/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2023/12/19/#ubuntu-release.txt

-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: soplex [armhf] (noble-proposed/universe) [6.0.3+dfsg-1] (no packageset)00:00
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-deluxe [riscv64] (noble-proposed/universe) [0.5.0-1] (no packageset)00:03
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: nanovg [riscv64] (noble-proposed/universe) [0.0~git20230826.f93799c+dfsg-1] (no packageset)00:04
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-libusb1-sys [riscv64] (noble-proposed/universe) [0.6.4-1] (no packageset)00:07
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: soplex [arm64] (noble-proposed/universe) [6.0.3+dfsg-1] (no packageset)00:08
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-libpulse-glib-binding [riscv64] (noble-proposed/universe) [2.28.1-1] (no packageset)00:12
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-pyo3-filelike [riscv64] (noble-proposed/universe) [0.2.0-1] (no packageset)00:12
vorlondoko: why have you added boost1.81 on i386?00:13
vorlonarraybolt3: "maybe sometime today" - definitely no guarantee on that, we're past EOY for all the Canonical folks (and none of the non-Canonical folks are particularly active).  And I have a number of other things I'm working on that are more urgent (like, launching a transition in Debian for 600 libraries for 64-bit time_t)00:20
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Removed boost1.81 from i386-whitelist in noble00:21
vorlondoko: ^^ removed again pending a rationale; boost1.83 is there by LocutusOfBorg's request because 1.83 is now boost-defaults in unstable, but I'm unaware of anything i386 that's blocked on boost1.8100:23
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added boost1.81 to i386-whitelist in noble00:36
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: soplex [riscv64] (noble-proposed/universe) [6.0.3+dfsg-1] (no packageset)01:31
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-deluxe [s390x] (noble-proposed/universe) [0.5.0-1] (no packageset)01:43
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-libusb1-sys [s390x] (noble-proposed/universe) [0.6.4-1] (no packageset)01:43
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: nanovg [s390x] (noble-proposed/universe) [0.0~git20230826.f93799c+dfsg-1] (no packageset)01:48
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-libpulse-glib-binding [s390x] (noble-proposed/universe) [2.28.1-1] (no packageset)01:48
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted nanovg [riscv64] (noble-proposed) [0.0~git20230826.f93799c+dfsg-1]01:50
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-deluxe [armhf] (noble-proposed) [0.5.0-1]01:50
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-deluxe [s390x] (noble-proposed) [0.5.0-1]01:50
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-libpulse-glib-binding [riscv64] (noble-proposed) [2.28.1-1]01:50
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-libusb1-sys [ppc64el] (noble-proposed) [0.6.4-1]01:50
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-libusb1-sys [s390x] (noble-proposed) [0.6.4-1]01:50
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-pyo3-filelike [riscv64] (noble-proposed) [0.2.0-1]01:50
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted soplex [arm64] (noble-proposed) [6.0.3+dfsg-1]01:50
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted soplex [ppc64el] (noble-proposed) [6.0.3+dfsg-1]01:50
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted nanovg [s390x] (noble-proposed) [0.0~git20230826.f93799c+dfsg-1]01:50
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-libpulse-glib-binding [ppc64el] (noble-proposed) [2.28.1-1]01:50
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-libusb1-sys [riscv64] (noble-proposed) [0.6.4-1]01:50
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted soplex [amd64] (noble-proposed) [6.0.3+dfsg-1]01:50
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted soplex [riscv64] (noble-proposed) [6.0.3+dfsg-1]01:50
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-deluxe [riscv64] (noble-proposed) [0.5.0-1]01:50
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-pyo3-filelike [ppc64el] (noble-proposed) [0.2.0-1]01:50
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-libpulse-glib-binding [s390x] (noble-proposed) [2.28.1-1]01:50
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted soplex [armhf] (noble-proposed) [6.0.3+dfsg-1]01:50
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted bankstown-lv2 [amd64] (noble-proposed) [1.0.0-1]01:50
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted bankstown-lv2 [armhf] (noble-proposed) [1.0.0-1]01:50
