[01:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: open-vm-tools (lunar-proposed/main) [2:12.1.5-3ubuntu0.23.04.3 => 2:12.3.5-3~ubuntu0.23.04.1] (ubuntu-cloud, ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server)
[01:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: open-vm-tools (jammy-proposed/main) [2:12.1.5-3~ubuntu0.22.04.4 => 2:12.3.5-3~ubuntu0.22.04.1] (ubuntu-cloud, ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server)
[01:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: open-vm-tools (mantic-proposed/main) [2:12.3.0-1ubuntu0.1 => 2:12.3.5-3~ubuntu0.23.10.1] (ubuntu-cloud, ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server)
[10:01] <apw> xnox, hrm, so it is.  i've pinged the uploader to sort that out.
[10:49] <danilogondolfo> Hello, I'm looking for a friend to demote libgitlab-api-v4-perl and libio-prompter-perl to Universe. libgitlab was a dependency of devscripts but it was dropped to suggests to avoid 2 or 3 new MIRs.
[11:14] <apw> xnox, ok n-g-d-535 should be appearing shortly
[11:48] <LocutusOfBorg> doko, Missing build dependencies: gcc
[11:48] <LocutusOfBorg> will it auto heal?
[11:48] <LocutusOfBorg> https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nurpawiki/1.2.4-4build1/+build/27190033
[11:55] <apw> ricotz, thanks for the heads up, not sure how that happened; but it should be resolved
[11:56] <apw> ricotz, xnox, that update won't happen till the beginning of the year to allow for QA and LRM respins.
[12:00] <LocutusOfBorg> apw, can you please accept src:signon from queue?
[12:01] <LocutusOfBorg> err src:signond
[12:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: rejected linux-intel-opt [sync] (noble-proposed) [6.5.0-1003.3]
[12:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: rejected linux-signed-intel-opt [sync] (noble-proposed) [6.5.0-1003.3]
[12:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: rejected linux-meta-intel-opt [sync] (noble-proposed) [6.5.0.1003.3]
[12:20] <apw> LocutusOfBorg, and we know signond is a superset of our local signon package?
[12:20] <LocutusOfBorg> yes
[12:20] <LocutusOfBorg> checked with debdiff
[12:20] <LocutusOfBorg> one by one all the binaries
[12:20] <LocutusOfBorg> there is also discussion on the sponsorship bug btw
[12:22] <apw> LocutusOfBorg, yeah, i think everything is in order.
[12:22] <LocutusOfBorg> thanks!
[12:22] <LocutusOfBorg> I'll also bother once it migrates to remove the old binaryless source
[12:22] <LocutusOfBorg> :)
[12:23] <LocutusOfBorg> (also we could have avoided the delta by patching lto-disabled-list)
[12:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted signond [source] (noble-proposed) [8.61-1ubuntu1]
[12:23] <ahasenack> jbicha: I saw there was a regression in mutter 45.2, heavy stuttering in firefox. Do you want to halt that update?
[12:24] <ahasenack> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2046360
[12:24] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Launchpad bug 2046360 in mutter (Ubuntu) "Heavy stuttering in Firefox with mutter 45.1/45.2" [Undecided, New]
[12:25] <ahasenack> that was filed on the 13th, prior to the release :/
[12:32] <doko> LocutusOfBorg: I see other uninstallabilities, maybe something down the ocaml stack?
[12:34] <adrien> doko: do you have a link or two?
[12:34] <adrien> ah, nurpawiki
[12:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: linux-firmware (mantic-proposed/main) [20230919.git3672ccab-0ubuntu2.4 => 20230919.git3672ccab-0ubuntu2.5] (core, kernel)
[12:56] <doko> adrien: it built on retry
[13:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: linux-firmware (jammy-proposed/main) [20220329.git681281e4-0ubuntu3.23 => 20220329.git681281e4-0ubuntu3.24] (core, kernel)
[13:33] <jbicha> ahasenack: yes, let's pause phasing on mutter for mantic
[13:39] <ahasenack> jbicha: do you know where this file is? https://git.launchpad.net/ubuntu-archive-tools/tree/phased-updater#n765
[13:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: rustc-1.73 (noble-proposed/primary) [1.73.0+dfsg0ubuntu1-0ubuntu1]
[13:45] <schopin> xnox: FYI ^
[14:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted linux-firmware [source] (mantic-proposed) [20230919.git3672ccab-0ubuntu2.5]
[14:27] <doko> again some strange uninstallabilities: https://launchpadlibrarian.net/702905828/buildlog_ubuntu-noble-amd64.libuv1_1.46.0-2ubuntu1_BUILDING.txt.gz
[14:28] <doko> Calculating upgrade...
