[03:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted calamares-settings-ubuntu [amd64] (noble-proposed) [1:24.04.13]
[13:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted lcov [source] (mantic-proposed) [2.0-1ubuntu0.1]
[14:21] <aciba> rbasak: Hi, sorry for the ping. While doing SRU verification of cloud-init 23.4.2 we discovered and fixed another manifestation of LP: #2046483 and marked it as regression-proposed, version 23.4.3 contains a fix for this problem. Could you please drop 23.4.2?
[14:21] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Launchpad bug 2046483 in cloud-init (Ubuntu Mantic) "status: races with dbus and errors out" [Undecided, In Progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/2046483
[14:22] <rbasak> aciba: please mark those bugs as verification-<series>-failed with a comment explaining that you're fixing in 23.4.3
[14:22] <rbasak> It's easier to accept an upload over the top than to drop from proposed beforehand.
[14:24] <sudip> rbasak: I have a doubt about LP: #2043195. the build failed for jammy-proposed, what is the next step for that? will it be verification-failed ?
[14:24] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Launchpad bug 2043195 in openafs (Ubuntu Jammy) "opeanfs-modules-dkms FTBS with linux 6.5 on jammy" [Undecided, Fix Committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/2043195
[14:24] <aciba> r_basak: doing, thanks!
[14:28] <rbasak> sudip: yes I can change the tag thanks. It will need fixing and a re-upload I guess? I asked arighi to join here to coordinate.
[14:28] <rbasak> arighi: ^ sudip is asking about bug 2043195
[14:28] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Bug 2043195 in openafs (Ubuntu Jammy) "opeanfs-modules-dkms FTBS with linux 6.5 on jammy" [Undecided, Fix Committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/2043195
[14:28] <arighi> rbasak, sorry my irc client was down, looking
[14:29] <sudip> arighi: hi, I was telling rbasak that the build for jammy-proposed has failed for that
[14:31] <arighi> sudip, hm.. so the openafs dkms doesn't build anymore
[14:32] <arighi> that is with the GA kernel right?
[14:33] <arighi> let me take a look, starting a jammy vm
[14:34] <sudip> that should be an easy fix (from the log), not seen the code yet
[14:49] <arighi> sudip, ok I was able to reproduce the build error in a vm, I'll upload a fix ASAP
[14:51] <sudip> thanks
[15:52] <tjaalton> I don't understand why the spirv-llvm-translator-* tests fail with newer spirv-tools, they're fine on debian..
[15:56] <arighi> sudip, hm.. more errors with openafs, having a fix is going to take a while...
[15:57] <sudip> arighi: thats ok, I am not an user of openafs, I just saw it while bug-hunting. or if you want I can take a look later
[16:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gigolo (jammy-proposed/universe) [0.5.2-1 => 0.5.2-1ubuntu0.22.04.1] (xubuntu)
[16:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gigolo (mantic-proposed/universe) [0.5.2-1 => 0.5.2-1ubuntu0.23.10.1] (xubuntu)
[16:18] <arighi> sudip, well I guess few people are users of openafs :) I'll fix it, but honestly it shouldn't be considered a blocker
[16:18] <seb128> tjaalton, seems to be similar to  https://github.com/InBetweenNames/gentooLTO/issues/889 , maybe try to build spirv-tools without lto?
[16:18] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Issue 889 in InBetweenNames/gentooLTO "dev-util/spirv-tools causes runtime failures with LTO" [Open]
[16:21] <tjaalton> seb128: okay, will try, thanks
[16:21] <seb128> np!
[16:51] <xnox> locutusofborg: i don't do antyhing for trusty -> ask canonical ESM team about that
[17:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted uvtool [source] (mantic-proposed) [0~git178-0ubuntu1.23.10.1]
[17:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted uvtool [source] (focal-proposed) [0~git169-0ubuntu1.20.04.1]
[17:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted uvtool [source] (jammy-proposed) [0~git178-0ubuntu1.22.04.1]
[17:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted unzip [source] (focal-proposed) [6.0-25ubuntu1.2]
[17:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted unzip [source] (mantic-proposed) [6.0-28ubuntu1.1]
[17:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted unzip [source] (jammy-proposed) [6.0-26ubuntu3.2]
[18:13] <locutusofborg> vorlon, it FTBFS on 32bit
[18:13] <locutusofborg>  /usr/include/features-time64.h:26:5: error: "_TIME_BITS=64 is allowed only with _FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64"
[18:15] <locutusofborg> do I need also +lfs?
[20:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: apache2 (mantic-proposed/main) [2.4.57-2ubuntu2.2 => 2.4.57-2ubuntu2.3] (i386-whitelist, ubuntu-server)
[20:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected apache2 [source] (mantic-proposed) [2.4.57-2ubuntu2.3]
[20:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted apache2 [source] (mantic-proposed) [2.4.57-2ubuntu2.3]
[20:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted apache2 [source] (jammy-proposed) [2.4.52-1ubuntu4.8]
[23:00] <jbicha> ubuntu-archive: if we want perl to migrate before python, I think an AA would need to revert these to the versions before the "No-change rebuild with Python 3.12"
[23:00] <jbicha> glgrib graphviz libsbml libsolv mapserver openbabel pcp zbar
[23:09] <_doko> not that easy, some small transitions on top
[23:18] <jbicha> I guess imagemagick too, there is an incomplete imagemagick transition :(
[23:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: rustc-1.74 (noble-proposed/primary) [1.74.1+dfsg0ubuntu1-0ubuntu2]