[00:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted firmware-sof [source] (jammy-proposed) [2.0-1ubuntu4.5]
[01:36] <vorlon> Eickmeyer: that gets a bit further https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-cdimage/+livefs/ubuntu/noble/ubuntustudio/+build/544331
[01:37] <Eickmeyer> vorlon: Looks like it didn't install the kernel.
[05:32] <vorlon> Eickmeyer: https://cdimage.ubuntu.com/ubuntustudio/dvd/20231209.1/ is some kind of something, then
[05:32] <vorlon> (built w/ livecd-rootfs from -proposed, and maybe it does something useful)
[05:33] <Eickmeyer> Oh! Nice!
[06:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted zemberek-ooo [source] (jammy-proposed) [1.0~rc2-10.4ubuntu1]
[06:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted mesa [source] (jammy-proposed) [23.2.1-1ubuntu3.1~22.04.1]
[06:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted update-manager [source] (jammy-proposed) [1:22.04.18]
[06:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: fonts-sahel [amd64] (noble-proposed/universe) [3.4.0-2ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[07:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted oem-somerville-muk-meta [sync] (jammy-proposed) [22.04~ubuntu1]
[07:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: oem-somerville-muk-meta [amd64] (jammy-proposed/none) [22.04~ubuntu1] (canonical-oem-metapackages)
[07:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted oem-somerville-marill-meta [sync] (jammy-proposed) [22.04~ubuntu1]
[07:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: oem-somerville-marill-meta [amd64] (jammy-proposed/none) [22.04~ubuntu1] (canonical-oem-metapackages)
[07:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: rejected oem-somerville-arcanine-meta [sync] (jammy-proposed) [22.04~ubuntu1]
[07:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted oem-somerville-marill-meta [amd64] (jammy-proposed) [22.04~ubuntu1]
[07:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted oem-sutton-bartek-meta [sync] (jammy-proposed) [22.04~ubuntu1]
[07:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted oem-somerville-muk-meta [amd64] (jammy-proposed) [22.04~ubuntu1]
[07:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: oem-sutton-bartek-meta [amd64] (jammy-proposed/none) [22.04~ubuntu1] (canonical-oem-metapackages)
[07:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: rejected oem-somerville-chansey-meta [sync] (jammy-proposed) [22.04~ubuntu1]
[08:41] <LocutusOfBorg> kanashiro, hello, ready for a ruby3.1 merge/sync? I can't understand if the delta can be dropped or not...
[17:13] <Eickmeyer> vorlon: So good news and bad news. The good news is it works, the bad news is it boots to a black screen where there should be a "try/install" screen, and this is due to a known bug where the installer is depending on gnome-shell. kenvandine had made us aware during a flavor sync, I'm just surprised it hadn't been fixed yet.
[17:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-microformats [amd64] (noble-proposed/universe) [0.6.0-3] (no packageset)
[17:32] <vorlon> Eickmeyer: ok.  do you want to stick with this as-is and move forward, or do you want to roll back?
[17:33] <vorlon> Eickmeyer: and do you want to land the edubuntu stuff now which I guess will also be affected
[17:33] <Eickmeyer> vorlon: Let's stick with this as-is, I'm going to poke people ad-nauseum until we can get this fixed. This was a priority thing when I talked to them during the flavor sync in September.
[17:33] <Eickmeyer> vorlon: Let's land the edubuntu stuff which will *not* be affected since it has gnome-shell.
[17:34] <vorlon> ok
[17:35] <Eickmeyer> Budgie even has gnome-shell components so it wasn't affected.
[17:35] <vorlon> Eickmeyer: can you rebase your patch for that? since you're changing a line I already had to edit for ubuntustudio ("ubuntustudio" -> "ubuntustudio-dvd")
[17:36] <Eickmeyer> Oh, sure. I thought I had, let me see what went wrong.
[17:40] <vorlon> Eickmeyer: also you've got a cut'n'paste error there, which would switch edubuntu to use the lowlatency kernel...
[17:40] <Eickmeyer> vorlon: Oops! Ha! on it.
[17:43] <Eickmeyer> vorlon: The version I have is rebased: Line 898: 		add_task standard.live ubuntustudio-dvd-live
[17:44] <Eickmeyer> If you look at the diff that line doesn't change.
[17:44] <vorlon> Eickmeyer: I'm talking about the first chunk of the diff
[17:48] <Eickmeyer> vorlon: Line 559?
[17:48] <vorlon> yes
[17:49] <vorlon> but I mean, just trying to do 'git rebase' is going to show you the conflict
[17:50] <Eickmeyer> I started from a clean clone.
[17:53] <Eickmeyer> But yes, I see the conflict. I wonder why I didn't get it when I did the clone.
[18:07] <Eickmeyer> vorlon: Now it's giving me a really nasty conflict. I'm going to take a mulligan on this (do-over).
[18:15] <Eickmeyer> vorlon: There we go, nice and clean.
[21:35] <doko> bdmurray: a lot of armhf autopkg tests in failed state show (like in https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-noble/noble/armhf/u/util-linux/20231202_165803_3a6b8@/log.gz)
[21:36] <doko> 190s badpkg: failed to call join for test specific package list, code 1
[21:36] <doko> 190s autopkgtest [16:57:57]: ERROR: erroneous package: failed to call join for test specific package list, code 1
[21:36] <doko> could the logs be scanned, and the tests retried?
[23:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted oem-somerville-quilladin-meta [sync] (jammy-proposed) [22.04~ubuntu1]
[23:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: oem-somerville-quilladin-meta [amd64] (jammy-proposed/main) [22.04~ubuntu1] (canonical-oem-metapackages)
[23:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted oem-somerville-hoppip-meta [sync] (jammy-proposed) [22.04~ubuntu1]