[00:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted golang-k8s-apimachinery [amd64] (noble-proposed) [0.29.0-1]
[00:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-isocline [arm64] (noble-proposed) [1.0.9-1]
[00:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-isocline [ppc64el] (noble-proposed) [1.0.9-1]
[00:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-isocline [s390x] (noble-proposed) [1.0.9-1]
[00:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-typst [ppc64el] (noble-proposed) [0.1.0.0-1]
[00:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ruby-deb-version [amd64] (noble-proposed) [1.0.2-1]
[00:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-fork [arm64] (noble-proposed) [0.1.22-1]
[00:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-fork [ppc64el] (noble-proposed) [0.1.22-1]
[00:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-fork [s390x] (noble-proposed) [0.1.22-1]
[00:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-isocline [amd64] (noble-proposed) [1.0.9-1]
[00:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-isocline [riscv64] (noble-proposed) [1.0.9-1]
[00:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-typst [s390x] (noble-proposed) [0.1.0.0-1]
[00:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-fork [armhf] (noble-proposed) [0.1.22-1]
[00:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-isocline [armhf] (noble-proposed) [1.0.9-1]
[00:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-fork [amd64] (noble-proposed) [0.1.22-1]
[00:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-typst [amd64] (noble-proposed) [0.1.0.0-1]
[00:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-fork [riscv64] (noble-proposed) [0.1.22-1]
[00:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: base-files (mantic-proposed/main) [13ubuntu2 => 13ubuntu2.1] (core, i386-whitelist)
[00:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: base-files (jammy-proposed/main) [12ubuntu4.4 => 12ubuntu4.5] (core, i386-whitelist)
[00:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: base-files (focal-proposed/main) [11ubuntu5.7 => 11ubuntu5.8] (core, i386-whitelist)
[01:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: base-files (bionic-proposed/main) [10.1ubuntu2.11 => 10.1ubuntu2.12] (core)
[01:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: base-files (xenial-proposed/main) [9.4ubuntu4.13 => 9.4ubuntu4.14] (core)
[02:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-hslua-repl [amd64] (noble-proposed/universe) [0.1.1-1] (no packageset)
[02:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: golang-k8s-api [amd64] (noble-proposed/universe) [0.29.0-1] (no packageset)
[02:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-hslua-repl [s390x] (noble-proposed/universe) [0.1.1-1] (no packageset)
[02:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-hslua-repl [arm64] (noble-proposed/universe) [0.1.1-1] (no packageset)
[02:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-hslua-repl [armhf] (noble-proposed/universe) [0.1.1-1] (no packageset)
[03:01] <tsimonq2> Please accept my email to ubuntu-release and technical-board on behalf of the Lubuntu Team.
[03:01] <tsimonq2> I promised I'd look at this today, I'd like to get it to the Technical Board today.
[03:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-hslua-repl [riscv64] (noble-proposed/universe) [0.1.1-1] (no packageset)
[03:19] <tsimonq2> ubuntu-release: Hey! Besides the above ML approval request, could we also get a review of picom-conf in Noble source NEW?
[03:20] <tsimonq2> The sooner we get that accepted, the sooner we can include it on the seed, the sooner I can ask for packageset upload access for our Lubuntu Developers, and the sooner it's stable enough for release. :)
[05:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-hslua-repl [amd64] (noble-proposed/universe) [0.1.1-2] (no packageset)
[05:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-async-zip [amd64] (noble-proposed/none) [0.0.16-1] (no packageset)
[05:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-async-zip [armhf] (noble-proposed/universe) [0.0.16-1] (no packageset)
[05:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-async-zip [ppc64el] (noble-proposed/universe) [0.0.16-1] (no packageset)
[05:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: python-trx-python [amd64] (noble-proposed/universe) [0.2.9-1] (no packageset)
[06:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-hslua-repl [s390x] (noble-proposed/universe) [0.1.1-2] (no packageset)
[06:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-async-zip [arm64] (noble-proposed/universe) [0.0.16-1] (no packageset)
[06:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-hslua-repl [arm64] (noble-proposed/universe) [0.1.1-2] (no packageset)
[06:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-async-zip [s390x] (noble-proposed/universe) [0.0.16-1] (no packageset)
[06:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-hslua-repl [armhf] (noble-proposed/universe) [0.1.1-2] (no packageset)
[06:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-async-zip [riscv64] (noble-proposed/universe) [0.0.16-1] (no packageset)
[06:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-hslua-repl [riscv64] (noble-proposed/universe) [0.1.1-2] (no packageset)
