| arraybolt3 | ginggs: I'm working on satpy now. It does need a merge, but the merge seems to have fixed almost everything. There's one test failure I've not yet figured out, but I think we're close. Should hopefully have an upload ready before tomorrow (depending on timezones and all that). | 02:02 |
|---|---|---|
| tsimonq2 | arraybolt3: <3 | 02:16 |
| arraybolt3 | sooo... I've determined with a fair amount of certainty that satpy is not Python 3.12-ready. The one test failure remaining only happens on Python 3.12, it's a very obscure error about some sort of zero-dimension object (? no clue what that means but it doesn't sound like something was just deprecated and needs a small fix), and trying to install | 05:02 |
| arraybolt3 | upstream satpy using pip in a Python 3.12 venv within a Noble VM is failing quite badly because multiple dependencies are failing to build due to the use of a configparser feature deprecated in Python 3.12 | 05:02 |
| arraybolt3 | Ubuntu 22.04 has Python 3.11 and Python 3.10, is Noble expected to have 3.12 and 3.11? If so, would it be an acceptable solution to add a flag to satpy that say "this is Python 3.11 only" somehow? | 05:02 |
| arraybolt3 | I believe I finally have satpy working, have to do one last build to make sure that it works right with proposed in autopkgtesting. | 05:36 |
| arraybolt3 | ginggs: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/satpy/+bug/2046322 satpy fix finished and ready for review. | 06:17 |
| -ubottu:#ubuntu-devel- Launchpad bug 2046322 in satpy (Ubuntu) "Merge satpy from Debian" [High, New] | 06:18 | |
| arraybolt3 | Thanks for your patience while I figured out what was wrong, and for bringing the entanglement to my attention so I could help with it. :) | 06:18 |
| Stormer | Canonical needs to publish system requirements for Ubuntu. Its frustrating not being able to find them and is a red flag Ubuntu sucks that I'm having headaches with it before even using it. | 10:40 |
| LocutusOfBorg | I syncd satpy arraybolt3 | 10:43 |
| LocutusOfBorg | Stormer, https://ubuntu.com/server/docs/installation#:~:text=CPU%3A%201%20gigahertz%20or%20better,a%20minimum%20of%202.5%20gigabytes | 10:43 |
| LocutusOfBorg | https://help.ubuntu.com/community/Installation/SystemRequirements | 10:44 |
| Stormer | LocutusOfBorg thanks, but that's for Ubuntu Server. | 10:44 |
| LocutusOfBorg | not the second one? | 10:44 |
| LocutusOfBorg | https://xubuntu.org/requirements/ | 10:44 |
| Stormer | LocutusOfBorg thanks, but that's for Xubuntu. | 10:45 |
| LocutusOfBorg | https://help.ubuntu.com/community/Installation#Minimal%20installations | 10:45 |
| seb128 | Stormer, https://ubuntu.com/download/desktop see 'Recommended system requirements'? | 10:45 |
| Stormer | LocutusOfBorg that page doesn't have any. | 10:45 |
| Stormer | seb128 thanks, but that is recommended system requirements, I just want the system requirements. | 10:46 |
| LocutusOfBorg | Stormer, what is the difference? | 10:46 |
| Stormer | LocutusOfBorg recommended system requirements is the recommended hardware for the best experience, system requirements are the minimum hardware requirements for it to work. | 10:47 |
| Stormer | LocutusOfBorg like this: https://ubuntu-mate.org/about/requirements/ | 10:48 |
| LocutusOfBorg | 2 GHz dual-core processor or better 4 GB system memory 25 GB of free hard drive space | 10:48 |
| LocutusOfBorg | this is already the bare minimum to have a useful user experience | 10:48 |
| Stormer | LocutusOfBorg that isn't the system requirements. 4 GB is a lot of RAM. Not even Windows 11 needs that much. | 10:49 |
| Stormer | Ok, my times up. This distro sucks ass bad | 10:49 |
| LocutusOfBorg | lol trolling people are trolling | 10:49 |
| Skia | trying to build a package from a `git-ubuntu` tree with `gbp buildpackage` and I get `dpkg-source: error: Version number suggests Ubuntu changes, but Maintainer: does not have Ubuntu address | 11:14 |
| Skia | how do I workaround that? | 11:14 |
| schopin | Skia: `update-maintainer` | 11:15 |
| Skia | thanks! | 11:15 |
| Skia | isn't it strange that this fail with a branch rebased on `ubuntu/devel`? | 11:16 |
| schopin | Skia: not especially. The ubuntu/devel branch might contain vanilla Debian package if it's in sync | 11:17 |
| Skia | seems legit | 11:18 |
| seb128 | @pilot in | 12:04 |
| === ChanServ changed the topic of #ubuntu-devel to: Archive: open | Devel of Ubuntu (not support) | Build failures: http://qa.ubuntuwire.com/ftbfs/ | #ubuntu for support and discussion of Focal-Mantic | Patch Pilots: seb128 | ||
| mirespace | vorlon: I'm fixing a FTBFS in heimdal (bug 2036253) similar to the one you fixed for krb5. I added as reviewer in the PR, if you have the time. | 12:07 |
| -ubottu:#ubuntu-devel- Bug 2036253 in heimdal (Ubuntu) "FTBFS: missing strl* symbols fail the build" [Undecided, In Progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/2036253 | 12:07 | |
| mirespace | vorlon:s/I added/I added you/ | 12:08 |
| LocutusOfBorg | mirespace, for some reasons I like to have no space between (optional) and the symbol... | 13:36 |
