[04:10] <lubuntik> HI
[04:10] <lubuntik> hello world
[04:10] <Random6> Hi
[06:44] <chris4285> hello
[07:30] <centrix_> I am using this script https://dpaste.com/BT4T5HFQ3 to clean out the SW installed for icinga2.
[07:30] <centrix_> However, reinstall cannot be done for various problems. Mainly with PHP.
[07:32] <centrix_> Eg.: https://dpaste.com/E75354FV3
[07:33] <centrix_> Before reviewing the script - it's been written quickly. No art. I need to clean out to install again a FULLY working Icinga.
[07:33] <centrix_> I am testing at a VM with a snapshot where only OS was installed.
[07:34] <centrix_> Ubuntu 22.04.3 LTS. ISO downloaded at Feb 12. 2024.
[07:35] <centrix_> There are many brutal removals due to the fact that uninstalling the packages a HOST of leftovers are still at the disk.
[07:36] <CosmicDJ> centrix_: man apt, search for purge
[07:38] <centrix_> CosmicDJ, I've just issued the apt purge command and "find / -name "*php*"" still delivers php related files.
[07:55] <CosmicDJ> centrix_: dpkg -S /path/to/php/file to check which package this file belongs to
[12:27] <Gunwoo> Alt, Control, Windows_Start, Shift, arrow_up/down/left/right deletes the currently selected text/cells in Firefox and Libreoffice-Calc but not in Libreoffice-Writer. and it only moves the cursor to the first character of the selection without deleting in Google Docs on Firefox. and this bug does not happen when firefox is running on X-wayland... Does anyone have any clue how to fix it?
[12:27] <Gunwoo> sway 1.8.1-2 is downloaded from Ubuntu. the version of ubnutu is 23.10.
[12:27] <Gunwoo> My first impression about the bug is written here: https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/questions/1438491#answer-1636603
[12:32] <PeGaSuS> I hate cross posting but I've been trying to get help on #ubuntu-server and I couldn't get any. so, when compiling UnrealIRCd, I'm facing this issue on one of my machines: /usr/bin/ld: error: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libkeyutils.so.1: file too short
[12:33] <PeGaSuS> tried to reinstall `libkeyutils1` and `libkeyutils-dev` to no avail. ideas?
[12:44] <ogra_> PeGaSuS, sounds like filesystem corruption (the .so is only in the library package, not in -dev FWIW)
[12:49] <PeGaSuS> I find it weird because all was working before updating the system
[12:50] <PeGaSuS> I just did `apt update && apt dist-upgrade`, rebooted the machine, tried to recompile UnrealIRCd (it compiled perfectly fine before) and hit the error
[12:57] <ogra_> also /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libkeyutils.so.1 is actually a symlink, does the target file exists and does the file command correctly detect it as ELF object ?
[13:26] <PeGaSuS> `ls -l /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libkeyutils.so.1` returns: lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 20 Feb 13 13:24 /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libkeyutils.so.1 -> libkeyutils.so.1.9
[13:26] <PeGaSuS> `file /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libkeyutils.so.1.9` returns: /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libkeyutils.so.1.9: ELF 64-bit LSB shared object, x86-64, version 1 (SYSV), dynamically linked, BuildID[sha1]=ff27227afa5eeddccab180dd29bd7fcff94aea7c, stripped
[13:43] <PeGaSuS> I guess I'll have to reinstall the system?
[14:10] <BluesKaj> Hi all
[14:11] <PeGaSuS> hello BluesKaj :)
[14:23] <BluesKaj> hey PeGaSuS
[14:53] <lotuspsychje> PeGaSuS: usualy apt knows what to do in case it spits out errors
[14:54] <PeGaSuS> well, I tried to reinstall even libgcc, etc. reinstalled the system and I'll see what happens next
[14:54] <PeGaSuS> there was only UnrealIRCd running there, so no big loss
[15:05] <ogra_> PeGaSuS, you could just use an lxd container for building, it is trivial and wouldnt taint your host then ...
[15:07] <leftyfb> mmmmmm containers ......
[15:08] <ogra_> leftyfb, did you see https://documentation.ubuntu.com/lxd/en/latest/howto/access_ui/ yet btw ?