[07:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted golang-k8s-api [amd64] (noble-proposed) [0.29.0-1]
[07:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-hslua-repl [arm64] (noble-proposed) [0.1.1-1]
[07:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-hslua-repl [riscv64] (noble-proposed) [0.1.1-1]
[07:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-hslua-repl [amd64] (noble-proposed) [0.1.1-2]
[07:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-hslua-repl [armhf] (noble-proposed) [0.1.1-2]
[07:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-hslua-repl [s390x] (noble-proposed) [0.1.1-2]
[07:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-async-zip [amd64] (noble-proposed) [0.0.16-1]
[07:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-async-zip [armhf] (noble-proposed) [0.0.16-1]
[07:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-async-zip [riscv64] (noble-proposed) [0.0.16-1]
[07:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-hslua-repl [amd64] (noble-proposed) [0.1.1-1]
[07:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-hslua-repl [s390x] (noble-proposed) [0.1.1-1]
[07:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-hslua-repl [riscv64] (noble-proposed) [0.1.1-2]
[07:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-async-zip [arm64] (noble-proposed) [0.0.16-1]
[07:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-async-zip [s390x] (noble-proposed) [0.0.16-1]
[07:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-hslua-repl [armhf] (noble-proposed) [0.1.1-1]
[07:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted python-trx-python [amd64] (noble-proposed) [0.2.9-1]
[07:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-hslua-repl [arm64] (noble-proposed) [0.1.1-2]
[07:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-async-zip [ppc64el] (noble-proposed) [0.0.16-1]
[09:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: golang-k8s-client-go [amd64] (noble-proposed/universe) [0.29.0-1] (no packageset)
[10:28] <schopin> tsimonq2: fwiw I think NEW processing is more an AA thing than a release team thing (yes the intersection of both sets is sizeable, but still, there are some non-release AAs out there ;) )
[10:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted golang-k8s-client-go [amd64] (noble-proposed) [0.29.0-1]
[12:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: base-files (lunar-proposed/main) [12.3ubuntu2 => 12.3ubuntu2.1] (core, i386-whitelist)
[14:32] <jbicha> rbasak: I think it would be helpful to get my mutter SRU into mantic-proposed. I can coordinate a postmortem response but it won't be until later next week since some key people are on holiday now
[14:47] <ahasenack> rbasak: hi, if you could release https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dnsmasq/+bug/2015562 today, that would be awesome, because I have another SRU for dnsmasq and my branch is already on top of what is in jammy-proposed
[14:47] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Launchpad bug 2015562 in dnsmasq (Ubuntu Jammy) "[SRU] Segfault in dnsmasq when using certain static domain entries + DoH (bugfix possibly exists upstream)" [Undecided, Fix Committed]
[14:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libslirp (jammy-proposed/main) [4.6.1-1build1 => 4.6.1-1ubuntu0.1] (ubuntu-server)
[15:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: livecd-rootfs (mantic-proposed/main) [23.10.57 => 23.10.58] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist)
[15:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cloud-init (focal-proposed/main) [23.4-0ubuntu1~20.04.1 => 23.4.1-0ubuntu1~20.04.1] (core, edubuntu, ubuntu-cloud)
[15:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cloud-init (jammy-proposed/main) [23.4-0ubuntu1~22.04.1 => 23.4.1-0ubuntu1~22.04.1] (core, ubuntu-cloud)
[15:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cloud-init (mantic-proposed/main) [23.4-0ubuntu1~23.10.1 => 23.4.1-0ubuntu1~23.10.1] (core, ubuntu-cloud)
[15:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cloud-init (lunar-proposed/main) [23.4-0ubuntu1~23.04.1 => 23.4.1-0ubuntu1~23.04.1] (core, ubuntu-cloud)
[17:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: benchmark [amd64] (noble-proposed/universe) [1.8.3-2] (i386-whitelist)
[17:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: benchmark [i386] (noble-proposed/universe) [1.8.3-2] (i386-whitelist)
[17:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: benchmark [armhf] (noble-proposed/universe) [1.8.3-2] (i386-whitelist)
[17:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: benchmark [s390x] (noble-proposed/universe) [1.8.3-2] (i386-whitelist)
[17:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: benchmark [arm64] (noble-proposed/universe) [1.8.3-2] (i386-whitelist)
[17:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: benchmark [ppc64el] (noble-proposed/universe) [1.8.3-2] (i386-whitelist)
[17:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: parmed [amd64] (noble-proposed/none) [4.2.2+dfsg-3] (no packageset)
[17:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: parmed [arm64] (noble-proposed/none) [4.2.2+dfsg-3] (no packageset)
[17:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: parmed [ppc64el] (noble-proposed/none) [4.2.2+dfsg-3] (no packageset)
[17:37] <vorlon> tsimonq2: I: picom-conf source: debian-watch-file-is-missing ?
