[01:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: docker.io-app (focal-proposed/universe) [24.0.5-0ubuntu1~20.04.1 => 24.0.7-0ubuntu2~20.04.1] (no packageset)
[01:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added cvise to i386-whitelist in noble
[01:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added openjdk-23 to i386-whitelist in noble
[01:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: docker.io-app (jammy-proposed/universe) [24.0.5-0ubuntu1~22.04.1 => 24.0.7-0ubuntu2~22.04.1] (no packageset)
[01:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: docker.io-app (mantic-proposed/universe) [24.0.5-0ubuntu1 => 24.0.7-0ubuntu2~23.10.1] (no packageset)
[01:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: docker-buildx (focal-proposed/universe) [0.11.2-0ubuntu1~20.04.2 => 0.12.1-0ubuntu1~20.04.1] (no packageset)
[01:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: docker-buildx (jammy-proposed/universe) [0.11.2-0ubuntu1~22.04.2 => 0.12.1-0ubuntu1~22.04.1] (no packageset)
[02:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: docker-buildx (mantic-proposed/universe) [0.11.2-0ubuntu2.1 => 0.12.1-0ubuntu1~23.10.1] (no packageset)
[02:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: docker-compose-v2 (focal-proposed/universe) [2.20.2+ds1-0ubuntu1~20.04.1 => 2.24.6+ds1-0ubuntu1~20.04.1] (no packageset)
[02:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: docker-compose-v2 (jammy-proposed/universe) [2.20.2+ds1-0ubuntu1~22.04.1 => 2.24.6+ds1-0ubuntu1~22.04.1] (no packageset)
[02:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: docker-compose-v2 (mantic-proposed/universe) [2.20.2+ds1-0ubuntu1 => 2.24.6+ds1-0ubuntu1~23.10.1] (no packageset)
[07:52] <LocutusOfBorg> libfftw3-mpi-dev is the reason for openmpi on i386...
[07:52] <LocutusOfBorg> (I guess)
[08:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: firmware-sof (jammy-proposed/restricted) [2.0-1ubuntu4.5 => 2.0-1ubuntu4.6] (no packageset)
[10:02] <bdrung> ubuntu-archive: please drop initramfs-tools 0.142ubuntu22 from the mantic queue (it was meant for noble)
[10:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected initramfs-tools [source] (mantic-proposed) [0.142ubuntu22]
[10:09] <apw> bdrung, ^
[10:09] <bdrung> thanks
[10:38] <philroche> Hi release team. We have 4 bugs with proposed changes that affect noble release for likely all server/cloud/wsl noble image: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/update-manager/+bug/2057559, https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-desktop-daemon/+bug/2057674, https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/wsl-pro-service/+bug/2057651,
[10:38] <philroche> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/software-properties/+bug/2057671. I have subscribed ubuntu-release as per FFE policy. Is there someone that can help with this in either helping to land or helping to make judgement call on whether this affects release. My view is that this affects release as there has been a package rename (ubuntu-advantage-tools to ubuntu-pro-client) and I would like to avoid shipping any images
[10:38] <philroche> with the old package name, even if it is now a transitional package.
[10:38] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Launchpad bug 2057559 in update-manager (Ubuntu Noble) "Rename the ubuntu-advantage-tools package" [Wishlist, New]
[10:38] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Launchpad bug 2057674 in ubuntu-advantage-desktop-daemon (Ubuntu Noble) "Rename the ubuntu-advantage-tools package" [Undecided, New]
[10:38] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Launchpad bug 2057651 in wsl-pro-service (Ubuntu Noble) "Rename the ubuntu-advantage-tools package" [Undecided, New]
[10:38] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Launchpad bug 2057671 in software-properties (Ubuntu Noble) "Rename the ubuntu-advantage-tools package" [Undecided, New]
[10:39] <philroche> Perhaps this falls under `bugfix-only updates` ?
[10:41] <utkarsh2102> yep, I'll take a look at those FFe along with php one (symfony)
[12:19] <jbicha> ubuntu-archive: please restore libusb i386 for noble. liblirc0 depends on it and is still published for i386
[15:55] <vorlon> LocutusOfBorg: circular build-dep between libguestfs and supermin, how do we unpick this?