[14:28] <doko> The following packages were automatically installed and are no longer required:
[14:28] <doko>   cpp cpp-13 libasan8 libatomic1 libc-dev-bin libc6-dev libcc1-0 libcrypt-dev
[14:28] <doko>   libgcc-13-dev libgomp1 libhwasan0 libisl23 libitm1 liblsan0 libmpc3 libmpfr6
[14:28] <doko>   libnsl-dev libquadmath0 libstdc++-13-dev libtirpc-dev libtsan2 libubsan1
[14:28] <doko>   libunistring2 linux-libc-dev rpcsvc-proto
[14:28] <doko> Use 'sudo apt autoremove' to remove them.
[14:28] <doko> The following packages will be REMOVED:
[14:28] <doko>   build-essential* g++* g++-13* gcc* gcc-13*
[14:28] <doko> The following NEW packages will be installed:
[14:28] <doko>   libunistring5
[14:29] <doko> The following packages have unmet dependencies:
[14:29] <doko>  build-essential : Depends: gcc (>= 4:12.3) but it is not installable
[14:29] <doko>  g++ : Depends: gcc (= 4:13.2.0-2ubuntu1) but it is not installable
[14:29] <doko>        Depends: gcc-13 (>= 13.2.0-2~) but it is not installable
[14:29] <doko>  g++-13 : Depends: gcc-13 (= 13.2.0-9ubuntu1) but it is not installable
[14:29] <doko> E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages.
[14:29] <doko> apt-get failed.
[14:29] <doko> any idea why?
[14:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted linux-firmware [source] (jammy-proposed) [20220329.git681281e4-0ubuntu3.24]
[14:42] <jbicha> ahasenack: I know that bdmurray knows how to halt phasing
[14:42] <ahasenack> jbicha: yeah, I pinged him, it will be a few more hours I think
[14:43] <jbicha> ubuntu-release: ^
[14:44] <jbicha> ubuntu-archive: ^
[14:44] <jbicha> I don't remember anyone besides him handling phasing :(
[14:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: zfs-linux (lunar-proposed/main) [2.1.9-2ubuntu1.2 => 2.1.14-0ubuntu0.23.04.1] (core, kernel-dkms)
[14:49] <LocutusOfBorg> apw, if I can abuse your time once more, please kick src:signon out, now that signond migrated :)
[14:57] <seb128> ahasenack, jbicha, https://code.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-sru/+junk/phased-update-overrides
[14:57] <ahasenack> seb128: thx, I eventually found that, but I think that's the opposite of what we want: it's to let the phasing continue, no?
[15:05] <seb128> ahasenack, right, I guess that's something to document on https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#Phasing once you get answers
[15:05] <ahasenack> maybe it was in the blog post, that that is gone too
[15:06] <ahasenack> the linked blog post, I mean
[15:06] <seb128> right
[15:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: drbd-utils (jammy-proposed/main) [9.15.0-1build2 => 9.15.0-1ubuntu0.1] (ubuntu-server)
[15:33] <danilogondolfo> Anyone available to help me with demoting libgitlab-api-v4-perl and libio-prompter-perl to universe?
[15:40] <ahasenack> hi ubuntu-archive, could someone please set mutter's phasing to 0 on mantic, due to https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mutter/+bug/2046360 ?
[15:40] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Launchpad bug 2046360 in mutter (Ubuntu) "Heavy stuttering in Firefox with mutter 45.1/45.2" [Undecided, New]
[16:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: fsvs (mantic-proposed/universe) [1.2.9-2 => 1.2.9-2ubuntu0.23.10.1] (no packageset)
[16:53] <ahasenack> hi ubuntu-archive, could someone please set mutter's phasing to 0 on mantic, due to https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mutter/+bug/2046360 ?
