| xnox | cpaelzer: is there llvm skew on riscv64? as bpftool needs llvm which might be still building on riscv or some such? | 00:52 |
|---|---|---|
| xnox | possibly worth a ping to arighi / paulo on ubuntu-kernel here, or on matrix kernel chanel | 00:53 |
| === pushkarnk1 is now known as pushkarnk | ||
| === RAOF_ is now known as RAOF | ||
| slyon | @pilot in | 11:50 |
| === ChanServ changed the topic of #ubuntu-devel to: Archive: open | Devel of Ubuntu (not support) | Build failures: http://qa.ubuntuwire.com/ftbfs/ | #ubuntu for support and discussion of Focal-Mantic | Patch Pilots: slyon | ||
| ahasenack | I'm really starting to dislike jupyter-* packages | 13:34 |
| ahasenack | fix one thing, another one pops up | 13:36 |
| ahasenack | amd64 builders are, er, loaded? | 13:50 |
| ahasenack | "start in 35min" | 13:50 |
| slyon | sudip: Hey! I'm currently looking at your proposed lptools merge in https://code.launchpad.net/~sudipmuk/ubuntu/+source/lptools/+git/lptools/+merge/460236, can you explain why you changed the Recommends/Depends in d/control? | 14:01 |
| sudip | slyon: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lptools/+bug/2052680/comments/1 | 14:02 |
| -ubottu:#ubuntu-devel- Launchpad bug 2052680 in lptools (Ubuntu) "Please merge lptools 0.3.0 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)" [Undecided, Confirmed] | 14:02 | |
| slyon | sudip: oh thanks! I missed the linked bug report :) | 14:04 |
| sudip | :) | 14:05 |
| === enr0n_ is now known as enr0n | ||
| dbungert | ahasenack: I am 3 bugfixes deep trying to get jupyter-notebook to migrate. Are you working on LP: #2054342 ? I think the proposal to "limit jupyter-client to < 8" should be seriously considered. | 15:24 |
| -ubottu:#ubuntu-devel- Launchpad bug 2054342 in jupyter-notebook (Ubuntu) "FTBFS (test failure) with jupyter-client >= 8" [Undecided, New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/2054342 | 15:24 | |
| slyon | sudip: Can you please comment on https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/digimend-dkms/+bug/2052708/comments/4 ? | 15:28 |
| -ubottu:#ubuntu-devel- Launchpad bug 2052708 in digimend-dkms (Ubuntu Jammy) "[SRU] digimend-dkms 10-4: digimend kernel module failed to build" [Undecided, Confirmed] | 15:28 | |
| * sudip looks | 15:31 | |
| flag | any AA around? | 15:35 |
| === flag is now known as ppisati | ||
| ppisati | we need a cleanup: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/2054439 | 15:36 |
| -ubottu:#ubuntu-devel- Launchpad bug 2054439 in linux (Ubuntu Noble) "RM obsolete binaries from noble to allow linux to migrate" [Undecided, Confirmed] | 15:36 | |
| ppisati | (on behalf of the kernel team) | 15:36 |
| sudip | slyon: replied to your comment. | 15:37 |
| ahasenack | dbungert: I am attempting to fix the dep8 test failure with jupyter-client 7.9.x, it now passws locally, just checking a ppa | 15:51 |
| ahasenack | dbungert: if that passes, we can give vorlon the go-ahead to remove jupyter-client 8.6.x from noble-proposed | 15:52 |
| ahasenack | and re-upload a new 7.9.x with the dep8 fix | 15:52 |
| dbungert | +1 | 15:52 |
| ahasenack | I even tried a jupyter-core patch yesterday, for the jupyter-notebook ftbfs, but that didn't help | 15:53 |
| lvoytek | @pilot in | 16:00 |
| === ChanServ changed the topic of #ubuntu-devel to: Archive: open | Devel of Ubuntu (not support) | Build failures: http://qa.ubuntuwire.com/ftbfs/ | #ubuntu for support and discussion of Focal-Mantic | Patch Pilots: slyon, lvoytek | ||
| slyon | sudip: thx! sponsored | 16:10 |
| slyon | @pilot out | 16:11 |
