| === JanC is now known as Guest2285 | ||
| === JanC_ is now known as JanC | ||
| sem | i'm going to try to finally update my lubuntu 20.04 now that I have a new graphics card. Wish me luck! First I might want to clean out some old ppas from sources.list | 00:53 |
|---|---|---|
| === JanC is now known as Guest3504 | ||
| === JanC_ is now known as JanC | ||
| ros_robot_builde | Hey, anyone working on any cool projects | 01:19 |
| oerheks | yes, #libera is full of projects | 01:20 |
| oerheks | !register | 01:20 |
| ubottu | For information on registering your IRC nick, see https://libera.chat/guides/registration - For any further help, ask in #libera | 01:20 |
| ros_robot_builde | what does "!register" do? | 01:22 |
| ros_robot_builde | Its been a long time since I used IRC | 01:22 |
| sem | i am having an interesting problem -- i can't uninstall things in Muon or Discover, but apt still works... seeing what I can find on the internet | 01:23 |
| === neo_ is now known as neo | ||
| === ros_robot_builde is now known as nec | ||
| === nec is now known as necrobot | ||
| sem | i hit 'y' here we go! | 01:47 |
| sarnold | lets goooo | 01:47 |
| necrobot | Nice! | 01:47 |
| sem | sarnold, i had to clear 271 MB to have enough space for the upgrade XD | 01:48 |
| sem | do you remember that time we removed all of snapd and a bunch of other stuff because my partition at the time was only 10 GB | 01:48 |
| sarnold | sem: oh nooooo that's cutting it way too close, my guess is something's going to bust.. | 01:48 |
| sarnold | oh yeah that does sound vaguely familiar | 01:48 |
| sem | This time I have more space: there were some large .isos I could remove | 01:49 |
| sem | it is already 96% progress! | 01:54 |
| sem | libc-bin must have a lot of triggers to process | 01:54 |
| sem | it keeps telling me to close xscreensaver before updating... i hope part of the updater will close it | 01:58 |
| sarnold | I think you have to do that yourself | 01:58 |
| sem | ok done | 01:59 |
| === chris14_ is now known as chris14 | ||
| === Guest7675 is now known as Kryten | ||
| === Kryten is now known as Kryten_ | ||
| === Kryten_ is now known as Kryten_R | ||
| === ghost is now known as Guest8568 | ||
| === ckm is now known as corrodedcoffin | ||
| === remy_ is now known as Remy | ||
| === zaki_fl is now known as zaki | ||
| azlan | how are u | 10:07 |
| azlan | helllooo | 10:07 |
| === keypushe- is now known as keypusher | ||
| === remy_ is now known as Remy | ||
| BluesKaj | Hi all | 13:15 |
| warsoul | sudo: unable to resolve host ubuntu: Name or service not known | 13:39 |
| warsoul | i changed host name | 13:40 |
| warsoul | now im getting this error message | 13:40 |
| ravage | also change /etc/hosts | 13:41 |
| warsoul | -bash: cd: /etc/hosts: Not a directory | 13:42 |
| jeremy31 | warsoul: sudo nano /etc/hosts | 13:43 |
| warsoul | done | 13:43 |
| warsoul | thanks | 13:43 |
| === victor is now known as Guest6172 | ||
| ashafq | Firefox snap on Ubuntu 22.04 does not open Downloads folder when I click "show-all-downloads" | 14:42 |
| ashafq | Is this a known issue? Am I missing any packages? | 14:43 |
| Your_Dog | ashafq: lemme try on a fresh ubuntu install, but iirc before i move back to non-snap (keepassxc reasons) i was able to open the download folder | 15:03 |
| === mario_ is now known as mik77 | ||
| Your_Dog | ashafq: is yours a fresh install? because I just tested mine, it works | 15:12 |
| chico_ | ashafq: Show all downloads opens the firefox download library not the downloads folder. click the folder icon to the right of the download and should open downloads folder. | 15:20 |