| LocutusOfBorg | and for noble there is an extra newline on changelog file | 13:37 |
| mirespace | LocutusOfBorg: Ok, changing it! Thanks for the extra pair of eye on the changelog | 13:53 |
| LocutusOfBorg | mirespace, if I can, I'm happy to sponsor | 13:55 |
| LocutusOfBorg | ping me, maybe with packages on a ppa | 13:56 |
| LocutusOfBorg | but as you prefer | 13:56 |
| mirespace | LocutusOfBorg: \o/ Thanks! I'll ping you when the changes are ready | 13:56 |
| LocutusOfBorg | usually I prefer a dsc on a ppa, this way I also check if it does build :D | 13:56 |
| LocutusOfBorg | and check build logs | 13:56 |
| mirespace | and uploaded again to ppa | 13:57 |
| LocutusOfBorg | ack | 13:57 |
| mirespace | I have a ppa: ppa:mirespace/heimdal-ftbfs-lp2036253 , but with the thing I have to correct from your input | 13:57 |
| mirespace | s/with/without/ | 13:57 |
| LocutusOfBorg | for me it's also ok to just correct by myself and upload, not big deal | 13:58 |
| mirespace | as you wish :) | 13:58 |
| mirespace | I cannot do the fix right now (entering in meeting) .. so if you want to change and upload, thanks a lot! | 13:59 |
| LocutusOfBorg | uploading | 13:59 |
| LocutusOfBorg | mirespace, noble is fine, I also removed an extra space at the end of changelog file, this is added by merge o matic, and when I find it, I delete | 14:02 |
| LocutusOfBorg | both sponsored | 14:06 |
| === arif-ali_ is now known as arif-ali | ||
| mirespace | Thank you LocutusOfBorg! | 14:32 |
| LocutusOfBorg | mirespace, please use https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates and convert your bug to have the SRU accepted for mantic... | 14:43 |
| * LocutusOfBorg has internet connection troubles, will go afk | 14:43 | |
| mirespace | totally... I will do, but now I have to go afk | 14:44 |
| LocutusOfBorg | thanks | 14:44 |
| * tsimonq2 passes seb128 some well-deserved coffee :) | 14:46 | |
| seb128 | tsimonq2, thanks :) | 14:46 |
| seb128 | @pilot out | 15:41 |
| === ChanServ changed the topic of #ubuntu-devel to: Archive: open | Devel of Ubuntu (not support) | Build failures: http://qa.ubuntuwire.com/ftbfs/ | #ubuntu for support and discussion of Focal-Mantic | Patch Pilots: N/A | ||
| athos | @pilot in | 16:54 |
| === ChanServ changed the topic of #ubuntu-devel to: Archive: open | Devel of Ubuntu (not support) | Build failures: http://qa.ubuntuwire.com/ftbfs/ | #ubuntu for support and discussion of Focal-Mantic | Patch Pilots: athos | ||
| mirespace | LocutusOfBorg: Preparing the SRU paperwork for heimdal, looking for something for the test plan, I look for binaries that uses that symbols | 18:55 |
| mirespace | and they don't like the symbols: | 18:55 |
| mirespace | i.e.: aklog --help | 18:55 |
| mirespace | aklog: symbol lookup error: aklog: undefined symbol: rk_strlcat, version HEIMDAL_ROKEN_1.0 | 18:55 |
| mirespace | ook.. after panic mode less-on and asking, it's a matter of rebuild the packages that uses those heimdal libraries | 19:33 |
| athos | @pilot out | 20:58 |
| === ChanServ changed the topic of #ubuntu-devel to: Archive: open | Devel of Ubuntu (not support) | Build failures: http://qa.ubuntuwire.com/ftbfs/ | #ubuntu for support and discussion of Focal-Mantic | Patch Pilots: N/A | ||
| eslerm | I am working on LP#2012440 and LP#2040321 to add compiler hardening flags to gcc-13 and dpkg | 21:09 |
| -ubottu:#ubuntu-devel- Launchpad bug 2012440 in gcc-13 (Ubuntu) "Please add -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=3 to default build flags" [High, New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/2012440 | 21:09 | |
| -ubottu:#ubuntu-devel- Launchpad bug 2040321 in gcc-13 (Ubuntu) "Please add -mbranch-protection=standard to default arm64 build flags" [High, New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/2040321 | 21:09 | |
| eslerm | I am building the arm64 locally to test -mbranch-protection, since that Launchpad build is running slow | 21:09 |
| eslerm | https://launchpad.net/~eslerm/+archive/ubuntu/compilerflags/+packages | 21:09 |
| eslerm | apologize to @mwhudson for not notifying this channel earlier | 21:09 |
| mwhudson | eslerm: eh i think what we and you are doing is not _super_ related | 22:48 |
| mwhudson | the point of doing the riscv with-tests rebuild is mostly just to find out where we are at the current time | 22:49 |
| mwhudson | i guess it would be interesting to include the flags that we expect to be the default for noble but eh. useful either way | 22:49 |
| eslerm | relieved to hear that :) | 22:55 |
| eslerm | -mbranch-protection=standard only applies to arm64 (and is already enabled in dpkg) and -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=3 instead of 2 shouldn't have a noticeable impact | 22:56 |
| eslerm | packages which misuse malloc_usable_size may have build issues using _FORTIFY_SOURCE=3 | 23:01 |
| eslerm | https://archlinux.org/todo/prepare-packages-for-d_fortify_source3/ | 23:01 |
| eslerm | I believe these cases are rare. The only two past exceptions I know about have been resolved (see LP comments) | 23:04 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!