-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pbcopper [riscv64] (noble-proposed/universe) [2.3.0+dfsg-2] (no packageset) | 00:05 | |
=== NotEickmeyer is now known as Eickmeyer | ||
tsimonq2 | xnox: FYI say hi to r/Ubuntu where https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/zfs-linux/+bug/2044657/comments/48 is linked. | 03:10 |
---|---|---|
-ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Launchpad bug 2044657 in zfs-linux (Ubuntu Jammy) "Multiple data corruption issues in zfs" [High, Confirmed] | 03:10 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gnome-snapshot [amd64] (noble-proposed/none) [45.2-2] (no packageset) | 05:24 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gnome-snapshot [ppc64el] (noble-proposed/none) [45.2-2] (no packageset) | 05:26 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gnome-snapshot [s390x] (noble-proposed/none) [45.2-2] (no packageset) | 05:26 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gnome-snapshot [armhf] (noble-proposed/universe) [45.2-2] (no packageset) | 05:48 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gnome-snapshot [arm64] (noble-proposed/universe) [45.2-2] (no packageset) | 05:53 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gnome-snapshot [riscv64] (noble-proposed/universe) [45.2-2] (no packageset) | 07:04 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gnome-snapshot [amd64] (noble-proposed) [45.2-2] | 09:05 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gnome-snapshot [armhf] (noble-proposed) [45.2-2] | 09:05 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gnome-snapshot [riscv64] (noble-proposed) [45.2-2] | 09:06 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gpu-burn [amd64] (noble-proposed) [0+git20240115+ds-1] | 09:06 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pbcopper [arm64] (noble-proposed) [2.3.0+dfsg-2] | 09:06 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pbcopper [riscv64] (noble-proposed) [2.3.0+dfsg-2] | 09:06 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rustc [arm64] (noble-proposed) [1.75.0+dfsg0ubuntu1-0ubuntu1] | 09:06 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted srcpd [arm64] (noble-proposed) [2.1.6-1] | 09:06 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted srcpd [ppc64el] (noble-proposed) [2.1.6-1] | 09:06 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted srcpd [s390x] (noble-proposed) [2.1.6-1] | 09:06 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gnome-snapshot [arm64] (noble-proposed) [45.2-2] | 09:06 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gnome-snapshot [s390x] (noble-proposed) [45.2-2] | 09:06 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pbcopper [ppc64el] (noble-proposed) [2.3.0+dfsg-2] | 09:06 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted srcpd [amd64] (noble-proposed) [2.1.6-1] | 09:06 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted srcpd [riscv64] (noble-proposed) [2.1.6-1] | 09:06 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gnome-snapshot [ppc64el] (noble-proposed) [45.2-2] | 09:06 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pbcopper [s390x] (noble-proposed) [2.3.0+dfsg-2] | 09:06 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pbcopper [amd64] (noble-proposed) [2.3.0+dfsg-2] | 09:06 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted srcpd [armhf] (noble-proposed) [2.1.6-1] | 09:06 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: cadabra2 (noble-proposed/primary) [2.4.5.4-0ubuntu1] | 10:32 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted cadabra2 [source] (noble-proposed) [2.4.5.4-0ubuntu1] | 10:34 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: cadabra2 [amd64] (noble-proposed/none) [2.4.5.4-0ubuntu1] (no packageset) | 10:42 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: cadabra2 [s390x] (noble-proposed/none) [2.4.5.4-0ubuntu1] (no packageset) | 10:44 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: cadabra2 [arm64] (noble-proposed/none) [2.4.5.4-0ubuntu1] (no packageset) | 10:45 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: cadabra2 [ppc64el] (noble-proposed/none) [2.4.5.4-0ubuntu1] (no packageset) | 10:45 