[17:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: benchmark [riscv64] (noble-proposed/universe) [1.8.3-2] (i386-whitelist)
[17:44] <rbasak> ahasenack: I looked at 2015562 but there's an ambiguity in the SRU verification. I left a comment.
[17:44] <ahasenack> rbasak: christian was ambiguous?? :)
[17:45] <rbasak> He was not, but the expected Test Plan was, IMHO.
[17:45] <rbasak> If you read the entire text.
[17:53] <arraybolt3> vorlon: there was no release at the time of packaging, thus it was a Git snapshot IIRC.
[17:53] <vorlon> arraybolt3: ack
[17:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: fluidsynth (mantic-proposed/universe) [2.3.3-2.1 => 2.3.3-2.1ubuntu0.23.10.1~ppa2] (i386-whitelist, kubuntu)
[17:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: fluidsynth (mantic-proposed/universe) [2.3.3-2.1 => 2.3.3-2.1ubuntu0.23.10.1] (i386-whitelist, kubuntu)
[17:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: parmed [riscv64] (noble-proposed/none) [4.2.2+dfsg-3] (no packageset)
[18:01] <Eickmeyer> ubuntu-sru: Could I get a reject on the ~ppa2 version of fluidsynth? Accidental upload.
[18:03] <bdmurray> Eickmeyer: for which release?
[18:03] <Eickmeyer> bdmurray: mantic
[18:04] <Eickmeyer> The second one is legit (versioned correctly) and I'm just working on the bug doc now.
[18:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected fluidsynth [source] (mantic-proposed) [2.3.3-2.1ubuntu0.23.10.1~ppa2]
[18:23] <vorlon> arraybolt3: resources/freedesktop/application.appdata.xml.in copyright: none + License: CC0-1.0 is meaningless
[18:24] <vorlon> arraybolt3: I think it would be better to omit mention of this file in debian/copyright; to the extent that there is any creative content in that file at all that might be subject to copyright, it would presumably have the same copyright holder as the rest of the project
[18:27] <vorlon> arraybolt3: picom-conf.lintian-overrides: please don't use this to suppress legitimate warning messages from lintian
[18:27] <vorlon> tsimonq2: ^^
[18:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted picom-conf [source] (noble-proposed) [0.17.0~git20231210-0ubuntu1]
[18:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: picom-conf [amd64] (noble-proposed/universe) [0.17.0~git20231210-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[18:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: picom-conf [arm64] (noble-proposed/universe) [0.17.0~git20231210-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[18:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: picom-conf [s390x] (noble-proposed/universe) [0.17.0~git20231210-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[18:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: picom-conf [armhf] (noble-proposed/universe) [0.17.0~git20231210-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[18:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: picom-conf [ppc64el] (noble-proposed/universe) [0.17.0~git20231210-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[18:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted benchmark [arm64] (noble-proposed) [1.8.3-2]
[18:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted benchmark [ppc64el] (noble-proposed) [1.8.3-2]
[18:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted parmed [amd64] (noble-proposed) [4.2.2+dfsg-3]
[18:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted parmed [ppc64el] (noble-proposed) [4.2.2+dfsg-3]
[18:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted benchmark [armhf] (noble-proposed) [1.8.3-2]
[18:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted parmed [arm64] (noble-proposed) [4.2.2+dfsg-3]
[18:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted benchmark [riscv64] (noble-proposed) [1.8.3-2]
[18:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted parmed [riscv64] (noble-proposed) [4.2.2+dfsg-3]
[18:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted benchmark [amd64] (noble-proposed) [1.8.3-2]
[18:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted benchmark [s390x] (noble-proposed) [1.8.3-2]
[18:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted benchmark [i386] (noble-proposed) [1.8.3-2]
[18:36] <vorlon> I: picom-conf: spelling-error-in-binary "GNU Library Public License" "GNU Library General Public License" [usr/bin/picom-conf]
[18:36] <vorlon> heh
[18:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted picom-conf [amd64] (noble-proposed) [0.17.0~git20231210-0ubuntu1]
[18:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted picom-conf [armhf] (noble-proposed) [0.17.0~git20231210-0ubuntu1]
[18:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted picom-conf [s390x] (noble-proposed) [0.17.0~git20231210-0ubuntu1]
[18:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted picom-conf [arm64] (noble-proposed) [0.17.0~git20231210-0ubuntu1]
[18:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted picom-conf [ppc64el] (noble-proposed) [0.17.0~git20231210-0ubuntu1]
[18:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: picom-conf [riscv64] (noble-proposed/universe) [0.17.0~git20231210-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[18:50] <arraybolt3> vorlon: what warning did I override?
