[00:11] <Guest26> ...
[00:12] <pikaro> If I enable secure boot, it still doesn't work. Same result if I replace the BOOTX64.EFI with the ubuntu\shimx64.efi. BUT I can manually start the ubuntu\shimx64.efi and boot Ubuntu, and it briefly flashes somethign about signing. No idea how that works, though...
[00:15] <EriC^^> pikaro: didnt read it all, but did you run grub-install after moving the efi partition
[00:15] <jeremy31> pikaro: You may have to disable Secure Boot, boot into Ubuntu, do all updates, then you might be able to use Secure Boot again
[00:16] <EriC^^> cause you have to run that to update the uefi entries in the motherboard to point to the new partition
[00:16] <ramblebamble> pikaro, not a heavy Ubuntuuser, but your last statement just reminded me, it can be that you need to reconfigure the protocol in the bios settings. e..g I was able to run a live-ubuntu CD on a new laptop but was not able to run the installation. changing the protocol used to talk to the disks eliminated that problem(required a reinstall though)
[00:17] <pikaro> EriC^^: yes, grub-install --target=x86_64-efi --efi-directory=/boot/efi --removable --bootloader-id=GRUB
[00:17] <EriC^^> pikaro: nope
[00:18] <EriC^^> pikaro: --removable i think would just copy the bootx64.efi but not modify the entries cause it's a removable media
[00:19] <pikaro> ramblebamble: You mean switching to MBR boot? That's not really an option, requires way too much doing, and you could never just screw around with it like I did with the EFI
[00:20] <pikaro> EriC^^: Hm... could be that there's an old entry from previous install attempts in the UEFI that I have to remove. It _is_ a removable install medium, after all - I just want to boot it as "generic USB harddisk". Thanks for the pointer!
[00:20] <pikaro> *removable boot medium
[00:20] <ramblebamble> pikaro, no not talking about MBR-boot, I am talking about the the protocol the bios uses to talk to the disks. That machine also had UEFI.
[00:20] <EriC^^> pikaro: what's your 'sudo efibootmgr -v' output look like right now along with 'sudo blkid'
[00:22] <pikaro> EriC^^: There are atually _two_ entries related to ubuntu in there, one from the HDD and one from the stick... they do look like they point to the correct partition, though
[00:22] <EriC^^> can you share please?
[00:22] <EriC^^> "(sudo blkid; sudo efibootmgr -v) | nc termbin.com 9999"
[00:24] <Guest26> }}
[00:26] <pikaro> http://termbin.com/a6g6 yeah UUID is correct
[00:26] <EriC^^> the entries use the partuuid
[00:27] <EriC^^> which one is the usb? sda?
[00:27] <pikaro> sdb
[00:28] <EriC^^> hmm, did it used to boot before fine when the efi partition wasnt on the usb?
[00:29] <pikaro> Only booted it once like that, but yes
[00:30] <EriC^^> i wonder if it's some implementation thing, what's curious to me is that there's no old ubuntu entry in the order, the one before 0002 is windows
[00:31] <pikaro> That might be automatic - when I did the update LTS -> normal, it prompted me that Grub was installed on a different disk previously. So it may have removed that automatically and replaced it with these, assuming that it's not a removable media.
[00:35] <EriC^^> when you say you had to replace boot/bootx64.efi with grubx64.efi to get it to boot, you mean on the usb?
[00:35] <EriC^^> (just read the rest of your initial post)
[00:35] <pikaro> Yes
[00:36] <pikaro> The EFI on the Windows disk works as normal when chainloaded from Grub
[00:36] <Guest26> }}}
[00:36] <EriC^^> i see
[00:39] <EriC^^> which server model is it pikaro ? maybe the message about signing can help get it to boot from the entry using secureboot+shim
[00:39] <Guest26> =$
[00:39] <EriC^^> might find a screenshot somewhere
[00:39] <tomreyn> Guest26: please don't post random characters here,. if you have an ubuntu question, you are welcome to ask it. (see https://ubottu.com/y/gl for more info)
[00:42] <pikaro> EriC^^: You mean hardware? It's not a server, standard consumer custom build. Just using Ubuntu server minimal to hand-pick packages and get some more pro tools
[00:44] <pikaro> But honestly, it's working for now and since there doesn't seem to be a simple solution this is better suited for a forum. Thanks a lot for looking into it in any case!!
[00:47] <EriC^^> no problem pikaro
[03:52] <jasper_mcvain> Hello Everyone. If I may ask; does this channel support Ubuntu Servers as well?
[03:52] <rbox> ubuntu is ubuntu
[03:52] <jasper_mcvain> Understood clearly, rbox. Thank you.
[04:08] <AzBukiVedi> hi all!
