=== guiverc2 is now known as guvierc === guvierc is now known as guiverc [09:03] Hello, I'm looking for a friend to demote libgitlab-api-v4-perl and libio-prompter-perl to Universe. libgitlab was a dependency of devscripts but it was dropped to suggests to avoid 2 or 3 new MIRs. [10:42] jbicha: your suggestion on using the same as libgegl-0.4-0.symbols for heimdal/openafs tools worked \o/. Thank you! [10:46] danilogondolfo, maybe on -release channel you might have bigger luck? [10:47] LocutusOfBorg, will try there thanks ;) [12:49] In case anyone has any last-minute EOY sponsorship requests from the Canonical side, I'm around from right now through US(/Central) EOD, feel free to ping me. [12:50] The sponsorship queue is at 0, flat. So, whoever is scheduled to patch pilot today, happy holidays. :) [12:51] (I'll still be around over the holidays, but will pivot my primary focus from development work, since I'm not sure there will be movement if something breaks...) [13:09] LocutusOfBorg: Uploaded new heimdal package for noble (also mantic, but maybe it doesn't qualify for SRU) at https://launchpad.net/~mirespace/+archive/ubuntu/heimdal-ftbfs-lp2036253/+sourcepub/15539233/+listing-archive-extra [13:10] diff attached to the bug also [13:15] mirespace: if it's FTBFS it definitely qualifies for an SRU, since it makes security fixes impossible without fixing it. [13:16] schopin: It makes senses to me too, but I don't know because the rebuild of openafs (rebuilding in supported version?) .. anyway, I prepared it too [13:19] well, you need to be a bit more discriminate in the SRU, I guess. For instance I see in your changelog something "to prevent further skew" that I wouldn't include in an SRU. [13:21] schopin: You're totally right with that ... _me backporting the noble changelog :$ _ [13:22] * schopin goes back to minding his own business :P [13:22] schopin: No, no... its totally fine... I appreciate your comments a lot :) [13:23] thank you! [13:23] mirespace, uploaded [13:23] for heimdal/noble [13:23] LocutusOfBorg: Thank you! [13:24] also uploaded a no change rebuild of openafs, I want to see the failure on the build logs, or autopkgtest logs [13:28] LocotusOfBorg: I got this in the same ppa as I uploaded heimdal packages: https://dpaste.com/7MN6V5BX9 , but I hadn't time to research it [13:52] mirespace, false positive [13:52] I think it was due to dpkg defaulting to FORTIFY=3, but gcc not yet rebuilt on top of it [13:52] now that error is only left on arm64, and gcc is publishing there [13:52] soooooooooo a rebuild should "fix it" [13:53] we discussed probably there or in release dr [13:56] LocotusOfBorg: nice [13:58] fwiw, that was vaguely discussed here yesterday [14:24] btw mirespace schopin, this error was really vague w.r.t. dpkg changes [14:34] * sudip saw tsimonq2 was unhappy with the sponsorship queue being at 0, so added 1 === jfsimon1981_c is now known as jfsimon [15:44] sudip: As a common point, I always tell people, "increase the verbosity of What Could Go Wrong" if I see "this has very little chance of regressing." Looking at your actual diff now. :) [15:45] sudip: I have some more minor modifications to make to your DEP-3 header. ;) [15:45] Otherwise, seems reasonable, uploading and letting the SRU team decide from here. [15:45] ohh.. I thought I dep-3 was ok this time [15:46] It *is* okay technically speaking, I'll just show you a few tricks for extra verbosity. :) [15:46] sudip: Also... "But Focal, Jammy, Lunar and Mantic are still affected." - the SRU team will likely want diffs for all of these releases. [15:47] diff will be same, I will just need to test on those releases first. will do after