[18:51] <arraybolt3> Also I would strongly disagree CC0-1.0 is meaningless - there are countries with no concept of public domain, and in those countries CC0-1.0 isn't simply a public domain declaration but rather a fully fledged license. Fedora treats it as such (and coincidentally rejects code under CC0-1.0 due to its license terms).
[18:51] <arraybolt3> anyway, lemme check that override
[18:52] <arraybolt3> vorlon: we've been overriding the no-manual-page warnings in almost everything in LXQt as upstream has no intention of writing a manpage, the applications include command-line help, and it was our understanding that the availability of command-line help made the manpage unnecessary.
[18:53] <arraybolt3> I'm happy to fix it and even write a manpage for it, but this is just standard LXQt packaging at the moment.
[19:00] <arraybolt3> vorlon: if the problem is the copyright: none line, I'm happy to replace it with LXQt team.
[19:23] <vorlon> arraybolt3: "countries with no concept of a public domain" inaccurate.  There are countries that have no legal process for *waiving copyright* and *assigning* a work to the public domain; they all have the concept of works that are not subject to copyright and are therefore *in* the public domain.  they also, by and large, expect copy rights to be based on the copyright registration status of a
[19:23] <vorlon> work in the creator's home jurisdiction.  So either the work is in the public domain (Copyright: none) in which case it is pointless to extend a specific CC0 license over it because a) no one has authority to be licensing a public domain work and b) a license on a public domain work can only limit rights, not extend them; or the work is not in the public domain and should not say "Copyright: none"
[19:33] <arraybolt3> vorlon: I'll go with the latter then. I'm happy if you want to patch it while you're right here (tsimonq2 isn't here at this exact moment, he said he'd be away for an hour or two, and I don't have upload rights to fix it myself), just change "Copyright: none" to "Copyright: LXQt team".
[19:33] <vorlon> arraybolt3: no hurry, this didn't block acceptance through NEW
[19:34] <arraybolt3> thanks :) Also if you have the necessary rights and want to expedite things, it would be awesome if you could add the package to the Lubuntu packageset so I can directly fix things. I'm happy to write the devel-permissions email real quick.
[19:36] <vorlon> ehm I do have access to do so but there ought to be a paper trail for such things
[19:36] <vorlon> and I'm not on the DMB so shouldn't actually be the one to exercise that change without their signoff
[19:36] <arraybolt3> ah, kk
[20:10] <arraybolt3> vorlon: question w.r.t. the manpage warning, we've gone to LXQt upstream before over the manpage issues and they were pretty clear that they have no intention of ever writing manpages for their software. Based on that I highly suspect they won't be interested in accepting them either even if we write them. I'm not too excited about the idea of
[20:10] <arraybolt3> maintaining a separate documentation set for already-documented applications, and even if we did write manpages we'd just have to then override the maintainer-manual-page tags since upstream doesn't want them. We've been just ignoring them for that reason, and therefore overriding the warning about them (if we would rather not write them, upstream
[20:10] <arraybolt3> isn't going to, and they're unnecessary, no point in being told they're missing every time we package). Is it really necessary to either leave that tag visible when it's not going to be fixed, or spend extra rather superfluous effort "fixing" it just to end up with another tag to override anyway?
[20:11] <arraybolt3> (picom-conf is part of Qtilities, not LXQt, but they're *very* tightly related.)
