedback about the latest status since he is the expert on flash-kernel.
[16:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: zfs-linux (mantic-proposed/main) [2.2.0-0ubuntu1~23.10 => 2.2.2-0ubuntu1~23.10] (core, kernel-dkms)
[16:52] <dannf> tchavadar: ACK - then probably too early to ping the release team. @waveform would you have time to take a look at @tchavadar latest patch?
=== deathcollege is now known as returned2sendrx1
=== returned2sendrx1 is now known as retrn2sendrx1000
[17:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pytorch-geometric [amd64] (noble-proposed/universe) [2.3.1-3] (no packageset)
[17:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pytorch-geometric [amd64] (noble-proposed) [2.3.1-3]
[18:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected livecd-rootfs [source] (jammy-proposed) [2.765.30]
[18:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected livecd-rootfs [source] (jammy-proposed) [2.765.31]
[18:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected livecd-rootfs [source] (jammy-proposed) [2.765.32]
[18:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: livecd-rootfs (jammy-proposed/main) [2.765.26 => 2.765.31] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist)
[18:38] <cpete> Could an archive admin take a look at LP:#2045793 for me? I'd like to request removal of a package from the archive and I'm told this is the place to ask.
[18:38] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Launchpad bug 2045793 in alex4 (Ubuntu) "remove alex4-data from the archive" [Undecided, New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/2045793
[18:41] <ginggs> cpete: I subscribed ~ubuntu-archive to that bug
[18:43] <cpete> ginggs: thanks!
[18:54] <vorlon> cpete: which is the correct process, and then no need to separately ask here
[18:56] <cpete> vorlon: good to know. Thank you
[19:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: livecd-rootfs (jammy-proposed/main) [2.765.26 => 2.765.32] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist)
[19:15] <ricotz> hello, please reject libreoffice from the mantic queue which was uploaded on 2023-11-23
[19:15] <ricotz> https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/mantic/+queue?queue_state=1&queue_text=libreoffice
[19:16] <vpa1977> Hi, would it be possible to take a look at openjdk-21 upload in the focal queue at some point - https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/focal/+queue?queue_state=1&queue_text=openjdk-21 . It is needed to work around gcc-9 crash on RISCV. Compiling with gcc-10 did not introduce any regressions.
[19:17] <vpa1977> Thank you!!!!
[19:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: livecd-rootfs (mantic-proposed/main) [23.10.56 => 23.10.57] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist)
[19:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: livecd-rootfs (lunar-proposed/main) [2.828 => 2.828.3] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist)
[19:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected livecd-rootfs [source] (mantic-proposed) [23.10.57]
[20:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libvirt (lunar-proposed/main) [9.0.0-2ubuntu1.2 => 9.0.0-2ubuntu1.3] (ubuntu-server, virt)
[20:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libvirt (jammy-proposed/main) [8.0.0-1ubuntu7.7 => 8.0.0-1ubuntu7.8] (ubuntu-server, virt)
[22:40] <vorlon> dannf: ah slight snag is that we have support for exactly one "manual" pin for a build, and we already have a ping for jammy server on account of intel-iot.  I'll reach out to Łukasz about this
[23:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ace [amd64] (noble-proposed/universe) [7.1.2+dfsg-2] (no packageset)
[23:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ace [arm64] (noble-proposed/universe) [7.1.2+dfsg-2] (no packageset)
[23:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ace [armhf] (noble-proposed/universe) [7.1.2+dfsg-2] (no packageset)
[23:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ace [ppc64el] (noble-proposed/universe) [7.1.2+dfsg-2] (no packageset)
[23:37] <mwhudson> tsimonq2: i don't think we build LTS dailies with PROPOSED=1 any more
[23:38] <mwhudson> tsimonq2: not since, uh. focal?
[23:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ace [s390x] (noble-proposed/universe) [7.1.2+dfsg-2] (no packageset)