[04:09] <mybalzitch> jasper_mcvain: there's #ubuntu-server if you didn't find it yet
[04:09] <jasper_mcvain> I did not realize, thanks for the information, MB.
[04:18] <AzBukiVedi> help me pls make program https://pastebin.com/hvZ9h44k need luajit
[04:19] <rbox> AzBukiVedi: you can use apt search to search for packages
[04:21] <AzBukiVedi> done thx
[04:22] <AzBukiVedi> apt install *luajit*
[04:44] <Guddu> If i have a Windows PC then can i install Linux as well so that it gets a Dual Boot option at Startup without affecting the current Windows Installation?
[04:46] <lotuspsychje> Guddu: yes, but there need to be taken smart measures
[04:46] <lotuspsychje> Guddu: like making a free space on your HD for ubuntu's install
[04:46] <Guddu> lotuspsychje, Thanks for your response. I even have 2 SSDs on this server.
[04:47] <lotuspsychje> Guddu: a backup is a good idea too, then follow uefi and grub howto
[04:47] <lotuspsychje> !uefi | Guddu
[04:47] <lotuspsychje> !dualboot | Guddu
[04:48] <Guddu> lotuspsychje, While there are some benefits to dual-booting (e.g. better performance for a native install), it is not recommended.
[04:48] <Guddu> Why is it not recommended?
[04:49] <lotuspsychje> Guddu: thats kind of opinion/the users choice
[04:49] <lotuspsychje> Guddu: an ideal situation would be using the whole HD/SSD for an Os some would say
[04:50] <lotuspsychje> dualboot is kind of tweaking around to have both worlds
[04:50] <Guddu> lotuspsychje, I have an idea. May be i can install on a separate disk altogether and change boot order in BIOS whenever I want to switch OS?
[04:51] <lotuspsychje> Guddu: thats up to yourself, whats the best way you want to work
[04:51] <Guddu> lotuspsychje, Do you find it better than Dual boot option?
[04:51] <lotuspsychje> Guddu: many would avice to test ubuntu first on a liveusb, then if like use the whole drive for ubuntu
[04:51] <lotuspsychje> dualboot is faster in switching Oses
[04:53] <lotuspsychje> Guddu: another idea would be running ubuntu in a windows Virtual machine to test
[04:53] <Guddu> lotuspsychje, I have tested it and i like it already.
[04:54] <lotuspsychje> Guddu: ok great, then the only question remains, what will you be using windows still for?
[04:54] <Guddu> If i have a Ubuntu machine as Virtual Box Guest then will it have an access to USB devices for huge data transfer between devices?
[04:54] <Guddu> lotuspsychje, I use programs that are not available for Linux at this stage. Hence Windows continue to remain part of my workflow.
[04:55] <lotuspsychje> Guddu: transfer to a VM are possible yes, but the real physical install would be the best choice for you i think
[04:55] <Guddu> Yeah. But i feel that vm reduces transfer rate
[04:55] <Guddu> Hence I prefer to not use VM
[04:55] <lotuspsychje> ok
[04:59] <Ademan_> I just wrote ubuntu server 22.04 to a thumb drive with exactly this command: `sudo dd if=ubuntu-22.04.3-live-server-amd64.iso bs=4M of=/dev/sda` after syncing, ejecting, and re-inserting the thumb drive, I see the following errors in dmesg: https://dpaste.com/ESHS463WH is this just because it's a 128GB thumb drive but the image is only 2GB? I'd be less concerned if it looked like it was referring to the
[04:59] <Ademan_> end of the whole usb drive, but that's more like 137438953472 bytes. It *did* boot just fine, but there were some similar (didn't save them) error messages on boot. I'm a bit skiddish to use this as an installer, but nothing is obviously wrong... anyone seen this before and have a good explanation?
[05:01] <AzBukiVedi> I was build program in Debian, how make .deb? http://explorer.net.ru:8080/temp/rubirc.deb.png meson bulid system
[05:02] <rbox> Ademan_: theres nothign wrong
[05:03] <ravage> AzBukiVedi: this is the Ubuntu support channel. Debian has it's own
[05:04] <AzBukiVedi> Ubnutu Sever build
[05:04] <AzBukiVedi> me need .deb to meson
[05:05] <Ademan_> rbox: I agree it looks ok but I want to understand what's going on better
[05:06] <rbox> [3226496.385412] GPT:Primary header thinks Alt. header is not at the end of the disk.
[05:06] <rbox> if you copied an image that was smaller than the size of the disk
[05:06] <rbox> the header is most defintely not going to be at th ened
[06:33] <prova> Hi everybody! Happy New Year! :)
[06:33] <prova> Is somebody here?