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted elenv [amd64] (noble-proposed) [0.1.0+git20231106.e7619ff-1]01:50
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted licenserecon [amd64] (noble-proposed) [1.0]01:50
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted licenserecon [armhf] (noble-proposed) [1.0]01:50
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted minetest-mod-ltool [amd64] (noble-proposed) [1.6.1-1]01:50
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted nanovg [arm64] (noble-proposed) [0.0~git20230826.f93799c+dfsg-1]01:50
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted nanovg [ppc64el] (noble-proposed) [0.0~git20230826.f93799c+dfsg-1]01:50
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted r-cran-patrick [amd64] (noble-proposed) [0.2.0-1]01:51
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-deluxe [arm64] (noble-proposed) [0.5.0-1]01:51
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted bankstown-lv2 [arm64] (noble-proposed) [1.0.0-1]01:51
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted endesive [amd64] (noble-proposed) [2.16+dfsg-1]01:51
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted licenserecon [ppc64el] (noble-proposed) [1.0]01:51
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted nanovg [armhf] (noble-proposed) [0.0~git20230826.f93799c+dfsg-1]01:51
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-deluxe [amd64] (noble-proposed) [0.5.0-1]01:51
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-libpulse-glib-binding [amd64] (noble-proposed) [2.28.1-1]01:51
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-libpulse-glib-binding [armhf] (noble-proposed) [2.28.1-1]01:51
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-libusb1-sys [arm64] (noble-proposed) [0.6.4-1]01:51
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-pyo3-filelike [amd64] (noble-proposed) [0.2.0-1]01:51
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-pyo3-filelike [armhf] (noble-proposed) [0.2.0-1]01:51
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted deepdish [amd64] (noble-proposed) [0.3.7-1]01:51
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted nanovg [amd64] (noble-proposed) [0.0~git20230826.f93799c+dfsg-1]01:51
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-deluxe [ppc64el] (noble-proposed) [0.5.0-1]01:51
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-libusb1-sys [amd64] (noble-proposed) [0.6.4-1]01:51
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-pyo3-filelike [arm64] (noble-proposed) [0.2.0-1]01:51
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted licenserecon [arm64] (noble-proposed) [1.0]01:51
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-libpulse-glib-binding [arm64] (noble-proposed) [2.28.1-1]01:51
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-pyo3-filelike [s390x] (noble-proposed/universe) [0.2.0-1] (no packageset)01:51
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted r-cran-labelled [amd64] (noble-proposed) [2.12.0-1]01:51
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-libusb1-sys [armhf] (noble-proposed) [0.6.4-1]01:51
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: soplex [s390x] (noble-proposed/universe) [6.0.3+dfsg-1] (no packageset)01:58
=== chris14_ is now known as chris14
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-pyo3-filelike [s390x] (noble-proposed) [0.2.0-1]04:40
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted soplex [s390x] (noble-proposed) [6.0.3+dfsg-1]04:40
vorlontsimonq2, Eickmeyer: uh /usr/share/applications/kde4/ubiquity-kdeui.desktop is the *actual filename* shipped in ubiquity-frontend-kde05:55
Eickmeyervorlon: https://launchpadlibrarian.net/703887511/ubiquity_24.04.1_24.04.2.diff.gz05:56
vorlonEickmeyer: ok - I only saw the casper diff not the ubiquity diff.  In any event, such a change doesn't belong being added onto an unrelated MP without being documented in the changelog05:58
EickmeyerI mean, we're not stupid; we wouldn't have done one without the other.06:01
vorlonhow should I know it wasn't an oversight, when the ubiquity changes are being made without following existing code review processes?06:04
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted icu [amd64] (noble-proposed) [74.2-1ubuntu1]06:17
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted icu [armhf] (noble-proposed) [74.2-1ubuntu1]06:17
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted icu [ppc64el] (noble-proposed) [74.2-1ubuntu1]06:17
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted icu [s390x] (noble-proposed) [74.2-1ubuntu1]06:17
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted icu [arm64] (noble-proposed) [74.2-1ubuntu1]06:17
