[00:27] <mwhudson> vorlon, Eickmeyer: i've merged that livecd-rootfs fix but i'll give the current package in -proposed to migrate before uploading again
[00:28] <Eickmeyer> mwhudson: Sounds good. I'll keep an eye out for it.
[00:28] <Eickmeyer> fossfreedom_: ^
[00:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: gnome-kiosk (noble-proposed/primary) [45.0-2]
[08:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: ubuntu-boot-test (noble-proposed/primary) [1]
[08:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: slurm-wlm [amd64] (noble-proposed/universe) [23.11.3-1ubuntu1] (kubuntu)
[08:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: slurm-wlm [armhf] (noble-proposed/universe) [23.11.3-1ubuntu1] (kubuntu)
[08:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: slurm-wlm [s390x] (noble-proposed/universe) [23.11.3-1ubuntu1] (kubuntu)
[08:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: slurm-wlm [ppc64el] (noble-proposed/universe) [23.11.3-1ubuntu1] (kubuntu)
[09:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: slurm-wlm [arm64] (noble-proposed/universe) [23.11.3-1ubuntu1] (kubuntu)
[10:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gnupg2 [riscv64] (noble-proposed/main) [2.4.4-2ubuntu1] (core, i386-whitelist)
[11:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gnupg2 [i386] (noble-proposed/main) [2.4.4-2ubuntu2] (core, i386-whitelist)
[11:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gnupg2 [amd64] (noble-proposed/main) [2.4.4-2ubuntu2] (core, i386-whitelist)
[11:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gnupg2 [armhf] (noble-proposed/main) [2.4.4-2ubuntu2] (core, i386-whitelist)
[11:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gnupg2 [s390x] (noble-proposed/main) [2.4.4-2ubuntu2] (core, i386-whitelist)
[11:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gnupg2 [ppc64el] (noble-proposed/main) [2.4.4-2ubuntu2] (core, i386-whitelist)
[11:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gnupg2 [arm64] (noble-proposed/main) [2.4.4-2ubuntu2] (core, i386-whitelist)
[12:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gnupg2 [riscv64] (noble-proposed/main) [2.4.4-2ubuntu2] (core, i386-whitelist)
[12:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: slurm-wlm [riscv64] (noble-proposed/universe) [23.11.3-1ubuntu1] (kubuntu)
[13:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-apt (jammy-proposed/main) [2.4.0ubuntu2 => 2.4.0ubuntu3] (core, i386-whitelist)
[13:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-release-upgrader (jammy-proposed/main) [1:22.04.18 => 1:22.04.19] (core)
[14:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: qatengine (noble-proposed/primary) [1.5.0-0ubuntu1]
[15:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: qatzip (noble-proposed/primary) [1.2.0-0ubuntu1]
[15:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-apt [source] (jammy-proposed) [2.4.0ubuntu3]
[15:42] <stgraber> is rmadison stuck/broken?
[15:43] <stgraber> incus has moved to the noble release pocket 6 days ago, all binaries are in there and apt is happy with it, but looking at rmadison output, it's showing me:
[15:43] <stgraber>  incus | 0.4-1ubuntu1 | noble/universe          | source, amd64, arm64, armhf, ppc64el, riscv64, s390x
[15:43] <stgraber>  incus | 0.5.1-1      | noble-proposed/universe | source
[15:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gce-compute-image-packages (mantic-proposed/main) [20230808.00-0ubuntu1 => 20230808.00-0ubuntu2~23.10.0] (core, ubuntu-cloud)
[15:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: lxc [amd64] (noble-proposed/universe) [1:5.0.3-2ubuntu1] (ubuntu-server)
[15:44] <stgraber> would also be nice if someone could process: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/incus/+bug/2052413
[15:44] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Launchpad bug 2052413 in incus (Ubuntu) "Please remove Incus from sync-blocklist" [Undecided, New]
[15:44] <stgraber> obviously not an issue right now as autosync is disabled, but would be nice not to need manual syncs for noble+1
[15:46] <philroche> I believe there was an issue with rmadison following the LP outage last week. I see the new incus upload `0.5.1-1` using https://snapcraft.io/ubuntu-package-status which queries the archive using the LP API
[15:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: lxc [s390x] (noble-proposed/universe) [1:5.0.3-2ubuntu1] (ubuntu-server)
[15:47] <seb128> stgraber, we are not at feature freeze yet, autosyncs are disabled temporarly to help finishing some of the ongoing transitions
[15:48] <seb128> so it might be an issue before noble+1
[15:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected autopkgtest [source] (mantic-proposed) [5.32ubuntu3~23.10.1]
[15:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected autopkgtest [source] (mantic-proposed) [5.32ubuntu3~23.10.1]
[15:48] <seb128> I'm unsure who maintains the service though, let's see if anyone here who knows reply, otherwise I will try to nag and find people
[15:48] <stgraber> seb128: thanks!