[15:56] <vorlon> jbicha: restored
[15:57] <LocutusOfBorg> vorlon, I'm working on it
[15:57] <LocutusOfBorg> nodejs is B-D sad on armhf
[15:57] <vorlon> LocutusOfBorg: ok - let me know if you need AA support (binary/source removals)
[15:57] <LocutusOfBorg> this is way more trickier...
[16:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ovn (jammy-proposed/main) [22.03.3-0ubuntu0.22.04.2 => 22.03.3-0ubuntu0.22.04.3] (no packageset)
[16:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ovn (mantic-proposed/main) [23.09.0-1ubuntu0.1 => 23.09.0-1ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[16:02] <LocutusOfBorg> vorlon, restoring libguestfs 1:1.52.0-2ubuntu9 might help
[16:02] <LocutusOfBorg> we make it build
[16:03] <LocutusOfBorg> and once reverse-depends (supermin and so) are ok, we restore newer libguestfs
[16:04] <vorlon> LocutusOfBorg: ok, can do that
[16:06] <vorlon> LocutusOfBorg: done; you can manually retry the builds, or wait until published to use ubuntu-build (I learned that there's apparently no SPPH for packages that are 'pending' publication)
[16:06] <vorlon> oh, well, not exactly true - there is but I'm currently filtering on 'Published' :)
[16:09] <LocutusOfBorg> btw I found ubuntu-build --batch --retry to not retry all the builds...
[16:09] <LocutusOfBorg> how can I know why=
[16:09] <LocutusOfBorg> look e.g. petsc4py
[16:09] <LocutusOfBorg> last build 2 days ago
[16:11] <fnordahl> ahasenack: the ovn SRU's listed by queuebot above fix a FTBFS ref bug 2056769 which is currently blocking propagation of packages to UCA, so hoping for review when you have a spare moment
[16:11] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Bug 2056769 in ovn (Ubuntu Mantic) "[jammy/mantic] ftbfs due to build-time incompatibility with updated openvswitch" [High, Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/2056769
[16:11] <fnordahl> jamespage: fyi ^
[16:14] <jamespage> thanks fnordahl
[17:02] <ahasenack> fnordahl: will do
[17:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libisoburn [amd64] (noble-proposed/main) [1:1.5.6-1.1ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[17:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libisoburn [s390x] (noble-proposed/main) [1:1.5.6-1.1ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[17:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libisoburn [arm64] (noble-proposed/main) [1:1.5.6-1.1ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[17:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libisoburn [ppc64el] (noble-proposed/main) [1:1.5.6-1.1ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[17:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libisoburn [armhf] (noble-proposed/main) [1:1.5.6-1.1ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[17:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libisoburn [amd64] (noble-proposed) [1:1.5.6-1.1ubuntu1]
[17:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libisoburn [armhf] (noble-proposed) [1:1.5.6-1.1ubuntu1]
[17:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libisoburn [s390x] (noble-proposed) [1:1.5.6-1.1ubuntu1]
[17:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libisoburn [arm64] (noble-proposed) [1:1.5.6-1.1ubuntu1]
[17:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libisoburn [ppc64el] (noble-proposed) [1:1.5.6-1.1ubuntu1]
[17:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted fabric-manager-550 [amd64] (noble-proposed) [550.54.14-0ubuntu2]
[17:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted fwupd-snap [amd64] (noble-proposed) [1.9.x-0ubuntu1]
[17:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libnvidia-nscq-550 [arm64] (noble-proposed) [550.54.14-0ubuntu1]
[17:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted nvidia-graphics-drivers-550-server [arm64] (noble-proposed) [550.54.14-0ubuntu3]
[17:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted performance-tools [amd64] (noble-proposed) [0ubuntu1]
[17:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ubuntu-boot-test [arm64] (noble-proposed) [1]
[17:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ubuntu-boot-test [ppc64el] (noble-proposed) [1]
[17:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ubuntu-boot-test [s390x] (noble-proposed) [1]