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted icu [riscv64] (noble-proposed) [74.2-1ubuntu1]06:17
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted icu [i386] (noble-proposed) [74.2-1ubuntu1]06:17
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: boost-defaults [amd64] (noble-proposed/main) [1.83.0.1ubuntu1] (i386-whitelist, ubuntu-desktop)06:20
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: boost-defaults [ppc64el] (noble-proposed/main) [1.83.0.1ubuntu1] (i386-whitelist, ubuntu-desktop)06:20
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: boost-defaults [i386] (noble-proposed/main) [1.83.0.1ubuntu1] (i386-whitelist, ubuntu-desktop)06:20
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: boost-defaults [s390x] (noble-proposed/main) [1.83.0.1ubuntu1] (i386-whitelist, ubuntu-desktop)06:20
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: boost-defaults [armhf] (noble-proposed/main) [1.83.0.1ubuntu1] (i386-whitelist, ubuntu-desktop)06:21
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: boost-defaults [arm64] (noble-proposed/main) [1.83.0.1ubuntu1] (i386-whitelist, ubuntu-desktop)06:22
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted boost-defaults [amd64] (noble-proposed) [1.83.0.1ubuntu1]06:34
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted boost-defaults [armhf] (noble-proposed) [1.83.0.1ubuntu1]06:34
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted boost-defaults [ppc64el] (noble-proposed) [1.83.0.1ubuntu1]06:34
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted boost-defaults [arm64] (noble-proposed) [1.83.0.1ubuntu1]06:34
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted boost-defaults [s390x] (noble-proposed) [1.83.0.1ubuntu1]06:34
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted boost-defaults [i386] (noble-proposed) [1.83.0.1ubuntu1]06:34
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: boost-defaults [riscv64] (noble-proposed/main) [1.83.0.1ubuntu1] (i386-whitelist, ubuntu-desktop)06:40
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted boost-defaults [riscv64] (noble-proposed) [1.83.0.1ubuntu1]06:43
LocutusOfBorgvorlon, now that we have boost-defaults defaulting on i386 we need it?07:54
LocutusOfBorgvorlon, can we please have some ghc removals so we can finally end this transition?07:55
LocutusOfBorgDebian migrated yesterday07:55
vorlonLocutusOfBorg: what do you mean, "boost-defaults defaulting on i386"?08:22
vorlonLocutusOfBorg: ghc removals> I've just yanked out ppc64el libghc*lua* that were missing according to update_excuses; this was slightly faster than working out binary package names from the list of source packages you gave.  you had some packages in the list you posted earlier that I can't see have removals required wrt ppc64el08:23
vorlonspecifically, haskell-hedis?08:24
vorlonand I see lpeg is out of date, checking that now08:24
vorlonalso I apparently forgot the '-a ppc64el' part, lovely08:25
vorlonbut ^C is your friend08:25
LocutusOfBorgvorlon, I'm speaking about this08:25
LocutusOfBorgboost-defaults (1.74.0.3ubuntu7 to 1.83.0.1ubuntu1)08:25
LocutusOfBorgnow I presume d_oko will start issuing rebuilds after boost-defaults publishes and then stuff will need i38608:25
vorlonboost1.83 is already built on i386 https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/boost1.83/1.83.0-1ubuntu208:26
LocutusOfBorgmaybe it would have been better to first merge boost-defaults and then add it to i386 list08:26
LocutusOfBorgI'm just trying to understand your sentence above08:26
LocutusOfBorg<vorlon> doko: ^^ removed again pending a rationale; boost1.83 is there by LocutusOfBorg's request because 1.83 is now boost-defaults in unstable, but I'm unaware of anything i386 that's blocked on boost1.8108:26
LocutusOfBorgI don't know if I made any mistake in my request08:27
vorlonI'm talking about the fact that doko added boost1.8*1* to i386 whitelist, not boost1.8*3*08:27
LocutusOfBorgohhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh08:27
LocutusOfBorgI already had my coffee, probably I should get another one08:27
LocutusOfBorganyhow, last blockers are:08:27
LocutusOfBorgnbconvert kick out or ignore autopkgtests (Debian bugs: #1042699 #1050667 #1057949)08:28
-ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Debian bug 1050667 in src:nbconvert "DSA for jupyter-core in oldstable triggers nbconvert autopkgtest" [Serious, Open] https://bugs.debian.org/105066708:28
-ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Debian bug 1057949 in src:nbconvert "nbconvert: needs update for new version of pandoc: PDF creating failed" [Serious, Open] https://bugs.debian.org/105794908:28
-ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Debian bug 1042699 in src:nbconvert "nbconvert: FTBFS with Sphinx 7.1, docutils 0.20: TypeError: not all arguments converted during string formatting" [Serious, Open] https://bugs.debian.org/104269908:28
LocutusOfBorgpypandoc, r--cran-flextable r-cran-rmarkdown ignore on ppc64el, they are related to lua support missing.08:28
LocutusOfBorgwe can upload a fix to ignore testsuite, but we are confident that haskell lua will start building again on ppc64el in the future, so together with Debian release team we assumed that hinting the testsuite on ppc64el was better than hacking it, and forget about the hack later08:29
LocutusOfBorgso, with the 3 badtesting above we should be finally good to migrate, or at least britney will tell us something more08:30
LocutusOfBorg(btw haskell-hedis was fixed in the new ghc upload, fixing a ppc64el specific failure, the Debian bug should have the good list)08:32
LocutusOfBorglast thing, do you think we can stop building ocaml on i386?08:33
vorlonwhat still depends on it?08:37
vorlonit's late here, I don't have time to look at the autopkgtest ignores; I'll try to pick it up in the morning08:38
vorlonI don't see ocaml in the i386 list08:38
vorlonso yes, we have stopped building it; just needs cleanup of older binaries08:39
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cockpit (jammy-backports/universe) [306-1~bpo22.04.1 => 307-1~bpo22.04.1] (no packageset)08:47
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cockpit (lunar-backports/universe) [303-1~bpo23.04.1 => 307-1~bpo23.04.1] (no packageset)08:47
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cockpit-machines (mantic-backports/universe) [300-1~bpo23.10.1 => 304-1~bpo23.10.1] (no packageset)08:48
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cockpit (mantic-backports/universe) [303-1~bpo23.10.1 => 307-1~bpo23.10.1] (no packageset)08:48
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cockpit-machines (jammy-backports/universe) [303-1~bpo22.04.1 => 304-1~bpo22.04.1] (no packageset)08:48
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cockpit-podman (lunar-backports/universe) [79-1~bpo23.04.1 => 82-1~bpo23.04.1] (no packageset)08:48
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cockpit-machines (lunar-backports/universe) [300-1~bpo23.04.1 => 304-1~bpo23.04.1] (no packageset)08:48
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cockpit-podman (mantic-backports/universe) [79-1~bpo23.10.1 => 82-1~bpo23.10.1] (no packageset)08:49
vorlonLocutusOfBorg: did a run of removals of unneeded i386 binaries, ocaml is gone now08:53
doko1.81 was just to have something in the release pocket on i386 before the icu upload. it could have been removed later09:12
LocutusOfBorgyay!09:37
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: r-cran-broom.helpers [amd64] (noble-proposed/universe) [1.14.0-1] (no packageset)09:54
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted r-cran-broom.helpers [amd64] (noble-proposed) [1.14.0-1]10:02
LocutusOfBorgmissing build on ppc64el: libghc-hslua-marshalling-dev, libghc-hslua-marshalling-prof (from 2.1.0-2build1)11:27
LocutusOfBorgvorlon, ^^11:27
LocutusOfBorgalso if possible the hints...11:28
LocutusOfBorgoops g night!11:28
LocutusOfBorgI didn't read11:29
tsimonq2vorlon: Ubiquity> In this case, following the existing code process would have been quite ineffective. MPs have been rejected recently for the desire to not put further effort into Ubiquity, and generally speaking, Foundations does *not* support Qt frontends for core applications. I know, because we've had critical bugs for Ubiquity, software-properties-qt, and more in the past, but were told to11:59
tsimonq2fix it ourselves if we wanted it done. All three Qt-based flavors feel this way, acutely with the new Flutter installer, which hardcodes GNOME items in, with us as an afterthought. We're used to it. It's not how it should be, but as the only Core Developer out of the three aforementioned flavors, I tend to take on reviews and queries specific to this. I was actively iterating on these changes11:59
tsimonq2with Erich, therefore we didn't file an MP. If you'd like us to file the paperwork regardless next time, fine, that's a valid point. As for, "well, this should have followed an MP process," no, we refuse to wait three months just to get a NACK.11:59
tsimonq2(Sorry, te_ward is also a Core Developer and he's on the Lubuntu Team, he's just not heavily involved with these sorts of things.)12:02
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: node-jupyterlab [amd64] (noble-proposed/universe) [4.0.9+ds1+~cs3.4.4-1] (no packageset)13:55
LocutusOfBorgvorlon, please if you do the hints, rollback haskell-text-icu 0.8.0.4-1build1 to the previous version and restore once the haskell is migrated14:09
