[06:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: udisks2 (mantic-proposed/main) [2.10.1-1ubuntu1 => 2.10.1-1ubuntu1.1] (core, i386-whitelist)
[08:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-gssapi (mantic-proposed/universe) [1.8.2-1build1 => 1.8.2-1ubuntu0.23.10.1] (no packageset)
[08:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-gssapi (lunar-proposed/universe) [1.8.2-1build1 => 1.8.2-1ubuntu0.23.04.1] (no packageset)
[08:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-gssapi (jammy-proposed/universe) [1.6.12-1build2 => 1.6.12-1ubuntu2.1] (no packageset)
[09:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-gssapi [source] (mantic-proposed) [1.8.2-1ubuntu0.23.10.1]
[10:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-gssapi [source] (lunar-proposed) [1.8.2-1ubuntu0.23.04.1]
[10:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected udisks2 [source] (mantic-proposed) [2.10.1-1ubuntu1.1]
[11:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-gssapi (jammy-proposed/universe) [1.6.12-1build2 => 1.6.12-1ubuntu0.1] (no packageset)
[11:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-shell [source] (mantic-proposed) [45.2-0ubuntu1]
[11:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected python-gssapi [source] (jammy-proposed) [1.6.12-1ubuntu2.1]
[11:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-gssapi [source] (jammy-proposed) [1.6.12-1ubuntu0.1]
[11:43] <RikMills> ubuntu-release: please see: https://answers.launchpad.net/launchpad/+question/708661
[11:43] <RikMills> just for your FYI
[11:46] <ricotz> RikMills, hi :), I was about to ask about that ;)
[11:47] <RikMills> ricotz: if it help you, kconfig in proposed can be deleted
[11:47] <ricotz> it is about https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/4:7.6.4-0ubuntu1/+build/27060284 , so it might help
[11:48] <RikMills> yes, that dependency issue would go away at least
[11:49] <RikMills> and I don't think libreoffice KDE code invokes the broken kdeconfig_compiler_kf5 in its code
[11:49] <RikMills> you previous libreoffice upload would have failed if it did
[11:49] <ricotz> so +1 for that mitigation
[11:49] <ricotz> ack
[11:50] <RikMills> https://launchpad.net/~ci-train-ppa-service/+archive/ubuntu/4979/+build/27045185
[11:50] <RikMills> that was started before the dep issue, and looks to be completing
[11:50] <RikMills> slowly....
[11:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted osinfo-db [source] (mantic-proposed) [0.20231027-0ubuntu0.23.10.1]
[11:52] <RikMills> ubuntu-archive: please remove kconfig from noble proposed, for the above reasons. thanks
[11:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted osinfo-db [source] (jammy-proposed) [0.20231027-0ubuntu0.22.04.1]
[12:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cloud-init [source] (mantic-proposed) [23.4-0ubuntu1~23.10.1]
[12:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cloud-init [source] (lunar-proposed) [23.4-0ubuntu1~23.04.1]
[12:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cloud-init [source] (jammy-proposed) [23.4-0ubuntu1~22.04.1]
[12:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cloud-init [source] (focal-proposed) [23.4-0ubuntu1~20.04.1]
[12:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted distro-info-data [source] (mantic-proposed) [0.58ubuntu0.2]
[12:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted distro-info-data [source] (lunar-proposed) [0.57ubuntu0.3]
[12:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted distro-info-data [source] (jammy-proposed) [0.52ubuntu0.6]
[12:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted distro-info-data [source] (focal-proposed) [0.43ubuntu1.15]
[12:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted distro-info [source] (mantic-proposed) [1.5ubuntu0.23.10.1]
[12:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted distro-info [source] (lunar-proposed) [1.5ubuntu0.23.04.1]
[12:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted distro-info [source] (jammy-proposed) [1.1ubuntu0.2]
[12:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted fonts-noto-color-emoji [source] (mantic-proposed) [2.042-0ubuntu0.23.10.1]
[12:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted fonts-noto-color-emoji [source] (jammy-proposed) [2.042-0ubuntu0.22.04.1]
[12:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-characters [source] (mantic-proposed) [45.0-1ubuntu1]
[13:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected open-vm-tools [source] (jammy-proposed) [2:12.3.0-1~ubuntu0.22.04.1]
[13:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected open-vm-tools [source] (lunar-proposed) [2:12.3.0-1~ubuntu0.23.04.1]
[13:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libvirt [source] (lunar-proposed) [9.0.0-2ubuntu1.3]
[13:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libvirt [source] (jammy-proposed) [8.0.0-1ubuntu7.8]
[13:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libgcrypt20 [source] (jammy-proposed) [1.9.4-3ubuntu3.1]
[13:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: udisks2 (mantic-proposed/main) [2.10.1-1ubuntu1 => 2.10.1-1ubuntu1.1] (core, i386-whitelist)
[13:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected dnsmasq [source] (jammy-proposed) [2.86-1.1ubuntu0.4]
[13:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted udisks2 [source] (mantic-proposed) [2.10.1-1ubuntu1.1]
[13:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libreoffice (mantic-proposed/main) [4:7.6.2-0ubuntu1 => 4:7.6.4-0ubuntu0.23.10.1] (ubuntu-desktop)
[14:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: firmware-sof (mantic-proposed/main) [2.2.6-1ubuntu1.2 => 2.2.6-1ubuntu1.3] (no packageset)
[14:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: firmware-sof (jammy-proposed/restricted) [2.0-1ubuntu4.4 => 2.0-1ubuntu4.5] (no packageset)
[14:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted getmail6 [source] (jammy-proposed) [6.18.4-2ubuntu1]
[14:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted haproxy [source] (jammy-proposed) [2.4.24-0ubuntu0.22.04.1]
[15:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted haproxy [source] (focal-proposed) [2.0.33-0ubuntu0.1]
[15:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted openafs [source] (jammy-proposed) [1.8.10-1ubuntu2~22.04.1]
[15:09] <ricotz> mfo, hello :), did you get a second opinion and could you follow up on https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/2044019 ?
