[08:32] <schopin> @pilot in
[09:14] <schopin> tjaalton: since I see your name pop up on the xserver-xorg changelog, would you mind having a look at https://code.launchpad.net/~jeff250/ubuntu/+source/xorg-server/+git/xorg-server/+merge/457781 ? I'll leave a review on the purely packaging aspects, but the patches are too big for me to feel comfortable since I don't know the first thing about that code base.
[10:10] <sudip> bryceh: about LP: #2048846 it has already been fixed in Debian. Ubuntu just needs to sync.
[10:10] -ubottu:#ubuntu-devel- Launchpad bug 2048846 in offlineimap3 (Ubuntu) "offlineimap3 dep8 failure with testgsshmail" [Medium, New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/2048846
[10:10] <sudip> or maybe not. I will test today
[10:12]  * sudip reads the full report and realises its not fixed :(
[10:22] <bryceh> sudip, I uploaded a workaround, I'm really only interested in getting exim4 to migrate.  If you can find a better solution with Debian definitely feel free to discard my changes and sync it.
[10:24] <sudip> sure. or worst case I can disable the test in Debian also.
[11:27] <tjaalton> schopin: same, I would not enable it without upstream merging it first
[11:29] <schopin> afaict it has been merged in the upstream main branch, I just don't know if they tend to do frequent releases.
[11:41] <tjaalton> yeah I've noticed that a lot has been merged lately, maybe there's going to be a release sometime soon.. I'll ask
[12:43] <mirespace> Hi, does anyone have experience with https://metacpan.org/pod/Crypt::Perl::Ed25519 ? I'm looking for an alternative to libcryptx-perl
[12:45] <mirespace> I know it's not packaged, but I'd like to get opinions on whether it's worth doing.
[13:10] <bochecha> hi everyone, hope people are good on this side of Linux (I'm a Fedora user and developer, so I rarely come in Ubuntu circles)
[13:11] <bochecha> I'm trying to find the package name for the Python libcanberra bindings in Ubuntu, I can't find it :-/
[13:11] <bochecha> on Fedora it's called simply python3-canberra, but that doesn't seem to return anything in Ubuntu?
[13:17] <jbicha> bochecha: it's mostly unpackaged outside Fedora https://repology.org/project/pycanberra/versions
[13:18] <bochecha> jbicha, ah yes, seems so :-/
[13:19] <bochecha> I use it for my input method (ibus-cangjie) to emit error sounds in some cases
[13:19] <bochecha> like, if no Chinese character corresponds to the user input
[13:20] <bochecha> jbicha, is gsound packaged in Ubuntu ? because I'm eventually going to move to that instead of canberra
[13:21] <jbicha> bochecha: yes
[13:22] <bochecha> ok, so one more rason for me to move then :)
[13:22] <bochecha> thank you :D
[14:11] <bochecha> how to install the meson package though on Ubuntu? I thought it was in Universe? :-/
[14:14] <schopin> bochecha: it is?
[14:16] <bochecha> well, my CI failed; https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/cangjie/ibus-cangjie/-/jobs/53571928
[14:16] <bochecha>  /usr/bin/bash: line 136: meson: command not found
[14:17] <bochecha> here are the commands I run in the Ubuntu CI: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/cangjie/ibus-cangjie/-/blob/bochecha/meson-attempt/install_deps.py?ref_type=heads
[14:17] <bochecha>         ['add-apt-repository', '-y', 'universe'],
[14:18] <bochecha>         ['apt-get', 'update'],
[14:18] <bochecha>             'apt-get', 'install', '-y',
[14:18] <bochecha>             'gobject-introspecion', 'ibus-dev', 'libgtk-3-0', 'meson',
[14:18] <bochecha> so meson should get installed :-/
[14:20] <bochecha> and yet: /usr/bin/bash: line 136: meson: command not found
[14:24] <jbicha> typo fixes: gobject-introspection libibus-1.0-dev python3-pycangjie
[14:26] <bochecha> ah, ok, didn't know the packages were named that way on Ubuntu, thank you very much :)
[14:26] <bochecha> gobject-introspection I had found the typo and fixed it myself though
[14:30] <bochecha> I'm surprised about the python3-pycangjie name, the Python module is just "cangjie", it is only the upstream project that is called pycangjie :-/
[14:59] <Odd_Bloke> bdmurray: I have replied to https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/+bug/1969365 with my complete reproduction steps, and verified that the new systemd does indeed fix the problem (and so marked it verification-done-focal).  Thanks again for the ping!