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted cadabra2 [amd64] (noble-proposed) [2.4.5.4-0ubuntu1] | 10:46 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted cadabra2 [ppc64el] (noble-proposed) [2.4.5.4-0ubuntu1] | 10:46 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted cadabra2 [arm64] (noble-proposed) [2.4.5.4-0ubuntu1] | 10:46 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted cadabra2 [s390x] (noble-proposed) [2.4.5.4-0ubuntu1] | 10:46 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gcc-defaults [armhf] (noble-proposed/main) [1.210ubuntu1] (core, i386-whitelist) | 11:30 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gcc-defaults [amd64] (noble-proposed/main) [1.210ubuntu1] (core, i386-whitelist) | 11:34 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gcc-defaults [arm64] (noble-proposed/main) [1.210ubuntu1] (core, i386-whitelist) | 11:35 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gcc-defaults [i386] (noble-proposed/main) [1.210ubuntu1] (core, i386-whitelist) | 11:36 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gcc-defaults [s390x] (noble-proposed/main) [1.210ubuntu1] (core, i386-whitelist) | 11:36 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gcc-defaults [amd64] (noble-proposed) [1.210ubuntu1] | 11:37 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gcc-defaults [armhf] (noble-proposed) [1.210ubuntu1] | 11:37 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gcc-defaults [s390x] (noble-proposed) [1.210ubuntu1] | 11:37 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gcc-defaults [arm64] (noble-proposed) [1.210ubuntu1] | 11:37 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gcc-defaults [ppc64el] (noble-proposed/main) [1.210ubuntu1] (core, i386-whitelist) | 11:37 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gcc-defaults [i386] (noble-proposed) [1.210ubuntu1] | 11:37 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gcc-defaults [ppc64el] (noble-proposed) [1.210ubuntu1] | 11:37 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gcc-defaults [riscv64] (noble-proposed/main) [1.210ubuntu1] (core, i386-whitelist) | 11:54 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gcc-defaults [riscv64] (noble-proposed) [1.210ubuntu1] | 11:54 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cinder (mantic-proposed/main) [2:23.0.0-0ubuntu1 => 2:23.0.0-0ubuntu1.1] (openstack) | 12:04 | |
tjaalton | LocutusOfBorg: why are you reusing the same bug for vbox sru? | 13:02 |
tjaalton | lp2017101 | 13:02 |
tjaalton | lp#2017101 | 13:02 |
-ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Launchpad bug 2017101 in virtualbox-hwe (Ubuntu Mantic) "[SRU] Virtualbox 7.0.12 and 6.1.48" [Undecided, Fix Released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/2017101 | 13:02 | |
tjaalton | seems you've filed a new bug but forgot to use it | 13:10 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected virtualbox [source] (mantic-proposed) [7.0.14-dfsg-1~ubuntu1.23.10.1] | 13:11 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected virtualbox-hwe [source] (mantic-proposed) [7.0.14-dfsg-1~ubuntu1.23.10.1] | 13:14 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected virtualbox-guest-additions-iso [source] (mantic-proposed) [7.0.14-1~ubuntu1.23.10.1] | 13:15 | |
LocutusOfBorg | tjaalton, more like I did wrong copy-paste | 13:22 |
LocutusOfBorg | daaaaaaaaaaaaamn | 13:22 |
LocutusOfBorg | and I triple checked it | 13:22 |
LocutusOfBorg | :( | 13:22 |
tjaalton | I'll just reject them all without looking each one | 13:32 |
tjaalton | oh wait | 13:33 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected virtualbox-ext-pack [source] (mantic-proposed) [7.0.14-1~ubuntu1.23.10.1] | 13:33 | |
tjaalton | jammy might be good | 13:33 |
tjaalton | mantic wasnt | 13:33 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted virtualbox-ext-pack [source] (jammy-proposed) [6.1.50-1~ubuntu1.22.04.1] | 13:35 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted virtualbox [source] (jammy-proposed) [6.1.50-dfsg-1~ubuntu1.22.04.1] | 13:37 | |
tjaalton | LocutusOfBorg: so jammy at least is fine so far, just mantic needs fixing I guess | 13:43 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted virtualbox-hwe [source] (jammy-proposed) [6.1.50-dfsg-1~ubuntu1.22.04.1] | 13:46 | |
