=== sarnold_ is now known as sarnold | ||
=== pushkarnk1 is now known as pushkarnk | ||
sudip | can anyone please mark LP: #2048923 as affecting Jammy | 11:12 |
---|---|---|
-ubottu:#ubuntu-devel- Launchpad bug 2048923 in r8168 (Ubuntu) "r8168-dkms fails to build module on kernel 6.5.0-14-generic" [Undecided, Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/2048923 | 11:12 | |
* sudip has also posted in #ubuntu-bugs | 11:12 | |
ginggs | sudip: . | 12:17 |
sudip | thanks ginggs | 12:17 |
sudip | a newbie question. I can see Apport retracing service (apport) removed "need-duplicate-check" tag, I assume that means the service found there is no duplicate but LP: #2051547 is same as LP: #2048923. So how does the service confirm that its not a duplicate? | 12:31 |
-ubottu:#ubuntu-devel- Launchpad bug 2051547 in r8168 (Ubuntu) "r8168-dkms 8.049.02-1ubuntu1.2: r8168 kernel module failed to build" [Undecided, New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/2051547 | 12:31 | |
-ubottu:#ubuntu-devel- Launchpad bug 2048923 in r8168 (Ubuntu Jammy) "[SRU] r8168-dkms fails to build module on kernel 6.5.0-14-generic" [Undecided, Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/2048923 | 12:31 | |
* sudip will mark them as duplicate but is curious to know the process | 12:32 | |
paride | @pilot in | 13:01 |
=== ChanServ changed the topic of #ubuntu-devel to: Archive: open | Devel of Ubuntu (not support) | Build failures: http://qa.ubuntuwire.com/ftbfs/ | #ubuntu for support and discussion of Focal-Mantic | Patch Pilots: paride | ||
rbasak | paride: o/ | 13:15 |
rbasak | Sorry I haven't written up my shift yesterday yet | 13:15 |
rbasak | I didn't get much done due to the outage | 13:15 |
rbasak | But see above for the conversation with dbungert about debootstrap | 13:15 |
rbasak | I was also going to sponsor giara but couldn't. Perhaps I can do that today. | 13:16 |
paride | hey rbasak, thanks! looking at the backlog conversation here then | 13:19 |
dbungert | @pilot in | 16:00 |
=== ChanServ changed the topic of #ubuntu-devel to: Archive: open | Devel of Ubuntu (not support) | Build failures: http://qa.ubuntuwire.com/ftbfs/ | #ubuntu for support and discussion of Focal-Mantic | Patch Pilots: dbungert, paride | ||
dbungert | paride: looks like there is actionable stuff in the 1 wk+ category, I'm checking that first | 16:01 |
rbasak | dbungert, paride: I'm going to sponsor giara today - I was blocked from doing that due to the outage during my shift yesterday | 16:07 |
rbasak | So you can ignore that one in the queue as I've reviewed it already so I might as well finish. | 16:07 |
dbungert | ack, thanks | 16:07 |
paride | ack+1, thanks rbasak | 16:08 |
paride | is https://reqorts.qa.ubuntu.com/reports/sponsoring/general.html working for you? | 16:17 |
dbungert | paride: it is, yes | 16:18 |
dbungert | do you need a copy of it somewhere? | 16:18 |
rbasak | It's a different URL now | 16:19 |
dbungert | oh right, I updated my bookmark http://sponsoring-reports.ubuntu.com/general.html | 16:19 |
rbasak | http://sponsoring-reports.ubuntu.com/general.html | 16:19 |
paride | right, thanks | 16:34 |
paride | @pilot out | 17:10 |
=== ChanServ changed the topic of #ubuntu-devel to: Archive: open | Devel of Ubuntu (not support) | Build failures: http://qa.ubuntuwire.com/ftbfs/ | #ubuntu for support and discussion of Focal-Mantic | Patch Pilots: dbungert | ||
paride | I just left my summary on discourse | 17:10 |
dbungert | paride: thanks. The same link was posted twice, is that a paste error? | 17:15 |
paride | dbungert, yes, fixed, thanks | 17:16 |
paride | I also added a comment to the MP related to that bug | 17:19 |
bdmurray | sudip: the apport retracing service looks at the StacktraceAddressSignature and then checks its duplicate database for any other bugs with the same StacktraceAddressSignature | 17:56 |
sudip | and if there is no stacktrace? | 17:58 |
bdmurray | Like a python traceback? | 17:58 |
sudip | in this case, there was no trace, it only had the dkms log | 17:59 |
bdmurray | Can you share the bug? | 17:59 |
sudip | bdmurray: LP: #2051547 and LP: #2048923 | 17:59 |
-ubottu:#ubuntu-devel- Launchpad bug 2048923 in r8168 (Ubuntu Jammy) "[SRU] r8168-dkms fails to build module on kernel 6.5.0-14-generic" [Undecided, Confirmed] [duplicate: 2051547] https://launchpad.net/bugs/2048923 | 17:59 | |