[06:33] <p0indexter> hello
[06:35] <prova> Hello p0indexter! How are you? :) May I ask something about ubuntu 20.04 and netplan?
[06:36] <prova> Tomb silence!
[06:37] <ravage> !ask | prova
[06:38] <prova> Sorry, i'm almost new on this chat and chat in general!
[06:41] <prova> I'm trying to connect some Virtual Machines via "Virtual Machine Manager" and I have troubles to connect them! Can Anybody help me?
[06:42] <ravage> https://askubuntu.com/questions/1412503/setting-up-a-bridge-for-host-and-vm
[06:54] <prova> A more specific question: I have two desktop PC: A and B. On any PC A and B I have a Virtual Machine: VMA and VMB. I want that all the Machines A, B, VMA, VMB communicate them between. All the Machines use ubuntu 20.04! I'm using qemu/KVM with Virtual Machine Manager!
[06:55] <ravage> that works with the bridge described on the article
[07:00] <prova> OK ravage! I will study the article! Thank you! :)
[07:01] <ravage> yw. basically create a bridge. put your main network interface in it. tell virt-manager to use that bridge
[07:14] <prova> In order to use the bridge, can I use the GUI of "Virtual Machine Manager" or have I to write the files in the article?
[09:09] <dell> hi
[13:58] <deckone> exit
[14:24] <BluesKaj> Hi all
[17:21] <Yakov> I can call my app with /home/j/Downloads/qtcreator_build/bin/qtcreator, I've set desktop file which can be open with Command "type qt", I can add to favorites tab as well, but If I open my cpp or h files I can not select qt in Select Application list
[18:16] <cart> Hey everyone. When I go to software and updates application / Additional drivers tab. I try and get the latest NVIDIA drivers for 2060. But I get this error pk-client-error-quark: E: http://bw.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu kinetic/main amd64 libglibmm-2.4-1v5 amd64 2.66.5-1 is not (yet) available (404  Not Found [IP: 91.189.91.81 80])
[18:16] <cart> What does this mean>?
[18:16] <cart> Not yet available but why is it on the lsit?
[18:16] <cart> list`
[18:17] <rbox> could be mirrors are in the middle of syncing
[18:17] <rbox> and the file isn't there yet
[18:17] <rbox> wait an hour and try again
[18:19] <cart> rbox: Ahh ok ok
[18:23] <cart> rbox: I tried running sudo apt update and every attempt and fetching a file failed. Could this really be a mirror sync issue? Can I force it to try another mirror?
[18:23] <rbox> i dont think an hour has passed...
[18:23] <ioria> !22.10
[18:23] <rbox> the mirrors are set in /etc/sources.list
[18:24] <rbox> oh, you're using an end of life dist?
[18:24] <rbox> lol
[18:24] <cart> rbox: Hmmm well shit. How do I upgrade that then?
[18:24] <cart> Or what do I  do?
[18:25] <ioria> follow the white rabbit
[18:25] <sw3333t> ^
[18:25] <cart> ioria: Ohhh gawd nooo
[18:25] <ioria> come on, not tragic ^_^
[18:25] <cart> ioria: Fine where do I start
[18:26] <ioria> check !eol or clean install
[18:26] <rbox> !upgrades
[18:26] <rbox> !eol
[18:27] <sw3333t> "sudo do-release-upgrade"
[18:27] <cart> Ok wait but... it seems like EOF is 6 months from now for the latest release? Is that right?
[18:28] <rbox> support ended on July 20, 2023
[18:28] <cart> Mantic Minotaur ... June -.-
[18:28] <sw3333t> Unless your way far back... than just install fresh
[18:28] <ioria> first, check if available , a simple 'do-release-upgrade -c' will do
[18:29] <fdan> hey guys
[18:29] <cart> sw3333t:  -> Your Ubuntu release is not supported anymore.
[18:29] <fdan> im trying to write log file to a different location
[18:30] <fdan> i introduced these 2 lines, the files got created but it was not adding any contents. how can i ensure or test if this is working
[18:30] <fdan> StandardOutput=append:/var/log/test/access.log
[18:30] <fdan> StandardError=append:/var/log/test/error.log
[18:31] <sw3333t> If you dont have anything super important on there, I would just reinstall and I usually stick to LTS releases cause I got tired of just that.
[18:36] <cart> sw3333t: Yea ok
[18:36] <cart> thanks
[20:30] <TechPup> Hello
[20:32] <jailbreak> TechPup: hi..... How can we help?
[20:33] <TechPup> I just wanted to chat, if that is against the rules than I shall remove myself from this channel.
[20:33] <jailbreak> !offtopic| TechPup
[20:34] <TechPup> alright
[22:12] <Guddu> Could someone help me with this error?