tjaalton | focal is fine too | 13:47 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted virtualbox-guest-additions-iso [source] (jammy-proposed) [6.1.50-1~ubuntu1.22.04.1] | 13:47 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted virtualbox-guest-additions-iso [source] (focal-proposed) [6.1.50-1~ubuntu1.20.04.1] | 13:48 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted virtualbox-hwe [source] (focal-proposed) [6.1.50-dfsg-1~ubuntu1.20.04.1] | 13:49 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted virtualbox [source] (focal-proposed) [6.1.50-dfsg-1~ubuntu1.20.04.1] | 13:49 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted virtualbox-ext-pack [source] (focal-proposed) [6.1.50-1~ubuntu1.20.04.1] | 13:50 | |
LocutusOfBorg | tjaalton, thanks | 13:57 |
LocutusOfBorg | will reupload now | 13:57 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted fsvs [source] (mantic-proposed) [1.2.9-2ubuntu0.23.10.1] | 13:58 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted fsvs [source] (jammy-proposed) [1.2.9-2ubuntu0.22.04.1] | 13:59 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted fsvs [source] (focal-proposed) [1.2.7-1ubuntu0.1] | 14:00 | |
tjaalton | bryceh: hi! I'm looking at open-vm-tools, but noticed that it has "debian/changelog.dch" on it which seems to be extra cruft? | 14:13 |
tjaalton | basically a dupe of d/changelog plus some ppa upload on top | 14:14 |
tjaalton | that's the mantic upload | 14:16 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected update-manager [source] (jammy-proposed) [1:22.04.19] | 14:16 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: update-manager (jammy-proposed/main) [1:22.04.18 => 1:22.04.19] (core) | 14:16 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected update-manager [source] (focal-proposed) [1:20.04.10.20] | 14:24 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: update-manager (focal-proposed/main) [1:20.04.10.19 => 1:20.04.10.20] (core) | 14:32 | |
bryceh | tjaalton, yes that's just cruft, sorry | 14:32 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected update-manager [source] (bionic-proposed) [1:18.04.11.23] | 14:32 | |
bryceh | tjaalton, want me to respin and reupload? | 14:33 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: update-manager (bionic-proposed/main) [1:18.04.11.22 => 1:18.04.11.23] (core) | 14:38 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected update-manager [source] (xenial-proposed) [1:16.04.20] | 14:39 | |
tjaalton | bryceh: yeah that'd be nice, thanks | 14:40 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected open-vm-tools [source] (mantic-proposed) [2:12.3.5-3~ubuntu0.23.10.1] | 14:42 | |
bryceh | tjaalton, fix mantic pkg uploaded | 14:54 |
bryceh | bbiab | 14:55 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: open-vm-tools (mantic-proposed/main) [2:12.3.0-1ubuntu0.1 => 2:12.3.5-3~ubuntu0.23.10.1] (ubuntu-cloud, ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server) | 14:56 | |
tjaalton | bryceh: thanks, looking | 14:57 |
philroche | \o How do meta packages work when uploaded to noble -proposed? I see a new ubuntu-server package has been uploaded today and is in -proposed but I don't see any autopkgtests that would gate its promotion to -release @ https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/ubuntu-server | 15:22 |
bdmurray | philroche: the tests could still be queued | 15:24 |
rbasak | philroche: it should just migrate once fully built and published. Unless there's something blocking it. | 15:24 |
bdmurray | philroche: oh, the package has not tests | 15:24 |
rbasak | On the last run riscv64 wasn't built yet. Apparently it is now. | 15:24 |
philroche | Ah - I see it in https://ubuntu-archive-team.ubuntu.com/proposed-migration/update_excuses.html | 15:25 |
philroche | So just a matter of waiting until the fact that riscv64 has been published is registered and it will auto migrate to -release? | 15:29 |
rbasak | Yes, unless the excuses page flags something else | 15:30 |