| === ChanServ changed the topic of #ubuntu-devel to: Archive: open | Devel of Ubuntu (not support) | Build failures: http://qa.ubuntuwire.com/ftbfs/ | #ubuntu for support and discussion of Focal-Mantic | Patch Pilots: lvoytek | ||
| * slyon passing on the torch to lvoytek | 16:13 | |
| sudip | thanks slyon | 16:36 |
| ahasenack | dbungert: vorlon I have jupyter-client 7.4.9-2ubuntu1 passing dep8 in noble: https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-noble-ahasenack-plusoneweek/noble/amd64/j/jupyter-client/20240220_164938_21410@/log.gz with patch https://git.launchpad.net/~ahasenack/ubuntu/+source/jupyter-client/commit/?id=8bc7ee5cf88d831f54c625d32abd00e87de3ff69 | 16:54 |
| -ubottu:#ubuntu-devel- Commit 8bc7ee5 in ~ahasenack/ubuntu/+source/jupyter-client "* d/p/ignore-datetime-warnings.patch: with python 3.12, some datetime" | 16:54 | |
| ahasenack | it's ignoring the deprecated datetime usage from python-datetime | 16:54 |
| ahasenack | I figured we can update python-datetime after the python transition is done. Or I could fix python-datetime now, I juse fear it could cause a massive amount of retesting (haven't checked) | 16:55 |
| ahasenack | branch: https://code.launchpad.net/~ahasenack/ubuntu/+source/jupyter-client/+git/jupyter-client/+ref/jupyter-client-749-deprecated-utcnow | 16:55 |
| ahasenack | doko: are you ok with removing https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/jupyter-client/8.6.0-0ubuntu1 from noble-proposed? You were the one who uploaded it, ahead of debian. We have exhausted our options to fix jupyter-notebook, it just doesn't work with jupyter-client >= 8.x (upstream ack'ed the breakage) | 16:56 |
| dbungert | ahasenack: that looks like a good plan, nice work | 16:57 |
| ahasenack | we just need an AA now :) | 16:59 |
| ahasenack | ...and for that, I should be in the right channel | 17:02 |
| lvoytek | sudip: I see your debdiff for LP: #2026760 for the no-change rebuild and the description look good. My only note is that for the version, since there are no changes (other than maintainer) you can just increase the build# rather than -3ubuntu0.1. So in this case it would be 4.1.0-3build2. If you'd like though I can sponsor the change and just update the # | 18:00 |
| -ubottu:#ubuntu-devel- Launchpad bug 2026760 in wrk (Ubuntu Mantic) "[SRU] wrk fails to run" [Undecided, Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/2026760 | 18:00 | |
| ahasenack | dbungert: have you looked at ansible by any chance? | 18:18 |
| ahasenack | I saw a good dep8 test recently, with 9.2.0, but didn't manage to replicate it | 18:18 |
| ahasenack | I'll look at libapache2-mod-python/3.5.0.1-1build1, I remember working on it in the past | 18:19 |
| doko | ahasenack: mkukri was working on the latter. https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libapache2-mod-python/+bug/2054133 maybe just sponsor that? | 18:21 |
| -ubottu:#ubuntu-devel- Launchpad bug 2054133 in libapache2-mod-python (Ubuntu Noble) "Running with Python 3.12 failed because imp was removed." [Undecided, In Progress] | 18:21 | |
| * ahasenack checks | 18:21 | |
| dbungert | ahasenack: negative, schopin may have though | 18:21 |
| ahasenack | it's still being reviewed by upstream | 18:23 |
| sudip | lvoytek: yes, please. I was in doubt about the version but since SRU wiki says to do ubuntu0.1 so I just followed that | 19:26 |
| lvoytek | Alright, updated and sponsored | 19:33 |
| sudip | thanks lvoytek | 19:52 |
| lvoytek | sure thing | 19:54 |
| ahasenack | dbungert: [ubuntu/noble-proposed] jupyter-client 7.4.9-2ubuntu1 (Accepted) | 19:58 |
| sergiodj | juliank: hi, a few days ago you mentioned that the Noble chroot problem reported by tjaalton had been fixed by gnupg2/2.4.4-2ubuntu3, but I'm still seeing the error (and postfix being installed) | 19:58 |