[15:08] <leftyfb> ew
[15:09] <leftyfb> :)
[15:09] <ogra_> well, turned off by default 🙂
[16:00] <PeGaSuS> isn't a VPS already a container? :P
[16:10] <plastikman> no
[16:10] <plastikman> its a VM
[16:23] <leftyfb> it could also be a container
[18:20] <cent> A question off the topic - I ahve a ubuntu ISO I want to install onto a dell server. Is it possible to UPLOAD the ISO into the iDRAC "space". Not map a REMOTE ISO, but to have that locally available. Thanks.
[18:22] <cent> Some sort of the "iDRAC has kinda memory chip you can use to store your files" thing.
[18:22] <cent> Thank you.
[18:22] <leftyfb> cent: no. Not unless you have the sd/microsd card flash module installed and write the iso to that
[18:23] <leftyfb> I've been running into this issue a lot lately. The iso is apparently just big enough to be a little too much to be mounted over the internet to some locations
[18:39] <plastikman> Why not just setup MAAS or Cobbler (yes its redhat, but it works with ubuntu), or FAI (is that still a thing?)
[18:41] <leftyfb> plastikman: that's not what they were asking for
[18:46] <plastikman> I know....but like, the real way to deploy servers is with a deployment tool :)
[18:47] <cent> leftyfb, rhanks. That is what I suspected. To your additional note, I do not use large ISOs as I take care to have the Inet access to a repo off of which I can install packages etc..
[18:47] <cent> Bu that ISO location would be neat to have.
[18:47] <leftyfb> plastikman: the real way is using the tools and resources you have available to you and those that fit your workflow and abilities
[18:47] <cent> Location, storage
[18:47] <plastikman> leftyfb: fair.
[18:48] <leftyfb> cent: you asked about Ubuntu. The latest 22.04.3 iso is fairly large and in my experience across dozens of deployments, it's become and issue mounting it remotely using the iDrac
[19:25] <rodney_> Hy all, please, it's my first time here and I'd like to know how to check through terminal in ubuntu if my hardware supports avx - I installed vinegar to run roblox in ubuntu, but roblox is not opening.
[19:25] <rodney_> I'm using 22.04 version
[19:26] <leftyfb> rodney_: I typed: linux "avx" into google and got "https://stackoverflow.com/questions/37480071/how-to-tell-if-a-linux-machine-supports-avx-avx2-instructions
[19:27] <rodney_> Fine leftyfb, I gonna try it now, thank you :)
[19:27] <bprompt> rodney_: grep avx /proc/cpuinfo   <--- at the console, ** shamelessly taken from https://stackoverflow.com/questions/37480071/how-to-tell-if-a-linux-machine-supports-avx-avx2-instructions **
[19:28] <rodney_> bprompt, thank you very much !
[19:28] <leftyfb> it's the same link I already posted
[19:29] <bprompt> heheh, notice that, that just means we're fast typist =), and yes, it was the 1st link in the results
[19:31] <rodney_> Please leftyfb and bprompt, I'm confused with this output: https://paste.debian.net/plain/1307231
[19:31] <leftyfb> rodney_: if you got output, it means it found it
[19:31] <rodney_> I really can't understand through this information if avx is supported or not by my computer
[19:32] <leftyfb> rodney_: grep -o avx /proc/cpuinfo
[19:32] <leftyfb> rodney_: grep -o avx2 /proc/cpuinfo
[19:32] <oerheks> that means you have 8 cores
[19:33] <oerheks> err 4 cores, i have 8
[19:34] <rodney_> leftyfb and bprompt and oerheks, it has returned avx2 four times after typed 'grep -o avx2 /proc/cpuinfo'
[19:34] <oerheks> That sounds good.
[19:34] <leftyfb> rodney_: yes, your CPU supports avx and avx2
[19:36] <rodney_> Ok, thank you. I really can't understand why roblox is not opening - I installed vinegar and made the configuration in the configuration file according a  tutorial that explains how to install it in ubuntu.
[19:36] <leftyfb> rodney_: you'll have to seek support from the vinegar project
[19:37] <leftyfb> !wine | rodney_ you can also try this channel:
[19:38] <bprompt> rodney_: I'd like to point out there's a #vinegarhq channel
[19:39] <rodney_> thanks leftyfb and ubottu - First of all, I'd like  to get any irc channel for vinegar
[19:39] <rodney_> bprompt, is this channel found in libera.chat ?