LocutusOfBorgI don't think we want to entangle haskell with everything else14:10
LocutusOfBorgjbicha, gst-plugins ping :)14:13
vorlontsimonq2: "MPs have been rejected recently for the desire to not put further effort into Ubiquity" [citation needed] https://code.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-installer/ubiquity/+git/ubiquity/+ref/main/+merges?field.status=REJECTED&field.status-empty-marker=116:02
vorlonthere was one MP recently that I disapproved of because it was adding code in ubiquity for an UBUNTU image, which is not supposed to be using ubiquity by 24.04 release16:03
vorlonand "I don't want to use the review process because I don't like the review feedback from the (current) maintainers" is a poor excuse16:03
vorlondoko: I have no idea why "something in the release pocket on i386 before the icu upload" is supposed to be useful, for a package we don't need on i386 at all16:05
vorlonLocutusOfBorg: fwiw with the haskell lua ppc64el removals, I would expect those autopkgtests to also fail on baseline now, not requiring a hint16:21
vorlon(and this is what I'm trying now)16:21
vorlonLocutusOfBorg: marshalling> oops, I overlooked that marshal and marshalling are different :P16:26
vorlontemporarily rolling haskell-text-icu back to 0.8.0.4-1 to unentangle icu vs ghc16:28
dokovorlon: there's also haskell-stringprep16:37
vorlondoko: thanks, rolling that back too16:38
Eickmeyervorlon: ubiquity/casper> It would probably be in your best interest to not carry on that line of conversation any further as it's just showing to be anti-collaborative and disrespectful toward fellow developers, and placing unnecessary barriers for the sake of placing barriers. As I see it, it seems that you don't trust either one of us to do the16:44
Eickmeyerright thing, and for that we're both quite offended. Simon is a very competent developer which you seem to disregard and stifle regularily. So, perhaps before berating a Core Developer accepting a seemingly unrelated MP, check to see if the right thing was done first? And then, maybe instead of berating a Core Developer for maintaining16:44
Eickmeyerlong-unmaintained code (the Qt frontend) that Foundations refuses to maintain, maybe you should thank him? If this is the system you support, then as I see it, it's very broken. There are a lot of eyes on you right now, so I'd be very careful about how you respond.16:44
vorlonEickmeyer: the "right thing" for these packages is to use the established code review practices.  What's anti-collaborative is ignoring the established processes.  Once ubiquity is disentangled from main and no longer has ~ubuntu-installer as the maintainer, flavors can maintain it using whatever practices they want.  Or if someone wants to move the ubiquity KDE frontend to a separate source16:53
vorlonpackage and decouple it from ubiquity, that's fine too.  But casper remains in main and should be held to a high standard regarding not just the content of code changes but also the documentation (in changelog and commit messages) because of the sensitivity of the code in interacting with other packages.16:53
LocutusOfBorgvorlon, they need hint16:57
LocutusOfBorgthey are not "BD-uninstallable"16:57
LocutusOfBorgon stderr there is a print16:57
LocutusOfBorg"247s RuntimeError: Pandoc died with exitcode "89" during conversion: This version of pandoc has been compiled without Lua support.16:57
LocutusOfBorg"16:57
LocutusOfBorgthis is not something that will auto heal I would say with a ppc64el removal16:57
LocutusOfBorgright?16:57
LocutusOfBorgtest_conversion_with_lua_filter is something that will fail in any case16:57
vorlonLocutusOfBorg: what changes is that the *baseline* regresses, so it's no longer a regression that blocks migration16:58
vorlonhttps://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/r/r-cran-rmarkdown/noble/ppc64el16:58
LocutusOfBorgbut pandoc in release is probably built with lua support embedded16:58
LocutusOfBorgso, not sure if it will fail... in proposed it was split into a ton of pandoc-foo libraries16:59
vorlonwell, at least one of them has also failed in release pocket on retry17:00
vorlonas this is preferred over hints, we'll see what happens with the other two17:00
vorlonand I'll add hints if necessary17:00
LocutusOfBorgthanks!17:04
vorlonLocutusOfBorg: and yeah, pypandoc passed in release pocket, feh - adding a hint17:06
LocutusOfBorgyeah that was my fear17:07
vorlonand oops the retry above that failed wasn't my no-proposed one at all, it was the spurious regular test against -proposed that I had to trigger to get fresh cookies out of autopkgtest.u.c :P17:07
LocutusOfBorgok so now I understand, that was also my guess :)17:08