[15:48] <seb128> np!
[15:49] <seb128> thank you for the report :)
[15:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected autopkgtest [source] (jammy-proposed) [5.32ubuntu3~22.04.1]
[15:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected autopkgtest [source] (jammy-proposed) [5.32ubuntu3~22.04.1]
[15:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected autopkgtest [source] (jammy-proposed) [5.32ubuntu3~22.04.1]
[15:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: lxc [arm64] (noble-proposed/universe) [1:5.0.3-2ubuntu1] (ubuntu-server)
[15:49] <bdmurray> Is rmadison the service being discussed?
[15:49] <seb128> bdmurray, yes
[15:50] <bdmurray> That's the release team.
[15:50] <seb128> bdmurray, see what Stephane was saying 8 minutes ago about the results being non current
[15:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: lxc [ppc64el] (noble-proposed/universe) [1:5.0.3-2ubuntu1] (ubuntu-server)
[15:52] <LocutusOfBorg> stgraber, <3
[15:52] <LocutusOfBorg> (context is lxc)
[15:53] <stgraber> LocutusOfBorg: thanks! trying to get to the point where lxc can join lxcfs and incus in being just a straight sync from Debian as we've clearly been pretty bad at maintaining it on its own in Ubuntu :)
[15:54] <LocutusOfBorg> I'm also uploading python3-lxc as "sync" with Debian
[15:54] <LocutusOfBorg> so, next time python3-lxc gets a new upload, we sync and live happy
[15:54] <stgraber> excellent!
[15:54] <LocutusOfBorg> the delta was about adding liblxc-dev dependency, and we can drop
[16:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected autopkgtest [source] (jammy-proposed) [5.32ubuntu3~22.04.1]
[16:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: apache2 (focal-proposed/main) [2.4.41-4ubuntu3.15 => 2.4.41-4ubuntu3.16] (i386-whitelist, ubuntu-server)
[16:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: lxc [armhf] (noble-proposed/universe) [1:5.0.3-2ubuntu1] (ubuntu-server)
[16:18] <vorlon> morning, folks
[16:19] <vorlon> I have rolled back the ec5421ba from debian-cd to unblock builds of layered images, while we're waiting for the livecd-rootfs fix to land
[16:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: nvidia-graphics-drivers-535-server (mantic-proposed/restricted) [535.154.05-0ubuntu0.23.10.1 => 535.154.05-0ubuntu0.23.10.2] (i386-whitelist)
[16:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: nvidia-graphics-drivers-535-server (jammy-proposed/restricted) [535.154.05-0ubuntu0.22.04.1 => 535.154.05-0ubuntu0.22.04.2] (i386-whitelist)
[16:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: nvidia-graphics-drivers-535-server (focal-proposed/restricted) [535.154.05-0ubuntu0.20.04.1 => 535.154.05-0ubuntu0.20.04.2] (i386-whitelist)
[16:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted apache2 [source] (focal-proposed) [2.4.41-4ubuntu3.16]
[16:29] <ItzSwirlz> Hey release team, I don't have access to respin Cinnamon images on the QA tracker. What can I do to have that ability?
[16:56] <Eickmeyer> ubuntu-release ^
[17:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: autopkgtest (jammy-proposed/main) [5.28ubuntu0.22.04.0 => 5.32ubuntu3~22.04.1] (core)
[17:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: autopkgtest (mantic-proposed/main) [5.28ubuntu1 => 5.32ubuntu3~23.10.1] (core)
[17:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: apt (jammy-proposed/main) [2.4.11 => 2.4.12] (core, i386-whitelist)
[17:32] <arraybolt3> ubuntu-release: Heya, it seems that kubuntu-installer-prompt is still in NEW. As it's holding up Kubuntu's ability to transition fully to Calamares and Feature Freeze is approaching, it would be much appreciated if this could be reviewed whenever someone has time. Thanks!
