[09:03] <danilogondolfo> Hello, I'm looking for a friend to demote libgitlab-api-v4-perl and libio-prompter-perl to Universe. libgitlab was a dependency of devscripts but it was dropped to suggests to avoid 2 or 3 new MIRs.
[10:42] <mirespace> jbicha: your suggestion on using the same as libgegl-0.4-0.symbols for heimdal/openafs tools worked \o/. Thank you!
[10:46] <LocutusOfBorg> danilogondolfo, maybe on -release channel you might have bigger luck?
[10:47] <danilogondolfo> LocutusOfBorg, will try there thanks ;)
[12:49] <tsimonq2> In case anyone has any last-minute EOY sponsorship requests from the Canonical side, I'm around from right now through US(/Central) EOD, feel free to ping me.
[12:50] <tsimonq2> The sponsorship queue is at 0, flat. So, whoever is scheduled to patch pilot today, happy holidays. :)
[12:51] <tsimonq2> (I'll still be around over the holidays, but will pivot my primary focus from development work, since I'm not sure there will be movement if something breaks...)
[13:09] <mirespace>  LocutusOfBorg: Uploaded new heimdal package for noble (also mantic, but maybe it doesn't qualify for SRU) at https://launchpad.net/~mirespace/+archive/ubuntu/heimdal-ftbfs-lp2036253/+sourcepub/15539233/+listing-archive-extra
[13:10] <mirespace> diff attached to the bug also
[13:15] <schopin> mirespace: if it's FTBFS it definitely qualifies for an SRU, since it makes security fixes impossible without fixing it.
[13:16] <mirespace> schopin: It makes senses to me too, but I don't know because the rebuild of openafs (rebuilding in supported version?) .. anyway, I prepared it too
[13:19] <schopin> well, you need to be a bit more discriminate in the SRU, I guess. For instance I see in your changelog something "to prevent further skew" that I wouldn't include in an SRU.
[13:21] <mirespace> schopin: You're totally right with that ... _me backporting the noble changelog :$ _
[13:22]  * schopin goes back to minding his own business :P
[13:22] <mirespace> schopin: No, no... its totally fine... I appreciate your comments a lot :)
[13:23] <mirespace> thank you!
[13:23] <LocutusOfBorg> mirespace, uploaded
[13:23] <LocutusOfBorg> for heimdal/noble
[13:23] <mirespace> LocutusOfBorg: Thank you!
[13:24] <LocutusOfBorg> also uploaded a no change rebuild of openafs, I want to see the failure on the build logs, or autopkgtest logs
[13:28] <mirespace> LocotusOfBorg: I got this in the same ppa as I uploaded heimdal packages: https://dpaste.com/7MN6V5BX9 , but I hadn't time to research it
[13:52] <LocutusOfBorg> mirespace, false positive
[13:52] <LocutusOfBorg> I think it was due to dpkg defaulting to FORTIFY=3, but gcc not yet rebuilt on top of it
[13:52] <LocutusOfBorg> now that error is only left on arm64, and gcc is publishing there
[13:52] <LocutusOfBorg> soooooooooo a rebuild should "fix it"
[13:53] <LocutusOfBorg> we discussed probably there or in release dr
[13:56] <mirespace> LocotusOfBorg: nice
[13:58] <schopin> fwiw, that was vaguely discussed here yesterday
[14:24] <LocutusOfBorg> btw mirespace schopin, this error was really vague w.r.t. dpkg changes
[14:34]  * sudip saw tsimonq2 was unhappy with the sponsorship queue being at 0, so added 1
[15:44] <tsimonq2> sudip: As a common point, I always tell people, "increase the verbosity of What Could Go Wrong" if I see "this has very little chance of regressing." Looking at your actual diff now. :)
[15:45] <tsimonq2> sudip: I have some more minor modifications to make to your DEP-3 header. ;)
[15:45] <tsimonq2> Otherwise, seems reasonable, uploading and letting the SRU team decide from here.
[15:45] <sudip> ohh.. I thought I dep-3 was ok this time
[15:46] <tsimonq2> It *is* okay technically speaking, I'll just show you a few tricks for extra verbosity. :)
[15:46] <tsimonq2> sudip: Also... "But Focal, Jammy, Lunar and Mantic are still affected." - the SRU team will likely want diffs for all of these releases.
[15:47] <sudip> diff will be same, I will just need to test on those releases first. will do after I am back from $dayjob today
[15:48] <tsimonq2> Sounds good! Here's what I'll do: I'll make the tweaks to the DEP-3 header, let you know what they are, and upload this one to Mantic.
[15:49] <tsimonq2> You've been pretty on top of things so far, so I'll trust that you'll have some followup diffs for me Very Soon. Usually I'd wait, but I doubt we'll see movement from the SRU team a) on a Friday and b) right before EOY.
