[00:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pbcopper [riscv64] (noble-proposed/universe) [2.3.0+dfsg-2] (no packageset) === NotEickmeyer is now known as Eickmeyer [03:10] xnox: FYI say hi to r/Ubuntu where https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/zfs-linux/+bug/2044657/comments/48 is linked. [03:10] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Launchpad bug 2044657 in zfs-linux (Ubuntu Jammy) "Multiple data corruption issues in zfs" [High, Confirmed] [05:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gnome-snapshot [amd64] (noble-proposed/none) [45.2-2] (no packageset) [05:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gnome-snapshot [ppc64el] (noble-proposed/none) [45.2-2] (no packageset) [05:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gnome-snapshot [s390x] (noble-proposed/none) [45.2-2] (no packageset) [05:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gnome-snapshot [armhf] (noble-proposed/universe) [45.2-2] (no packageset) [05:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gnome-snapshot [arm64] (noble-proposed/universe) [45.2-2] (no packageset) [07:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gnome-snapshot [riscv64] (noble-proposed/universe) [45.2-2] (no packageset) [09:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gnome-snapshot [amd64] (noble-proposed) [45.2-2] [09:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gnome-snapshot [armhf] (noble-proposed) [45.2-2] [09:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gnome-snapshot [riscv64] (noble-proposed) [45.2-2] [09:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gpu-burn [amd64] (noble-proposed) [0+git20240115+ds-1] [09:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pbcopper [arm64] (noble-proposed) [2.3.0+dfsg-2] [09:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pbcopper [riscv64] (noble-proposed) [2.3.0+dfsg-2] [09:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rustc [arm64] (noble-proposed) [1.75.0+dfsg0ubuntu1-0ubuntu1] [09:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted srcpd [arm64] (noble-proposed) [2.1.6-1] [09:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted srcpd [ppc64el] (noble-proposed) [2.1.6-1] [09:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted srcpd [s390x] (noble-proposed) [2.1.6-1] [09:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gnome-snapshot [arm64] (noble-proposed) [45.2-2] [09:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gnome-snapshot [s390x] (noble-proposed) [45.2-2] [09:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pbcopper [ppc64el] (noble-proposed) [2.3.0+dfsg-2] [09:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted srcpd [amd64] (noble-proposed) [2.1.6-1] [09:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted srcpd [riscv64] (noble-proposed) [2.1.6-1] [09:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gnome-snapshot [ppc64el] (noble-proposed) [45.2-2] [09:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pbcopper [s390x] (noble-proposed) [2.3.0+dfsg-2] [09:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pbcopper [amd64] (noble-proposed) [2.3.0+dfsg-2] [09:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted srcpd [armhf] (noble-proposed) [2.1.6-1] [10:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: cadabra2 (noble-proposed/primary) [2.4.5.4-0ubuntu1] [10:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted cadabra2 [source] (noble-proposed) [2.4.5.4-0ubuntu1] [10:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: cadabra2 [amd64] (noble-proposed/none) [2.4.5.4-0ubuntu1] (no packageset) [10:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: cadabra2 [s390x] (noble-proposed/none) [2.4.5.4-0ubuntu1] (no packageset) [10:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: cadabra2 [arm64] (noble-proposed/none) [2.4.5.4-0ubuntu1] (no packageset) [10:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: cadabra2 [ppc64el] (noble-proposed/none) [2.4.5.4-0ubuntu1] (no packageset) [10:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted cadabra2 [amd64] (noble-proposed) [2.4.5.4-0ubuntu1] [10:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted cadabra2 [ppc64el] (noble-proposed) [2.4.5.4-0ubuntu1] [10:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted cadabra2 [arm64] (noble-proposed) [2.4.5.4-0ubuntu1] [10:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted cadabra2 [s390x] (noble-proposed) [2.4.5.4-0ubuntu1] [11:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gcc-defaults [armhf] (noble-proposed/main) [1.210ubuntu1] (core, i386-whitelist) [11:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gcc-defaults [amd64] (noble-proposed/main) [1.210ubuntu1] (core, i386-whitelist) [11:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gcc-defaults [arm64] (noble-proposed/main) [1.210ubuntu1] (core, i386-whitelist) [11:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gcc-defaults [i386] (noble-proposed/main) [1.210ubuntu1] (core, i386-whitelist) [11:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gcc-defaults [s390x] (noble-proposed/main) [1.210ubuntu1] (core, i386-whitelist) [11:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gcc-defaults [amd64] (noble-proposed) [1.210ubuntu1] [11:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gcc-defaults [armhf] (noble-proposed) [1.210ubuntu1] [11:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gcc-defaults [s390x] (noble-proposed) [1.210ubuntu1] [11:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gcc-defaults [arm64] (noble-proposed) [1.210ubuntu1] [11:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gcc-defaults [ppc64el] (noble-proposed/main) [1.210ubuntu1] (core, i386-whitelist) [11:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gcc-defaults [i386] (noble-proposed) [1.210ubuntu1] [11:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gcc-defaults [ppc64el] (noble-proposed) [1.210ubuntu1] [11:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gcc-defaults [riscv64] (noble-proposed/main) [1.210ubuntu1] (core, i386-whitelist) [11:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gcc-defaults [riscv64] (noble-proposed) [1.210ubuntu1] [12:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cinder (mantic-proposed/main) [2:23.0.0-0ubuntu1 => 2:23.0.0-0ubuntu1.1] (openstack) [13:02] LocutusOfBorg: why are you reusing the same bug for vbox sru? [13:02] lp2017101 [13:02] lp#2017101 [13:02] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Launchpad bug 2017101 in virtualbox-hwe (Ubuntu Mantic) "[SRU] Virtualbox 7.0.12 and 6.1.48" [Undecided, Fix Released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/2017101 [13:10] seems you've filed a new bug but forgot to use it [13:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected virtualbox [source] (mantic-proposed) [7.0.14-dfsg-1~ubuntu1.23.10.1] [13:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected virtualbox-hwe [source] (mantic-proposed) [7.0.14-dfsg-1~ubuntu1.23.10.1] [13:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected virtualbox-guest-additions-iso [source] (mantic-proposed) [7.0.14-1~ubuntu1.23.10.1] [13:22] tjaalton, more like I did wrong copy-paste [13:22] daaaaaaaaaaaaamn [13:22] and I triple checked it [13:22] :( [13:32] I'll just reject them all without looking each one [13:33] oh wait [13:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected virtualbox-ext-pack [source] (mantic-proposed) [7.0.14-1~ubuntu1.23.10.1] [13:33] jammy might be good [13:33] mantic wasnt [13:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted virtualbox-ext-pack [source] (jammy-proposed) [6.1.50-1~ubuntu1.22.04.1] [13:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted virtualbox [source] (jammy-proposed) [6.1.50-dfsg-1~ubuntu1.22.04.1] [13:43] LocutusOfBorg: so jammy at least is fine so far, just mantic needs fixing I guess [13:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted virtualbox-hwe [source] (jammy-proposed) [6.1.50-dfsg-1~ubuntu1.22.04.1] [13:47] focal is fine too [13:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted virtualbox-guest-additions-iso [source] (jammy-proposed) [6.1.50-1~ubuntu1.22.04.1] [13:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted virtualbox-guest-additions-iso [source] (focal-proposed) [6.1.50-1~ubuntu1.20.04.1] [13:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted virtualbox-hwe [source] (focal-proposed) [6.1.50-dfsg-1~ubuntu1.20.04.1] [13:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted virtualbox [source] (focal-proposed) [6.1.50-dfsg-1~ubuntu1.20.04.1] [13:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted virtualbox-ext-pack [source] (focal-proposed) [6.1.50-1~ubuntu1.20.04.1] [13:57] tjaalton, thanks [13:57] will reupload now [13:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted fsvs [source] (mantic-proposed) [1.2.9-2ubuntu0.23.10.1] [13:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted fsvs [source] (jammy-proposed) [1.2.9-2ubuntu0.22.04.1] [14:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted fsvs [source] (focal-proposed) [1.2.7-1ubuntu0.1] [14:13] bryceh: hi! I'm looking at open-vm-tools, but noticed that it has "debian/changelog.dch" on it which seems to be extra cruft? [14:14] basically a dupe of d/changelog plus some ppa upload on top [14:16] that's the mantic upload [14:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected update-manager [source] (jammy-proposed) [1:22.04.19] [14:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: update-manager (jammy-proposed/main) [1:22.04.18 => 1:22.04.19] (core) [14:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected update-manager [source] (focal-proposed) [1:20.04.10.20] [14:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: update-manager (focal-proposed/main) [1:20.04.10.19 => 1:20.04.10.20] (core) [14:32] tjaalton, yes that's just cruft, sorry [14:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected update-manager [source] (bionic-proposed) [1:18.04.11.23] [14:33] tjaalton, want me to respin and reupload? [14:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: update-manager (bionic-proposed/main) [1:18.04.11.22 => 1:18.04.11.23] (core) [14:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected update-manager [source] (xenial-proposed) [1:16.04.20] [14:40] bryceh: yeah that'd be nice, thanks [14:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected open-vm-tools [source] (mantic-proposed) [2:12.3.5-3~ubuntu0.23.10.1] [14:54] tjaalton, fix mantic pkg uploaded [14:55] bbiab [14:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: open-vm-tools (mantic-proposed/main) [2:12.3.0-1ubuntu0.1 => 2:12.3.5-3~ubuntu0.23.10.1] (ubuntu-cloud, ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server) [14:57] bryceh: thanks, looking [15:22] \o How do meta packages work when uploaded to noble -proposed? I see a new ubuntu-server package has been uploaded today and is in -proposed but I don't see any autopkgtests that would gate its promotion to -release @ https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/ubuntu-server [15:24] philroche: the tests could still be queued [15:24] philroche: it should just migrate once fully built and published. Unless there's something blocking it. [15:24] philroche: oh, the package has not tests [15:24] On the last run riscv64 wasn't built yet. Apparently it is now. [15:25] Ah - I see it in https://ubuntu-archive-team.ubuntu.com/proposed-migration/update_excuses.html [15:29] So just a matter of waiting until the fact that riscv64 has been published is registered and it will auto migrate to -release? [15:30] Yes, unless the excuses page flags something else [15:30] +1 [15:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: update-manager (xenial-proposed/main) [1:16.04.19 => 1:16.04.20] (core) [15:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: virtualbox-ext-pack (mantic-proposed/multiverse) [7.0.12-2~ubuntu1.23.10.1 => 7.0.14-1~ubuntu1.23.10.1] (no packageset) [15:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: virtualbox-guest-additions-iso (mantic-proposed/multiverse) [7.0.12-1~ubuntu1.23.10.1 => 7.0.14-1~ubuntu1.23.10.1] (no packageset) [16:00] tjaalton, ^^ please? [16:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: virtualbox (mantic-proposed/multiverse) [7.0.12-dfsg-1~ubuntu1.23.10.1 => 7.0.14-dfsg-1~ubuntu1.23.10.1] (kernel-dkms, ubuntu-cloud) [16:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: virtualbox-hwe (mantic-proposed/multiverse) [7.0.12-dfsg-1~ubuntu1.23.10.1 => 7.0.14-dfsg-1~ubuntu1.23.10.1] (kernel-dkms) [16:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted open-vm-tools [source] (mantic-proposed) [2:12.3.5-3~ubuntu0.23.10.1] [16:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted open-vm-tools [source] (jammy-proposed) [2:12.3.5-3~ubuntu0.22.04.1] [16:05] LocutusOfBorg: ack, waiting for the diff [16:06] ack thanks [16:07] arraybolt3, ^^ help testing pleeeeeeease? [16:07] LocutusOfBorg: Sure thing :) [16:07] Still got all my ISOs armed and ready for use [16:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted virtualbox-ext-pack [source] (mantic-proposed) [7.0.14-1~ubuntu1.23.10.1] [16:09] thanks! [16:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted virtualbox-guest-additions-iso [source] (mantic-proposed) [7.0.14-1~ubuntu1.23.10.1] [16:11] LocutusOfBorg: the kbuild bump; jammy doesn't have the newer version [16:12] will it fail there? [16:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted virtualbox [source] (mantic-proposed) [7.0.14-dfsg-1~ubuntu1.23.10.1] [16:14] didn't [16:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted virtualbox-hwe [source] (mantic-proposed) [7.0.14-dfsg-1~ubuntu1.23.10.1] [16:14] mmm [16:14] no? [16:15] didn't bump kbuild in 7.0.14 [16:15] not for jammy [16:15] -1 did it for mantic, but it has that [16:15] exactly [16:16] I didn't strip libsdl2 library < 7.0.x [16:16] so we don't need newer kbuild there [16:17] ok [16:17] I'm done [16:17] thanks! [16:17] I already asked on #vbox-dev for testing, the user reporting issues will probably be happy to confirm the fix [16:18] I'll adjoust my testing based on community feedbacks [16:27] ETA before testing packages hit -proposed? [16:27] want to get as much done as possible while possible [17:09] arraybolt3, focal, jammy should be already there [17:10] virtualbox | 6.1.50-dfsg-1~ubuntu1.20.04.1 | focal-proposed/multiverse | source, amd64 [17:10] virtualbox | 6.1.50-dfsg-1~ubuntu1.22.04.1 | jammy-proposed/multiverse | source, amd64 [17:11] mantic should be there in one install [17:23] +1 [17:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: python-djvulibre [amd64] (noble-proposed/none) [0.9.0-1] (no packageset) [17:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: python-djvulibre [ppc64el] (noble-proposed/none) [0.9.0-1] (no packageset) [17:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: python-djvulibre [s390x] (noble-proposed/none) [0.9.0-1] (no packageset) [17:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: python-djvulibre [arm64] (noble-proposed/universe) [0.9.0-1] (no packageset) [17:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: python-djvulibre [armhf] (noble-proposed/universe) [0.9.0-1] (no packageset) [17:56] arraybolt3, looks now in mantic-proposed too [18:05] perfect [18:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: python-djvulibre [riscv64] (noble-proposed/universe) [0.9.0-1] (no packageset) [19:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted python-djvulibre [amd64] (noble-proposed) [0.9.0-1] [19:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted python-djvulibre [armhf] (noble-proposed) [0.9.0-1] [19:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted python-djvulibre [riscv64] (noble-proposed) [0.9.0-1] [19:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted python-djvulibre [arm64] (noble-proposed) [0.9.0-1] [19:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted python-djvulibre [s390x] (noble-proposed) [0.9.0-1] [19:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted python-djvulibre [ppc64el] (noble-proposed) [0.9.0-1] [19:14] LocutusOfBorg: What exactly was expected to potentially break in Win8.1? It seems to work flawlessly here with the new VBox. [19:15] ooooh, except for a 3d acceleration bug [19:21] and Seamless Mode is a bit glitchy [19:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: google-guest-agent (jammy-security/main) [20231004.02-0ubuntu1~22.04.2 => 20220622.00-0ubuntu2~22.04.1] (core) (sync) [19:21] but neither of those are big deals I don't think, I'll check the older version of VBox just to make sure it's not a regressoin [19:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: google-guest-agent (focal-security/universe) [20231004.02-0ubuntu1~20.04.2 => 20220622.00-0ubuntu2~20.04.2] (no packageset) (sync) [19:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted google-guest-agent [sync] (jammy-security) [20220622.00-0ubuntu2~22.04.1] [19:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted google-guest-agent [sync] (focal-security) [20220622.00-0ubuntu2~20.04.2] [20:48] bdmurray: https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/24-04-feature-freeze-and-transitions/41948 :) [21:02] tsimonq2: the armhf 32-bit time transition is a big one that will happen soon [22:13] jbicha: I wasn't remembering if that was included with the glibc update or not, mind throwing something on the thread when you get the chance? :) [22:15] well I don't have a timeline for it, but there's been a lot of discussion on the debian-devel list and it has to happen soon for 24.04 LTS because too many usecases will have Y2038 issues otherwise before support ends [22:16] I've been wondering... 24 + 12 = 36, which means there's still a two year gap for ESM, am I missing something? :) [22:17] think if you want to put something on your calendar for 2 years in the future, or imagine security certificates that are valid for 3 years, 5 years, 10 years [22:19] Ah, okay. That would make sense [22:20] Thanks! Curious to hear from Foundations :) [23:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: asterisk-espeak [amd64] (noble-proposed/universe) [5.0~1-4] (no packageset) [23:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: asterisk-espeak [s390x] (noble-proposed/universe) [5.0~1-4] (no packageset) [23:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: asterisk-espeak [armhf] (noble-proposed/universe) [5.0~1-4] (no packageset) [23:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: asterisk-espeak [arm64] (noble-proposed/universe) [5.0~1-4] (no packageset) [23:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gensio [amd64] (noble-proposed/universe) [2.8.2-1] (no packageset) [23:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: asterisk-espeak [ppc64el] (noble-proposed/universe) [5.0~1-4] (no packageset) [23:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pointpats [amd64] (noble-proposed/universe) [2.4.0-1] (no packageset) [23:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gensio [s390x] (noble-proposed/universe) [2.8.2-1] (no packageset) [23:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: asterisk-espeak [riscv64] (noble-proposed/universe) [5.0~1-4] (no packageset)