[22:12] <Guddu> https://dpaste.org/ezMv4
[22:13] <tomreyn> Guddu: did you run   sudo apt update   beforehand?
[22:16] <tomreyn> Guddu: if you did, there's still another issue: your ubuntu release has reached its end of life
[22:20] <Guddu> tomreyn, https://dpaste.org/COUEX Sudo update gives this error. This is running on a raspberry pi
[22:20] <tomreyn> Guddu: https://help.ubuntu.com/community/EOLUpgrades explains how to upgrade such releases. I do not know whether tor not this works for Ubuntu *ports*.
[22:21] <tomreyn> Guddu: these error messages (on your pastes) are a result of your ubuntu release having reached end-of-life.
[22:22] <Guddu> tomreyn, I will update my ubuntu version then altogether. What say? Need to find if there is one for raspberry still.
[22:23] <Guddu> I currently have Ubuntu 22.10
[22:23] <Guddu> Ubuntu 22.04.3 LTS
[22:23] <Guddu> The latest Long Term Supported release of Ubuntu with five years of security patching and maintenance until April 2027
[22:23] <Guddu> So my version is still no EOL i thought
[22:23] <rbox> 22.10 isn't LTS
[22:23] <tomreyn> i just checked: the EOLUpgrades guide should also be possible for ports. However, I'm not sure whether release upgrades are supported for ports at all. You may want to try a fresh install indeed (after backing up your data and important configurations).
[22:24] <tomreyn> you're on 22.10, not 22.04 LTS
[22:24] <Guddu> tomreyn, You mean I should probbaly do install of 22.04 LTS?
[22:25] <tomreyn> i mean you should probably do a fresh installation of a supported Ubuntu release. Either 22.04 LTS or 22.10 (non-LTS)
[22:25] <Guddu> The one i have is corrupt you mean for some reason?
[22:26] <tomreyn> not currupt, but no longer supported, and no longer reciving critical security updates
[22:26] <tomreyn> !eol
[22:27] <tomreyn> https://ubuntu.com/download/raspberry-pi
[22:30] <tomreyn> Guddu: does this answer your question?
[22:31] <Guddu> tomreyn, Thanks. I am now using Balena Etcher to copy the 22.04.3 LTS image on my 64GB Mem Card used by my Raspberry
[22:33] <tomreyn> Guddu: nice. are you installing desktop, server or core? and on which pi?
[22:33] <Guddu> tomreyn, Raspberry PI 4
[22:33] <Guddu> But honestly I don't need Desktop
[22:34] <Guddu> I think core would be the best?
[22:34] <tomreyn> so what are you downloading?
[22:34] <Guddu> I use this only for connecting via remote and doing wol on other servers on my lan
[22:34] <Guddu> I downloaded Desktop but I was not thinking well until you asked that question.
[22:34] <tomreyn> core is probably not what you think it is. "core" uses snap packaging only, is a different system than classic ubuntu.
[22:35] <Guddu> Ubuntu Server 22.04.3 LTS would be best then.
[22:35] <tomreyn> right, this should work on pi4
[22:36] <Guddu> tomreyn, Is it a good idea to schedule a daily cron to do apt update?
[22:37] <tomreyn> that's something you need to decide on, installing apt updates automatically can have positive and negative effects, so you should consider these.
[22:38] <tomreyn> https://ubuntu.com/tutorials/how-to-install-ubuntu-on-your-raspberry-pi is your installation guide
[22:38] <JanC> better use 'unattended-upgrades' for that also
[22:38] <JanC> not try to create your own cron thing
[22:38] <tomreyn> unattended-upgrades let you check for and install some or all available apt updates automatically, and optionally do a reboot, too
[22:38] <Guddu> Flash fails with Balena. Checking another.
[22:39] <tomreyn> it's not an iso image, but a raw (but compressed) disk image.
[22:40] <ravage> https://snapcraft.io/rpi-imager
[22:40] <tomreyn> see the guide i linked for how to get raspberry pie imager for other operating systems
[22:40] <tomreyn> oops 'pi'
[22:41] <tomreyn> that's what the holidays did to me!
[22:41] <ravage> you fine piece of.. pie :P
[22:41] <tomreyn> :-P
[23:00] <oerheks> HNY !
[23:02] <jailbreak> Awkward....
[23:50] <Guddu> I have a ip of 192.168.100.25 on my raspberry. How can i prevent it from changing? How do i set it to static?
[23:53] <PeGaSuS> you can probably assign a static ip via your router web interface?
[23:54] <sem> i recommend configuring your router as well
[23:54] <sem> look for dhcp reservation if you don't see it
[23:54] <sem> or 'lease type' static