-ubottu:#ubuntu-devel- Launchpad bug 2048923 in r8168 (Ubuntu Jammy) "[SRU] r8168-dkms fails to build module on kernel 6.5.0-14-generic" [Undecided, Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/2048923 | 17:59 | |
bdmurray | No duplicate checking is done for 2048923 b/c the `ProblemType: Bug` | 18:01 |
bdmurray | Yeah, that's the case with both of them. | 18:01 |
bdmurray | There are other signatures used for python tracebacks `ProblemType: Crash` and package install failures | 18:02 |
bdmurray | which I think is `ProblemType: Package` | 18:02 |
sudip | ok.. I guess my screen does not show these signatures | 18:04 |
sudip | bdmurray: is there any way I can search using these signatures ? | 18:04 |
bdmurray | sudip: Could you be more specific about what you are trying to do and I'll see if I can help. | 18:06 |
sudip | I was thinking of searching for bugs which has the signature of `ProblemType: Bug`. I assume duplicate checking hasn't been done for any of them. | 18:08 |
sudip | but I just noticed that Ubuntu bugs are also in udd, so I can make a query to see what it can show me. | 18:09 |
bdmurray | sudip: What I meant was the bug reports with a `ProblemType` of bug don't have a duplicate signature. However, if you are trying to find bugs with a string from the DKMSBuildLog that is possible. | 18:18 |
bdmurray | Additionally the "crash log from dkms" in bug 2048923 has a "ProblemType: Package" and a "DuplicateSignature" in it. | 18:19 |
-ubottu:#ubuntu-devel- Bug 2048923 in r8168 (Ubuntu Jammy) "[SRU] r8168-dkms fails to build module on kernel 6.5.0-14-generic" [Undecided, Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/2048923 | 18:19 | |
bdmurray | DuplicateSignature: dkms:r8168-dkms:8.049.02-1ubuntu1.2:/var/lib/dkms/r8168/8.049.02/build/r8168_n.c:27733:24: error: implicit declaration of function | 18:19 |
bdmurray | sudip: udd likely won't be helpful here (but I haven't looked in years) because it doesn't have the attachments. | 18:20 |
sudip | ohh.. ok.. thanks bdmurray. I misunderstood initially. I thought the bugs will have some extra hidden tags to say the "ProblemType". | 18:21 |
bdmurray | A problem type of "Bug" is used when a user runs 'ubuntu-bug $pkgname'. A crash report will be "ProblemType: Crash" and a package install failure will be "ProblemType: Package". | 18:27 |
bdmurray | sudip: there is a tool called lp-grab-attachments which can download all the bug attachments for a bug or all the bugs about a package. | 18:28 |
bdmurray | After using that you could search the log files locally. | 18:28 |
sudip | ok, will check that. thanks for explaining all this bdmurray | 18:29 |
bdmurray | No problem! I'm happy to answer any more questions as I have some experience in this area. ;-) | 18:31 |
sudip | thanks, will ping you when I have my next doubt. :) | 18:32 |
sudip | also, udd does not have a bug description to search for. | 18:33 |
bdmurray | Oh right, that's also an additional argument to lp-grab-attachments because the Description is not an attachment. ;-) | 18:35 |
* sudip checks | 19:06 | |
mh23 | Hi. What's an example "Justification for backporting the new version to the stable release"? https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuBackports | 20:45 |
dbungert | @pilot out | 20:48 |
=== ChanServ changed the topic of #ubuntu-devel to: Archive: open | Devel of Ubuntu (not support) | Build failures: http://qa.ubuntuwire.com/ftbfs/ | #ubuntu for support and discussion of Focal-Mantic | Patch Pilots: N/A | ||
mh23 | Is this backport bug missing anything https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/git-credential-oauth/+bug/2052555 ? | 20:51 |
-ubottu:#ubuntu-devel- Launchpad bug 2052555 in git-credential-oauth (Ubuntu) "[BPO] git-credential-oauth/0.11.0-1 from noble" [Undecided, New] | 20:51 | |
rbasak | mh23: here's an example: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/jammy/+source/mozc/+bug/2030259 | 20:52 |
-ubottu:#ubuntu-devel- Launchpad bug 2030259 in mozc (Ubuntu Jammy) "[BPO] Backport mozc from lunar to jammy" [Undecided, Fix Released] | 20:52 | |
rbasak | mh23: you can search the bug database for bugs that are Fix Released and subscribed to by ~ubuntu-backporters if you'd like more examples. | 20:52 |
rbasak | I'm not on the backporters team and not particularly familiar so I don't feel confident in judging your bug, sorry. | 20:52 |
rbasak | But hopefully existing examples are helpful. | 20:52 |
mh23 | Thank you | 20:54 |
=== guiverc2 is now known as guiverc |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!