[16:53] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Launchpad bug 2046360 in mutter (Ubuntu) "Heavy stuttering in Firefox with mutter 45.1/45.2" [Undecided, New]
[16:54] <ahasenack> apologies if done already, the report at https://ubuntu-archive-team.ubuntu.com/phased-updates.html still has a timestamp of 2023-12-15 12:20:36 UTC
[16:54] <tsimonq2> I don't think anyone is home, I don't see a response to your ping.
[16:55] <tsimonq2> (Seems critical enough for at least an ack.)
[16:55] <tsimonq2> ahasenack: You might have to try poking someone Internally, if you want this done before January...
[17:04] <bdmurray> Only AAs can manually adjust the phasing of a package.
[17:04] <tsimonq2> There's bdmurray :)
[17:04] <schopin> ... who's NOT an AA :/
[17:05] <bdmurray> use change-override in ubuntu-archive-tools with --percentage 0
[17:06] <tsimonq2> bdmurray should take it as a compliment that I already thought he was an AA, despite getting my hopes up. ;)
[17:08] <bdmurray> I keep thinking it would make sense to have another AA in the americas
[17:09] <bdmurray> Its effectively just Steve
[17:09] <tsimonq2> IMO, you'd be a pretty darn good candidate, if your plate isn't already full enough. Anyway, I digress.
[17:09] <bdmurray> My plate is so full stuff falls off it.
[17:10] <bdmurray> But I don't think there is an AA duty rotation so it would be fine.
[17:11] <ahasenack> even christian doesn't do much AA stuff yet
[17:12] <ahasenack> just the random ping
[17:12] <ahasenack> (as far as I know)
[17:12] <Eickmeyer> bdmurray: west coast best coast
[17:14] <tsimonq2> It's a general point too; if there were a few trusted community members in both the Archive Team and the Release Team, we wouldn't have the issue of having nobody to ping for two weeks because well, those people don't work for Canonical. The teams have "Ubuntu" in the name, for Pete's sake.
[17:15] <bdmurray> What package needs phasing stopped?
[17:15] <tsimonq2> bdmurray: mutter bug 2046360
[17:15] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Bug 2046360 in mutter (Ubuntu) "Heavy stuttering in Firefox with mutter 45.1/45.2" [Undecided, New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/2046360
[17:15] <bdmurray> for mantic?
[17:16] <tsimonq2> errrr bug 2043000 looks better - yes, for Mantic
[17:16] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Bug 2043000 in mutter (Ubuntu Mantic) "Update mutter to 45.2" [High, Fix Released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/2043000
[17:17] <bdmurray> lazr.restfulclient.errors.Unauthorized: HTTP Error 401: Unauthorized
[17:17] <bdmurray> change-override -s mantic-proposed mutter --percentage=0
[17:17] <bdmurray> ^- for whatever AA turns up
[17:20] <bdmurray> er mantic-updates
[17:24] <ahasenack> you also get 401 with mantic-updates? Just checking :)
[18:01] <bdmurray> ahasenack: yes, also with mantic-updates. ;-)
[18:04] <ahasenack> too bad
[19:51] <rbasak> we wouldn't have the issue of having nobody to ping for two weeks> I don't think that's the situation now. People are generally around. Just not right at this moment.
[19:52] <rbasak> If we need 24/7 AA coverage for this kind of situation, then that's something we can discuss. I don't think it's necessarily linked to the current memberships of AAs and the release team.
[19:55] <ahasenack> shouldn't phasing be under the control of the SRU team as well?
[19:55] <ahasenack> or at least release team?
[20:00] <rbasak> I've been aware for a while that we don't have a formal process or playbook to handle regression reports, and perhaps we should. As part of working that out, the ACLs for these things need to be considered.
[20:01] <rbasak> But I have too many things I'm driving at the moment to take that on as well. If somebody else wants to, please do.
[20:01] <rbasak> (and you don't need to formally be part of any team to do it either, as it's mainly about documentation and talking to people)
[20:06] <rbasak> Perhaps one of the people wanting to join one of these teams that is the subject of the TB thread "open process for new members" could take this on?
