[11:15] <nubuntu> https://pasteimg.com/image/screenshot-2024-03-04-08-09-59.hnwub
[11:15] <nubuntu> installer stuck in the "Preparing Xubuntu"
[11:15] <nubuntu> :=/
[12:16] <waveform> @pilot in
[12:39] <ahasenack> bdrung: I updated https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tzdata/+bug/2055718, could you take a look when you have a moment please? I'm not sure how timedatectl and tzdata are supposed to interact with each other, if at all
[12:39] -ubottu:#ubuntu-devel- Launchpad bug 2055718 in tzdata (Ubuntu) "Regression after update: timezone changed unexpectedly" [High, Incomplete]
[12:42] <bdrung> ahasenack, your investigation is correct. it's not a regression. I'll have a deeper look later today.
[12:42] <ahasenack> bdrung: thanks
[13:40] <Skia> If some SRU team member sees this, it should be ready for approval: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/autopkgtest/+bug/2051939 thanks :-)
[13:40] -ubottu:#ubuntu-devel- Launchpad bug 2051939 in autopkgtest (Ubuntu) "[SRU exception] backport 5.32 to Jammy and Mantic" [Undecided, New]
[15:57] <vorlon> @pilot in
[15:58] <utkarsh2102> !dmb-ping
[16:27] <jafa> noble-server will no longer install (fails installing grub) and existing installs fail to apt update attempting to configure grub-efi-amd64-signed... what is the best irc channel for this?
[16:46] <tsimonq2> jafa: Probably #ubuntu :)
[16:47] <tsimonq2> jafa: #ubuntu-server may be able to help as well, but I'd try that first
[16:48] <mkukri> fix is in proposed
[16:48] <mkukri> depwait for glib-2.0
[16:49] <mkukri> this is an actual bug tho, not support request
[16:49] <tsimonq2> I mean, they didn't mention the version, I assumed stable :)
[16:53] <mkukri> "noble-server" :)
[16:55] <waveform> @pilot out
[16:55] <waveform> ahasenack, I assume you're not piloting still? Just noticed the topic :)
[16:55] <ahasenack> oops
[16:55] <ahasenack> @pilot out
[16:55] <ahasenack> forgot to logout on friday
[17:01] <tsimonq2> mkukri: you are right :) good catch, apparently I need more coffee!
[17:17] <jafa> tsimonq2: thanks
[19:09] <damonlynch_> Is there a PPA with the latest debuild and other packaging tools for Jammy? Or is it pretty much always the case that the latest Ubuntu for packaging?
[19:10] <damonlynch_> latest Ubuntu is needed for packaging? *
[19:45] <sergiodj> doko: not sure if you've seen my message on Friday, but just in case: hi, we're going to need to pin llvm-17 when building postgresql-16. the package is FTBFSing with llvm-18 and there's no fix available yet. failures and logs (courtesy of athos): https://launchpad.net/~athos-ribeiro/+archive/ubuntu/pgsql-llvm18/+packages
[19:46] <enr0n> damonlynch_: I think most developers do use more recent releases for packaging, however you should be able to use a schroot/sbuild setup: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SimpleSbuild
[19:46] <doko> sergiodj: sure, just adjust the b-d
[19:46] <sergiodj> doko: thanks
[19:46] <sergiodj> athos: ^
[19:47] <doko> sergiodj: and fyi, gdb on armhf is built without debuginfod, so that it is installable
[19:48] <sergiodj> doko: is libdebuginfod FTBFSing on armhf?
[19:48] <doko> t64 bootstrap, help is welcome
[19:49] <sergiodj> yep, I've just prepared merges for sssd and net-snmp
[19:49] <doko> ta
[20:28] <paride> ahasenack, hi o/ did you perhaps got any further with https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/isc-kea/+bug/2055151 ? Still suspecting boost?
[20:28] -ubottu:#ubuntu-devel- Launchpad bug 2055151 in isc-kea (Ubuntu) "kea-ctrl-agent segfault in ppc64el dep8 test" [High, New]
[20:28] <ahasenack> paride: no further debugging since Friday
[20:28] <ahasenack> suspect boost just because it shows up in the backtrace, and because a rebuild with noble and previous boost worked
[20:29] <ahasenack> but with noble-proposed, the isc-kea daemons (not just control agent) segfault at shutdown
[20:55] <paride> ahasenack, yep I saw the logs you attached. I'm thinking of which package we could cherry-pick from proposed to do a test rebuild with noble-release + cherry-picked-package
[20:55] <paride> however I'm not sure it's going to be that easy
[20:56] <paride> as the time_t transition is likely entangling several packages together
[21:04] <ahasenack> yes, now the archive is turbulent