| === justache- is now known as justache | ||
| === guiverc2 is now known as guiverc | ||
| === pushkarnk1 is now known as pushkarnk | ||
| kjerome1 | Hi all, | 12:24 |
|---|---|---|
| kjerome1 | I'm a bit frustrated - I have a simple bugfix pending for the cups-browsed package. | 12:24 |
| kjerome1 | I uploaded a patch about two months ago and opened a merge request, yet they don't seem to get the maintainer's attention. | 12:24 |
| kjerome1 | Is there anything you people could do to help me merge it? Should I email the maintainer? | 12:24 |
| seb128 | kjerome1, hey, do you have the bug/mp reference? it's not showing on http://reports.qa.ubuntu.com/reports/sponsoring/index.html | 12:45 |
| sudip | for reference to others, its LP: #2028172 | 12:45 |
| -ubottu:#ubuntu-devel- Launchpad bug 2028172 in cups-browsed (Ubuntu) "Cups-browsed cannot bind to port 631 as non-root user on Ubuntu 23.04" [Undecided, Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/2028172 | 12:45 | |
| * sudip just added a comment there now | 12:45 | |
| seb128 | seems a bit of a complicate case, I will nudge Till to have him to review again | 12:48 |
| bluca | seb128: do you happen to know what's the status of apparmor patches needed in the upstream kernel for dbus-broker support? | 13:31 |
| bluca | it would be good if the package could be common between debian/ubuntu and I'd be happy to merge the backport in Salsa, as long as it doesn't break on Debian kernels with apparmor | 13:32 |
| seb128 | bluca, hey, I don't know what's the status of upstreaming of the kernel changes but maybe sforshee can help there? | 13:57 |
| seb128 | bluca, https://forum.snapcraft.io/t/snapd-still-requires-out-of-tree-apparmor-patches-for-strict-confinement/19632/20 suggests the remaining patch might land in linux 6.8 | 14:00 |
| seb128 | or jjohansen probably knows the current status better | 14:01 |
| jjohansen | bluca: they should land for the 6.9 kernel, they unfortunately are missing the 6.8 kernel due to a couple of issues | 14:21 |
| jjohansen | seb128: ^ | 14:21 |
| seb128 | jjohansen, thanks | 14:21 |
| bluca | ah nice | 14:21 |
| bluca | you'll probably want to mention it here: https://github.com/bus1/dbus-broker/pull/286 | 14:22 |
| -ubottu:#ubuntu-devel- Pull 286 in bus1/dbus-broker "Apparmor support" [Open] | 14:22 | |
| paride | @pilot in | 14:24 |
| === ChanServ changed the topic of #ubuntu-devel to: Archive: open | Devel of Ubuntu (not support) | Build failures: http://qa.ubuntuwire.com/ftbfs/ | #ubuntu for support and discussion of Focal-Mantic | Patch Pilots: paride | ||
| bluca | if you rub dbus-broker with the changes in that PR, but without kernel changes, do bad things happen? | 14:26 |
| seb128 | I haven't tried ... jjohansen do you know? | 14:34 |
| bluca | if it doesn't have any adverse effects, then I can just backport it to Debian too | 14:43 |
| === pushkarnk1 is now known as pushkarnk | ||
| jjohansen | bluca: I am willing to help with that, depending on target version it will have some dependencies and won't be a single patch | 14:54 |
| bluca | sure that would be ok - I'd really like to see noble ship with dbus-broker v35 as it enables some new pidfd related features we need in systemd | 15:03 |
| paride | @pilot off | 16:44 |
| ubottu | (pilot <in|out>) -- Set yourself as in or out of patch pilot. | 16:44 |
| paride | heh, again | 16:44 |
| paride | @pilot out | 16:44 |
| === ChanServ changed the topic of #ubuntu-devel to: Archive: open | Devel of Ubuntu (not support) | Build failures: http://qa.ubuntuwire.com/ftbfs/ | #ubuntu for support and discussion of Focal-Mantic | Patch Pilots: N/A | ||