I am back from $dayjob today [15:48] Sounds good! Here's what I'll do: I'll make the tweaks to the DEP-3 header, let you know what they are, and upload this one to Mantic. [15:49] You've been pretty on top of things so far, so I'll trust that you'll have some followup diffs for me Very Soon. Usually I'd wait, but I doubt we'll see movement from the SRU team a) on a Friday and b) right before EOY. [15:54] I honestly doubt there will be any accepted SRUs over the next 2 1/2-ish weeks for that reason. [15:55] Yeah, it's unfortunate that there really aren't many (if any) community members on the SRU team, otherwise I don't think we'd come to a complete halt for two weeks... [15:55] Anyway... [15:56] sudip: So, in an ideal world, if I was to be really nitpicky, this is what the patch would look like: https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/DVH3htsR3v/ [15:56] sudip: The patch you have works, and as far as I can tell, is DEP-3 compliant. Figured I'd just let you in on some of the extra stuff I usually see. :) [15:57] ahh.. ok. other DEP-3 headers.. [15:57] sudip: Also, if the patch you're working with is the one currently applied by quilt (and at the top of the stack), if it doesn't have a patch header, quilt header --dep3 -e will insert a template for you. :) [15:58] Anyway, besides my nitpicks that I'm using to give you some wider context, it's all good I think :) [15:58] Thanks for your work. [15:59] thanks for looking [15:59] * sudip will add the other debdiffs in about 2.5 hours [16:00] Sounds good, I'll circle back then! 😁 [16:02] Hi folks! Could somebody with permissions hit retry on this build (https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/open-iscsi/2.1.9-3ubuntu1/+build/27188801), please? :) [16:03] tsimonq2, sudip: To be clear, it does affect Lunar, Mantic, and Noble now? [16:03] Eickmeyer: read up, already covered ;) [16:03] mateus-morais: Looking. [16:03] tsimonq2: Marking the bug appropriately. [16:03] Eickmeyer: just did [16:04] like 30 seconds ago :) [16:04] mateus-morais: . [16:04] looking at other arches, will . too [16:04] tsimonq2: Psh. 👨 🚌 💨 [16:04] Eickmeyer: Looks like my coffee is stronger than yours today. ;) [16:05] tsimonq2: Probably hasn't kicked in yet. :P [16:05] XD [16:05] tsimonq2: I'm just waiting on gcc-13 13.2.0-9ubuntu1 to build on riscv64 to retry that one as well. Thanks!! [16:05] mateus-morais: I did it anyway, but I'll be around for a while, so feel free to ping me again when you're ready for that one. (I sponsored it, I should probably help follow up, eh? ;) ) [16:05] Anyway, thanks for your work on this! [16:06] tsimonq2: will do, and thanks for sponsoring! :) [16:06] Of course! [16:51] tsimonq2: did you get a buildlog by any chance? The arm64 build failed but I don't see a log on launchpad [16:52] mateus-morais: Negative, retrying again. [17:05] tsimonq2: worked this time, thanks! :) [17:06] <3 [18:10] tsimonq2: still there? added all the debdiffs to LP: #1875642 [18:10] -ubottu:#ubuntu-devel- Launchpad bug 1875642 in fsvs (Ubuntu Mantic) "[SRU] FSVS - not able to commit changes to remote HTTP SVN repo" [Medium, In Progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1875642 [18:10] iiuc, I will need to remove myself from the "Assigned to" field [19:28] mirespace, openafs-client : Depends: libroken19-heimdal (= 1.8.10-1ubuntu5) but 7.8.git20221117.28daf24+dfsg-3ubuntu3 is to be installed [19:32] I think I uploaded a fix [19:32] please check [19:40] tsimonq2: you going to be around for a bit more to maybe help with a merge sponsorship? [19:40] if so I may soon have an openMSX diff to throw at you [19:41] also don't forget Qtilitools in