| dbungert | :tada: | 19:58 |
| dbungert | ahasenack: I'm clicking the rebuild button on jupyter-notebook | 19:59 |
| ahasenack | dbungert: hold, we need it to be published first | 19:59 |
| dbungert | k | 19:59 |
| sergiodj | juliank: I'm going to remove gpg meanwhile | 19:59 |
| juliank | sergiodj: Are you bootstrapping it from scratch? | 19:59 |
| sergiodj | yes | 20:00 |
| juliank | sergiodj: Upgrades will continue to see the issue, but fresh bootstraps should not pull in gpg-wks-server anymore | 20:00 |
| lvoytek | @pilot out | 20:00 |
| === ChanServ changed the topic of #ubuntu-devel to: Archive: open | Devel of Ubuntu (not support) | Build failures: http://qa.ubuntuwire.com/ftbfs/ | #ubuntu for support and discussion of Focal-Mantic | Patch Pilots: N/A | ||
| sergiodj | juliank: I did a bootstrap from scratch and could reproduce the problem | 20:00 |
| sergiodj | removing gnupg from the schroot fixed the issue for now | 20:01 |
| juliank | sergiodj: How did you bootstrap with gnupg from proposed without installing the one in the release pocket first? | 20:01 |
| juliank | The one in the release pocket still depends on gpg-wks-server | 20:01 |
| juliank | the release pocket gpg-wks-server does not depend on mail-transport-agent though | 20:02 |
| juliank | so you can get mail-transport-agent by installing the release pocket first and then upgrading | 20:02 |
| juliank | Or something else pulling in mail-transport-agent :) | 20:03 |
| sergiodj | I haven't debugged it much further, but you're probably right in that mk-sbuild only enables -proposed after the initial bootstrap | 20:03 |
| juliank | gnupg2 should migrate any britney run now | 20:03 |
| sergiodj | I'll give it a try after gnupg migrates | 20:03 |
| ahasenack | dbungert: you can click that button now, the new jupyter-client is published | 20:38 |
| ahasenack | the current rebuild still used client 8.6.0 | 20:43 |
| ahasenack | I'll click again | 20:43 |
| dbungert | ahasenack: debating an explicit upload on jupyter-notebook with a <8 dep on jupyter-client | 20:49 |
| ahasenack | unsure, but wouldn't be wrong | 20:50 |
| ahasenack | there is a >= already | 20:50 |
| ahasenack | python3-jupyter-client (>= 5.3.4) <!nocheck>, | 20:50 |
| dbungert | ahasenack: build button spam success, jupyter-notebook built this time | 21:03 |
| ahasenack | hooray | 21:04 |
| dbungert | teward: maybe we should bring this to this channel. re bios boot of the live-server candidate, I'm able to see the grub menu and "HWE kernel" entry on bios boot, is it possible the menu went by too fast? | 23:02 |
| teward | no, it didn't pass me up i'll reload and see if it was a bug but it didn't show HWE Kernel | 23:03 |
| teward | i'm finishing up UEFI now and then going to drop aother VM up to test again | 23:03 |
| teward | dbungert: ok it's there, but i could have sworn i saw an extra option on UEFI and the naming is inconsistent on both | 23:06 |
| teward | i'll dig back later, but it looks like that could've been because tiny-screen | 23:06 |
| teward | (4k resolution) | 23:06 |
| teward | (with small VM screen) | 23:07 |
| * tsimonq2 sends teward to fix All 4k screens | 23:08 | |
| dbungert | there is a difference between uefi and bios boots, bios boot has "test memory" and uefi has "boot from next volume" and "uefi firmware settings" | 23:08 |
| * teward pushes @tsimonq2 into the abyss of Windows 3.1 disks. | 23:08 | |
| dbungert | cruel and unusual | 23:10 |
| tsimonq2 | friendly banter between friends :D | 23:13 |
| teward | but still cruel that i tossed Simon into the abyss of 3.1 disks xD | 23:17 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!