[15:09] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Launchpad bug 2044019 in libreoffice (Ubuntu Mantic) "[SRU] libreoffice 7.6.4 for mantic" [Medium, Incomplete]
[15:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted octavia [source] (focal-proposed) [6.2.2-0ubuntu1.1]
[15:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntu-image [source] (focal-proposed) [1.11+20.04ubuntu1.1]
[15:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected libreoffice [source] (mantic-proposed) [4:7.6.3-0ubuntu0.23.10.1]
[15:52] <mfo> hi ricotz o/ i'm out today/monday. but yes, i asked someone for a second opinion right after posting the comment yesterday, and other members of the sru team can also check it during their sru vanguard shifts. thanks again for your promptness on it!
[15:53] <ricotz> mfo, I see, could you please ask someone to take a look or even take over this review?
[15:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: update-manager (jammy-proposed/main) [1:22.04.17 => 1:22.04.18] (core)
[15:54] <ricotz> mfo, thank you for the detailed review, I have simplified the diff for easier understanding
[15:56] <mfo> ricotz, this is not assigned to me exclusively, it just happened i took it for review the last couple of weeks; please feel free to ping the sru vanguard of the day, by all means :)
[15:56] <mfo> (gotta reboot for some updates)
[15:59] <ricotz> tjaalton, hi :), I see you were already quite busy with SRU handling, would you still have time to take a look at libreoffice for lunar and mantic?
[16:11] <ricotz> mfo, thanks, I have done so
[16:11] <mfo> ricotz, you're welcome! o/
[16:18] <tjaalton> ricotz: yeah I'm getting done with my day
[16:19] <tjaalton> and really need to head out now
[16:30] <tjaalton> I'll have a look on Monday
[16:31] <ricotz> tjaalton, thank you
[16:52] <doko> https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/zope.interface  why is "autopkgtest for zope.component/5.1.0-1: ppc64el: Regression" still shown when 6.1-0.1 already succeeds?
[16:59] <doko> bdmurray: is there an update about the arm64 autopkg tests against unknown versions?
[16:59] <vorlon> doko: why are you asking here about the contents of tracker.debian.org?
[17:00] <juliank> you want #debci in oftc I suppose
[17:00] <juliank> or debian-release
[17:00] <doko> vorlon: oops, mismatch
[17:03] <bdmurray> doko: I'm testing a fix now
[17:05] <bdmurray> doko: but look the armhf queues are doing well!
[17:07] <doko> well, I don't see the point that all the stable queues are emptying faster than the development/noble queue.
[17:09] <bdmurray> glass half empty I guess
[17:13] <doko> Net gschimpft isch globt gnug
[18:15] <ricotz> vorlon, hi :), Rik_Mills requested the removal of kconfig in noble-proposed earlier
[18:15] <ricotz> which will unblock https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/4:7.6.4-0ubuntu1/+build/27060284
[18:16] <ricotz> https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/kconfig/5.112.0-0ubuntu2
[18:16] <tsimonq2> ricotz: This will likely block SRUs you do as well.
[18:17] <ricotz> tsimonq2, libreoffice builds on the new riscv64 builders
[18:23] <RikMills> tsimonq2:
[18:24] <RikMills> ricotz: yes, libreoffice doesn't seem to use that binary form kconfig in the build
[18:24] <RikMills> not all package that build depend on kconfig do
[18:52] <vorlon> ricotz, RikMills: kconfig removed from noble-proposed
[19:21] <vorlon> tsimonq2: um we're talking about risc-v here. A "porter box" is your own personal qemu.
