[11:12] <sudip> can anyone please mark LP: #2048923 as affecting Jammy
[11:12] -ubottu:#ubuntu-devel- Launchpad bug 2048923 in r8168 (Ubuntu) "r8168-dkms fails to build module on kernel 6.5.0-14-generic" [Undecided, Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/2048923
[11:12]  * sudip has also posted in #ubuntu-bugs
[12:17] <ginggs> sudip: .
[12:17] <sudip> thanks ginggs
[12:31] <sudip> a newbie question. I can see Apport retracing service (apport) removed "need-duplicate-check" tag, I assume that means the service found there is no duplicate but LP: #2051547 is same as LP: #2048923. So how does the service confirm that its not a duplicate?
[12:31] -ubottu:#ubuntu-devel- Launchpad bug 2051547 in r8168 (Ubuntu) "r8168-dkms 8.049.02-1ubuntu1.2: r8168 kernel module failed to build" [Undecided, New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/2051547
[12:31] -ubottu:#ubuntu-devel- Launchpad bug 2048923 in r8168 (Ubuntu Jammy) "[SRU] r8168-dkms fails to build module on kernel 6.5.0-14-generic" [Undecided, Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/2048923
[12:32]  * sudip will mark them as duplicate but is curious to know the process
[13:01] <paride> @pilot in
[13:15] <rbasak> paride: o/
[13:15] <rbasak> Sorry I haven't written up my shift yesterday yet
[13:15] <rbasak> I didn't get much done due to the outage
[13:15] <rbasak> But see above for the conversation with dbungert about debootstrap
[13:16] <rbasak> I was also going to sponsor giara but couldn't. Perhaps I can do that today.
[13:19] <paride> hey rbasak, thanks! looking at the backlog conversation here then
[16:00] <dbungert> @pilot in
[16:01] <dbungert> paride: looks like there is actionable stuff in the 1 wk+ category, I'm checking that first
[16:07] <rbasak> dbungert, paride: I'm going to sponsor giara today - I was blocked from doing that due to the outage during my shift yesterday
[16:07] <rbasak> So you can ignore that one in the queue as I've reviewed it already so I might as well finish.
[16:07] <dbungert> ack, thanks
[16:08] <paride> ack+1, thanks rbasak
[16:17] <paride> is https://reqorts.qa.ubuntu.com/reports/sponsoring/general.html working for you?
[16:18] <dbungert> paride: it is, yes
[16:18] <dbungert> do you need a copy of it somewhere?
[16:19] <rbasak> It's a different URL now
[16:19] <dbungert> oh right, I updated my bookmark http://sponsoring-reports.ubuntu.com/general.html
[16:19] <rbasak> http://sponsoring-reports.ubuntu.com/general.html
[16:34] <paride> right, thanks
[17:10] <paride> @pilot out
[17:10] <paride> I just left my summary on discourse
[17:15] <dbungert> paride: thanks.  The same link was posted twice, is that a paste error?
[17:16] <paride> dbungert, yes, fixed, thanks
[17:19] <paride> I also added a comment to the MP related to that bug
[17:56] <bdmurray> sudip: the apport retracing service looks at the StacktraceAddressSignature and then checks its duplicate database for any other bugs with the same StacktraceAddressSignature
[17:58] <sudip> and if there is no stacktrace?
[17:58] <bdmurray> Like a python traceback?
[17:59] <sudip> in this case, there was no trace, it only had the dkms log
[17:59] <bdmurray> Can you share the bug?
[17:59] <sudip> bdmurray: LP: #2051547 and LP: #2048923
[17:59] -ubottu:#ubuntu-devel- Launchpad bug 2048923 in r8168 (Ubuntu Jammy) "[SRU] r8168-dkms fails to build module on kernel 6.5.0-14-generic" [Undecided, Confirmed] [duplicate: 2051547] https://launchpad.net/bugs/2048923
[17:59] -ubottu:#ubuntu-devel- Launchpad bug 2048923 in r8168 (Ubuntu Jammy) "[SRU] r8168-dkms fails to build module on kernel 6.5.0-14-generic" [Undecided, Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/2048923
[18:01] <bdmurray> No duplicate checking is done for 2048923 b/c the `ProblemType: Bug`
[18:01] <bdmurray> Yeah, that's the case with both of them.