Debian, I think you mentioned handing that to LocutusOfBorg? [20:00] arraybolt3, not sure what is the context [20:00] if you need something to sponsor ping [20:03] arraybolt3: I didn't ping him yet :D [20:03] sudip: Yeah, I'm floating around. I still don't disagree with the "unassign yourself" rule but someone has yet to make an argument for why, so I can understand. :P [20:03] *agree [20:04] tsimonq2: sorry :P [20:04] LocutusOfBorg: Was looking to see if you would be interested in sponsoring a source NEW package for arraybolt3 to Debian, for some diversity in sponsors? [20:04] arraybolt3: no worries :) [20:04] arraybolt3: Where was the VCS link for that again? [20:04] sure [20:04] * arraybolt3 digs in Salsa [20:04] https://salsa.debian.org/ArrayBolt3/qtilitools [20:06] oh how I hate that autopkgtest doesn't run apt full-upgrade in a container before trying to run [20:07] er apt update I mean [20:07] arraybolt3: ? It should [20:08] it doesn't on my machine [20:08] tsimonq2: well, the wiki says - The Assignment should be "Nobody". ref: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MOTU/Sponsorship/SponsorsQueue [20:08] does it need a particular autopkgtest switch on the command line? [20:08] (I have it being called automatically in my ~/.sbuildrc) [20:08] arraybolt3: no, show your work [20:08] sudip: Yeah, that's the second time in the last week or so I've seen that link, and still don't understand *why* someone put that there. :P [20:09] ooi, why is that qtilitools marked as libdevel ? [20:09] bdmurray: https://termbin.com/cmoy [20:09] all tests run in the infrastructure call autopkgtest with --apt-upgrade [20:09] https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-noble/noble/amd64/g/gzip/20231214_103204_2b072@/log.gz [20:10] https://termbin.com/o6gt1 [20:10] so yes, it does need an extra switch [20:10] my sbuildrc doesn't have that [20:10] * arraybolt3 goes and fixes [20:10] sudip: 1.2.9-2ubuntu0.22.04.3.1> you have the right idea... ;) correcting to 1.2.9-2ubuntu0.22.04.3 [20:12] (Bah, Version Numbers Are Cheap ™) [20:13] sudip: All set. Thank you so much for your patience and help here! Please keep the patches coming :D [20:14] tsimonq2: thanks for sponsoring, but why did you correct the version to 1.2.9-2ubuntu0.22.04.3 ? [20:14] sudip: So, what I *meant* to do was correct it to 1.2.9-2ubuntu0.22.04.1 - that one's my fault. :P [20:15] That being said, you usually don't see 1.2.9-2ubuntu0.22.04.3.1 unless 1.2.9-2ubuntu0.22.04.3 was in the release pocket on release day. [20:15] (You'd just increment 3 -> 4, 4 -> 5, etc.) [20:16] ok [20:21] sudip: By the way, it's been fixed now, the upload to actually be reviewed has the version 1.2.9-2ubuntu0.22.04.1 :) [20:22] * tsimonq2 passes rbasak some Christmas/Holiday cookies [20:22] yeah, saw that chat in #ubuntu-release [20:22] Sweet :) [20:22] * sudip thought rbasak has started his holiday [20:23] Soon :) [20:24] ❄ 🎉 [20:35] arraybolt3, is it ready to go? I would prefer a dsc if possible, even to ubuntu ppa, this way I can grab also orig tarball and so [20:35] (also mentors.debian.net is fine) [20:40] tsimonq2: is there a reason you uploaded livecd-rootfs without committing to git? [20:45] vorlon: The MP was against the git-ubuntu branch; fixed. [20:45] LocutusOfBorg: It is ready to go. I can provide a dsc, I just thought those were rather easy to generate and that a Git repo would be the preferred modifiable and reviewable form. [20:46] But yeah, I can make a source package if that's easier to work with. [21:01] LocutusOfBorg: https://launchpad.net/~arraybolt3/+archive/ubuntu/qtilitools [21:49] arraybolt3, . [22:06] LocutusOfBorg: Thank you kindly!