[19:22] <vorlon> (we do need documentation about what version Launchpad is running and what commandline it's invoked with)
[19:22] <tsimonq2> vorlon: The RISC-V builds are done on QEMU, not Real Hardware? That slightly makes it easier.
[19:23] <tsimonq2> vorlon: I've set up launchpad-buildd before and I'm familiar; those extra docs would be perfect.
[19:23] <tsimonq2> (I think I've been told a few years ago they were all virtualized, but thought maybe that would have changed over the years, or something.)
[19:24] <vorlon> yeah, riscv64 hardware exists but we don't have any yet that's adequately server-grade and performant enough to run launchpad on
[19:24] <vorlon> there's a plan, but AIUI the hardware delivery has been pushed back
[19:24] <tsimonq2> Okay, that makes sense. Is it emulated on amd64?
[19:24] <vorlon> yes
[19:24] <vorlon> (though in principle the host architecture should be irrelevant)
[19:26] <tsimonq2> Got it. I'll try this tomorrow to see if I get anywhere, thanks!
[19:26] <vorlon> anyway, it was qemu before the move to bos03 and it's qemu afterwards, so figuring out what changed in the qemu in the process is very relevant!
[19:27] <vorlon> one difference AIUI is that the builders are now deployed via openstack instead of manually
[19:27] <tsimonq2> I suspect the Launchpad team documented that (and if they didn't before, they probably will now ;) )
[19:27] <tsimonq2> vorlon: What kind of difference does that make?
[19:28] <vorlon> tsimonq2: it means figuring out the actual commandline being used might have to involve getting an IS admin with access to the compute notes to empirically check what the commandline is
[19:28] <vorlon> (launchpad team are not admins on the cloud, they're tenants)
[19:29] <tsimonq2> Ah, right, I remember learning that (tenant vs admin) recently.
[19:30] <tsimonq2> Thanks again for your help - and if we do get that information, let me know, I'd like to give it a try too. :)
[19:32] <tsimonq2> Side note, generally for ubuntu-archive: I did https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/language-pack-kde-en/1:19.10.0ubuntu2 and friends yesterday, and moved the Section from translations to localization per Debian Policy. I know when I've set up my local Launchpad instance with Soyuz that archive admins can override the section manually; my question is, is there some Automagic there or is that a
[19:32] <tsimonq2> manual move?
[19:33] <vorlon> sections are initially set from the control field in the package on initial publication; after that the sections can be managed by an AA with `change-override -x`, which pokes overrides into the launchpad db that are used for subsequent index generation
[19:34] <tsimonq2> Sounds good, I'll file a bug with the details and an AA can follow up there. Thanks again!
[19:37] <vorlon> tsimonq2: you are welcome to file a bug, but why do you care about the section at all?
[19:38] <tsimonq2> I don't, just figured I'd DTRT. :)
[19:39] <tsimonq2> (All of those are ancient debhelper 8 packages, so there is likely bigger fish to fry.)
[19:51] <vorlon> tsimonq2: nothing in Ubuntu cares about section, except for "metapackages".  There are likely to be a large number of discrepancies nowadays between the source packages and the archive.  And even if we reconciled them now, they'd drift again over time, given the way launchpad overrides currently work.  I don't think it's worth spending time playing whack-a-mole here
[19:51] <tsimonq2> vorlon: Sounds good, thanks for the info!
[20:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: edubuntu-meta [amd64] (noble-proposed/universe) [24.04.3] (no packageset)
[20:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: edubuntu-meta [arm64] (noble-proposed/universe) [24.04.3] (no packageset)
[20:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: edubuntu-meta [armhf] (noble-proposed/universe) [24.04.3] (no packageset)
[20:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: edubuntu-meta [ppc64el] (noble-proposed/universe) [24.04.3] (no packageset)
[20:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: edubuntu-meta [s390x] (noble-proposed/universe) [24.04.3] (no packageset)
[20:21] <Eickmeyer> vorlon: ^ Working on a minimal install for edubuntu, this one actually has contents. Just needs an ack if you don't mind. :)
[20:22] <Eickmeyer> (I'll need to do another upload for the dependencies of the non-minimal seed to depend on the minimal)
[20:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted edubuntu-meta [amd64] (noble-proposed) [24.04.3]
[20:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted edubuntu-meta [arm64] (noble-proposed) [24.04.3]
[20:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted edubuntu-meta [armhf] (noble-proposed) [24.04.3]
[20:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted edubuntu-meta [ppc64el] (noble-proposed) [24.04.3]
[20:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted edubuntu-meta [s390x] (noble-proposed) [24.04.3]
[20:25] <Eickmeyer> ta
[20:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted python-pyasyncore [source] (noble-proposed) [1.0.2-0ubuntu1]
[20:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: python-pyasyncore [amd64] (noble-proposed/none) [1.0.2-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[20:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted python-pyasyncore [amd64] (noble-proposed) [1.0.2-0ubuntu1]
[22:23] <ricotz> vorlon, hi, please could you reject the libreoffice SRU uploads in the lunar and mantic queues?