[17:33] <arraybolt3> (we've got this, a couple of image builder patches, and a seed change before we're pretty much done)
[18:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: livecd-rootfs (focal-proposed/main) [2.664.52 => 2.664.53] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist)
[18:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: apt (mantic-proposed/main) [2.7.3 => 2.7.3ubuntu0.1] (core, i386-whitelist)
[18:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted nvidia-graphics-drivers-535-server [source] (mantic-proposed) [535.154.05-0ubuntu0.23.10.2]
[18:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted nvidia-graphics-drivers-535-server [source] (jammy-proposed) [535.154.05-0ubuntu0.22.04.2]
[18:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: lxc [riscv64] (noble-proposed/universe) [1:5.0.3-2ubuntu1] (ubuntu-server)
[18:26] <tsimonq2> arraybolt3: hey :) it's ubuntu-archive that does NEW approvals, u_buntu-release's function is slightly different
[18:27] <tsimonq2> From a Kubuntu Member perspective, I concur with arraybolt3. :)
[18:27] <arraybolt3> gah, is there somewhere where those things are documented? :P
[18:27] <arraybolt3> I know there's u_buntu-sru, u_buntu-release, and only now am I learning/remembering that there's u_buntu-archive.
[18:29] <tsimonq2> Yeah, there's those three, and q_a-help to get the QA Team's attention (so specifically, questions about the autopkgtest service, ISO QA tracker, and bugs as a meta item.)
[18:30] <tsimonq2> And I've learned that it's also a good idea to check https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/autopkgtest-service/34490/2 before pinging QA. I do wish the other teams had similar pages. :)
[18:34] <tsimonq2> vorlon, mwhudson: Just caught your above messages re: livecd-rootfs, I do appreciate it! I had it down to "either it's a missing mkdir or the .chroot_early hook isn't being ran," and tried the former. Anyway, thanks!
[18:43] <mwhudson> tsimonq2: i'm not going to make any claims that debugging livefs failures is in any way straightforward
[18:43] <mwhudson> i just have a large pile of previous bad experiences to draw on
[18:48] <tsimonq2> I can definitely relate. ;)
[19:03] <juliank> ubuntu-archive gnupg2 2.4 has new binaries in NEW, please approve them :-)
[19:04] <juliank> I'll get to work on that in 1-2 days sorting out regressions and picking new features from git that we want to revoke legacy public key algorithms in apt
[19:04] <juliank> So it would be good to have autopkgtests by then :)
[19:08] <juliank> gnupg 2.4 adds yet another daemon to manage public keyboxes of all things
[19:08] <juliank> I'm very sad but it is what it is
[19:13] <juliank> We also have nice small APT srus
[19:14] <juliank> Well 2 line of code changes and like 50 of test changes?
[19:14] <juliank> :D
[19:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gradebook [amd64] (noble-proposed) [1.2-0ubuntu1]
[19:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gradebook [armhf] (noble-proposed) [1.2-0ubuntu1]
[19:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gradebook [riscv64] (noble-proposed) [1.2-0ubuntu1]
[19:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gradebook [arm64] (noble-proposed) [1.2-0ubuntu1]
[19:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gradebook [s390x] (noble-proposed) [1.2-0ubuntu1]
[19:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gradebook [ppc64el] (noble-proposed) [1.2-0ubuntu1]
[19:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gnome-kiosk [sync] (noble-proposed) [45.0-2]
[19:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gnome-kiosk [amd64] (noble-proposed/none) [45.0-2] (no packageset)
[19:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gnome-kiosk [ppc64el] (noble-proposed/none) [45.0-2] (no packageset)
[19:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gnome-kiosk [armhf] (noble-proposed/none) [45.0-2] (no packageset)
[19:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gnome-kiosk [s390x] (noble-proposed/none) [45.0-2] (no packageset)
[19:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gnome-kiosk [arm64] (noble-proposed/none) [45.0-2] (no packageset)
[20:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted nvidia-graphics-drivers-535-server [source] (focal-proposed) [535.154.05-0ubuntu0.20.04.2]
[20:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gnome-kiosk [riscv64] (noble-proposed/universe) [45.0-2] (no packageset)
[20:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gnupg2 [riscv64] (noble-proposed) [2.4.4-2ubuntu1]
[20:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gnupg2 [arm64] (noble-proposed) [2.4.4-2ubuntu2]
[20:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gnupg2 [i386] (noble-proposed) [2.4.4-2ubuntu2]
[20:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gnupg2 [riscv64] (noble-proposed) [2.4.4-2ubuntu2]
[20:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gnupg2 [amd64] (noble-proposed) [2.4.4-2ubuntu2]
[20:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gnupg2 [ppc64el] (noble-proposed) [2.4.4-2ubuntu2]
[20:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gnupg2 [armhf] (noble-proposed) [2.4.4-2ubuntu2]
[20:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gnupg2 [s390x] (noble-proposed) [2.4.4-2ubuntu2]
[20:24] <seb128> juliank, ^
[20:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gnome-kiosk [arm64] (noble-proposed) [45.0-2]
[20:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gnome-kiosk [riscv64] (noble-proposed) [45.0-2]
[20:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gnome-kiosk [ppc64el] (noble-proposed) [45.0-2]
[20:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gnome-kiosk [amd64] (noble-proposed) [45.0-2]
[20:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gnome-kiosk [s390x] (noble-proposed) [45.0-2]
[20:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted lxc [arm64] (noble-proposed) [1:5.0.3-2ubuntu1]
[20:26] <juliank> seb128: thanks!