| ChristopheM | Hi, where can I find more chat rooms or Lubuntu related forums ? | 15:22 |
| Matthias1 | I was asking about this in #linux but wondered if someone here would know. I'm trying to install `libffi-dev`, but getting "no installation candidate" | 15:22 |
| chico_ | lubuntu channel | 15:23 |
| Matthias1 | I've tried apt update and apt upgrade, so it seems like there's something wrong with my package cache? | 15:23 |
| Matthias1 | On focal LTS | 15:23 |
| chico_ | Matthias1: I'm assuming that it's no longer available | 15:24 |
| ravage | it is still available in noble. also in focal | 15:25 |
| ravage | https://packages.ubuntu.com/focal/libffi-dev | 15:25 |
| leftyfb | Matthias1: please copy and paste this into your terminal: ( uname -a ; cat /etc/os-release ; apt-cache policy libffi-dev ; cat /etc/apt/sources.list ) | nc termbin.com 9999 | 15:25 |
| Matthias1 | https://termbin.com/ph2g | 15:27 |
| leftyfb | you don't have a single non-security repo enabled | 15:27 |
| leftyfb | why did you disable all of your repositories? | 15:27 |
| leftyfb | oh wait, you have universe | 15:28 |
| Matthias1 | deb http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu focal universe ? | 15:28 |
| ravage | the package is in main | 15:28 |
| Matthias1 | And I don't have main. That's great | 15:29 |
| ravage | backup that file and try https://gist.githubusercontent.com/ishad0w/788555191c7037e249a439542c53e170/raw/3822ba49241e6fd851ca1c1cbcc4d7e87382f484/sources.list | 15:29 |
| ravage | you can remove the last 2 lines | 15:29 |
| leftyfb | ooo, faster than me | 15:29 |
| leftyfb | https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/6sNFzHVFW9/ | 15:30 |
| leftyfb | I usuall suggest that | 15:30 |
| leftyfb | usually* | 15:30 |
| ravage | it was just a quick google search 🙂 | 15:30 |
| Matthias1 | What if I comment out my current sources and just keep adding to the bottom lol | 15:30 |
| ravage | you already have old stuff in there that is commented | 15:31 |
| leftyfb | Matthias1: how about just doing away with your complete mess and just run from a working sources.list? | 15:31 |
| ravage | and it looks like you already lost control over ut | 15:31 |
| ravage | maybe use a fresh one | 15:31 |
| Matthias1 | Yeah | 15:31 |
| Your_Dog | I agree, just start with a fresh one first and if you feel like it, start tweaking again from there | 15:32 |
| Matthias1 | Apparently I botched it when upgrading from bionic | 15:32 |
| leftyfb | Matthias1: curl -s https://gist.githubusercontent.com/ishad0w/788555191c7037e249a439542c53e170/raw/3822ba49241e6fd851ca1c1cbcc4d7e87382f484/sources.list | sudo tee /etc/apt/sources.list && sudo apt update ; sudo apt full-upgrade | 15:32 |
| leftyfb | maybe replace that last ; with a && | 15:33 |
| Matthias1 | Got it working without any more issues. Thank you all | 15:45 |
| Menzador | You're welcome, but in all reality you shouldn't yeet an arbitrary GitHub link into your sources list | 15:54 |
| ravage | it is not arbitrary | 15:56 |
| Menzador | I mean, *I* know where the content is coming from, but something that important should always come from the Ubuntu Web site. ESPECIALLY since Focal (20.04 LTS) is still a supported release for the main flavor | 16:00 |
| ravage | the url was sent to him before to check. the content is not that complex. it clearly shows only official servers | 16:01 |
| Menzador | You can also find a copy in /usr/share/doc/apt/examples/sources.list | 16:03 |
| Menzador | Even on a Live image | 16:03 |
| ravage | no idea when that gets updated | 16:03 |