philroche | +1 | 15:30 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: update-manager (xenial-proposed/main) [1:16.04.19 => 1:16.04.20] (core) | 15:39 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: virtualbox-ext-pack (mantic-proposed/multiverse) [7.0.12-2~ubuntu1.23.10.1 => 7.0.14-1~ubuntu1.23.10.1] (no packageset) | 15:58 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: virtualbox-guest-additions-iso (mantic-proposed/multiverse) [7.0.12-1~ubuntu1.23.10.1 => 7.0.14-1~ubuntu1.23.10.1] (no packageset) | 15:59 | |
LocutusOfBorg | tjaalton, ^^ please? | 16:00 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: virtualbox (mantic-proposed/multiverse) [7.0.12-dfsg-1~ubuntu1.23.10.1 => 7.0.14-dfsg-1~ubuntu1.23.10.1] (kernel-dkms, ubuntu-cloud) | 16:01 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: virtualbox-hwe (mantic-proposed/multiverse) [7.0.12-dfsg-1~ubuntu1.23.10.1 => 7.0.14-dfsg-1~ubuntu1.23.10.1] (kernel-dkms) | 16:02 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted open-vm-tools [source] (mantic-proposed) [2:12.3.5-3~ubuntu0.23.10.1] | 16:03 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted open-vm-tools [source] (jammy-proposed) [2:12.3.5-3~ubuntu0.22.04.1] | 16:05 | |
tjaalton | LocutusOfBorg: ack, waiting for the diff | 16:05 |
LocutusOfBorg | ack thanks | 16:06 |
LocutusOfBorg | arraybolt3, ^^ help testing pleeeeeeease? | 16:07 |
arraybolt3 | LocutusOfBorg: Sure thing :) | 16:07 |
arraybolt3 | Still got all my ISOs armed and ready for use | 16:07 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted virtualbox-ext-pack [source] (mantic-proposed) [7.0.14-1~ubuntu1.23.10.1] | 16:08 | |
LocutusOfBorg | thanks! | 16:09 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted virtualbox-guest-additions-iso [source] (mantic-proposed) [7.0.14-1~ubuntu1.23.10.1] | 16:10 | |
tjaalton | LocutusOfBorg: the kbuild bump; jammy doesn't have the newer version | 16:11 |
tjaalton | will it fail there? | 16:12 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted virtualbox [source] (mantic-proposed) [7.0.14-dfsg-1~ubuntu1.23.10.1] | 16:13 | |
tjaalton | didn't | 16:14 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted virtualbox-hwe [source] (mantic-proposed) [7.0.14-dfsg-1~ubuntu1.23.10.1] | 16:14 | |
LocutusOfBorg | mmm | 16:14 |
LocutusOfBorg | no? | 16:14 |
LocutusOfBorg | didn't bump kbuild in 7.0.14 | 16:15 |
tjaalton | not for jammy | 16:15 |
tjaalton | -1 did it for mantic, but it has that | 16:15 |
LocutusOfBorg | exactly | 16:15 |
LocutusOfBorg | I didn't strip libsdl2 library < 7.0.x | 16:16 |
LocutusOfBorg | so we don't need newer kbuild there | 16:16 |
tjaalton | ok | 16:17 |
tjaalton | I'm done | 16:17 |
LocutusOfBorg | thanks! | 16:17 |
LocutusOfBorg | I already asked on #vbox-dev for testing, the user reporting issues will probably be happy to confirm the fix | 16:17 |
LocutusOfBorg | I'll adjoust my testing based on community feedbacks | 16:18 |
arraybolt3 | ETA before testing packages hit -proposed? | 16:27 |
arraybolt3 | want to get as much done as possible while possible | 16:27 |
LocutusOfBorg | arraybolt3, focal, jammy should be already there | 17:09 |
LocutusOfBorg | virtualbox | 6.1.50-dfsg-1~ubuntu1.20.04.1 | focal-proposed/multiverse | source, amd64 | 17:10 |
LocutusOfBorg | virtualbox | 6.1.50-dfsg-1~ubuntu1.22.04.1 | jammy-proposed/multiverse | source, amd64 | 17:10 |
LocutusOfBorg | mantic should be there in one install | 17:11 |
arraybolt3 | +1 | 17:23 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: python-djvulibre [amd64] (noble-proposed/none) [0.9.0-1] (no packageset) | 17:23 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: python-djvulibre [ppc64el] (noble-proposed/none) [0.9.0-1] (no packageset) | 17:29 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: python-djvulibre [s390x] (noble-proposed/none) [0.9.0-1] (no packageset) | 17:29 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: python-djvulibre [arm64] (noble-proposed/universe) [0.9.0-1] (no packageset) | 17:38 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: python-djvulibre [armhf] (noble-proposed/universe) [0.9.0-1] (no packageset) | 17:47 | |
LocutusOfBorg | arraybolt3, looks now in mantic-proposed too | 17:56 |