[20:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted lxc [ppc64el] (noble-proposed) [1:5.0.3-2ubuntu1]
[20:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted lxc [s390x] (noble-proposed) [1:5.0.3-2ubuntu1]
[20:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gnome-kiosk [armhf] (noble-proposed) [45.0-2]
[20:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted lxc [armhf] (noble-proposed) [1:5.0.3-2ubuntu1]
[20:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted lxc [amd64] (noble-proposed) [1:5.0.3-2ubuntu1]
[20:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted lxc [riscv64] (noble-proposed) [1:5.0.3-2ubuntu1]
[20:26] <seb128> np!
[20:28] <seb128> arraybolt3, the  kubuntu-installer-prompt description states 'and will either launch Calamares or LXQt', that seems wrong?
[20:29] <arraybolt3> That was an accident, going to fix it in the next upload.
[20:29] <arraybolt3> The fix is already in Git.
[20:29] <seb128> ack
[20:30] <seb128> arraybolt3, src/main.cpp: * Copyright (C) 2022-2023 Lubuntu Developers <lubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com>
[20:31] <arraybolt3> That's accurate.
[20:31] <seb128> but debian/copyright states 2022
[20:31] <arraybolt3> oh
[20:31] <arraybolt3> hmm, /me checks something
[20:31] <seb128> those are minors, I'm not going to reject on that but please fix in the next upload
[20:31] <arraybolt3> I'm guessing this was an inconsistency in the original package I migrated this from.
[20:31] <arraybolt3> yep, sure enough
[20:32] <arraybolt3> ack, fixing in Git now.
[20:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted kubuntu-installer-prompt [source] (noble-proposed) [24.04.1]
[20:33] <seb128> arraybolt3, ^
[20:33] <arraybolt3> thanks you!
[20:33] <arraybolt3> *thank
[20:33] <seb128> np!
[20:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: kubuntu-installer-prompt [amd64] (noble-proposed/none) [24.04.1] (no packageset)
[20:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: kubuntu-installer-prompt [armhf] (noble-proposed/none) [24.04.1] (no packageset)
[20:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: kubuntu-installer-prompt [s390x] (noble-proposed/none) [24.04.1] (no packageset)
[20:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: kubuntu-installer-prompt [arm64] (noble-proposed/none) [24.04.1] (no packageset)
[20:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: kubuntu-installer-prompt [ppc64el] (noble-proposed/none) [24.04.1] (no packageset)
[21:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: kubuntu-installer-prompt [riscv64] (noble-proposed/universe) [24.04.1] (no packageset)
[21:10] <UnivrslSuprBox> Hey ubuntu-archive, I just found lp:2053071 which prevents faketime from doing much of anything useful in lunar+. However, it also causes the package to FTBFS for a different patch that I'd like to put in. I'm not sure how much work it would be to fix faketime for 32-bit architectures, it seems broken upstream as well. What's the path forward?
[21:10] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Launchpad bug 2053071 in faketime (Ubuntu) "faketime i386 and armhf fail to fake timestamps through date(1) in lunar and above" [Undecided, New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/2053071
[21:12] <vorlon> adrien: ^^
[21:12] <vorlon> UnivrslSuprBox: not really an ubuntu-archive question unless you're asking for package removal
[21:13] <UnivrslSuprBox> tsimonq2: redirect loop :P
[21:18] <adrien> UnivrslSuprBox: I'm a bit surprised; can you confirm the issue is present without your latest changes? (sorry if you already said so somewhere, it's late here)
[21:18] <adrien> ah, right, sorry; I read again
[21:18] <UnivrslSuprBox> adrien: yep, installed faketime straight from the archive on jammy, kinetic, lunar, mantic, and noble in i386 chroots to test.
