| ginggs | bdmurray: because no tests have been requested for 2.1.5-2 in unstable, and nothing has triggered a migration-reference/0 in testing yet | 06:00 |
|---|---|---|
| ginggs | you can see 2.1.5-2 results for the migration tests here though: https://ci.debian.net/packages/p/pygrib/testing/amd64/ | 06:01 |
| adrien_ | I'm looking at ncurses' migration (I dealt with ruby3.1 a few weeks ago and started wanting the package to migrate, no other reason); I re-tried a bunch of tests yesterday and all passed except for the autopkgtest for ncurses itself on i386 | 08:13 |
| adrien_ | https://objectstorage.prodstack5.canonical.com/swift/v1/AUTH_0f9aae918d5b4744bf7b827671c86842/autopkgtest-noble/noble/i386/n/ncurses/20240208_162839_a4355@/log.gz | 08:13 |
| adrien_ | the issue seems to start with "Investigating (0) ncurses-bin:i386 < none -> 6.4+20240113-1 @un puN Ib >" \n "Broken ncurses-bin:i386 Conflicts on ncurses-bin:amd64 < 6.4+20240113-1 @ii K Ib >" | 08:14 |
| adrien_ | but I feel like I'm missing some bit of information to properly understand the issue; does that ring a bell to anyone? | 08:15 |
| adrien_ | my first question would be why the i386 has all the amd64 repos (I don't think I had to think about this for i386 so far) | 08:16 |
| dviererbe | dotnet8 on jammy proposed is in the pending publication state for nearly a day now. Is this normal or is something stuck on launchpad? | 10:30 |
| dviererbe | See: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dotnet8 | 10:30 |
| rbasak | It needs NEW processing by an AA. | 10:41 |
| rbasak | (binNEW specifically) | 10:41 |
| rbasak | I think you can highlight ubuntu-archive in #ubuntu-release. | 10:42 |
| rbasak | (but perhaps ordinary human binNEW takes more than a day normally anyway) | 10:42 |
| seb128 | rbasak, dviererbe, accepted, thanks for the ping :-) | 10:43 |
| rbasak | Thank you! :) | 10:43 |
| dviererbe | Thank you :) | 10:43 |
| seb128 | we don't review NEW queue from stable serie often afaik | 10:44 |
| === lesbraz is now known as sbraz | ||
| sudip | rbasak: since you sponsored LP: #2024325 last time, can you please have another look when you have some time | 13:42 |
| -ubottu:#ubuntu-devel- Launchpad bug 2024325 in trac (Ubuntu Jammy) "[SRU] trac crashes while importing a library in Ubuntu 20.04 (ImportError: cannot import name 'soft_unicode' from 'jinja2.utils')" [Undecided, Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/2024325 | 13:42 | |
| rbasak | sudip: re-sponsored | 13:50 |
| sudip | thanks rbasak, and sorry again for being a pain :( | 13:51 |
| rbasak | No worries. | 13:51 |
| === NotEickmeyer is now known as Eickmeyer | ||
| === adrien_ is now known as adrien | ||
| bdmurray | ginggs: thanks, from what I see pygrib is core dumping in Ubuntu so I'll add it to big packages | 17:13 |
| bdmurray | For those wondering what happened to pygrib when added to big_packages - it still dumped core! | 18:33 |
| sudip | mfo: from #ubuntu-release about weex, only timestamp was the problem ? I am still wondering why it was building properly when -proposed is added | 18:36 |
| arraybolt3 | this is mostly out of curiosity, but... usually for package building I run sbuild. However, I see there's a tool called pbuilder that seems to be advertised all over the place in Debian packaging. Why do we use sbuild rather than pbuilder? | 18:41 |
| bdmurray | I use it because I'm an old man and have a hard time learning new tricks. | 18:43 |
| sudip | I use it as the buildd uses sbuild and I prefer to have similar environment like that to avoid nasty shocks later | 18:44 |
| jbicha | I believe most of the pbuilder recommendations are old, sbuild has become more of a standard over time | 19:42 |
| mapreri | arraybolt3: sbuild is what is used by the official buildds. I believe pbuilder was born because historically sbuild was way too hard to set up locally. Now sbuild is much easier than 20 years ago to set up locally | 19:54 |
| mapreri | but I'm the (slightly inactive) current maintainer of pbuilder, so I'm going to tell you to go and use pbuilder :P | 19:55 |
| arraybolt3 | haha :) | 19:55 |
| arraybolt3 | I might try it. | 19:55 |
| mapreri | Eickmeyer: sorry for leaving it in the bpo queue, I went through it yesterday, and thank you for the ping! | 19:56 |
| Eickmeyer | mapreri: NP! Thanks for the accept! | 19:56 |
| arraybolt3 | Why. Is. CC-BY-SA-4.0. Not. In. /usr/share/common-licenses. | 21:44 |
| arraybolt3 | The number of times I've had to format that tome^Uwall of text for a debian/copyright file is immense. | 21:44 |
| Eickmeyer | arraybolt3: Good question, but considering that's a Debian thing, I'd say probably something that needs to be pushed upstream. | 22:05 |
| Eickmeyer | (Same with CC-BY-4.0, etc.) | 22:06 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!