-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: gradebook (noble-proposed/primary) [1.2-0ubuntu1] | 01:03 | |
Eickmeyer | ^ gradebook is NEW for Edubuntu, would like to get this one in this cycle. Reasons should be obvious. :) | 01:04 |
---|---|---|
=== sarnold_ is now known as sarnold | ||
=== chris14_ is now known as chris14 | ||
=== pushkarnk1 is now known as pushkarnk | ||
aciba | RAOF/bdmurray: Hi! following up on https://irclogs.ubuntu.com/2024/02/05/%23ubuntu-release.html#t21:27 | 08:40 |
aciba | RAOF/bdmurray: While doing SRU verification of cloud-init 23.4.2 we discovered and fixed another manifestation of LP: #2046483 and marked it as regression-proposed, version 23.4.3 contains a fix for this problem. Could you please drop 23.4.2? | 08:40 |
-ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Launchpad bug 2046483 in cloud-init (Ubuntu Mantic) "status: races with dbus and errors out" [Undecided, In Progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/2046483 | 08:40 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gce-compute-image-packages (focal-proposed/main) [20230808.00-0ubuntu1~20.04.0 => 20230808.00-0ubuntu1~20.04.1] (core, ubuntu-cloud) | 09:12 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gce-compute-image-packages (jammy-proposed/main) [20230808.00-0ubuntu1~22.04.0 => 20230808.00-0ubuntu1~22.04.1] (core, ubuntu-cloud) | 09:14 | |
fossfreedom_ | hi ubuntu-release - does britney need a gentle rub to spring back into action again (last report date midday yesterday https://ubuntu-archive-team.ubuntu.com/proposed-migration/noble/)? or are the builders particularly busy after the outage and are still recovering? | 10:23 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: uvtool (focal-proposed/universe) [0~git169-0ubuntu1 => 0~git169-0ubuntu1.20.04.1] (no packageset) | 11:38 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: uvtool (mantic-proposed/universe) [0~git178-0ubuntu1 => 0~git178-0ubuntu1.23.10.1] (no packageset) | 11:38 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: uvtool (jammy-proposed/universe) [0~git178-0ubuntu1 => 0~git178-0ubuntu1.22.04.1] (no packageset) | 11:38 | |
ahasenack | is the excuses report broken due to yesterday's outage? Its generated time is still from yesterday | 12:22 |
ahasenack | yep: https://ubuntu-archive-team.ubuntu.com/proposed-migration/log/noble/2024-02-06/12:18:07.log | 12:23 |
ahasenack | Could not get britney lockfile! | 12:23 |
ahasenack | -r--r--r-- 1 ubuntu-archive ubuntu-archive 1 Feb 5 13:31 /home/ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/var/lock/britney-ubuntu-noble.lock | 12:23 |
ahasenack | ubuntu-archive: is this something that you can look at, or #is? | 12:23 |
Skia | I think sil2100 is on this, but he'll confirm | 12:24 |
ahasenack | poor britney, trying every minute | 12:34 |
ahasenack | maybe related, https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/2:4.19.4+dfsg-3ubuntu1 was published 19h ago, but is not yet showing up in rmadison, and git-ubuntu also didn't import it yet, so looks like something is stuck, probably due to yesterday's outage still | 12:40 |
sil2100 | ahasenack: yes, some time ago I removed all the stale lockfiles | 12:56 |
sil2100 | So britney is running now | 12:56 |
sil2100 | Actually, that was one more stale lockfile! | 12:58 |
sil2100 | Now it should be good | 12:58 |
sil2100 | Since morning I removed like 6 different lockfiles that were stale after the machine went down due to the last outage | 12:58 |
ahasenack | there are ways to check the age of a lock and override it, maybe it's something to think about. Or it could be too risky, I don't know, and it's better to always have a person handle it | 12:59 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: unzip (focal-proposed/main) [6.0-25ubuntu1.1 => 6.0-25ubuntu1.2] (core, i386-whitelist) | 13:33 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: unzip (mantic-proposed/main) [6.0-28ubuntu1 => 6.0-28ubuntu1.1] (core, i386-whitelist) | 13:33 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: unzip (jammy-proposed/main) [6.0-26ubuntu3.1 => 6.0-26ubuntu3.2] (core, i386-whitelist) | 13:33 | |
jbicha | I retried the running noble autopkgtests last night since huge appeared stuck. Now that things are working again, it would probably help to drop the many autopkgtests I queued | 13:54 |
ahasenack | the 3426 armhf ones? :) | 13:55 |
jbicha | ahasenack: yes & arm64 | 14:02 |
jbicha | ahasenack: you don't have access to do that though, right? | 14:05 |
schopin | ubuntu-qa: ^ | 14:06 |
schopin | (I *think* they have a HL on that?) | 14:06 |
Skia | qa-help, it is :-) | 14:09 |
Skia | if you don't remember, it's on the status page, linked from autopkgtest.u.c (https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/autopkgtest-service/34490) | 14:09 |
Skia | jbicha: we'll see about that queue cleanup | 14:10 |
Skia | thanks | 14:12 |
andersson1234 | 3426 noble armhf tests? and arm64? | 14:12 |
andersson1234 | were they for a specific package or the whole queue? | 14:12 |
andersson1234 | all queues were stuck yday because of some outages, but all is good-ish now | 14:13 |
andersson1234 | nvm, I'll just remove everything queued by you | 14:13 |
jbicha | andersson1234: thank you! | 14:18 |
andersson1234 | schopin: Did you also re-queue tests for the same reason, or was your re-triggering unrelated? | 14:24 |
schopin | andersson1234: no, my re-triggering is a routine glibc retrigger. | 14:25 |
andersson1234 | jbicha: If I remove everything from the relevant queues, can you then re-queue the necessary tests? | 14:25 |
andersson1234 | queue doesn't preserve the requester, so it's hard to filter between the tests the two of you have queued | 14:25 |