[19:39] <bprompt> rodney_: from what I can see, yes
[19:40] <leftyfb> rodney_: type: /join #vinegarhw
[19:40] <rodney_> Ok, I'll check it around there, thank you very much :)
[19:40] <leftyfb> though it doesn't look very active
[19:41] <rodney_> Yes, there is anyone over there
[19:41] <rodney_> Is there anyone how have installed roblox in ubuntu here successfully ?
[19:43] <oerheks> some use flatpak / grapejuice https://flathub.org/apps/net.brinkervii.grapejuice
[19:44] <rodney_> Does grapejuice works fine in ubuntu ? Some people have related several issues with grapejuice
[21:01] <heyeyey> does anyone know why firefox is extremely laggy on startup? this only happens with ubuntu. I usually have to close it and reopen it for it to be normal again. I'm using ubuntu 20.04 lts
[21:04] <kawal> you have a dual boot system?
[21:05] <heyeyey> no, normal boot with ubuntu
[21:05] <kawal> try to flush firefox cache, or start with a clean config double check you didn;t install bad extensions.
[21:06] <kawal> maybe your hardrive is getting slower.
[21:07] <heyeyey> but why would it work again until I turn off my computer? Once it works, firefox works perfectly until I shut down my computer
[21:07] <heyeyey> yeah maybe it's an extension problem
[21:07] <leftyfb> heyeyey: it's more than likely due to just being a snap
[21:07] <leftyfb> snaps have an issue on the very first boot
[21:08] <heyeyey> firefox is a snap?
[21:08] <leftyfb> once you open the app, it should load fine after until you reboot again
[21:08] <leftyfb> yes
[21:08] <heyeyey> yep that's what happens
[21:08] <heyeyey> is there a way to install it normally?
[21:08] <leftyfb> it is installed
[21:09] <leftyfb> "normally"
[21:09] <kawal> leftyfb is snap the only available firefox now? or .deb package still around?
[21:10] <xangua> There's an official Deb repository around now
[21:10] <leftyfb> not from the official ubuntu repos. Mozilla has a package, but it's not supported by the Ubuntu community
[21:10] <leftyfb> xangua: it's not official from Ubuntu
[21:10] <heyeyey> maybe i'll switch to debian than
[21:10] <xangua> By Mozilla*
[21:10] <heyeyey> s/than/then
[21:10] <heyeyey> it's a shame
[21:10] <leftyfb> heyeyey: are you constantly rebooting?
[21:10] <heyeyey> yeah basically everyday
[21:11] <kawal> only the snap is ubuntu official firefox then.
[21:11] <oerheks> it is lagging at 1st startup .. because you did not run updates first, properly, after boot
[21:11] <oerheks> it checks online
[21:11] <leftyfb> heyeyey: and 2-5 seconds is too long to wait for the first time to load an app once your computer boots up?
[21:11] <oerheks> can do 10 seconds, or 25?
[21:12] <heyeyey> it's not 2-5 secs, it's like a constant lag that doesn't go away until I restart the program
[21:12] <heyeyey> it can go on for a long time
[21:12] <leftyfb> heyeyey: ah, then that's not likely a snap problem
[21:12] <oerheks> a lag .. per new page? how much ram do you have?
[21:12] <heyeyey> i have modern specs, it's not a computer problem i think
[21:13] <heyeyey> and it doesn't even use more ram than usual neither does it use cpu
[21:13] <heyeyey> maybe it's a firefox bug
[21:14] <heyeyey> but what makes me suspicious is that i've used many distros and ubuntu is the only one with this problem
[21:14] <heyeyey> *where i have this problem
[21:40] <cdriscoll> Is this the correct channel to ask how to remove/disable the default Firefox snap package from the 22.04 desktop ISO (so it's not installed as a snap upon initial login) ?
[21:41] <leftyfb> cdriscoll: sudo snap remove firefox
[21:42] <cdriscoll> @leftyfb: Heh, but I want it removed during install.  I'm already preseeding a 22.04 Desktop install, but all of my attempts to disable the snap haven't worked :(
[21:42] <leftyfb> add the command to your autoinstall script
[21:44] <cdriscoll> Adding something like 'in-target sudo snap remove firefox --purge' to the ubiquity/success_command section?