[15:54] <Eickmeyer> I honestly doubt there will be any accepted SRUs over the next 2 1/2-ish weeks for that reason.
[15:55] <tsimonq2> Yeah, it's unfortunate that there really aren't many (if any) community members on the SRU team, otherwise I don't think we'd come to a complete halt for two weeks...
[15:55] <tsimonq2> Anyway...
[15:56] <tsimonq2> sudip: So, in an ideal world, if I was to be really nitpicky, this is what the patch would look like: https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/DVH3htsR3v/
[15:56] <tsimonq2> sudip: The patch you have works, and as far as I can tell, is DEP-3 compliant. Figured I'd just let you in on some of the extra stuff I usually see. :)
[15:57] <sudip> ahh.. ok. other DEP-3 headers..
[15:57] <tsimonq2> sudip: Also, if the patch you're working with is the one currently applied by quilt (and at the top of the stack), if it doesn't have a patch header, quilt header --dep3 -e will insert a template for you. :)
[15:58] <tsimonq2> Anyway, besides my nitpicks that I'm using to give you some wider context, it's all good I think :)
[15:58] <tsimonq2> Thanks for your work.
[15:59] <sudip> thanks for looking
[15:59]  * sudip will add the other debdiffs in about 2.5 hours
[16:00] <tsimonq2> Sounds good, I'll circle back then! 😁
[16:02] <mateus-morais> Hi folks! Could somebody with permissions hit retry on this build (https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/open-iscsi/2.1.9-3ubuntu1/+build/27188801), please? :)
[16:03] <Eickmeyer> tsimonq2, sudip: To be clear, it does affect Lunar, Mantic, and Noble now?
[16:03] <tsimonq2> Eickmeyer: read up, already covered ;)
[16:03] <tsimonq2> mateus-morais: Looking.
[16:03] <Eickmeyer> tsimonq2: Marking the bug appropriately.
[16:03] <tsimonq2> Eickmeyer: just did
[16:04] <tsimonq2> like 30 seconds ago :)
[16:04] <tsimonq2> mateus-morais: .
[16:04] <tsimonq2> looking at other arches, will . too
[16:04] <Eickmeyer> tsimonq2: Psh. 👨 🚌 💨
[16:04] <tsimonq2> Eickmeyer: Looks like my coffee is stronger than yours today. ;)
[16:05] <Eickmeyer> tsimonq2: Probably hasn't kicked in yet. :P
[16:05] <tsimonq2> XD
[16:05] <mateus-morais> tsimonq2: I'm just waiting on gcc-13 13.2.0-9ubuntu1 to build on riscv64 to retry that one as well. Thanks!!
[16:05] <tsimonq2> mateus-morais: I did it anyway, but I'll be around for a while, so feel free to ping me again when you're ready for that one. (I sponsored it, I should probably help follow up, eh? ;) )
[16:05] <tsimonq2> Anyway, thanks for your work on this!
[16:06] <mateus-morais> tsimonq2: will do, and thanks for sponsoring! :)
[16:06] <tsimonq2> Of course!
[16:51] <mateus-morais> tsimonq2: did you get a buildlog by any chance? The arm64 build failed but I don't see a log on launchpad
[16:52] <tsimonq2> mateus-morais: Negative, retrying again.
[17:05] <mateus-morais> tsimonq2: worked this time, thanks! :)
[17:06] <tsimonq2> <3
[18:10] <sudip> tsimonq2: still there? added all the debdiffs to LP: #1875642
[18:10] -ubottu:#ubuntu-devel- Launchpad bug 1875642 in fsvs (Ubuntu Mantic) "[SRU] FSVS - not able to commit changes to remote HTTP SVN repo" [Medium, In Progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1875642
[18:10] <sudip> iiuc, I will need to remove myself from the "Assigned to" field
[19:28] <LocutusOfBorg> mirespace,  openafs-client : Depends: libroken19-heimdal (= 1.8.10-1ubuntu5) but 7.8.git20221117.28daf24+dfsg-3ubuntu3 is to be installed
[19:32] <LocutusOfBorg> I think I uploaded a fix
[19:32] <LocutusOfBorg> please check
[19:40] <arraybolt3> tsimonq2: you going to be around for a bit more to maybe help with a merge sponsorship?
[19:40] <arraybolt3> if so I may soon have an openMSX diff to throw at you
[19:41] <arraybolt3> also don't forget Qtilitools in Debian, I think you mentioned handing that to LocutusOfBorg?
