[04:22] <fatdat> G
[04:24] <btugr> Ben
[18:19] <arraybolt3> sigh, note to self, check an SRU bug report before beginning lengthy testing.
[18:19] <arraybolt3> I just did a bunch of Jammy testing for the new VBox SRU that had already been done.
[18:22] <arraybolt3> LocutusOfBorg: are you intending to do Focal testing of VBox some other way, or can Focal be mine? It takes me hours to do a test for one release and I just wasted those hours doing Jammy unneccessarily, so I'd like to avoid that.
[18:31] <LocutusOfBorg> why were them unnecessary?
[18:33] <LocutusOfBorg> I would like to avoid doing focal tbh
[18:33] <arraybolt3> The Jammy tests I did were unnecessary since by the time I finished testing the HWE kernel, I saw that testing of the HWE and GA kernels forJammy were already done.
[18:34] <arraybolt3> If I can just do Focal, great, I just don't want to go to log my progress and see that the job is finished since then I'm like, "gah, I could have used that time for XYZ other things" :P
[18:34] <arraybolt3> anyway, sounds like we have a plan
[18:50] <tsimonq2> @pilot in
[18:50] <tsimonq2> Gooood afternoon :D
[18:52] <tsimonq2> kajiya: Hey! Looks like a followup upload was sponsored, great! I'll give Andreas the opportunity to sponsor, if you don't hear anything by Monday or Tuesday feel free to ping me. Thanks!
[18:54] <tsimonq2> https://code.launchpad.net/~adrien-n/ubuntu/+source/ruby3.1/+git/ruby3.1/+merge/459521 if anyone is scared to take this, I'm not, I learned Ruby recently ;) will sponsor once the DEP-3 headers are good.
[18:57] <tsimonq2> sudip: Sponsoring https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-show-player/+bug/1987073 - seems okay for an SRU as well. I wonder about the autopkgtest story to prevent future regressions like this. Do you know if something is already in the works?
[18:57] -ubottu:#ubuntu-devel- Launchpad bug 1987073 in linux-show-player (Ubuntu Jammy) "[SRU] Failure to start on 22.04" [Undecided, Confirmed]
[18:58] <tsimonq2> I won't be pedantic on your patch headers this time around, but *thwack* that seems about half DEP-3 and half Git header. You're a DD, I expect this was intentional, and it includes everything we would need otherwise...
[18:59] <tsimonq2> (What's causing me *not* to block is that it's machine-readable anyway...)
[19:01] <tsimonq2> W: linux-show-player source: changelog-file-missing-explicit-entry 0.5.2-1 -> 0.5.2-1ubuntu0 (missing) -> 0.5.2-1ubuntu0.1
[19:01] <tsimonq2> oh Lintian, which regex should I update...
[19:02] <tsimonq2> @pilot out
[19:03] <tsimonq2> I think this time deserves a Discourse report...
[19:08] <tsimonq2> https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/patch-pilot-hand-off-24-04/39509/58
[20:34] <tsimonq2> In case anyone is interested in the dumat reports, http://usr-move-202401.tsimonq2.net/ now exists (cc sudip arraybolt3 paride) - https://git.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-core-dev/+git/dumat/ is the repo that's running
[20:34] <tsimonq2> I have it running on an hourly systemd timer
[20:34] <tsimonq2> helmut: ^^^^ :)
[21:08] <troelsarvin> I'm trying to find out how I can help pushing https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tomcat9/+bug/2047933 further along. I'm being referred to https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SecurityTeam/UpdateProcedures where it mentions a group called "MOTU" (Masters of the Universe) which can (could?) help me along. But MOTU seems gone (no meeting since 2012, IRC channel gone). Also, the #ubuntu-packaging channel
[21:08] <troelsarvin> doesn't look very active.
[21:08] -ubottu:#ubuntu-devel- Launchpad bug 2047933 in tomcat9 (Ubuntu) "Fix for CVE-2023-46589 in Jammy's tomcat9" [Undecided, New]
[21:10] <troelsarvin> Sorry, I meant this case (the other one is also relevant, though): https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tomcat9/+bug/2047933
[21:10] -ubottu:#ubuntu-devel- Launchpad bug 2047933 in tomcat9 (Ubuntu) "Fix for CVE-2023-46589 in Jammy's tomcat9" [Undecided, New]