| Menzador | You copy it to /etc/apt/sources.list and then change the distribution whichever is correct | 16:03 |
| ravage | on my noble device it still shows lunar | 16:03 |
| Menzador | *to whichever is correct | 16:03 |
| ravage | and changing sources the right way was exactly why he was here | 16:04 |
| ravage | and struggled with it | 16:04 |
| Menzador | But you DON'T have to find that from an unofficial source. It's best practice to use the official source to begin with. | 16:05 |
| ravage | giving support here without code to paste from a paste bin is almost impossible | 16:05 |
| ravage | but please try it | 16:05 |
| ravage | also in this case any packages not signed correctly would be denied by ap | 16:07 |
| ravage | apt. so i dont see the big security risk | 16:07 |
| Menzador | Would they? What if a GPG key outside the official repos was trusted and signed by the user without examination | 16:08 |
| ravage | it was not | 16:08 |
| Menzador | And that was lucky | 16:09 |
| ravage | not by any of the volonteers | 16:09 |
| Menzador | I am done discussing this issue. My point is, if something that can be found within your installation (I do this all the time with, e.g., /etc/skel/.bashrc for resetting my .bashrc file) it's ALWAYS preferable over some arbitrary text file. Good day to you. | 16:13 |
| chico_ | Updating to 23.10, On boot blue screen ERROR Verification failed: (0x1A) Security violation | 16:53 |
| chico_ | Continue Boot has lock on screen Security Boot Fail | 16:54 |
| chico_ | which to allow as trusted? bootx64.efi, mmx64.efi or grubx64.efi to reinstall from usb | 16:56 |
| jeremy31 | chico_: Disable Secure Boot in BIOS | 16:58 |
| jeremy31 | Then install all updates and see if it will boot with Secure Boot then | 16:59 |
| chico_ | jeremy31: UEFI Firmware Settings says Secure Boot Mode: Custom.....Erase Secure Boot Setting:....Select an UEFI file as trusted for executing:.....Restore Secure Boot:...Factory Default | 17:02 |
| chico_ | also grub commandline says need to load kernel first | 17:03 |
| jeremy31 | For Secure Boot I thought there was a shimx64.efi | 17:05 |
| chico_ | jeremy31: Under Ubuntu option ther is (grubx64.efi, shimx64.efi and mmx64.efi) under boot there is ()Bootx64.efi, fbx64.efi and mmx64.efi). Choosing shimx64.efi under ubuntu it says The boot description exists | 17:09 |
| jeremy31 | under boot would be for the USB I think, try mmx64.efi | 17:10 |
| chico_ | It still does the same. Takes me to MOK Management | 17:12 |
| chico_ | Then pops up the security boot fail screen | 17:14 |
| chico_ | When choosing memory test it says error: file '/BOOT/ubuntu_mcptlo@/memtest86+x64.efi' not found. | 17:16 |
| jeremy31 | chico_: Does this have Windows installed? | 17:16 |
| jeremy31 | The memtest only works on Legacy/BIOS boot | 17:17 |
| chico_ | No. was Ubuntu 22.04 upgrading to Ubuntu 23.10 | 17:17 |
| chico_ | when choosing to boot Ubuntu 23.10 it says /BOOT/vmlinuz-6.5.0-21-generic not found | 17:18 |
| chico_ | you need to load the kernel first | 17:19 |
| jeremy31 | Any other kernel installed? | 17:21 |
| jeremy31 | Try using Grub Menu advanced options for ubuntu | 17:22 |
| chico_ | jeremy31: Many thanks!! Was able to get secure boot disabled and now reinstalling ubuntu 21.10 from usb. | 17:24 |
| jeremy31 | chico_: can you boot the install and update it? | 17:24 |
| jeremy31 | Or just use the ISO on USB, chroot into the install and install updates | 17:25 |
| geirha | hopefully you mean 23.10 and not 21.10 | 17:25 |
