/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2024/01/17/#ubuntu-release.txt

-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: nvidia-graphics-drivers-535-server [amd64] (noble-proposed/restricted) [535.154.05-0ubuntu1] (i386-whitelist)00:02
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: nvidia-graphics-drivers-535 [amd64] (noble-proposed/restricted) [535.154.05-0ubuntu1] (i386-whitelist)00:02
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: nvidia-graphics-drivers-535-server [arm64] (noble-proposed/restricted) [535.154.05-0ubuntu1] (i386-whitelist)00:04
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: nvidia-graphics-drivers-535 [arm64] (noble-proposed/restricted) [535.154.05-0ubuntu1] (i386-whitelist)00:04
=== chris14_ is now known as chris14
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: python-jpype [amd64] (noble-proposed/none) [1.5.0-1] (no packageset)05:17
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: python-jpype [armhf] (noble-proposed/none) [1.5.0-1] (no packageset)05:19
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: python-jpype [ppc64el] (noble-proposed/none) [1.5.0-1] (no packageset)05:20
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: fpylll [amd64] (noble-proposed/none) [0.6.0-1] (no packageset)05:21
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: fpylll [arm64] (noble-proposed/none) [0.6.0-1] (no packageset)05:22
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: fpylll [ppc64el] (noble-proposed/none) [0.6.0-1] (no packageset)05:23
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: python-jpype [s390x] (noble-proposed/none) [1.5.0-1] (no packageset)05:24
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: python-jpype [arm64] (noble-proposed/none) [1.5.0-1] (no packageset)05:27
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: fpylll [s390x] (noble-proposed/none) [0.6.0-1] (no packageset)05:31
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: fpylll [armhf] (noble-proposed/universe) [0.6.0-1] (no packageset)05:37
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: python-jpype [riscv64] (noble-proposed/universe) [1.5.0-1] (no packageset)05:59
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: fpylll [riscv64] (noble-proposed/universe) [0.6.0-1] (no packageset)06:13
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected vim [source] (lunar-proposed) [2:9.0.1000-4ubuntu3.4]07:40
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected flash-kernel [source] (lunar-proposed) [3.106ubuntu15]07:57
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected coreutils [source] (lunar-proposed) [9.1-1ubuntu2.23.04.1]07:58
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected budgie-desktop [source] (lunar-proposed) [10.7.1-1ubuntu3.1]08:02
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected cloud-init [source] (lunar-proposed) [23.4.1-0ubuntu1~23.04.1]08:02
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected open-vm-tools [source] (lunar-proposed) [2:12.3.5-3~ubuntu0.23.04.1]08:02
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected chromium-browser [source] (lunar-proposed) [2:1snap1-0ubuntu1.23.04.1]08:02
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected zfs-linux [source] (lunar-proposed) [2.1.14-0ubuntu0.23.04.1]08:02
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected cloud-init [source] (lunar-proposed) [23.4.1-0ubuntu1~23.04.2]08:02
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted fpylll [amd64] (noble-proposed) [0.6.0-1]08:16
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted fpylll [armhf] (noble-proposed) [0.6.0-1]08:16
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted fpylll [riscv64] (noble-proposed) [0.6.0-1]08:16
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted golang-bitbucket-creachadair-shell [amd64] (noble-proposed) [0.0.8-1]08:16
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted golang-github-cavaliergopher-rpm [amd64] (noble-proposed) [1.2.0-1]08:16
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted golang-github-sassoftware-go-rpmutils [amd64] (noble-proposed) [0.2.0-1]08:16
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted golang-github-sigstore-protobuf-specs [amd64] (noble-proposed) [0.2.1-1]08:16
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted golang-github-veraison-go-cose [amd64] (noble-proposed) [1.2.1-1]08:16
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted python-jpype [arm64] (noble-proposed) [1.5.0-1]08:16
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted python-jpype [ppc64el] (noble-proposed) [1.5.0-1]08:16
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted fpylll [arm64] (noble-proposed) [0.6.0-1]08:16
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted fpylll [s390x] (noble-proposed) [0.6.0-1]08:16