LocutusOfBorgr-cran-rmarkdown needs an hint17:13
LocutusOfBorgit didn't fail with migration-reference17:13
vorlonack (boo)17:13
LocutusOfBorgand also r-cran-flextable succeeded with migration-reference/017:16
LocutusOfBorg:/17:16
vorlonyeah, all hints added now17:16
LocutusOfBorgthanks, crossing fingers17:16
LocutusOfBorgI'll copy back the two packages if I see the migration17:16
vorlonack17:17
LocutusOfBorg(the copy you did one hour ago didn't publish yet, strange)17:18
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: appstream [amd64] (noble-proposed/main) [1.0.1-2] (core)17:20
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: appstream [arm64] (noble-proposed/main) [1.0.1-2] (core)17:22
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted appstream [amd64] (noble-proposed) [1.0.1-2]17:23
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted node-jupyterlab [amd64] (noble-proposed) [4.0.9+ds1+~cs3.4.4-1]17:23
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted appstream [arm64] (noble-proposed) [1.0.1-2]17:23
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: appstream [ppc64el] (noble-proposed/main) [1.0.1-2] (core)17:23
LocutusOfBorgwhoever accepted appstream binaries please make sure you are not accepting into main pocket17:30
vorlonI used new-binary-debian-universe to accept them; if that put them in the wrong pocket, will be fixed up via https://ubuntu-archive-team.ubuntu.com/component-mismatches-proposed.html17:34
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: r-cran-ggstats [amd64] (noble-proposed/universe) [0.5.1-1] (no packageset)17:39
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted appstream [ppc64el] (noble-proposed) [1.0.1-2]17:41
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted r-cran-ggstats [amd64] (noble-proposed) [0.5.1-1]17:41
vorlonN | libappstreamqt3 Component: main Section: libs Priority: OPTIONAL17:41
vorlonso yes it'll get cleaned up via component-mismatches17:41
vorlonLocutusOfBorg: so appstream-generator is in unstable now, but it's ftbfs on armhf/riscv64/s390x17:46
vorlonI mean, I guess I don't care too much, we're not going to be running the generator for Ubuntu itself on any of those archs17:47
LocutusOfBorgcorrect17:47
LocutusOfBorgno reverse deps17:47
LocutusOfBorgI'm waiting for Debian but if you want to remove in the meanwhile even better17:48
vorlonyeah, I'll just remove those17:48
LocutusOfBorgthis should make ldc and appstream transition become NBS cleanable17:48
vorlonyep17:49
LocutusOfBorg(and haskell to migrate next round hopefully)17:49
vorlonhave just uploaded libappindicator to drop gtk2 support (NBS) but that itself appears to have revdeps, me17:49
vorlonh17:49
vorlonafk for a couple hours (at least)17:49
LocutusOfBorgyay thanks for the help, I'm keeping fingers crossed17:50
LocutusOfBorgmigrating ghc/9.4.7-2/amd64 to testing makes libghc-stringprep-dev/1.0.0-12build2/amd64 uninstallable18:02
LocutusOfBorgsigh18:02
LocutusOfBorgneeding a new run18:02
LocutusOfBorgvorlon, if I can use your time... netcdf/i386 hint please?18:55
LocutusOfBorgreal test was added, and fails now, from neutral to fail18:57
LocutusOfBorgMoving: haskell-ghc-typelits-knownnat/0.7.9-1build219:41
LocutusOfBorgBRACE FOR IMPACT19:41
vorlonLocutusOfBorg: netcdf/i386> done19:47
LocutusOfBorgthanks!19:47
LocutusOfBorglibappstreamqt3/amd64 in main cannot depend on libqt6core6 in universe19:53
LocutusOfBorgvorlon, ^^ it should really go in universe indeed19:54
vorlonyeah. libappstreamqt-dev needs re-added to the Extra-Excludes.  Done now (after having just dropped it :P)20:01
LocutusOfBorg(haskell-stringprep and haskell-text-icu copied back!)20:21
LocutusOfBorgoh btw, src:signon can go away, all the binaries have been replaced and provided by src:signond from Debian20:22
vorlonLocutusOfBorg: do you mind a quick removal bug report for that one?20:23
LocutusOfBorghttps://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/signon/+bug/204697120:24
-ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Launchpad bug 2046971 in signon (Ubuntu) "RM signon from noble" [Undecided, New]20:24
LocutusOfBorgdone :)20:24
vorlonEickmeyer: fyi, related to your earlier casper mp https://code.launchpad.net/~vorlon/livecd-rootfs/+git/livecd-rootfs/+merge/45766520:24
Eickmeyervorlon: Funny you should mention that. I managed to do the exact same thing using edubuntu-live-settings, all in a package, completely with actual installed files. I think the desktop team could do the same.20:26
vorlonah, that's certainly an option; and you already had an edubuntu-live-settings package to add it to, so it makes a certain amount of sense there.  I was going to outline how the above hook would then be refactored to work for both edubuntu and ubuntu, and avoid code getting out of sync20:36
