[00:11] ... [00:12] If I enable secure boot, it still doesn't work. Same result if I replace the BOOTX64.EFI with the ubuntu\shimx64.efi. BUT I can manually start the ubuntu\shimx64.efi and boot Ubuntu, and it briefly flashes somethign about signing. No idea how that works, though... [00:15] pikaro: didnt read it all, but did you run grub-install after moving the efi partition [00:15] pikaro: You may have to disable Secure Boot, boot into Ubuntu, do all updates, then you might be able to use Secure Boot again [00:16] cause you have to run that to update the uefi entries in the motherboard to point to the new partition [00:16] pikaro, not a heavy Ubuntuuser, but your last statement just reminded me, it can be that you need to reconfigure the protocol in the bios settings. e..g I was able to run a live-ubuntu CD on a new laptop but was not able to run the installation. changing the protocol used to talk to the disks eliminated that problem(required a reinstall though) [00:17] EriC^^: yes, grub-install --target=x86_64-efi --efi-directory=/boot/efi --removable --bootloader-id=GRUB [00:17] pikaro: nope [00:18] pikaro: --removable i think would just copy the bootx64.efi but not modify the entries cause it's a removable media [00:19] ramblebamble: You mean switching to MBR boot? That's not really an option, requires way too much doing, and you could never just screw around with it like I did with the EFI [00:20] EriC^^: Hm... could be that there's an old entry from previous install attempts in the UEFI that I have to remove. It _is_ a removable install medium, after all - I just want to boot it as "generic USB harddisk". Thanks for the pointer! [00:20] *removable boot medium [00:20] pikaro, no not talking about MBR-boot, I am talking about the the protocol the bios uses to talk to the disks. That machine also had UEFI. [00:20] pikaro: what's your 'sudo efibootmgr -v' output look like right now along with 'sudo blkid' [00:22] EriC^^: There are atually _two_ entries related to ubuntu in there, one from the HDD and one from the stick... they do look like they point to the correct partition, though [00:22] can you share please? [00:22] "(sudo blkid; sudo efibootmgr -v) | nc termbin.com 9999" [00:24] }} [00:26] http://termbin.com/a6g6 yeah UUID is correct [00:26] the entries use the partuuid [00:27] which one is the usb? sda? [00:27] sdb [00:28] hmm, did it used to boot before fine when the efi partition wasnt on the usb? [00:29] Only booted it once like that, but yes [00:30] i wonder if it's some implementation thing, what's curious to me is that there's no old ubuntu entry in the order, the one before 0002 is windows [00:31] That might be automatic - when I did the update LTS -> normal, it prompted me that Grub was installed on a different disk previously. So it may have removed that automatically and replaced it with these, assuming that it's not a removable media. [00:35] when you say you had to replace boot/bootx64.efi with grubx64.efi to get it to boot, you mean on the usb? [00:35] (just read the rest of your initial post) [00:35] Yes [00:36] The EFI on the Windows disk works as normal when chainloaded from Grub [00:36] }}} [00:36] i see [00:39] which server model is it pikaro ? maybe the message about signing can help get it to boot from the entry using secureboot+shim [00:39] =$ [00:39] might find a screenshot somewhere [00:39] Guest26: please don't post random characters here,. if you have an ubuntu question, you are welcome to ask it. (see https://ubottu.com/y/gl for more info) [00:42] EriC^^: You mean hardware? It's not a server, standard consumer custom build. Just using Ubuntu server minimal to hand-pick packages and get some more pro tools [00:44] But honestly, it's working for now and since there doesn't seem to be a simple solution this is better suited for a forum. Thanks a lot for looking into it in any case!! [00:47] no problem pikaro === ingrim6 is now known as ingrim === catties is now known as Catty === servalan is now known as aglaonike === dstein64- is now known as dstein64 === chris14_ is now known as chris14 [03:52] Hello Everyone. If I may ask; does this channel support Ubuntu Servers as well? [03:52] ubuntu is ubuntu [03:52] Understood clearly, rbox. Thank you. === lord_black is now known as lord_daemon [04:08] hi all! [04:09] jasper_mcvain: there's #ubuntu-server if you didn't find it yet [04:09] I did not realize, thanks for the information, MB. [04:18] help me pls make program https://pastebin.com/hvZ9h44k need luajit [04:19] AzBukiVedi: you can use apt search to search for packages [04:21] done thx [04:22] apt install *luajit* [04:44] If i have a Windows PC then can i install Linux as well so that it gets a Dual Boot option at Startup without affecting the current Windows Installation? [04:46] Guddu: yes, but there need to be taken smart measures [04:46] Guddu: like making a free space on your HD for ubuntu's install [04:46] lotuspsychje, Thanks for your response. I even have 2 SSDs on this server. [04:47] Guddu: a backup is a good idea too, then follow uefi and grub howto [04:47] !uefi | Guddu [04:47] Guddu: UEFI is a specification that defines a software interface between an operating system and platform firmware. It is meant as a replacement for the BIOS. For information on how to set up and install Ubuntu and its derivatives on UEFI machines please read https://help.ubuntu.com/community/UEFI [04:47] !dualboot | Guddu [04:47] Guddu: Dual boot instructions: x86/AMD64: https://help.ubuntu.com/community/DualBoot/Windows - Macs: https://help.ubuntu.com/community/MacBookPro https://help.ubuntu.com/community/YabootConfigurationForMacintoshPowerPCsDualBoot [04:48] lotuspsychje, While there are some benefits to dual-booting (e.g. better performance for a native install), it is not recommended. [04:48] Why is it not recommended? [04:49] Guddu: thats kind of opinion/the users choice [04:49] Guddu: an ideal situation would be using the whole HD/SSD for an Os some would say [04:50] dualboot is kind of tweaking around to have both worlds [04:50] lotuspsychje, I have an idea. May be i can install on a separate disk altogether and change boot order in BIOS whenever I want to switch OS? [04:51] Guddu: thats up to yourself, whats the best way you want to work [04:51] lotuspsychje, Do you find it better than Dual boot option? [04:51] Guddu: many would avice to test ubuntu first on a liveusb, then if like use the whole drive for ubuntu [04:51] dualboot is faster in switching Oses [04:53] Guddu: another idea would be running ubuntu in a windows Virtual machine to test [04:53] lotuspsychje, I have tested it and i like it already. [04:54] Guddu: ok great, then the only question remains, what will you be using windows still for? [04:54] If i have a Ubuntu machine as Virtual Box Guest then will it have an access to USB devices for huge data transfer between devices? [04:54] lotuspsychje, I use programs that are not available for Linux at this stage. Hence Windows continue to remain part of my workflow. [04:55] Guddu: transfer to a VM are possible yes, but the real physical install would be the best choice for you i think [04:55] Yeah. But i feel that vm reduces transfer rate [04:55] Hence I prefer to not use VM [04:55] ok [04:59] I just wrote ubuntu server 22.04 to a thumb drive with exactly this command: `sudo dd if=ubuntu-22.04.3-live-server-amd64.iso bs=4M of=/dev/sda` after syncing, ejecting, and re-inserting the thumb drive, I see the following errors in dmesg: https://dpaste.com/ESHS463WH is this just because it's a 128GB thumb drive but the image is only 2GB? I'd be less concerned if it looked like it was referring to the [04:59] end of the whole usb drive, but that's more like 137438953472 bytes. It *did* boot just fine, but there were some similar (didn't save them) error messages on boot. I'm a bit skiddish to use this as an installer, but nothing is obviously wrong... anyone seen this before and have a good explanation? [05:01] I was build program in Debian, how make .deb? http://explorer.net.ru:8080/temp/rubirc.deb.png meson bulid system [05:02] Ademan_: theres nothign wrong [05:03] AzBukiVedi: this is the Ubuntu support channel. Debian has it's own [05:04] Ubnutu Sever build [05:04] me need .deb to meson [05:05] rbox: I agree it looks ok but I want to understand what's going on better [05:06] [3226496.385412] GPT:Primary header thinks Alt. header is not at the end of the disk. [05:06] if you copied an image that was smaller than the size of the disk [05:06] the header is most defintely not going to be at th ened [06:33] Hi everybody! Happy New Year! :) [06:33] Is somebody here? [06:33] hello [06:35] Hello p0indexter! How are you? :) May I ask something about ubuntu 20.04 and netplan? [06:36] Tomb silence! [06:37] !ask | prova [06:37] prova: Please don't ask to ask a question, simply ask the question (all on ONE line and in the channel, so that others can read and follow it easily). If anyone knows the answer they will most likely reply. :-) See also !patience [06:38] Sorry, i'm