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted golang-github-go-webauthn-webauthn [amd64] (noble-proposed) [0.10.0-1]08:16
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted golang-github-transparency-dev-merkle [amd64] (noble-proposed) [0.0.2-1]08:16
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted python-jpype [armhf] (noble-proposed) [1.5.0-1]08:16
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted python-jpype [s390x] (noble-proposed) [1.5.0-1]08:16
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted fpylll [ppc64el] (noble-proposed) [0.6.0-1]08:16
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted golang-github-shibumi-go-pathspec [amd64] (noble-proposed) [1.3.0-1]08:16
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted python-jpype [riscv64] (noble-proposed) [1.5.0-1]08:16
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted golang-github-adamkorcz-go-fuzz-headers-1 [amd64] (noble-proposed) [0.0~git20230919.8b5d3ce-1]08:16
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted python-jpype [amd64] (noble-proposed) [1.5.0-1]08:16
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted nvidia-graphics-drivers-535-server [amd64] (noble-proposed) [535.154.05-0ubuntu1]08:16
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted nvidia-graphics-drivers-535 [amd64] (noble-proposed) [535.154.05-0ubuntu1]08:16
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted qutip [amd64] (noble-proposed) [4.7.3-1]08:16
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted qutip [ppc64el] (noble-proposed) [4.7.3-1]08:16
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted qutip [s390x] (noble-proposed) [4.7.3-1]08:16
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted nvidia-graphics-drivers-535-server [arm64] (noble-proposed) [535.154.05-0ubuntu1]08:16
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted qutip [armhf] (noble-proposed) [4.7.3-1]08:16
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted nvidia-graphics-drivers-535 [arm64] (noble-proposed) [535.154.05-0ubuntu1]08:16
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted qutip [riscv64] (noble-proposed) [4.7.3-1]08:16
ricotz xnox, hi, dropping *-fbc1-* in control in not correct - https://launchpadlibrarian.net/708564226/nvidia-graphics-drivers-545_545.29.06-0ubuntu2_545.29.06-0ubuntu3.diff.gz08:31
LocutusOfBorgautopkgtest for diaspora-installer/0.7.18.2+debian3: amd64: Pass, arm64: Test in progress, armhf: Regression ♻ , i386: Not a regression, ppc64el: Not a regression, s390x: Regression ♻10:43
LocutusOfBorgseb128, ginggs ^^ they are regressed in release, but since the package doesn't exist in release, the migration-reference/0 fails...10:43
LocutusOfBorgcan we do something?10:43
LocutusOfBorglike hint, forget10:44
LocutusOfBorgunknownmigration-reference/010:44
LocutusOfBorgthis is what happens10:44
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rustc [i386] (noble-proposed/main) [1.74.1+dfsg0ubuntu1-0ubuntu1] (i386-whitelist)11:11
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: golang-github-protonmail-gluon [amd64] (noble-proposed/universe) [0.17.0-2] (no packageset)11:17
LocutusOfBorgdoko, hello, is anybody working on libguestfs rebuild issues?11:23
LocutusOfBorgI would say we need a libvirt merge11:23
LocutusOfBorgMissing build dependencies: libvirt-dev (>= 9.8.0~)11:23
LocutusOfBorglibvirt-sys-perl is sad11:24
dokosergiodj: ^^^11:24
LocutusOfBorghttps://launchpad.net/~costamagnagianfranco/+archive/ubuntu/costamagnagianfranco-ppa/+sourcepub/15700348/+listing-archive-extra11:40
LocutusOfBorgsergiodj, ^^11:40
LocutusOfBorgthis might even build :D11:41
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rustc [amd64] (noble-proposed/main) [1.74.1+dfsg0ubuntu1-0ubuntu1] (i386-whitelist)11:42
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rustc [armhf] (noble-proposed/main) [1.74.1+dfsg0ubuntu1-0ubuntu1] (i386-whitelist)11:42
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rustc [s390x] (noble-proposed/main) [1.74.1+dfsg0ubuntu1-0ubuntu1] (i386-whitelist)11:59
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rustc [ppc64el] (noble-proposed/main) [1.74.1+dfsg0ubuntu1-0ubuntu1] (i386-whitelist)12:03
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rustc [arm64] (noble-proposed/main) [1.74.1+dfsg0ubuntu1-0ubuntu1] (i386-whitelist)12:12
LocutusOfBorgwell some libvirt-daemon-system revert can be now dropped12:44
ginggsLocutusOfBorg: yes, it looks like diaspora-installer can do with a hint12:45
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: livecd-rootfs (jammy-proposed/main) [2.765.34 => 2.765.35] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist)12:47
LocutusOfBorgso this commit needs to be applied again? https://salsa.debian.org/libvirt-team/libvirt/-/commit/c62b8b27161bf69d6a8a47131450de3f81b1fe9d12:48
-ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Commit c62b8b2 in libvirt-team/libvirt "libvirt-daemon-system: Drop polkit rules in legacy pkla format"12:48
LocutusOfBorgseb128, ^^12:48
seb128LocutusOfBorg, no, we updated polkit in lunar, we are using .js as well now12:49
seb128sorry, in mantic12:49
LocutusOfBorgsorry seb128 I was meant to ping sergiodj ^^12:51
LocutusOfBorgI mean, that revert should have been reverted already, but meh, somebody forgot about it...12:51
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted golang-github-protonmail-gluon [amd64] (noble-proposed) [0.17.0-2]13:20
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rustc [arm64] (noble-proposed) [1.74.1+dfsg0ubuntu1-0ubuntu1]13:20
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rustc [i386] (noble-proposed) [1.74.1+dfsg0ubuntu1-0ubuntu1]13:20
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rustc [s390x] (noble-proposed) [1.74.1+dfsg0ubuntu1-0ubuntu1]13:20
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rustc [amd64] (noble-proposed) [1.74.1+dfsg0ubuntu1-0ubuntu1]13:20
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rustc [ppc64el] (noble-proposed) [1.74.1+dfsg0ubuntu1-0ubuntu1]13:20
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rustc [armhf] (noble-proposed) [1.74.1+dfsg0ubuntu1-0ubuntu1]13:20
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: freeradius (jammy-proposed/main) [3.0.26~dfsg~git20220223.1.00ed0241fa-0ubuntu3.1 => 3.0.26~dfsg~git20220223.1.00ed0241fa-0ubuntu3.2] (ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server)13:30
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: qatlib (noble-proposed/primary) [23.11.0-0ubuntu1]14:02
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: iptables (jammy-proposed/main) [1.8.7-1ubuntu5.1 => 1.8.7-1ubuntu5.2] (core, i386-whitelist)14:30
xnoxricotz: huh, indeed it is not, this is buggy ppc64le removal.14:40
xnoxricotz: will open a bug report about it.14:41
sergiodjLocutusOfBorg: hi, I talked to doko a few minutes ago but I won't be able to upload the new libvirt today as I was planning to (there's a regression that I still have to investigate). IIRC doko has plans to fix the issue with the perl package meanwhile14:50
LocutusOfBorgta14:51
ricotzxnox, please don't forget to push the packaging changes for 54514:54
xnoxricotz: ?14:54
xnoxricotz: note 545 is not a recommended driver, and should not be used by default14:55
ricotzxnox, I am referring to https://github.com/canonical/nvidia-graphics-drivers14:56
xnoxricotz: sure, but why do you use that repo?14:56
ricotzxnox, I am aware I am managing https://launchpad.net/~graphics-drivers/+archive/ubuntu/ppa14:57
ricotzxnox, thanks14:58
xnoxricotz: i am curious why you do that though. as it duplicates what we have in the archive; doesn't work with secureboot; breaks LRM; and causes multiple upgrade bugs between releases and supported users =/15:08
xnoxricotz: what benefit does that ppa have over the ubuntu archive?15:09
xnoxricotz: i also relly disline the attirbution -> binary package copies appear as if they were uploaded and endorsed by Canonical employess in said ppa15:10
ricotzxnox, the final release *if* they are available in ubuntu are binary copies, otherwise newer release are provided which are not made available in ubuntu yet15:10
xnoxricotz: you do understand we at ubuntu have pre-release access to all rc builds of drivers months ahead of them being public.15:12
xnoxricotz: and we don't publish them to the archive, due to known issues, bugs, regressions that make it critical to not make them available on ubuntu =)15:12
xnoxricotz: or we publishe them ahead of them being available publically....... i hope you can see that 535.154.05 was build days ahead of it being public.15:13
xnoxricotz: hence it is a disservice most of the time to publish things in that ppa.15:13
ricotzxnox, I know, there are internal releases made available early to you15:13
ricotzso I tend to provide NFB releases like 545, so users can decided to try it out or not15:14
xnoxthe way things packaged in that ppa, when one enables it, things work when they are inline with public archive and public LRM and then break the machines when they are not inline. And potentially shipping known regressions.15:14
xnox545 was packaged in november, regressions found, and we held releasing it until regressions were fixed and verified by nvidia15:15
xnoxhence it is now published.15:15
xnoxricotz: again, disservice.15:15
xnoxricotz: also you are using up disk space in the ppa, why do you feel the need to copy in archive builds of the driver into the ppa, instead of simply deleting it? (as that would be the same effect, people upgrading to the archive builds which are served with mirrors and CDN, rather than by launchpad service only)15:16
xnox(also note archive publications have snapshot service with longer timelines than ppas do)15:17
