[00:13] <arraybolt3> LocutusOfBorg: If you get a chance, can you review the sync request here? https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fonts-sahel/+bug/2045930
[00:13] -ubottu:#ubuntu-devel- Launchpad bug 2045930 in fonts-sahel (Ubuntu) "Please sync fonts-sahel from Debian" [Undecided, New]
[16:30] <tsimonq2> qa-help: https://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/ is down it looks like.
[16:30] <tsimonq2> In case I didn't get the highlight correct, bdmurray paride ^^^^
[16:35] <bdmurray> Luckily there is no iso testing right now
[16:39] <tsimonq2> I mean, there *are* ambitious testers who race to complete all the tests every day, two of which have already pinged me. :P
[16:39]  * tsimonq2 sips coffee
[16:54] <juliank> Rhonda: o/ It  seems that packages.ubuntu.com doesn't show security updates on ports architectures, only on main archive (amd64, i386). It seems this was reported previously at https://bugs.launchpad.net/pkg-website/+bug/1866833; we see it right now on https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/shim-signed (and jammy of course)
[16:54] -ubottu:#ubuntu-devel- Launchpad bug 1866833 in pkg-website "Looks like ports-security is not updated" [Undecided, New]
[16:59] <juliank> I guess it tries security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu and finds no entries when it should try http://ports.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-ports/ (the security pockets are not split out)
[17:34] <eslerm> why is the arm64 version of shim-signed focal different on Launchpad and the Archive?
[17:35] <eslerm> https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/shim-signed
[17:35] <eslerm> https://packages.ubuntu.com/focal/shim-signed
[17:35]  * eslerm didn't scroll down first, thanks juliank
[17:36] <eslerm> this might be the source of an Ubuntu pro issue
[17:42] <juliank> eslerm: it should be just cosmetic, if pro client is fetching data from there that would be a bug
[17:43] <juliank> also we really should be running this ourselves fwiw and not have Rhonda run it
[17:43] <juliank> unless she wants to I don't know
[17:55] <ahasenack> @pilot in
[18:19] <eslerm> thanks juliank
[18:20] <eslerm> I'll followup on the pro work
[20:30] <arraybolt3> does anyone know what it means when piuparts says "ERROR: FAIL: After purging files have disappeared"? Does this mean purging a package somehow removed files belonging to other packages?
[20:33] <jbicha> arraybolt3: piuparts isn't really used in Ubuntu currently, you might have better results asking Debian
[20:34] <arraybolt3> jbicha: hmm, makes sense, though I am using it to try to make sure a package won't break Ubuntu when synced from Debian
[20:35] <arraybolt3> (building signond is telling me /etc/localtime and some other file seem to have "disappeared" (whatever that means in this context) upon purging the packages, which sounds rather wrong to me, but I have no clue why that would happen, and wonder if it's something I should even worry about.)
[20:36] <jbicha> you might not have configured piuparts correctly; I don't know anyone who currently runs piuparts against Ubuntu packages
[20:37] <arraybolt3> Quite possible.
[21:30] <arraybolt3> vorlon: If you have the time, could you check out the sync request and debdiff at vorlon: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/2046007? This is that signond package we talked about on the ubuntu-devel ML yesterday.
[21:30] -ubottu:#ubuntu-devel- Launchpad bug 2046007 in Ubuntu "Please sync signond from Debian" [Undecided, New]
[21:36] <arraybolt3> sigh, typos
[22:12] <ahasenack> @pilot out
[22:47] <vorlon> arraybolt3: subscribing ubuntu-sponsors to it