[18:02] <bdmurray> There are other signatures used for python tracebacks `ProblemType: Crash` and package install failures
[18:02] <bdmurray> which I think is `ProblemType: Package`
[18:04] <sudip> ok.. I guess my screen does not show these signatures
[18:04] <sudip> bdmurray: is there any way I can search using these signatures ?
[18:06] <bdmurray> sudip: Could you be more specific about what you are trying to do and I'll see if I can help.
[18:08] <sudip> I was thinking of searching for bugs which has the signature of `ProblemType: Bug`. I assume duplicate checking hasn't been done for any of them.
[18:09] <sudip> but I just noticed that Ubuntu bugs are also in udd, so I can make a query to see what it can show me.
[18:18] <bdmurray> sudip: What I meant was the bug reports with a `ProblemType` of bug don't have a duplicate signature. However, if you are trying to find bugs with a string from the DKMSBuildLog that is possible.
[18:19] <bdmurray> Additionally the "crash log from dkms" in bug 2048923 has a "ProblemType: Package" and a "DuplicateSignature" in it.
[18:19] -ubottu:#ubuntu-devel- Bug 2048923 in r8168 (Ubuntu Jammy) "[SRU] r8168-dkms fails to build module on kernel 6.5.0-14-generic" [Undecided, Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/2048923
[18:19] <bdmurray> DuplicateSignature: dkms:r8168-dkms:8.049.02-1ubuntu1.2:/var/lib/dkms/r8168/8.049.02/build/r8168_n.c:27733:24: error: implicit declaration of function
[18:20] <bdmurray> sudip: udd likely won't be helpful here (but I haven't looked in years) because it doesn't have the attachments.
[18:21] <sudip> ohh.. ok.. thanks bdmurray. I misunderstood initially. I thought the bugs will have some extra hidden tags to say the "ProblemType".
[18:27] <bdmurray> A problem type of "Bug" is used when a user runs 'ubuntu-bug $pkgname'. A crash report will be "ProblemType: Crash" and a package install failure will be "ProblemType: Package".
[18:28] <bdmurray> sudip: there is a tool called lp-grab-attachments which can download all the bug attachments for a bug or all the bugs about a package.
[18:28] <bdmurray> After using that you could search the log files locally.
[18:29] <sudip> ok, will check that. thanks for explaining all this bdmurray
[18:31] <bdmurray> No problem! I'm happy to answer any more questions as I have some experience in this area. ;-)
[18:32] <sudip> thanks, will ping you when I have my next doubt. :)
[18:33] <sudip> also, udd does not have a bug description to search for.
[18:35] <bdmurray> Oh right, that's also an additional argument to lp-grab-attachments because the Description is not an attachment. ;-)
[19:06]  * sudip checks
[20:45] <mh23> Hi. What's an example "Justification for backporting the new version to the stable release"? https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuBackports
[20:48] <dbungert> @pilot out
[20:51] <mh23> Is this backport bug missing anything https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/git-credential-oauth/+bug/2052555 ?
[20:51] -ubottu:#ubuntu-devel- Launchpad bug 2052555 in git-credential-oauth (Ubuntu) "[BPO] git-credential-oauth/0.11.0-1 from noble" [Undecided, New]
[20:52] <rbasak> mh23: here's an example: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/jammy/+source/mozc/+bug/2030259
[20:52] -ubottu:#ubuntu-devel- Launchpad bug 2030259 in mozc (Ubuntu Jammy) "[BPO] Backport mozc from lunar to jammy" [Undecided, Fix Released]
[20:52] <rbasak> mh23: you can search the bug database for bugs that are Fix Released and subscribed to by ~ubuntu-backporters if you'd like more examples.
[20:52] <rbasak> I'm not on the backporters team and not particularly familiar so I don't feel confident in judging your bug, sorry.
[20:52] <rbasak> But hopefully existing examples are helpful.
[20:54] <mh23> Thank you