ricotzxnox, please take a breath and research the history of that ppa instead of discrediting it right now15:18
ricotzkeeping things in sync feels more clear for users than removing the builds15:19
ricotzwhile Alberto was hardly reachable he also didn't made me aware of such concerns15:20
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: php8.3 (noble-proposed/primary) [8.3.0-1]15:53
EickmeyerIs cdimage (or something) stuck? I did a rebuild of both Edubuntu and Ubuntu Studio and neither appeared.16:39
vorlonI saw a build failure email for edubuntu16:53
vorlondue to an ephemeral failure16:53
vorlonEickmeyer: ^^17:01
Eickmeyervorlon: Doesn't explain the lack of Ubuntu Studio. Launchpad's logs show as successful for both, so it happened in the stage between there and publishing and I have completely forgotten where to look. Either way, I can't trigger a rebuild since iso.qa.u.c is stuck at "rebuilding" until a successful publication.17:15
vorlonyeah that bug is frustrating17:16
vorlonI'll retrigger them both manually17:16
EickmeyerIndeed.17:16
EickmeyerThanks. :)17:16
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: logbook [amd64] (noble-proposed/none) [1.7.0-1.0] (no packageset)17:19
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: logbook [ppc64el] (noble-proposed/none) [1.7.0-1.0] (no packageset)17:19
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: logbook [arm64] (noble-proposed/none) [1.7.0-1.0] (no packageset)17:20
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: logbook [armhf] (noble-proposed/none) [1.7.0-1.0] (no packageset)17:21
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: python-qmix [amd64] (noble-proposed/universe) [1.0.6-6] (no packageset)17:21
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: logbook [s390x] (noble-proposed/none) [1.7.0-1.0] (no packageset)17:22
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted logbook [amd64] (noble-proposed) [1.7.0-1.0]17:24
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted logbook [armhf] (noble-proposed) [1.7.0-1.0]17:24
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted logbook [s390x] (noble-proposed) [1.7.0-1.0]17:24
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted logbook [arm64] (noble-proposed) [1.7.0-1.0]17:24
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted python-qmix [amd64] (noble-proposed) [1.0.6-6]17:24
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted logbook [ppc64el] (noble-proposed) [1.7.0-1.0]17:24
Eickmeyervorlon: Now that we have Edubuntu part of ubuntu-images for the Raspberry Pi, how do we go about getting daily images built?17:44
EickmeyerI do realize we're in unprecedented territory.17:44
jbichaI believe Ubuntu Desktop/Server don't even do daily builds for Raspberry Pi17:46
Eickmeyerjbicha: They do.17:46
jbichaEickmeyer: where?17:51
Eickmeyerjbicha: Desktop: https://cdimage.ubuntu.com/daily-preinstalled/ Server: https://cdimage.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-server/daily-preinstalled/17:51
jbichathank you17:53
Eickmeyeryw17:53
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: golang-github-henrybear327-go-proton-api [amd64] (noble-proposed/universe) [1.0.0-3] (no packageset)18:28
bdmurrayEickmeyer: ubuntustudio timed out getting the seeds18:44
bdmurrayan email was sent to ubuntustudio-release@lists.launchpad.net is that the correct destination?18:44
Eickmeyerbdmurray: Oh, ok. Well, it's fine upon the retry.18:44
Eickmeyerbdmurray: For some reason, those aren't going through. Not sure why.18:45
tsimonq2Reminds me that I need to follow up on bug 2039492 so all Kubuntu systems (and derivatives) aren't hammering git.l.n...18:46
-ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Bug 2039492 in plasma-distro-release-notifier (Ubuntu Noble) "[SRU] plasma-distro-release-notifier gets EOL data from git.launchpad.net" [High, In Progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/203949218:46
tsimonq2I remember asking Colin if there's signs of huge load on that page from his end, and his response (to my recollection) was "meh, pretty negligible, but this is worthwhile to fix."18:47
bdmurrayEickmeyer: It doesn't look like any email has gone to that list18:47
Eickmeyertsimonq2: Been waiting on that.18:48
tsimonq2Eickmeyer: Been going through my old backlog and cleaning everything up anyway. I can commit to having a response to sitter upstream this week.18:49
Eickmeyerbdmurray: Yeah, strange. It should be. Originally it to a lists.ubuntu.com address, but we got complaints so we switched it to the launchapad one to try to alleviate that.18:49
Eickmeyertsimonq2: 👍18:49
bdmurrayEickmeyer: you might check https://launchpad.net/~ubuntustudio-release/+mailinglist-moderate19:08
Eickmeyerbdmurray: https://i.imgur.com/F3imYb9.png19:09
Eickmeyer ¯\_(ツ)_/¯19:10
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted golang-github-henrybear327-go-proton-api [amd64] (noble-proposed) [1.0.0-3]19:41
