=== guiverc2 is now known as guiverc [13:49] arraybolt3: Still interested in dotnet? Looks like it could be all yours. :) === coreycb_ is now known as coreycb === m_ueberall is now known as ueberall === bdmurray_ is now known as bdmurray [18:53] any idea why autopkgtest accepted my resquest - https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/running#pkg-ganeti ? [18:53] I didn't know I have such powers [19:05] sudip: are you a per-package uploader? I *think* you can request autopkgtests for packages you have upload rights to, and if you have PPU rights then you have some powers. Not certain that's what's happening, but I seem to remember doing something similar in Lubuntu-land once. [19:06] hmm, looks like you aren't a PPU though [19:06] in that instance :shrug: beats me :P [19:06] arraybolt3: no, I was planning to apply for PPU. but the wiki was little confusing :( [19:07] I dunno then. I don't think I've ever triggered something like that before. To be clear, you clicked on an autopkgtest triggering link and that happened? [19:07] * arraybolt3 is a bit hazy on how the autopkgtest guts work there [19:07] arraybolt3: yes [19:09] if no one here knows how you have those rights, you could ask in #canonical-sysadmin about it. (Or #launchpad, not sure which one of those two teams controls the autopkgtest infra, I would *guess* #canonical-sysadmin though) [19:09] well, I dont mind having such powers :) [19:09] heh :) [19:38] shoot, cdbs doesn't exist anymore and now it's jamming up TigerVNC in Focal. [19:39] so... I guess now I spin up a minimalistic Focal VM. [20:11] waveform: sorry, I again missed updating maintainer, even though I now have a script in "--post-build-commands" warning me about it :'( [20:16] * sudip has now modified the script to fail the build if maintainer is not updated [20:45] schopin: hey, let me know if you have more FTBFSes there. I fixed two out of the three you mentioned this morning (cp2k is more involved and will require more time/investigation) [20:57] sergiodj: have you seen this report? https://people.canonical.com/~ginggs/ftbfs-report/test-rebuild-20231215-noble-glibc-noble.html [20:58] dbungert: I have, but I was under the impression that schopin had a different list [21:00] the ftbfs report analysis resulted in this list - https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/glibc/+bugs?field.tag=test-rebuild-glibc-noble [21:01] most of them are unassigned. [21:02] ravikant_: thanks [21:03] sergiodj: you're welcome [21:07] sergiodj: following are some for universe, these are not glibc related. [21:07] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/php-symfony-polyfill/+bug/2049901 [21:07] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/r-bioc-savr/+bug/2049910 [21:07] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/taurus/+bug/2049914 [21:07] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/taurus-pyqtgraph/+bug/2049915 [21:07] -ubottu:#ubuntu-devel- Launchpad bug 2049901 in php-symfony-polyfill (Ubuntu) "php-symfony-polyfill FTBFS on noble" [Undecided, New] [21:07] -ubottu:#ubuntu-devel- Launchpad bug 2049910 in r-bioc-savr (Ubuntu) "r-bioc-savr FTBFS on noble" [Undecided, New] [21:07] -ubottu:#ubuntu-devel- Launchpad bug 2049914 in taurus (Ubuntu) "taurus FTBFS on noble" [Undecided, New] [21:07] -ubottu:#ubuntu-devel- Launchpad bug 2049915 in taurus-pyqtgraph (Ubuntu) "taurus-pyqtgraph FTBFS on noble" [Undecided, New] [21:09] I'll take a look at them [21:17] It's late but I was cleaning up some things (and, well, testing a new version of svt-av1); looking at https://ubuntu-archive-team.ubuntu.com/proposed-migration/update_excuses.html#gnutls28 , I see that exim4 on armhf uses 4.96-17ubuntu2.1, [21:17] on ppc64el 4.97-3ubuntu1, and elsewhere 4.97-3ubuntu2 but why does it use differ [21:17] ent versions? and how do we make tests use the same version everywhere? [21:46] adrien: #u-release is a general spot for p-m generally speaking :) [21:47] huh, right, I tend to ask on the same channel as my last message too much :P [21:48] now is bedtime, I'll see that tomorrow, thanks :) [21:48] Sorry, finding the best answer for you, we can followup there if you'd like? [21:48] Not a prob :) [22:23] sergiodj: I'm close to done with tinyxml2, looking at hiredis next