| tsimonq2 | <3 | 16:44 |
| tsimonq2 | @pilot in | 16:45 |
| === ChanServ changed the topic of #ubuntu-devel to: Archive: open | Devel of Ubuntu (not support) | Build failures: http://qa.ubuntuwire.com/ftbfs/ | #ubuntu for support and discussion of Focal-Mantic | Patch Pilots: tsimonq2 | ||
| tsimonq2 | Starting with golang-entgo-ent. | 16:45 |
| tsimonq2 | Re-visiting bluez with a local build, Lintian, and testing round... | 16:56 |
| schopin | My eyes are tired: is there anything wrong with this version number for a Mantic SRU? 0.7.3-6.1ubuntu6.23.10.1 | 16:57 |
| schopin | Lintian has a strange complaint that I don't remember seeing before: source: binary-nmu-debian-revision-in-source 0.7.3-6.1ubuntu6.23.10.1 | 16:57 |
| tsimonq2 | schopin: IME Lintian hates that combination for no good reason. | 16:58 |
| tsimonq2 | 0.7.3 (upstream) -6.1 (Debian revision) ubuntu6 (revision in the release pocket) .23.10.1 (SRU version, could be .1, this one is personal pref, I like what you have) | 16:59 |
| tsimonq2 | So, I think you're good :) | 16:59 |
| schopin | In this precise case, couldn't be .1 since we have the same version in Jammy and it'll need SRUing too. | 17:01 |
| schopin | Thanks for the second opinion! | 17:01 |
| tsimonq2 | Perfectly rational; you're welcome :) | 17:02 |
| dbungert | @pilot in | 17:04 |
| === ChanServ changed the topic of #ubuntu-devel to: Archive: open | Devel of Ubuntu (not support) | Build failures: http://qa.ubuntuwire.com/ftbfs/ | #ubuntu for support and discussion of Focal-Mantic | Patch Pilots: tsimonq2, dbungert | ||
| tsimonq2 | dbungert: golang-entgo-ent is done, bluez is in progress, you're welcome to take anything else, as I think bluez will take up the rest of my sponsorship time today. :) | 17:05 |
| dbungert | tsimonq2: awesome, thank you | 17:05 |
| tsimonq2 | of course :) | 17:21 |
| tsimonq2 | Bluez 5.72 tests well on my end. Was just missing a build dependency, but I've uploaded it now. | 17:21 |
| tsimonq2 | @pilot out | 17:21 |
| === ChanServ changed the topic of #ubuntu-devel to: Archive: open | Devel of Ubuntu (not support) | Build failures: http://qa.ubuntuwire.com/ftbfs/ | #ubuntu for support and discussion of Focal-Mantic | Patch Pilots: dbungert | ||
| === NotEickmeyer is now known as Eickmeyer | ||
| dbungert | @pilot out | 21:02 |
| === ChanServ changed the topic of #ubuntu-devel to: Archive: open | Devel of Ubuntu (not support) | Build failures: http://qa.ubuntuwire.com/ftbfs/ | #ubuntu for support and discussion of Focal-Mantic | Patch Pilots: N/A | ||
| liushuyu | Hi ubuntu-devel, I discovered an incorrect upload https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rustc-1.68/1.68.2+dfsg0ubuntu1-0ubuntu5 where the package rebuilds against libgit2 1.7 but the uploader failed to update `Build-Depends`. I have prepared a fix in https://launchpad.net/~liushuyu-011/+archive/ubuntu/rust-vvv-1.68/+packages. | 22:46 |
| tsimonq2 | @pilot in | 22:47 |
| === ChanServ changed the topic of #ubuntu-devel to: Archive: open | Devel of Ubuntu (not support) | Build failures: http://qa.ubuntuwire.com/ftbfs/ | #ubuntu for support and discussion of Focal-Mantic | Patch Pilots: tsimonq2 | ||
| tsimonq2 | liushuyu: Looking :) | 22:47 |
| liushuyu | Since I have prepared the fix before that problematic upload, the release version was not fit for upload | 22:47 |
| tsimonq2 | Knowing LocutusOfBorg, he likely did that NCR from a machine-generated list during a transition. | 22:48 |