vorlonEickmeyer: submit changes against lp:ubuntu-cdimage, and specifically etc/crontab19:43
Eickmeyervorlon: Ok, I'll get on it.19:43
vorlonand then that might fail because of some missing pieces in livecd-rootfs which we can work through19:43
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted livecd-rootfs [source] (jammy-proposed) [2.765.35]19:43
vorlonand then we also need to make sure we get it on the ISO tracker, with test cases19:43
EickmeyerSure, that makes sense.19:44
vorlonEickmeyer: oh you will also need to update etc/default-arches to say which arches edubuntu daily-preinstalled is built for by default (namely, arm64+raspi and not amd64).  This should NOT go as an architecture override in etc/crontab19:45
Eickmeyervorlon: Noted. I'll be sure to be aware of that.19:45
vorlonEOL data from git.lp.n> lolwut19:47
EickmeyerSeemed like a good idea at the time. Working on getting that changed.19:48
EickmeyerWith tsimonq2's help.19:48
vorlonwrt mail delivery, can confirm that mail to ubuntustudio-release@ successfully made it off the cdimage server for delivery19:48
EickmeyerCan confirm that it didn't even make it to a spam folder here.19:49
vorlonthat's a launchpad mailing list, so there should be a record on the server of it?19:50
vorlonby "server" I mean "web ui"19:51
EickmeyerSadly, I have nothing in the moderation queue.19:53
vorlonnor a log of auto-rejected messages?19:55
EickmeyerNor anything in the archive.19:56
vorlonok.  the only escalation path is to Canonical IS then19:56
bdmurrayWell maybe send a test message to the list from somewhere else19:57
vorlonif you do it from a mail server that you control and can see logs on, and will dispatch to lists.launchpad.net directly, yes19:57
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: samba [amd64] (noble-proposed/main) [2:4.19.4+dfsg-2ubuntu1] (core, i386-whitelist)20:03
EickmeyerYep, just tried a test email and everything is being lost to the ether. I'll ask IS and there will likely be an RT filed.20:07
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: samba [ppc64el] (noble-proposed/main) [2:4.19.4+dfsg-2ubuntu1] (core, i386-whitelist)20:08
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: samba [s390x] (noble-proposed/main) [2:4.19.4+dfsg-2ubuntu1] (core, i386-whitelist)20:32
Eickmeyervorlon: https://code.launchpad.net/~edubuntu-dev/ubuntu-cdimage/+git/ubuntu-cdimage/+merge/458839 ? Not sure if this looks right, but have fun grilling me.20:37
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: samba [arm64] (noble-proposed/main) [2:4.19.4+dfsg-2ubuntu1] (core, i386-whitelist)20:40
vorlonEickmeyer: you should not (need to) pass SUBPROJECT20:41
EickmeyerShould it run as a separate cron line then?20:43
vorlonEickmeyer: also you shouldn't need to add an etc/default-arches line for the daily-live image since we're not meaning to change anything there20:44
vorlonEickmeyer: separate cron line> orthogonal20:44
vorlonjust don't set SUBPROJECT for it20:44
EickmeyerAh, I see.20:44
vorlonthere's a bigger refactor in the back of my mind to consolidate the image dispatching to do it all around the same time of day instead of trying to stagger them around the clock, because the reason for the latter is definitively gone20:53
vorlonand then dispatch all commands in parallel with no cron entries with multiple commands in sequence20:53
vorlonbut that's not your problem20:53
Eickmeyervorlon: ack20:54
Eickmeyervorlon: Either way, I made the changes, so hopefully that should do the trick.20:54
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libreoffice [source] (jammy-backports) [4:7.5.9-0ubuntu0.23.04.1~bpo22.04.1]20:57
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted samba [amd64] (noble-proposed) [2:4.19.4+dfsg-2ubuntu1]21:17
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted samba [ppc64el] (noble-proposed) [2:4.19.4+dfsg-2ubuntu1]21:17
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted samba [arm64] (noble-proposed) [2:4.19.4+dfsg-2ubuntu1]21:17
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted samba [s390x] (noble-proposed) [2:4.19.4+dfsg-2ubuntu1]21:17
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cockpit-machines [source] (jammy-backports) [304-1~bpo22.04.1]21:18
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected gallery-dl [source] (jammy-backports) [1.26.4-1~bpo22.04.1]21:18
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected cockpit [source] (jammy-backports) [307-1~bpo22.04.1]21:18
tsimonq2Very Important email sent to technical-board and ubuntu-release. This seems like another reminder for me to fix sending from @ubuntu.com...21:19
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cockpit [source] (jammy-backports) [308-1~bpo22.04.1]21:19
