[04:24] <arraybolt3> I just checked the Launchpad bug tracker, and it seems that https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/8685 has not yet been reported. While I haven't encountered this exact problem, I just ran into someone who has encountered it earlier today. The problem has a patch in the upstream kernel already at
[04:24] -ubottu:#ubuntu-kernel- Issue 8685 in drm/intel "The display becomes frozen with error: [drm] *ERROR* [CRTC:131:pipe B] flip_done timed out on [Iris Xe Graphics]" [Closed]
[04:24] <arraybolt3> https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/intel-gfx/patch/20231211213750.27109-2-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com/.
[04:25] <arraybolt3> There'll probably be a bug report from either me or my boss soon enough, but I wanted to mention this here now.
[04:46] <arraybolt3> actually, the bug is already reported here: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-signed-hwe-6.5/+bug/2049027
[04:46] -ubottu:#ubuntu-kernel- Launchpad bug 2049027 in linux-signed-hwe-6.5 (Ubuntu) "The display becomes frozen after some time when a HDMI device is connected." [Undecided, New]
[12:25] <LocutusOfBorg> arighi hello, I closed LP: #2048778 and LP: #2049751
[12:25] -ubottu:#ubuntu-kernel- Launchpad bug 2048778 in falcosecurity-libs (Ubuntu Noble) "falcosecurity-libs DKMS FTBFS wrt Linux 6.7" [Undecided, Fix Released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/2048778
[12:25] -ubottu:#ubuntu-kernel- Launchpad bug 2049751 in falcosecurity-libs (Ubuntu Noble) "falcosecurity-scap-dkms FTBS with the latest linux 6.7 kernel in noble" [Undecided, Fix Released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/2049751
[12:25] <LocutusOfBorg> please let me know if it still fails
[13:41] <arighi> hey LocutusOfBorg, thank you so much!
[13:48] <LocutusOfBorg> please don't forget to ping in case 6.8 becomes a problem for falcosecurity-libs :)
[13:58] <arighi> LocutusOfBorg, ack :)
[14:09] <LocutusOfBorg> https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/introducing-kernel-6-8-for-the-24-04-noble-numbat-release/41958
[14:09] <LocutusOfBorg> arighi, "Support for enabling/disabling 86-bit x32 programs and syscalls at boot"
[14:09] <LocutusOfBorg> sorry but the typo made my day :D
[14:11] <LocutusOfBorg> I really hope the world won't ever need 86-bit processors :D
[15:56] <arighi> LocutusOfBorg, as it's written it actually sounds like 86-bits programs (~10 bytes), so pretty small programs, let me fix that :D
[16:04] <LocutusOfBorg> 86 bits ought to be enough for anybody (citation needed)
[16:04] <LocutusOfBorg> :D
[20:18] <arighi> lmao