| tsimonq2 | liushuyu: Given that Steve was your last sponsor, I don't feel as if I need to review the package much further. I see your upload built successfully in a PPA, it's also on level one of the appropriate transition tracker entry ( https://ubuntu-archive-team.ubuntu.com/transitions/html/html/rust.html ), and Debian has this dependency set as such as well, so if there are issues I have confidence those | 22:56 |
| tsimonq2 | patches can be backported ( https://salsa.debian.org/rust-team/cargo/-/blob/debian/sid/debian/control?ref_type=heads#L22 ). That all being said, not blocking, but I'll be following up on this tomorrow morning to see if there's any other action required according to Britney. | 22:56 |
| liushuyu | tsimonq2: Debian's Rust toolchain packaging is currently very different than Ubuntu. However, Debian is also now transitioning to use Ubuntu's Rust toolchain packaging | 22:58 |
| liushuyu | (which is merging cargo source package into rust source package) | 22:58 |
| tsimonq2 | Thanks for that info, that helps :) I've heard rumblings about more toolchain work in Foundations recently, figured this was a side effect of that. | 22:59 |
| tsimonq2 | liushuyu: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rustc-1.68/1.68.2+dfsg0ubuntu1-0ubuntu6 :) | 23:02 |
| liushuyu | tsimonq2: Yes. There were some resistence from Debian previously regarding the merge. But I believe the Debian Rust Team saw the issue with maintaining Cargo separately (Rust upstream does not intend you to build Cargo outside the `rustc` tree) | 23:02 |
| liushuyu | One of the issue was Cargo when building outside of the `rustc` tree will behave differently than when it is built in-tree | 23:03 |
| tsimonq2 | Looking at the last successful buildset, we'll know if amd64 and friends are successful in ~< 2 hours, we'll know if riscv64 builds in about 12 hours ;) which means starting now it'll be about 14 hours (very roughly speaking) until Britney will tell us about any next steps. | 23:03 |
| liushuyu | ... because when being built in-tree, Cargo will know which version of `rustc` it is working with | 23:04 |
| tsimonq2 | liushuyu: Sound logic. I'm glad Debian is being more cooperative, and I look forward to the day where these are mostly syncable. :D | 23:04 |
| tsimonq2 | (Collaborative is the right word, not cooperative. :P) | 23:05 |
| liushuyu | tsimonq2: Thank you! The RISC-V 64 build times are very unpredictable, it could be ranging from 9 hours to 30 hours if building rustc | 23:05 |
| tsimonq2 | (And that's partly because it's being emulated on amd64. ;)) | 23:06 |
| liushuyu | tsimonq2: Hopefully we will have KVM-capable (while being faster than Intel 80486) RISC-V hardware this year | 23:06 |
| tsimonq2 | That's what I keep hearing rumblings about, it would be nice to hear that definitively at some point. ;) | 23:07 |
| tsimonq2 | liushuyu: Anyway, generally speaking I'm happy to help if you have anything further for me, but as for right this second, I'm going to grab some dinner. | 23:07 |
| tsimonq2 | I'll check back on these two uploads (the one from -release and the one in here) in the morning to see how they went. | 23:07 |
| liushuyu | tsimonq2: Thank you! I think the current situation is just waiting on the builds | 23:07 |
| tsimonq2 | @pilot out | 23:08 |
| === ChanServ changed the topic of #ubuntu-devel to: Archive: open | Devel of Ubuntu (not support) | Build failures: http://qa.ubuntuwire.com/ftbfs/ | #ubuntu for support and discussion of Focal-Mantic | Patch Pilots: N/A | ||
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!