[08:08] <LocutusOfBorg> arraybolt3, debian bug: #1058713 is sponsored
[08:08] -ubottu:#ubuntu-devel- Debian bug 1058713 in wnpp "ITP: picom-conf -- Configuration editor for Picom" [Wishlist, Open] https://bugs.debian.org/1058713
[09:05] <JackFrost> https://ftp-master.debian.org/new/picom-conf_0.17.0-1.html
=== jfsimon1981_b is now known as jfsimon
[16:32] <LocutusOfBorg> arraybolt3, picom-conf is now in sid and noble
[18:29] <tsimonq2> LocutusOfBorg: <3
[18:31] <tsimonq2> https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/picom-conf/0.17.0-1~build1 <3
[18:32] <tsimonq2> @pilot in
=== ChanServ changed the topic of #ubuntu-devel to: Archive: open | Devel of Ubuntu (not support) | Build failures: http://qa.ubuntuwire.com/ftbfs/ | #ubuntu for support and discussion of Focal-Mantic | Patch Pilots: tsimonq2
[18:32]  * tsimonq2 cracks his knuckles
[18:37] <tsimonq2> kannel .
[18:43] <tsimonq2> sidplay . w ack from Eickmeyer
[18:49] <tsimonq2> ncurses-hexedit . w an opportunity for mkukri to get an upload sponsored to Debian if he'd like
[18:52] <tsimonq2> Allowing ItzSwirlz the opportunity to ack cinnamon-desktop-environment before syncing, he indicated 3-4 hours at most
[18:58] <tsimonq2> cunit .
[18:59] <tsimonq2> (^ Maintainer seems to be sorely inactive, an NMU is probably the Right Thing here too.)
[19:01] <tsimonq2> rbasak: I suspect this is something you may be interested in following up on: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lxc/+bug/2039873
[19:01] -ubottu:#ubuntu-devel- Launchpad bug 2039873 in lxc (Ubuntu) "liblxc-dev was built with LXC_DEVEL=1 in Ubuntu 22.04 and later releases" [Undecided, Confirmed]
[19:21] <tsimonq2> dbus .
[19:21] <tsimonq2> @pilot out
=== ChanServ changed the topic of #ubuntu-devel to: Archive: open | Devel of Ubuntu (not support) | Build failures: http://qa.ubuntuwire.com/ftbfs/ | #ubuntu for support and discussion of Focal-Mantic | Patch Pilots: N/A
[20:53] <rbasak> tsimonq2: I resubscribed ~ubuntu-sponsors already hoping that the next pilot will be able to help
=== guiverc2 is now known as guiverc
[22:13] <tsimonq2> rbasak: Not a problem, thanks anyway :)
[22:22] <mkukri> tsimonq2 it looks like the debian bugreport for that also has a patch attached that is similar to mine
[22:23] <mkukri> im wasnt sure if someone else was previously planning on uploading that
[22:29] <tsimonq2> mkukri: Just from the Debian bug report, my impression is that they're waiting for someone to NMU.
[22:29] <tsimonq2> mkukri: I don't think anyone is actively working on it, but I'm willing to take the chance.
[22:29] <tsimonq2> mkukri: (After all, your uploads are technically my responsibility when my key signs them. ;) )
[22:30] <tsimonq2> mkukri: Anyway yeah, I concur, those diffs look really similar. If you ever have the chance to prepare an NMU diff that would be great, if not, totally cool just tell me that.
[22:36] <mkukri> i can do one monday,  or maybe tomorrow.
[22:42] <tsimonq2> Let me know how I can help :)