arraybolt3 | perfect | 18:05 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: python-djvulibre [riscv64] (noble-proposed/universe) [0.9.0-1] (no packageset) | 18:59 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted python-djvulibre [amd64] (noble-proposed) [0.9.0-1] | 19:04 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted python-djvulibre [armhf] (noble-proposed) [0.9.0-1] | 19:04 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted python-djvulibre [riscv64] (noble-proposed) [0.9.0-1] | 19:04 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted python-djvulibre [arm64] (noble-proposed) [0.9.0-1] | 19:04 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted python-djvulibre [s390x] (noble-proposed) [0.9.0-1] | 19:04 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted python-djvulibre [ppc64el] (noble-proposed) [0.9.0-1] | 19:04 | |
arraybolt3 | LocutusOfBorg: What exactly was expected to potentially break in Win8.1? It seems to work flawlessly here with the new VBox. | 19:14 |
arraybolt3 | ooooh, except for a 3d acceleration bug | 19:15 |
arraybolt3 | and Seamless Mode is a bit glitchy | 19:21 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: google-guest-agent (jammy-security/main) [20231004.02-0ubuntu1~22.04.2 => 20220622.00-0ubuntu2~22.04.1] (core) (sync) | 19:21 | |
arraybolt3 | but neither of those are big deals I don't think, I'll check the older version of VBox just to make sure it's not a regressoin | 19:21 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: google-guest-agent (focal-security/universe) [20231004.02-0ubuntu1~20.04.2 => 20220622.00-0ubuntu2~20.04.2] (no packageset) (sync) | 19:21 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted google-guest-agent [sync] (jammy-security) [20220622.00-0ubuntu2~22.04.1] | 19:23 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted google-guest-agent [sync] (focal-security) [20220622.00-0ubuntu2~20.04.2] | 19:27 | |
tsimonq2 | bdmurray: https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/24-04-feature-freeze-and-transitions/41948 :) | 20:48 |
jbicha | tsimonq2: the armhf 32-bit time transition is a big one that will happen soon | 21:02 |
tsimonq2 | jbicha: I wasn't remembering if that was included with the glibc update or not, mind throwing something on the thread when you get the chance? :) | 22:13 |
jbicha | well I don't have a timeline for it, but there's been a lot of discussion on the debian-devel list and it has to happen soon for 24.04 LTS because too many usecases will have Y2038 issues otherwise before support ends | 22:15 |
tsimonq2 | I've been wondering... 24 + 12 = 36, which means there's still a two year gap for ESM, am I missing something? :) | 22:16 |
jbicha | think if you want to put something on your calendar for 2 years in the future, or imagine security certificates that are valid for 3 years, 5 years, 10 years | 22:17 |
tsimonq2 | Ah, okay. That would make sense | 22:19 |
tsimonq2 | Thanks! Curious to hear from Foundations :) | 22:20 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: asterisk-espeak [amd64] (noble-proposed/universe) [5.0~1-4] (no packageset) | 23:18 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: asterisk-espeak [s390x] (noble-proposed/universe) [5.0~1-4] (no packageset) | 23:18 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: asterisk-espeak [armhf] (noble-proposed/universe) [5.0~1-4] (no packageset) | 23:18 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: asterisk-espeak [arm64] (noble-proposed/universe) [5.0~1-4] (no packageset) | 23:19 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gensio [amd64] (noble-proposed/universe) [2.8.2-1] (no packageset) | 23:19 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: asterisk-espeak [ppc64el] (noble-proposed/universe) [5.0~1-4] (no packageset) | 23:19 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pointpats [amd64] (noble-proposed/universe) [2.4.0-1] (no packageset) | 23:19 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gensio [s390x] (noble-proposed/universe) [2.8.2-1] (no packageset) | 23:20 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: asterisk-espeak [riscv64] (noble-proposed/universe) [5.0~1-4] (no packageset) | 23:34 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!