[21:44] <leftyfb> I don't know, I don't have a need to remove firefox. Also, all my customizations I do through ansible after Ubuntu is installed
[21:45] <leftyfb> you can try it
[21:45] <cdriscoll> I did.  It doesn't work.  I want it to not be installed during OS installation.
[21:46] <leftyfb> why not just remove it after?
[21:46] <tanath> just do oem install
[21:46] <leftyfb> or just leace it
[21:46] <leftyfb> leave*
[21:47] <cdriscoll> @leftyfb: I don't want users to have to run a script or command to remove the snap post-install.  I just want the snap to not be there.
[21:47] <tanath> cdriscoll: https://help.ubuntu.com/community/Ubuntu_OEM_Installer_Overview
[21:48] <leftyfb> why not just let the users have firefox?
[21:48] <cdriscoll> @leftyfb: I have Firefox installed via the Mozilla repo.
[21:48] <tanath> you can set it up how you want, then prepare, and image the disk
[21:48] <tanath> assuming you want an image you can replicate
[21:48] <leftyfb> cdriscoll: or you could just leave it installed as a snap by default
[21:48] <cdriscoll> I could, yes, but I need disk encryption setup during install.
[21:48] <tanath> or if you just want the one system you're done
[21:49] <cdriscoll> I don't want the Firefox snap.
[21:49] <leftyfb> why?
[21:50] <cdriscoll> Does it matter?  It's a preference.  I can look into the OEM setup.
[21:51] <leftyfb> cdriscoll: you're spending all this effort because you "prefer" to not use snaps? You know firefox works, looks and acts exactly the same either way right?
[21:51] <cdriscoll> I want the .deb package installation method, seems pretty easy to understand.
[21:58] <tanath> leftyfb: it's needless bloat though, duplicating dependencies. it's not like there aren't good reasons to avoid it
[21:59] <leftyfb> tanath: half-truths
[21:59] <tanath> oh?
[21:59] <oerheks>  you need some trickery tricks to add the official firefox repo keys ..
[21:59] <oerheks> * with correct priority
[22:00] <cdriscoll> @oerheks: I'm currently extracting the ISO, unsquashing the filesystem and customizing packages there, which is where I'm adding the Mozilla repo keys and apt preferences, etc.  I just don't wasnt two Firefox packages installed (snap and deb).
[22:02] <leftyfb> cdriscoll: you have yet to give a valid reason to add a 3rd party, unsupported repo and install a duplicate package already installed on the system by default
[22:02] <cdriscoll> @leftyfb: Nope, I'll just ignore your unhelpful responses.
[22:03] <Menzador> I mean, "I don't like snap" is a valid reason, sure, but deb isn't the only solution
[22:03] <tanath> cdriscoll: if you want an example, here's one for mint, but would be same for ubuntu https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P0uY24H1o5k
[22:03] <Menzador> (I don't like snap either; I install and self-support a Flatpak instance myself)
[22:04] <Menzador> The reason people are getting mad is most likely because the snap is the officially supported way to install Firefox
[22:04] <Menzador> Everything else, ymmv
[22:08] <greenleaf> hello
[22:09] <oerheks> Menzador, and the mechanism, after 1st boot snaps check themselves.
[22:10] <greenleaf> I just installed a cli terminal termux on my android device
[22:10] <leftyfb> greenleaf: you might be looking for #android
[22:11] <tanath> there's a #termux channel
[22:11] <oerheks> How is that ubuntu support related?
[22:11] <greenleaf> ^ no way a termux on this server?
[22:11] <tanath> yep
[22:11] <oerheks> jolly
[22:11] <greenleaf> thank you fo4 telling me!
[22:12] <greenleaf> im using irssi and weechat on an old android tablet lol it rocka
[22:12] <greenleaf> rocks*
[22:12] <tanath> you're using both? 🤨
[22:12] <greenleaf> yes
[22:13] <greenleaf> beats carrying a laptop around
[22:13] <plastikman> take it to a general
[22:13] <leftyfb> greenleaf: feel free to discuss in #ubuntu-offtopic
[22:20] <bprompt> greenleaf: well, using a laptop beats "tying with one finger" on a keyboard covering half of the screen real state
[22:20] <bprompt> s/tying/typing/