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted limnoria [source] (jammy-backports) [2023.11.18-1~bpo22.04.1]21:21
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gallery-dl [source] (jammy-backports) [1.26.5-1~bpo22.04.1]21:22
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cockpit-machines [source] (lunar-backports) [304-1~bpo23.04.1]21:23
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected cockpit [source] (lunar-backports) [307-1~bpo23.04.1]21:23
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cockpit-podman [source] (lunar-backports) [82-1~bpo23.04.1]21:23
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cockpit [source] (lunar-backports) [308-1~bpo23.04.1]21:23
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected cockpit [source] (mantic-backports) [307-1~bpo23.10.1]21:24
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cockpit-machines [source] (mantic-backports) [304-1~bpo23.10.1]21:26
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cockpit [source] (mantic-backports) [308-1~bpo23.10.1]21:26
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cockpit-podman [source] (mantic-backports) [82-1~bpo23.10.1]21:26
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libcamera [amd64] (noble-proposed/main) [0.2.0-1ubuntu1] (i386-whitelist)21:40
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libcamera [i386] (noble-proposed/main) [0.2.0-1ubuntu1] (i386-whitelist)21:40
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libcamera [arm64] (noble-proposed/main) [0.2.0-1ubuntu1] (i386-whitelist)21:43
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libcamera [ppc64el] (noble-proposed/main) [0.2.0-1ubuntu1] (i386-whitelist)21:43
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libcamera [s390x] (noble-proposed/main) [0.2.0-1ubuntu1] (i386-whitelist)21:44
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libcamera [amd64] (noble-proposed) [0.2.0-1ubuntu1]21:53
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libcamera [i386] (noble-proposed) [0.2.0-1ubuntu1]21:53
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libcamera [s390x] (noble-proposed) [0.2.0-1ubuntu1]21:53
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libcamera [arm64] (noble-proposed) [0.2.0-1ubuntu1]21:53
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libcamera [armhf] (noble-proposed/main) [0.2.0-1ubuntu1] (i386-whitelist)21:53
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libcamera [ppc64el] (noble-proposed) [0.2.0-1ubuntu1]21:53
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libcamera [armhf] (noble-proposed) [0.2.0-1ubuntu1]21:53
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: golang-github-henrybear327-proton-api-bridge [amd64] (noble-proposed/universe) [1.0.0-2] (no packageset)22:16
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted golang-github-henrybear327-proton-api-bridge [amd64] (noble-proposed) [1.0.0-2]22:17
vorlonEickmeyer: I mean "edubuntu", not "edubuntu-preinstalled"22:22
Eickmeyervorlon: Oh. 😅22:22
Eickmeyervorlon: fixed22:23
vorlonEickmeyer: oh ah we do also need to set it up as a livefs in launchpad (etc/livefs-launchpad); I'll take care of that bit there's no sense in you raising an MP since the cdimage team has to actually create the launchpad livefs entry22:31
Eickmeyervorlon: Makes sense.22:31
Eickmeyervorlon: Also, heads-up: I'm pretty sure it was you and your daughter(?) that inspired us to make an ubuntu-edu-music metapackage that won't be pre-installed, but to be made available. If you have any package suggestions, let me know. :)22:35
vorlonI have a son; not sure what would have inspired that?22:38
EickmeyerMight've been a comment on a bug report, had something to do with rosegarden.22:39
vorlonnot me22:39
EickmeyerOk, fair. Someone inspired it. :)22:39
vorlonSo. do we want the information that edubuntu preinstalled is an 'ubuntu-image' project stored in livecd-rootfs, or in the launchpad livefs metadata22:51
vorlonfor ubuntu desktop it's currently in both22:51
vorlonI think in principle it should be in launchpad so we continue to make livecd-rootfs increasingly thinner22:51
EickmeyerHmm... is there any major difference with how it's presented? I mean, would one preclude the other from being published on cdimage.u.c?22:53
vorlonno22:53
EickmeyerSo, I think if we don't need to use livecd-rootfs, let's not.22:54
vorlonwe *use* livecd-rootfs; it's just a question of where to store this particular piece of information. and I'm convinced launchpad livefs metadata is the right answer22:54
EickmeyerI'm inclined to agree so it's not stored a million different places.22:55
vorlonok, https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-cdimage/+livefs/ubuntu/noble/edubuntu-preinstalled/ now exists22:55
EickmeyerExcellent.22:56
vorlonnote that this is PROJECT=edubuntu and SUBPROJECT=preinstalled; changes will be needed to livecd-rootfs that match this22:56