[20:17] <vorlon> arraybolt3: what's the basis for saying manpages are unnecessary if there's commandline help?  from my perspective, Debian policy is clear: it is a bug if a command does not have an associated manpage.  Such bugs may go unfixed for long periods of time, but policy definitely says it's a bug - which means the lintian error is correct.  In my view, lintian overrides should only be used when lintian
[20:17] <vorlon> is wrong, the output of lintian is intended for the developer community at large not just the maintainers so I don't consider it appropriate to use it for "bugs we've chosen to ignore/deprioritize"
[20:22] <vorlon> arraybolt3: and a missing manpage is a lintian warning whereas the maintainer-manual-page tag is pedantic (I never look at lintian 'pedantic' output and neither should you, there's lots of stuff in there that's "lintian maintainer opinion" or "buggy implementation of check" rather than policy)
[20:26] <arraybolt3> to be fair, the manpage being "unnecessary" is from a purely practical standpoint, not policy, and policy *does* leave room for omitting manpages (assuming RFC2119 interpretation of the wording). Yes, it says that omitted manpages are considered a bug, but what it doesn't say is that this is a high-priority bug, or that the bug is a violation of
[20:26] <arraybolt3> policy. It's simply a bug, and in this instance it's one that's hard to fix and has very little practical value.
[20:26] <arraybolt3> I suppose help2man would be usable in this instance, I'll investigate its usability here.
[20:27] <arraybolt3> (sidenote, Lubuntu policy is to consider all Lintian tags including pedantic and experimental, we are aware that it's not mandatory to fix those but we do anyway since sometimes they catch things that are nice to catch)
[20:29] <vorlon> right, well, your prerogative, but IME the tags at these levels are so low quality that my time is better spent on almost anything else
[20:29] <arraybolt3> I am somewhat rules-lawyering at this point but it's mainly because I'm defending an established practice. I don't have the authority to tell the rest of the devs "Welp, we're writing manpages now" :P (though I probably can get away with plugging help2man in all over the place)
[20:30] <arraybolt3> sorry :P valid point, I'll do something more worthwhile and let you do so as well
[20:31] <vorlon> hah no I didn't mean this conversation, I meant reviewing pedantic/experimental tag output
[20:32] <arraybolt3> oh haha
[20:32] <vorlon> I don't consider this conversation a waste of time, and I also don't insist that we reach agreement :)
[20:33] <arraybolt3> I really should look into help2man, as long as I can just touch every rules file once and not fight with the pages every time we upload a new LXQt package, then it should fix the whole thing.
[20:35] <vorlon> there's ample precedent for using help2man for this
[20:35] <vorlon> $ grep-dctrl -sPackage -FBuild-Depends help2man /var/lib/apt/lists/*Sources | wc -l
[20:35] <vorlon> 585
[20:35] <vorlon> $
[20:36] <tsimonq2> vorlon: Need anything from me? Looks like arraybolt3's got this one. :)
[20:38] <arraybolt3> nifty, then I'll look into it. tsimonq2: if it works, we should add the use of help2man in manpage-less applications to our policies so we don't rely on brittle human memory.
[20:38] <tsimonq2> arraybolt3: You have upload rights for a reason, JFDI if you think it's worth it and it works. :)
[20:40] <arraybolt3> I actually didn't know I could tweak our policy documents 🤪
[20:40] <arraybolt3> I keep finding out I have permissions I didn't know I had.
[20:42] <arraybolt3> er, actually, I don't have those rights right now... anyway, conversation for a different room
[20:55] <vorlon> tsimonq2: nope, the package is in anyway, the rest is quibbles
[20:56] <tsimonq2> vorlon: Thanks for your help!
[21:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted picom-conf [riscv64] (noble-proposed) [0.17.0~git20231210-0ubuntu1]
[22:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: systemd [amd64] (noble-proposed/main) [255.2-3ubuntu1] (core, i386-whitelist)
[23:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: manuskript (jammy-proposed/universe) [0.12.0-1 => 0.12.0-1ubuntu0.22.04.2] (no packageset)
[23:12] <arraybolt3> ubuntu-sru: ^ this fixes an over-1-year-old bug in Jammy. If it could be looked into sometime soon (maybe within the week?) that would be awesome.
[23:12] <arraybolt3> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/manuskript/+bug/1989203
[23:12] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Launchpad bug 1989203 in manuskript (Ubuntu Jammy) "Manuskript crashes on start" [High, In Progress]
[23:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: thumbor-plugins-gifv [amd64] (noble-proposed/none) [0.1.4-1] (no packageset)