[00:46] <rbasak> sudip: I think you're right to say that it's inappropriate to take a massive change into an SRU like that, but I don't think it follows that the bug is "Won't Fix". It might be possible to fix the bug by finding a more minimal fix, and we wouldn't want to rule that out.
[00:47] <rbasak> So to me the bug itself sounds valid for Mantic, but the reporter's assumed solution is not.
[00:50] <rbasak> "and Mantic not being a LTS release, a backport of 2.5.1-1 is also not possible" -> I'm not sure what you mean by that. What would be different if this affected Jammy?
[07:10] <sudip> rbasak: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuBackports says "Backports to non-LTS are not accepted (with exceptions).". and my interpretation (I might be wrong) was that backports are only accepted if its LTS. So, backports to Jammy will be accepted but Mantic wont be.
[08:27] <rbasak> Ah right. Thanks.