EickmeyerOk. I'll take a look.22:56
vorlonkicking off a manual build that I know will fail, for funsies23:01
vorlonI love that launchpad gives an estimated finish time with no priors23:05
sarnold:D23:07
sarnoldmaybe it was a parting gift from colin, a quick little solution to the halting problem on his way out the door23:07
vorlonlol23:07
vorlonduration: 7.375µs23:07
sarnoldlol23:07
vorlonwell thank you for the precision, ubuntu-image23:07
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: golang-github-common-nighthawk-go-figure [amd64] (noble-proposed/none) [0.0~git20210622.734e95f-1] (no packageset)23:16
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: igor2 [amd64] (noble-proposed/none) [0.5.3-2] (no packageset)23:16
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: puppet-module-rally [amd64] (noble-proposed/none) [5.4.0-1] (no packageset)23:16
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: golang-github-zeebo-errs [amd64] (noble-proposed/none) [1.3.0-2] (no packageset)23:16
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libsmacker [amd64] (noble-proposed/none) [1.2.0-1] (no packageset)23:16
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: nextcloud-spreed-signaling [amd64] (noble-proposed/universe) [1.2.2-2] (no packageset)23:17
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-hickory-proto [amd64] (noble-proposed/universe) [0.24.0-1] (no packageset)23:17
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: liblouisutdml [amd64] (noble-proposed/main) [2.12.0-3] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server)23:18
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-hickory-proto [ppc64el] (noble-proposed/universe) [0.24.0-1] (no packageset)23:18
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: liblouisutdml [arm64] (noble-proposed/main) [2.12.0-3] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server)23:19
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libsmacker [ppc64el] (noble-proposed/universe) [1.2.0-1] (no packageset)23:19
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: liblouisutdml [ppc64el] (noble-proposed/main) [2.12.0-3] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server)23:21
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: nextcloud-spreed-signaling [ppc64el] (noble-proposed/universe) [1.2.2-2] (no packageset)23:21
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: nextcloud-spreed-signaling [arm64] (noble-proposed/universe) [1.2.2-2] (no packageset)23:21
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted golang-github-zeebo-errs [amd64] (noble-proposed) [1.3.0-2]23:21
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted liblouisutdml [amd64] (noble-proposed) [2.12.0-3]23:21
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted liblouisutdml [ppc64el] (noble-proposed) [2.12.0-3]23:21
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libsmacker [ppc64el] (noble-proposed) [1.2.0-1]23:21
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted nextcloud-spreed-signaling [arm64] (noble-proposed) [1.2.2-2]23:21
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted puppet-module-rally [amd64] (noble-proposed) [5.4.0-1]23:21
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-hickory-proto [ppc64el] (noble-proposed) [0.24.0-1]23:21
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted igor2 [amd64] (noble-proposed) [0.5.3-2]23:21
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libsmacker [amd64] (noble-proposed) [1.2.0-1]23:21
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted nextcloud-spreed-signaling [ppc64el] (noble-proposed) [1.2.2-2]23:21
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted liblouisutdml [arm64] (noble-proposed) [2.12.0-3]23:21
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-hickory-proto [amd64] (noble-proposed) [0.24.0-1]23:21
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted nextcloud-spreed-signaling [amd64] (noble-proposed) [1.2.2-2]23:21
Eickmeyer7.375µs> HAHAHAHA23:21
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted golang-github-common-nighthawk-go-figure [amd64] (noble-proposed) [0.0~git20210622.734e95f-1]23:21
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: nextcloud-spreed-signaling [armhf] (noble-proposed/universe) [1.2.2-2] (no packageset)23:21
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: liblouisutdml [armhf] (noble-proposed/main) [2.12.0-3] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server)23:22
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libsmacker [armhf] (noble-proposed/universe) [1.2.0-1] (no packageset)23:22
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-hickory-proto [arm64] (noble-proposed/universe) [0.24.0-1] (no packageset)23:23
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-hickory-proto [armhf] (noble-proposed/universe) [0.24.0-1] (no packageset)23:23