| chico_ | 21.10 was the original, I upgraded to 22.04 fine. When attempting to upgrade to 23.10 had issue with secure boot | 17:26 |
| chico_ | Uefi dbx firmware update issue? | 17:28 |
| jeremy31 | chico_: That is my bet | 17:29 |
| chico_ | jeremy31: going to do a quick reinstall...updates and not update the uefi dbx and verify | 17:31 |
| jeremy31 | chico_: The UEFI update must already be in the computer or there wouldn't have been a boot issue with the ISO | 17:35 |
| chico_ | yes, I updated the vs 83 to 371 | 17:36 |
| === pah is now known as pa | ||
| chico_ | jeremy31: 23.10 running smoothly..:) | 19:18 |
| jeremy31 | chico_: good | 19:18 |
| === PasiZ4 is now known as PasiZ | ||
| WeeBey | Hi frens. I have 23.10 with 6.5.0-21-generic. I'm noticing that shortly after a kernel upgrade, I get a couple of hard crashes-totally unresponsive requiring hard reboot. I haven't noticed a pattern yet except It just happened while I was running VirtualBox. Keyboard stopped working and two apps stopped responding. Then everything stopped. | 22:09 |
| WeeBey | I'm wondering if anyone has heard of anything 23.10 crashing issues. I know it's vague right now. Any tips on finding info about the last crash would be helpful. | 22:10 |
| Guest46 | what am i doing wrong here `mlevental ALL=(ALL) NOPASSWD: /usr/bin/modprobe, /usr/bin/rmmod, /usr/sbin/insmod` ? i've tried a bunch of different forms of this and no matter what i still cannot get user `mlevental` to be able to run `modprobe -r` without sudo? | 23:20 |
| Guest46 | sorry should've been more clear - i put that line in `etc/sudoers`, logged out, logged in, etc | 23:20 |
| Guest46 | is it because modprobe is a symlink... | 23:22 |
| rbox | what do you mean without sudo | 23:25 |
| Guest13 | User mlevental may run the following commands on mlevental-F7BSC: | 23:25 |
| Guest13 | Â Â (ALL : ALL) ALL | 23:25 |
| Guest13 | Â Â (root) NOPASSWD: /usr/bin/modprobe, /usr/bin/rmmod, /usr/sbin/insmod | 23:25 |
| Guest13 | Â Â (ALL) NOPASSWD: /usr/sbin/modprobe, /usr/sbin/rmmod, /usr/sbin/insmod, /bin/kmod | 23:25 |
| rbox | the sudoers controls what users can do with sudo | 23:25 |
| rbox | it doesnt magically let you do thing as root | 23:25 |
| Guest13 | err | 23:25 |
| Guest13 | i'm le dumb | 23:25 |
| Guest13 | ok | 23:25 |
| Guest13 | i misread the docs/man | 23:25 |
| Guest13 | sorry - what is the point of NOPASSWD then? | 23:26 |
| rbox | to allow you to use sudo without typing in a password | 23:26 |
| Guest13 | OMG | 23:28 |
| Guest13 | bro | 23:28 |
| Guest13 | thank you | 23:28 |
| oerheks | the point of (ALL) NOPASSWD ??? | 23:28 |
| oerheks | i do not give support for such nonsense | 23:29 |
| Guest13 | is this correct or am i opening myself up to l33t hackers somehow: `mlevental ALL=(ALL) NOPASSWD: /usr/sbin/modprobe, /usr/sbin/rmmod, /usr/sbin/insmod, /bin/kmod` | 23:29 |
| === guiverc2 is now known as guiverc | ||
| Guest13 | (let's ignore whether l33t hackers can pwn me as me through kmod) - i'm just asking if `ALL=(ALL) is somehow more permissive than i want it to be? | 23:29 |
| rbox | Guest13: try to run modprobe, does it work? try to run soemthgin else, does it not work? | 23:30 |
| oerheks | this is ubuntu support, not pentesting or hackers support. | 23:30 |
| Guest13 | i'm asking about sudoers | 23:30 |
| Guest13 | syntax | 23:30 |
| rbox | what do you mean "more permissive" | 23:30 |
| Guest13 | that i'm unfamiliar with | 23:30 |
| Guest13 | nm | 23:30 |
| Guest13 | thanks rbox | 23:30 |
| oerheks | https://www.bing.com/search?q=detect+Bifrost+Malware | 23:47 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!