[14:59] -ubottu:#ubuntu-devel- Launchpad bug 1969365 in systemd (Ubuntu Focal) "focal: backport kexec fallback patch" [Low, Fix Committed]
[15:01] <schopin> @pilot out
[19:17] <jbicha> LocutusOfBorg: please either reopen bug 2047780 or open a new bug
[19:17] -ubottu:#ubuntu-devel- Bug 2047780 in bluez (Ubuntu) "BlueZ release 5.71" [Medium, Fix Released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/2047780
[20:10] <tsimonq2> sudip: Could you please remind me which bug report has your NMU diff? I've been looking at way too many bugs recently.
[20:11] <tsimonq2> jbicha: Re-opening, testing, reviewing, and hopefully uploading.
[20:13]  * tsimonq2 slaps LocutusOfBorg with a wet fish for a debian.tar and not a debdiff ;)
[20:19] <tsimonq2> Wow, there's a BUNCH of new, useful flags here. This will have to go through NEW though... heh
[20:19] <tsimonq2> The only thing I'm really concerned about (that I plan on checking) is how old those Conflicts/Replaces are.
[20:21] <sudip> tsimonq2: do you mean the NMU I did for mkukri ?
[20:22] <tsimonq2> sudip: Yes that's the one :)
[20:22] <tsimonq2> If you took care of it, I'm glad :D
[20:22] <sudip> yes, thats done.
[20:22] <tsimonq2> Thanks!
[20:23] <sudip> LP: #2048084
[20:23] -ubottu:#ubuntu-devel- Launchpad bug 2048084 in clog (Ubuntu) "clog FTBFS" [Critical, Fix Released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/2048084
[20:23] <tsimonq2> bluez> So, the latest commit doing anything with Conflicts/Replaces is from 2021 (thanks git blame) - I think we're okay to drop these now, they've been in 22.04
[20:25] <mkukri> there was ncurses-hexedit LP#2048384 too which also affects debian
[20:25] -ubottu:#ubuntu-devel- Launchpad bug 2048384 in ncurses-hexedit (Debian) "ncurses-hexedit FTBFS" [Unknown, New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/2048384
[20:25] <mkukri> and probably LP: #2048086 too, but it isnt marked as such
[20:25] -ubottu:#ubuntu-devel- Launchpad bug 2048086 in cunit (Ubuntu) "cunit FTBFS" [Undecided, Fix Released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/2048086
[20:25] <mkukri> (both should have debian nmu diffs too)
[20:26] <tsimonq2> sudip: Wanna volunteer for those as well, or would you like me to take them? :) ^^
[20:28] <sudip> sure, I can..
[20:29] <tsimonq2> Sounds good, if you run out of time just let me know!
[20:35] <sudip> uhh.. I wont be able to do it today, can do it tomorrow.
[21:32] <sudip> tsimonq2: I have a confusion about LP: #1931391. I can't see it at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/focal/+queue?queue_state=1. is there any other queue?
[21:32] -ubottu:#ubuntu-devel- Launchpad bug 1931391 in git (Ubuntu Focal) "[SRU] git bisect start crashed with SIGSEGV in buffer_slab_peek()" [Undecided, Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1931391
[21:43] <tsimonq2> sudip: That's because, for the second time in a row, I've uploaded an SRU to the queue and the Security Team did an upload before the upload was accepted despite me explicitly asking.
[21:43] <tsimonq2> sarnold: :)
[22:04] <tsimonq2> (I can try again for another SRU round, but I'd like a commitment from the Security Team that they're aware and are actually game to coordinate this time. :))
[22:12] <tsimonq2> 7/12 requests in the sponsorship queue are source NEW, I failed with usbio-drivers last time around and can re-review. If anyone else is looking to help take on those source NEW packages, they'll probably be a timesink, so the more help the better.
[22:15] <tsimonq2> xnox: hi :) https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/backport-iwlwifi-dkms/+bug/2046871 seems like it's up your alley if you're interested
[22:15] -ubottu:#ubuntu-devel- Launchpad bug 2046871 in backport-iwlwifi-dkms (Ubuntu) "migrate to upstream release/coreNN branch" [High, In Progress]
[22:17] <tsimonq2> Oh, looks like Timo took usbio-drivers; thanks! Removing sponsors.