vorlondoes ubuntustudio need anything in this regard still?20:36
EickmeyerI'm still mulling over how to do the same thing using Plasma Desktop. It can certainly be scripted to do something like that using javascript, but I just need to remember what needs to be done. Since there's an ubuntustudio-live-settings package, I can just do it there.20:37
Eickmeyervorlon: I am also considering adding an oft-requested minimal install option for Ubuntu Studio. Since it already has the core seed/metapackage, that would be the basis, so no new package necessary. It would, of course, require another MP for livecd-rootfs. Along with that, considering adding minimal+audio, minimal+video, and20:48
Eickmeyerminimal+graphics+photography options since the layering is quite easy.20:48
vorlonEickmeyer: layers however form a tree; you can't have an 'everything' layer that inherits from all of audio+video+graphics+photography, so if you intend to offer 'everything' as an install option, you'll be doubling the size of the image21:28
Eickmeyervorlon: True, and there's a lot to consider, and perhaps a refactoring of the tasks so that "everything" would be what is now the "desktop" tasks so that it doesn't layer, similar to how the "desktop-gnome" task for edubuntu is now.21:34
EickmeyerI'm perhaps not being specific enough, but there's an idea in my head that doesn't add task upon task upon task.21:35
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libcotp [amd64] (noble-proposed/universe) [3.0.0-1] (no packageset)23:17
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-heed [amd64] (noble-proposed/universe) [0.20.0~alpha.9-1] (no packageset)23:19
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-libgweather [amd64] (noble-proposed/universe) [4.3.1-1] (no packageset)23:20
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libcotp [arm64] (noble-proposed/universe) [3.0.0-1] (no packageset)23:22
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libcotp [ppc64el] (noble-proposed/universe) [3.0.0-1] (no packageset)23:22
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libcotp [armhf] (noble-proposed/universe) [3.0.0-1] (no packageset)23:23
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-heed [ppc64el] (noble-proposed/universe) [0.20.0~alpha.9-1] (no packageset)23:32
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-libgweather [ppc64el] (noble-proposed/universe) [4.3.1-1] (no packageset)23:32
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libcotp [amd64] (noble-proposed) [3.0.0-1]23:35
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libcotp [armhf] (noble-proposed) [3.0.0-1]23:35
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-heed [amd64] (noble-proposed) [0.20.0~alpha.9-1]23:35
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-libgweather [amd64] (noble-proposed) [4.3.1-1]23:35
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libcotp [arm64] (noble-proposed) [3.0.0-1]23:35
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-heed [ppc64el] (noble-proposed) [0.20.0~alpha.9-1]23:35
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libcotp [ppc64el] (noble-proposed) [3.0.0-1]23:35
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-libgweather [ppc64el] (noble-proposed) [4.3.1-1]23:35
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-libgweather [arm64] (noble-proposed/universe) [4.3.1-1] (no packageset)23:37
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-libgweather [armhf] (noble-proposed/universe) [4.3.1-1] (no packageset)23:37
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-heed [arm64] (noble-proposed/universe) [0.20.0~alpha.9-1] (no packageset)23:38
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-heed [armhf] (noble-proposed/universe) [0.20.0~alpha.9-1] (no packageset)23:39
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-heed [arm64] (noble-proposed) [0.20.0~alpha.9-1]23:44
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-libgweather [arm64] (noble-proposed) [4.3.1-1]23:44
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-heed [armhf] (noble-proposed) [0.20.0~alpha.9-1]23:44
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-libgweather [armhf] (noble-proposed) [4.3.1-1]23:44
vorlonxnox: Debian bug #737634 was wontfix'ed 9 years ago, and the TC issued advice a year ago that was not taken by the Debian maintainer.  Is it still useful to carry this delta?23:48
-ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Debian bug 737634 in dpkg "dpkg: Allow overriding is_native version checks in dpkg 3.0 Native." [Wishlist, Open] https://bugs.debian.org/73763423:48

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!