almost new on this chat and chat in general! [06:41] I'm trying to connect some Virtual Machines via "Virtual Machine Manager" and I have troubles to connect them! Can Anybody help me? [06:42] https://askubuntu.com/questions/1412503/setting-up-a-bridge-for-host-and-vm [06:54] A more specific question: I have two desktop PC: A and B. On any PC A and B I have a Virtual Machine: VMA and VMB. I want that all the Machines A, B, VMA, VMB communicate them between. All the Machines use ubuntu 20.04! I'm using qemu/KVM with Virtual Machine Manager! [06:55] that works with the bridge described on the article [07:00] OK ravage! I will study the article! Thank you! :) [07:01] yw. basically create a bridge. put your main network interface in it. tell virt-manager to use that bridge [07:14] In order to use the bridge, can I use the GUI of "Virtual Machine Manager" or have I to write the files in the article? === Oz_ is now known as OzWiz [09:09] hi === paulw2u is now known as PaulW2U === EriC^^_ is now known as EriC^^ [13:58] exit [14:24] Hi all [17:21] I can call my app with /home/j/Downloads/qtcreator_build/bin/qtcreator, I've set desktop file which can be open with Command "type qt", I can add to favorites tab as well, but If I open my cpp or h files I can not select qt in Select Application list === Beauregard43 is now known as Beauregard42 [18:16] Hey everyone. When I go to software and updates application / Additional drivers tab. I try and get the latest NVIDIA drivers for 2060. But I get this error pk-client-error-quark: E: http://bw.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu kinetic/main amd64 libglibmm-2.4-1v5 amd64 2.66.5-1 is not (yet) available (404 Not Found [IP: 91.189.91.81 80]) [18:16] What does this mean>? [18:16] Not yet available but why is it on the lsit? [18:16] list` [18:17] could be mirrors are in the middle of syncing [18:17] and the file isn't there yet [18:17] wait an hour and try again [18:19] rbox: Ahh ok ok [18:23] rbox: I tried running sudo apt update and every attempt and fetching a file failed. Could this really be a mirror sync issue? Can I force it to try another mirror? [18:23] i dont think an hour has passed... [18:23] !22.10 [18:23] Ubuntu 22.10 (Kinetic Kudu) was the 37th release of Ubuntu, support ended on July 20, 2023. See !eol and https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-announce/2023-July/000293.html [18:23] the mirrors are set in /etc/sources.list [18:24] oh, you're using an end of life dist? [18:24] lol [18:24] rbox: Hmmm well shit. How do I upgrade that then? [18:24] Or what do I do? [18:25] follow the white rabbit [18:25] ^ [18:25] ioria: Ohhh gawd nooo [18:25] come on, not tragic ^_^ [18:25] ioria: Fine where do I start [18:26] check !eol or clean install [18:26] !upgrades [18:26] For upgrading, see the instructions at https://help.ubuntu.com/community/UpgradeNotes - see also http://www.ubuntu.com/desktop/get-ubuntu/upgrade [18:26] !eol [18:26] End-Of-Life is when security updates and support for an Ubuntu release stop. Make sure to update Ubuntu before it goes EOL so you get updates promptly for newly-discovered security vulnerabilities. See https://help.ubuntu.com/community/EOL and https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Releases for more info. Looking to upgrade from an EOL release? See https://help.ubuntu.com/community/EOLUpgrades [18:27] "sudo do-release-upgrade" [18:27] Ok wait but... it seems like EOF is 6 months from now for the latest release? Is that right? [18:28] support ended on July 20, 2023 [18:28] Mantic Minotaur ... June -.- [18:28] Unless your way far back... than just install fresh [18:28] first, check if available , a simple 'do-release-upgrade -c' will do [18:29] hey guys [18:29] sw3333t: -> Your Ubuntu release is not supported anymore. [18:29] im trying to write log file to a different location [18:30] i introduced these 2 lines, the files got created but it was not adding any contents. how can i ensure or test if this is working [18:30] StandardOutput=append:/var/log/test/access.log [18:30] StandardError=append:/var/log/test/error.log [18:31] If you dont have anything super important on there, I would just reinstall and I usually stick to LTS releases cause I got tired of just that. [18:36] sw3333t: Yea ok [18:36] thanks === RaGE_Syria1 is now known as RaGE_Syria === jfsimon1981 is now known as jfsimon [20:30] Hello [20:32] TechPup: hi..... How can we help? [20:33] I just wanted to chat, if that is against the rules than I shall