athosHi :) Could anyone please accept php8.3 from the new queue?23:27
vorlondo I have to23:28
vorlondone23:29
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted liblouisutdml [armhf] (noble-proposed) [2.12.0-3]23:29
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-hickory-proto [armhf] (noble-proposed) [0.24.0-1]23:29
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-hickory-proto [arm64] (noble-proposed) [0.24.0-1]23:29
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libsmacker [armhf] (noble-proposed) [1.2.0-1]23:30
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted php8.3 [sync] (noble-proposed) [8.3.0-1]23:30
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted nextcloud-spreed-signaling [armhf] (noble-proposed) [1.2.2-2]23:30
athosI suppose there is automation in place to accept packages in new. I wonder what the rules are (from checking the queue in the past few hours, it seems it was not being picked up)23:30
athosthanks, vorlon23:30
dokonew processing is always manual23:32
vorlonathos: packages that are auto-synced from Debian are also auto-accepted from NEW but this was not auto-synced, it was manual.  binary packages that come from Debian syncs are batch-processed using the `new-binary-debian-universe` command.  But there is no automation for NEW source packages that are not Debian autosyncs23:33
dokodid you ever see a response time from the server team below 5h? ;p23:33
vorlonit might be reasonable for us to have such automation IMHO23:33
vorlonsuccess! (by which I mean fail) https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-cdimage/+livefs/ubuntu/noble/edubuntu-preinstalled/+build/56575523:35
EickmeyerTask failed successfully23:35
athosaha! thanks :)23:35
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: liblouisutdml [s390x] (noble-proposed/main) [2.12.0-3] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server)23:36
vorlonEickmeyer: ^^ it actually got quite a bit farther than I expected trying to build this with ubuntu-image before failing, uh it even used the correct image definition file without there being TTBOMK any edubuntu-specific code in livecd-rootfs to know to do this? nevertheless it failed *during* ubuntu-image with an error I don't immediately understand23:36
vorlon"umount: /tmp/ubuntu-image-a610cb9f-2939-4dca-91d5-592ad944f29e/chroot/dev: target is busy." looks approximately like one of mwhudson's theses23:37
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted liblouisutdml [s390x] (noble-proposed) [2.12.0-3]23:37
vorlonEickmeyer: to try to reproduce this locally you would want to run ubuntu-image inside a lxd container23:38
EickmeyerYeah, uh... I just shot a MP? https://code.launchpad.net/~edubuntu-dev/livecd-rootfs/+git/livecd-rootfs/+merge/45885123:39
EickmeyerDon't know if that will make a difference or not.23:40
vorlonit won't23:41
EickmeyerOk, so that's what you meant earlier.23:42
vorlonI am actually very pleasantly surprised that livecd-rootfs required no changes for this, that never happens23:43
vorlonI mean, in principle that's part of what we're trying to achieve with ubuntu-image. BUT STILL23:44
EickmeyerRight. Still doesn't solve the problem with what I can only assume is the tmpfs being unmounted prematurely.23:45
vorlonthat's not it, but there's no point trying to go into details here. it's an ubuntu-image bug, which I'll leave to you to file23:46
EickmeyerYay for me! /s23:47
EickmeyerBug 204969523:49
-ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Bug 2049695 in Ubuntu Image "LXD build of edubuntu raspberry pi images fail" [Undecided, New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/204969523:49
EickmeyerMight be an inaccurate short description, but it's close.23:49
vorlonlooks good23:50
vorlonI do encourage you to try to reproduce it on your own with an unadorned lxd container, to verify whether it needs launchpad's various lxd configuration bits to reproduce23:50
EickmeyerI do wonder if it's the difference between 3.1 and 3.1+snap7 which has a lot of bug fixes. I'm assuming LP is grabbing 3.1 (stable)?23:52
vorlonthe log should expose that information, does it?23:52
vorlonubuntu-image 3.1 from Canonical** installed23:53
Eickmeyervorlon: Yep. Just about to paste that.23:53
Eickmeyer3.1 is pretty buggy.23:53
vorlonI don't know what the differences are between the two (or if there are such significant differences, why the new one is merely labeled '3.1+snap7').  But 3.1 is currently latest/stable, so yes23:54
Eickmeyerupils had me use 3.1+snap7 in the latest testing as it was missing some key fixes. I believe 3.1+snap7 is eventually supposed to turn into 3.2 if it gets more commits, but I'm not entirely sure, that's a Lukasz thing.23:55
EickmeyerI do know that 3.1 is where I had the most failures.23:56

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!