andersson1234 | schopin: If I remove everything from the relevant queues, can you then re-queue the necessary tests? | 14:33 |
schopin | andersson1234: sure. | 14:35 |
andersson1234 | ty | 14:36 |
andersson1234 | doing so now | 14:36 |
andersson1234 | I've removed the items from the huge armhf and arm64 queues | 14:40 |
jbicha | thank you | 15:14 |
=== chris14_ is now known as chris14 | ||
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: u-boot [arm64] (noble-proposed/main) [2024.01+dfsg-1ubuntu1] (core) | 15:54 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: u-boot [riscv64] (noble-proposed/main) [2024.01+dfsg-1ubuntu1] (core) | 16:30 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: giara (jammy-proposed/universe) [0.3-3 => 0.3-3ubuntu0.1] (no packageset) | 16:31 | |
ahasenack | andersson1234: is it the same in the normal ubuntu queue? There also only arm* have thousands of packages | 16:48 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cockpit (jammy-backports/universe) [308-1~bpo22.04.1 => 310.1-1~bpo22.04.1] (no packageset) | 17:22 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cockpit (mantic-backports/universe) [308-1~bpo23.10.1 => 310.1-1~bpo23.10.1] (no packageset) | 17:22 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: qemu [s390x] (noble-proposed/main) [1:8.2.0+ds-4ubuntu2] (ubuntu-server, virt) | 17:56 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: qemu [arm64] (noble-proposed/main) [1:8.2.0+ds-4ubuntu2] (ubuntu-server, virt) | 17:57 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: qemu [ppc64el] (noble-proposed/main) [1:8.2.0+ds-4ubuntu2] (ubuntu-server, virt) | 18:17 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: qemu [amd64] (noble-proposed/main) [1:8.2.0+ds-4ubuntu2] (ubuntu-server, virt) | 18:52 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted qemu [amd64] (noble-proposed) [1:8.2.0+ds-4ubuntu2] | 19:02 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted qemu [ppc64el] (noble-proposed) [1:8.2.0+ds-4ubuntu2] | 19:02 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted qemu [arm64] (noble-proposed) [1:8.2.0+ds-4ubuntu2] | 19:02 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted qemu [s390x] (noble-proposed) [1:8.2.0+ds-4ubuntu2] | 19:02 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted edubuntu-meta [amd64] (noble-proposed) [24.04.10] | 19:02 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted edubuntu-meta [arm64] (noble-proposed) [24.04.10] | 19:02 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted edubuntu-meta [armhf] (noble-proposed) [24.04.10] | 19:02 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted edubuntu-meta [ppc64el] (noble-proposed) [24.04.10] | 19:02 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted kylin-process-manager [riscv64] (noble-proposed) [4.0.0.0-1] | 19:02 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-trash [riscv64] (noble-proposed) [3.2.1-1] | 19:02 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted u-boot [riscv64] (noble-proposed) [2024.01+dfsg-1ubuntu1] | 19:02 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ruby-faraday-net-http-persistent [amd64] (noble-proposed) [2.1.0-2] | 19:02 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted u-boot [arm64] (noble-proposed) [2024.01+dfsg-1ubuntu1] | 19:02 | |
_doko | somebody cancelled the gcc-13-mipsen-cross build. it still showed progress 30h ago ... restarted | 19:03 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: samba (focal-proposed/main) [2:4.15.13+dfsg-0ubuntu0.20.04.7 => 2:4.15.13+dfsg-0ubuntu0.20.04.8] (core, i386-whitelist) | 19:29 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: samba (jammy-proposed/main) [2:4.15.13+dfsg-0ubuntu1.5 => 2:4.15.13+dfsg-0ubuntu1.6] (core, i386-whitelist) | 19:29 | |
sudip | the build failed for LP: #2043195. what is the next step for that? will it be verification-failed ? | 19:46 |
-ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Launchpad bug 2043195 in openafs (Ubuntu Jammy) "opeanfs-modules-dkms FTBS with linux 6.5 on jammy" [Undecided, Fix Committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/2043195 | 19:46 | |
locutusofborg | vorlon, yes | 20:25 |
locutusofborg | I don't see any mention of provides in llvm-18 build logs | 20:25 |
locutusofborg | and i'm worried | 20:25 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: xtrabackup (noble-proposed/primary) [8.0.35-30-0ubuntu1] | 20:37 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: budgie-desktop-environment [amd64] (noble-proposed/universe) [0.20.6] (personal-fossfreedom, ubuntu-budgie) | 20:51 | |
=== guiverc2 is now known as guiverc | ||
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted budgie-desktop-environment [amd64] (noble-proposed) [0.20.6] | 22:48 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: calamares-settings-ubuntu [amd64] (noble-proposed/universe) [1:24.04.13] (lubuntu, ubuntustudio) | 23:14 | |
arraybolt3 | ubuntu-archive: ^ calamares-settings-ubuntu upload with a new binary - This upload contains calamares-settings-kubuntu, which is critical for Kubuntu's development as the Kubuntu Council has chosen to switch installers to Calamares. Please allow the package through at your earliest convenience. | 23:22 |
arraybolt3 | see https://kubuntu.org/news/kubuntu-council-meeting-30th-january-2024/ | 23:23 |
arraybolt3 | and also https://invent.kde.org/teams/distribution-kubuntu/to-do-24.04/-/issues/3 | 23:23 |
-ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Issue 3 in teams/distribution-kubuntu/to-do-24.04 "Switch to Calamares" [Opened] | 23:23 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!