remove myself from this channel. [20:33] !offtopic| TechPup [20:33] TechPup: #ubuntu is the Ubuntu support channel, for all Ubuntu-related support questions. Please use #ubuntu-offtopic for other topics (though our !guidelines apply there too). Thanks! [20:34] alright [22:12] Could someone help me with this error? [22:12] https://dpaste.org/ezMv4 [22:13] Guddu: did you run sudo apt update beforehand? [22:16] Guddu: if you did, there's still another issue: your ubuntu release has reached its end of life [22:20] tomreyn, https://dpaste.org/COUEX Sudo update gives this error. This is running on a raspberry pi [22:20] Guddu: https://help.ubuntu.com/community/EOLUpgrades explains how to upgrade such releases. I do not know whether tor not this works for Ubuntu *ports*. [22:21] Guddu: these error messages (on your pastes) are a result of your ubuntu release having reached end-of-life. [22:22] tomreyn, I will update my ubuntu version then altogether. What say? Need to find if there is one for raspberry still. [22:23] I currently have Ubuntu 22.10 [22:23] Ubuntu 22.04.3 LTS [22:23] The latest Long Term Supported release of Ubuntu with five years of security patching and maintenance until April 2027 [22:23] So my version is still no EOL i thought [22:23] 22.10 isn't LTS [22:23] i just checked: the EOLUpgrades guide should also be possible for ports. However, I'm not sure whether release upgrades are supported for ports at all. You may want to try a fresh install indeed (after backing up your data and important configurations). [22:24] you're on 22.10, not 22.04 LTS [22:24] tomreyn, You mean I should probbaly do install of 22.04 LTS? [22:25] i mean you should probably do a fresh installation of a supported Ubuntu release. Either 22.04 LTS or 22.10 (non-LTS) [22:25] The one i have is corrupt you mean for some reason? [22:26] not currupt, but no longer supported, and no longer reciving critical security updates [22:26] !eol [22:26] End-Of-Life is when security updates and support for an Ubuntu release stop. Make sure to update Ubuntu before it goes EOL so you get updates promptly for newly-discovered security vulnerabilities. See https://help.ubuntu.com/community/EOL and https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Releases for more info. Looking to upgrade from an EOL release? See https://help.ubuntu.com/community/EOLUpgrades [22:27] https://ubuntu.com/download/raspberry-pi [22:30] Guddu: does this answer your question? [22:31] tomreyn, Thanks. I am now using Balena Etcher to copy the 22.04.3 LTS image on my 64GB Mem Card used by my Raspberry [22:33] Guddu: nice. are you installing desktop, server or core? and on which pi? [22:33] tomreyn, Raspberry PI 4 [22:33] But honestly I don't need Desktop [22:34] I think core would be the best? [22:34] so what are you downloading? [22:34] I use this only for connecting via remote and doing wol on other servers on my lan [22:34] I downloaded Desktop but I was not thinking well until you asked that question. [22:34] core is probably not what you think it is. "core" uses snap packaging only, is a different system than classic ubuntu. [22:35] Ubuntu Server 22.04.3 LTS would be best then. [22:35] right, this should work on pi4 [22:36] tomreyn, Is it a good idea to schedule a daily cron to do apt update? [22:37] that's something you need to decide on, installing apt updates automatically can have positive and negative effects, so you should consider these. [22:38] https://ubuntu.com/tutorials/how-to-install-ubuntu-on-your-raspberry-pi is your installation guide [22:38] better use 'unattended-upgrades' for that also [22:38] not try to create your own cron thing [22:38] unattended-upgrades let you check for and install some or all available apt updates automatically, and optionally do a reboot, too [22:38] Flash fails with Balena. Checking another. [22:39] it's not an iso image, but a raw (but compressed) disk image. [22:40] https://snapcraft.io/rpi-imager [22:40] see the guide i linked for how to get raspberry pie imager for other operating systems [22:40] oops 'pi' [22:41] that's what the holidays did to me! [22:41] you fine piece of.. pie :P [22:41] :-P [23:00] HNY ! [23:02] Awkward.... [23:50] I have a ip of 192.168.100.25 on my raspberry. How can i prevent it from changing? How do i set it to static? [23:53] you can probably assign a static ip via your router web interface? [23:54] i recommend configuring your router as well [23:54] look for dhcp reservation if you don't see it [23:54] or 'lease type' static