[22:45] <vorlon> ricotz: done
[22:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected libreoffice [source] (lunar-proposed) [4:7.5.9-0ubuntu0.23.04.1]
[22:46] <ricotz> vorlon, thanks!
[22:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected libreoffice [source] (mantic-proposed) [4:7.6.4-0ubuntu0.23.10.1]
[22:52] <vorlon> Eickmeyer: well we have yet to build an Ubuntu Studio image using livecd-rootfs >= 24.04.8, we might want that to happen and have someone test that it works before moving on to switching edubuntu
[22:53] <Eickmeyer> vorlon: Fair, but the MR is there anyhow. I probably should've started with Edubuntu since it's closer to Ubuntu Desktop than Studio is, although Studio will be a nice canary to see how a KDE Plasma desktop will respond.
[22:54] <vorlon> also, my understanding is that the ubuntu-desktop-installer snap is supposed to be extended so that flavors will provide it config rather than shipping a separate snap.  Are edubuntu-desktop-installer and ubuntustudio-system-installer intended to be temporary?
[22:55] <Eickmeyer> vorlon: No, that's simply not true. ubuntu-flavor-installer exists for that purpose. https://github.com/canonical/ubuntu-flavor-installer
[22:55] <vorlon> and how about I do PROPOSED=1 build of Ubuntu Studio so we get some results without waiting for migration
[22:55] <Eickmeyer> vorlon: Sounds good.
[22:56] <vorlon> Eickmeyer: so that directly contradicts what I was told, and making flavors build and maintain their own snaps for something that SHOULD be a simple matter of configuration is flaming garbage.  I'll follow up on this internally
[22:57] <vorlon> (but it's December, I'm actually already EOY, so this may not happen until January)
[22:58] <vorlon> tsimonq2: lubuntu-update-notifier SRU ping
[22:58] <Eickmeyer> vorlon: Sounds good. Yeah, I was taken aback too, but the structure of Github is nice in that dependabot keeps the internals of ubuntu-desktop-installer up-to-date automatically, Launchpad syncs it, and then it automatically builds a snap which is then uploaded to the edge part of the snap in the store, so it's not as bad as it *could* have been.
[23:03] <vorlon> Eickmeyer: here we go, something for debugging https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-cdimage/+livefs/ubuntu/noble/ubuntustudio/+build/544166
[23:04] <Eickmeyer> vorlon: That's an odd one. What would've caused that?
[23:05] <vorlon> Eickmeyer: something somewhere is causing things to be done prior to the ubuntustudio-dvd case block starting on line 866
[23:06] <vorlon> it's not immediately obvious to me what/where
[23:06] <vorlon> ah
[23:06] <vorlon>                 case $PROJECT in
[23:06] <vorlon>                         ubuntu-server|ubuntu-wsl|ubuntu-oem|ubuntu|\
[23:06] <vorlon>                         ubuntu-budgie|ubuntustudio)
[23:06] <vorlon> needs to be ubuntustudio-dvd
[23:08] <vorlon> livecd-rootfs 24.04.10 uploaded
[23:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: golang-github-ghjm-cmdline [amd64] (noble-proposed/none) [0.1.2-1] (no packageset)
[23:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haproxy-cmd [amd64] (noble-proposed/none) [0.0.2] (no packageset)
[23:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: golang-github-inetaf-tcpproxy [amd64] (noble-proposed/none) [0.0~git20231102.2862066-1] (no packageset)
[23:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: golang-sourcehut-rockorager-go-jmap [amd64] (noble-proposed/none) [0.4.4-1] (no packageset)
[23:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: jruby-mavengem [amd64] (noble-proposed/none) [2.0.1-1] (no packageset)
[23:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted golang-github-ghjm-cmdline [amd64] (noble-proposed) [0.1.2-1]
[23:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted golang-sourcehut-rockorager-go-jmap [amd64] (noble-proposed) [0.4.4-1]
[23:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted jruby-mavengem [amd64] (noble-proposed) [2.0.1-1]
[23:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted golang-github-inetaf-tcpproxy [amd64] (noble-proposed) [0.0~git20231102.2862066-1]
[23:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haproxy-cmd [amd64] (noble-proposed) [0.0.2]
[23:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted firmware-sof [source] (mantic-proposed) [2.2.6-1ubuntu1.3]
[23:55] <deathcollege_> list
[23:56] <deathcollege_> not the right command sry