[20:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: fsvs (focal-proposed/universe) [1.2.7-1build2 => 1.2.7-1ubuntu0.1] (no packageset)
[20:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: fsvs (jammy-proposed/universe) [1.2.9-2 => 1.2.9-2ubuntu0.22.04.3] (no packageset)
[20:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: fsvs (lunar-proposed/universe) [1.2.9-2 => 1.2.9-2ubuntu0.23.04.1] (no packageset)
[20:14] <tsimonq2> 1.2.9-2ubuntu0.22.04.3> I realized my mistake immediately after the dput command finished. Don't know if it's hard policy, probably not, I'll roll the dice to see how pedantic the SRU team is feeling when they review it. :P
[20:14] <tsimonq2> (Should probably be 1.2.9-2ubuntu0.22.04.1 eh?)
[20:15] <rbasak> tsimonq2: just upload again over the top with the fixed version please. Let's not confuse others later when it's trivial to fix it now.
[20:16] <tsimonq2> rbasak: Not a problem, on it :)
[20:17] <tsimonq2> rbasak: Done. I really appreciate your quick feedback, thank you :)
[20:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: fsvs (jammy-proposed/universe) [1.2.9-2 => 1.2.9-2ubuntu0.22.04.1] (no packageset)
[20:19] <rbasak> Thanks. I just happened to be around :)
[20:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected fsvs [source] (jammy-proposed) [1.2.9-2ubuntu0.22.04.3]
[20:26] <vorlon> `change-override -s mantic-updates -S mutter -z 0 -y` fyi
[20:26] <vorlon> (done)
[20:27] <vorlon> is there a follow-up revert in process?
[20:27] <vorlon> ftr you want the -S to get all binaries from the mutter source package, not just the mutter binary
[20:28] <jbicha> vorlon: unfortunately I'm out of time today to do a new mutter upload. Would we want the new targeted mutter fix to wait for 7 days too?
[20:28] <vorlon> probably not
[20:28] <rbasak> Given the time I suggest that a straight revert is the safest thing to do right now.
[20:28] <jbicha> I haven't noticed the Firefox stuttering issue on my Firefox :/
[20:28] <rbasak> timing
[20:29] <rbasak> Anything else seems like it would be asking for trouble, _unless_ all the necessary people commit to being around.
[20:29] <jbicha> mutter 45.2 fixes important enough issues that I'd rather go forward than backwards
[20:32] <rbasak> It's up to whoever wants to take responsibility and do the work I guess (both uploader and SRU team member etc)
[20:33] <ahasenack> I will be around during the break
[20:33] <ahasenack> fwiw
[23:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: heatshrink [amd64] (noble-proposed/none) [0.4.1-1] (no packageset)
[23:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: heatshrink [ppc64el] (noble-proposed/none) [0.4.1-1] (no packageset)
[23:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: heatshrink [armhf] (noble-proposed/none) [0.4.1-1] (no packageset)
[23:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libdjconsole [ppc64el] (noble-proposed/none) [0.1.3-3.1] (no packageset)
[23:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libdjconsole [amd64] (noble-proposed/none) [0.1.3-3.1] (no packageset)
[23:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libdjconsole [armhf] (noble-proposed/none) [0.1.3-3.1] (no packageset)
[23:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libdjconsole [arm64] (noble-proposed/none) [0.1.3-3.1] (no packageset)
[23:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: heatshrink [arm64] (noble-proposed/none) [0.4.1-1] (no packageset)
[23:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libdbd-multi-perl [amd64] (noble-proposed/none) [1.02-1] (no packageset)
[23:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: session-token [amd64] (noble-proposed/none) [0.102-1] (no packageset)
[23:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: heatshrink [s390x] (noble-proposed/none) [0.4.1-1] (no packageset)
[23:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libdjconsole [s390x] (noble-proposed/none) [0.1.3-3.1] (no packageset)
[23:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: heatshrink [riscv64] (noble-proposed/none) [0.4.1-1] (no packageset)
[23:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libdjconsole [riscv64] (noble-proposed/none) [0.1.3-3.1] (no packageset)