[20:00] <LocutusOfBorg> arraybolt3, not sure what is the context
[20:00] <LocutusOfBorg> if you need something to sponsor ping
[20:03] <tsimonq2> arraybolt3: I didn't ping him yet :D
[20:03] <tsimonq2> sudip: Yeah, I'm floating around. I still don't disagree with the "unassign yourself" rule but someone has yet to make an argument for why, so I can understand. :P
[20:03] <tsimonq2> *agree
[20:04] <arraybolt3> tsimonq2: sorry :P
[20:04] <tsimonq2> LocutusOfBorg: Was looking to see if you would be interested in sponsoring a source NEW package for arraybolt3 to Debian, for some diversity in sponsors?
[20:04] <tsimonq2> arraybolt3: no worries :)
[20:04] <tsimonq2> arraybolt3: Where was the VCS link for that again?
[20:04] <LocutusOfBorg> sure
[20:04]  * arraybolt3 digs in Salsa
[20:04] <arraybolt3> https://salsa.debian.org/ArrayBolt3/qtilitools
[20:06] <arraybolt3> oh how I hate that autopkgtest doesn't run apt full-upgrade in a container before trying to run
[20:07] <arraybolt3> er apt update I mean
[20:07] <bdmurray> arraybolt3: ? It should
[20:08] <arraybolt3> it doesn't on my machine
[20:08] <sudip> tsimonq2: well, the wiki says - The Assignment should be "Nobody". ref: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MOTU/Sponsorship/SponsorsQueue
[20:08] <arraybolt3> does it need a particular autopkgtest switch on the command line?
[20:08] <arraybolt3> (I have it being called automatically in my ~/.sbuildrc)
[20:08] <bdmurray> arraybolt3: no, show your work
[20:08] <tsimonq2> sudip: Yeah, that's the second time in the last week or so I've seen that link, and still don't understand *why* someone put that there. :P
[20:09] <sudip> ooi, why is that qtilitools marked as libdevel ?
[20:09] <arraybolt3> bdmurray: https://termbin.com/cmoy
[20:09] <bdmurray> all tests run in the infrastructure call autopkgtest with --apt-upgrade
[20:09] <bdmurray> https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-noble/noble/amd64/g/gzip/20231214_103204_2b072@/log.gz
[20:10] <arraybolt3> https://termbin.com/o6gt1
[20:10] <arraybolt3> so yes, it does need an extra switch
[20:10] <arraybolt3> my sbuildrc doesn't have that
[20:10]  * arraybolt3 goes and fixes
[20:10] <tsimonq2> sudip: 1.2.9-2ubuntu0.22.04.3.1> you have the right idea... ;) correcting to 1.2.9-2ubuntu0.22.04.3
[20:12] <tsimonq2> (Bah, Version Numbers Are Cheap ™)
[20:13] <tsimonq2> sudip: All set. Thank you so much for your patience and help here! Please keep the patches coming :D
[20:14] <sudip> tsimonq2: thanks for sponsoring, but why did you correct the version to 1.2.9-2ubuntu0.22.04.3 ?
[20:14] <tsimonq2> sudip: So, what I *meant* to do was correct it to 1.2.9-2ubuntu0.22.04.1 - that one's my fault. :P
[20:15] <tsimonq2> That being said, you usually don't see 1.2.9-2ubuntu0.22.04.3.1 unless 1.2.9-2ubuntu0.22.04.3 was in the release pocket on release day.
[20:15] <tsimonq2> (You'd just increment 3 -> 4, 4 -> 5, etc.)
[20:16] <sudip> ok
[20:21] <tsimonq2> sudip: By the way, it's been fixed now, the upload to actually be reviewed has the version 1.2.9-2ubuntu0.22.04.1 :)
[20:22]  * tsimonq2 passes rbasak some Christmas/Holiday cookies
[20:22] <sudip> yeah, saw that chat in #ubuntu-release
[20:22] <tsimonq2> Sweet :)
[20:22]  * sudip thought rbasak has started his holiday
[20:23] <rbasak> Soon :)
[20:24] <tsimonq2> ❄ 🎉
[20:35] <LocutusOfBorg> arraybolt3, is it ready to go? I would prefer a dsc if possible, even to ubuntu ppa, this way I can grab also orig tarball and so
[20:35] <LocutusOfBorg> (also mentors.debian.net is fine)
[20:40] <vorlon> tsimonq2: is there a reason you uploaded livecd-rootfs without committing to git?
[20:45] <tsimonq2> vorlon: The MP was against the git-ubuntu branch; fixed.
[20:45] <arraybolt3> LocutusOfBorg: It is ready to go. I can provide a dsc, I just thought those were rather easy to generate and that a Git repo would be the preferred modifiable and reviewable form.
[20:46] <arraybolt3> But yeah, I can make a source package if that's easier to work with.
[21:01] <arraybolt3> LocutusOfBorg: https://launchpad.net/~arraybolt3/+archive/ubuntu/qtilitools
[21:49] <LocutusOfBorg> arraybolt3, .
[22:06] <arraybolt3> LocutusOfBorg: Thank you kindly!