[21:19] <UnivrslSuprBox> My changes _do_ fix stat(1) and ls(1) on i386 though! :P
[21:20] <adrien> I would expect the test command-line to succeed on 32-bit arches unless your timezone is "east" of UTC
[21:21] <adrien> what I mean is that:
[21:21] <adrien> % faketime -f '1970-01-01 00:00:01' date +%s
[21:21] <adrien> -3599
[21:21] <adrien> % TZ=UTC faketime -f '1970-01-01 00:00:01' date +%s
[21:21] <adrien> 1
[21:22] <adrien> wait, it should work anyway; well, it's really way too late for me, I'll have a look on tomorrow instead I think :P
[21:34] <vorlon> temporarily rolling back glgrib graphviz libsbml libsolv mapserver openbabel pcp zbar from -proposed to disentangle perl from python https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/jrn8wNKwtc/
[21:36] <vorlon> $ wcat https://irclogs.ubuntu.com/2024/01/31/%23ubuntu-release.txt | awk -F / '/ginggs.*launchpad.net/ { print $(NF-1) " " $NF }' | while read package version; do copy-package -b --auto-approve --force-same-destination -y -e $version $package -s noble-proposed --to-suite noble-proposed ; done
[21:36] <vorlon> ginggs: ^
[21:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cd-boot-images-amd64 (jammy-proposed/main) [20.2 => 20.3] (desktop-core)
[21:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cd-boot-images-arm64 (jammy-proposed/main) [16.1 => 16.2] (desktop-core)
[21:54] <jbicha> vorlon: I think you need to roll back libguestfs ; the latest version depends on glib2.0 which is entangled with python3 (via gobject-introspection)
[21:56] <vorlon> jbicha: can you elaborate on the entanglement here so I understand? I don't see gobject-introspection mentioned wrt glib2.0 on either update_excuses or update_output
[21:57] <vorlon> I: kubuntu-installer-prompt: spelling-error-in-binary Lon Long [usr/bin/kubuntu-installer-prompt]
[21:57] <vorlon> well that's gratuitous
[21:57] <jbicha> glib2.0 claims "will attempt migration" but I believe it needs gobject-introspection 1.78.1-13 changes "don't force glib to match exactly"
[21:57] <vorlon> it doesn't even show up in 'strings', could just be a random 3-character bit of the binary :P
[21:57] <vorlon> jbicha: ack
[21:58] <vorlon> jbicha: and is there a build of gobject-introspection not entangled with python3-defaults that I could roll back to instead?
[21:59] <jbicha> vorlon: no, 1.78.1-13 was in experimental. I synced it (actually -14) because I knew we would need it, but it was too late since python3 had already begun
[21:59] <vorlon> ack
[22:00] <vorlon> which version of libguestfs do I need to roll back to?
[22:01] <jbicha> vorlon: reading the changelog, I guess 1:1.52.0-2ubuntu2 since we aren't ready for php, right?
[22:01] <vorlon> no idea about that one
[22:01] <vorlon> but let's take the one that was specifically for perl, thanks
[22:01] <vorlon> done
[22:07] <cpete> So ros-ros-comm is the final blocker for the tinyxml2 transition and is one of the blockers in the python3-defaults transition, mainly due to usage of now deprecated unittest code in python3.12. I've been working on a patch to update the test code, but between the growing complexity of the patch and the question of if we even want to ship these packages in noble, I think we should just hint it.
[22:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ubuntucinnamon-meta [amd64] (noble-proposed/universe) [24.04.1] (no packageset)
[22:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ubuntucinnamon-meta [ppc64el] (noble-proposed/universe) [24.04.1] (no packageset)
[22:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ubuntucinnamon-meta [arm64] (noble-proposed/universe) [24.04.1] (no packageset)
[22:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ubuntucinnamon-meta [s390x] (noble-proposed/universe) [24.04.1] (no packageset)
[22:31] <Eickmeyer> New desktop-minimal package for ubuntucinnamon incoming. This is to accommodate upcoming MP for livecd-rootfs for layered build.
[23:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted kubuntu-installer-prompt [amd64] (noble-proposed) [24.04.1]
[23:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted kubuntu-installer-prompt [armhf] (noble-proposed) [24.04.1]
[23:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted kubuntu-installer-prompt [s390x] (noble-proposed) [24.04.1]
[23:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted kubuntu-installer-prompt [arm64] (noble-proposed) [24.04.1]
[23:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted kubuntu-installer-prompt [ppc64el] (noble-proposed) [24.04.1]
[23:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted kubuntu-installer-prompt [riscv64] (noble-proposed) [24.04.1]
[23:44] <vorlon> rolling back pcp to disentangle perl and python
[23:45] <vorlon> erm I already did that! I guess I should be checking update_excuses timestamps