[17:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ubuntukylin-meta [arm64] (noble-proposed) [0.54]
[17:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ubuntukylin-meta [ppc64el] (noble-proposed) [0.54]
[17:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted fabric-manager-550 [arm64] (noble-proposed) [550.54.14-0ubuntu2]
[17:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted nvidia-graphics-drivers-550-server [amd64] (noble-proposed) [550.54.14-0ubuntu3]
[17:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ubuntu-boot-test [amd64] (noble-proposed) [1]
[17:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ubuntu-boot-test [riscv64] (noble-proposed) [1]
[17:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ubuntukylin-meta [armhf] (noble-proposed) [0.54]
[17:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libnvidia-nscq-550 [amd64] (noble-proposed) [550.54.14-0ubuntu1]
[17:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ubuntu-boot-test [armhf] (noble-proposed) [1]
[17:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ubuntukylin-meta [s390x] (noble-proposed) [0.54]
[17:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted nvidia-graphics-drivers-550-server [i386] (noble-proposed) [550.54.14-0ubuntu3]
[17:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ubuntukylin-meta [amd64] (noble-proposed) [0.54]
[17:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ovn [source] (mantic-proposed) [23.09.0-1ubuntu1]
[17:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ovn [source] (jammy-proposed) [22.03.3-0ubuntu0.22.04.3]
[17:41] <vorlon> LocutusOfBorg: sorry, libguestfs failed to copy back because I tried to do a binary-full copy but no binaries were built; just saw the reject email now.  copied properly now
[17:42] <vorlon> LocutusOfBorg: not retrying all the builds> mwhudson's theory was that we needed to wrap the launchpad api with a list() context so it wouldn't react badly to us modifying the list while iterating.  But I'm not sure that helped
[17:48] <doko> vorlon: trying to iterate over all failed builds? yes, you have to use a list context
[18:08] <cjwatson> indeed, because the collection is returned in 75-item batches but each request just provides an index into the whole ordered collection, so if you've modified the collection between fetching one batch and fetching the next then you can end up missing items
[18:08] <cjwatson> can be confusing to debug because it's natural to experiment with small sets, and they tend to fit into a single batch ...
[19:01] <Eickmeyer> Heh, update excuses crashes my browser.
[19:03] <mwhudson> Eickmeyer: nice, usually have to reach for glibc build logs to do that
[19:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: landscape-client (mantic-proposed/main) [23.08-0ubuntu1 => 23.08-0ubuntu1.1] (ubuntu-server)
[19:42] <LocutusOfBorg> vorlon, https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1065791
[19:42] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Debian bug 1065791 in src:sleuthkit "sleuthkit: FTBFS on arm{el,hf}: /usr/include/zlib.h:1840:5: error: unknown type name ‘off64_t’" [Serious, Open]
[19:43] <LocutusOfBorg> something that rings a bell? looks like we need +lfs when we use zlib
[19:43] <LocutusOfBorg> or zlib is misbuilt
[19:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: landscape-client (jammy-proposed/main) [23.02-0ubuntu1~22.04.1 => 23.02-0ubuntu1~22.04.2] (ubuntu-server)
[19:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: landscape-client (focal-proposed/main) [23.02-0ubuntu1~20.04.1 => 23.02-0ubuntu1~20.04.2] (ubuntu-server)
[19:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cloud-init (jammy-proposed/main) [23.4.4-0ubuntu0~22.04.1 => 24.1.1-0ubuntu1~22.04.1] (core, ubuntu-cloud)
[20:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cloud-init (focal-proposed/main) [23.4.4-0ubuntu0~20.04.1 => 24.1.1-0ubuntu1~20.04.1] (core, edubuntu, ubuntu-cloud)
[20:03] <LocutusOfBorg> _LFS64_LARGEFILE should be defined on armhf? vorlon this looks like some sort of glibc issue?
[20:04] <vorlon> LocutusOfBorg: this is a problem of packages that have non-lfs-driven dual ABI support, as zlib does (and zziplib).  off64_t is only defined by glibc when LFS support is NOT enabled
[20:04] <vorlon> so zlib will need a sourceful fix
[20:04] <LocutusOfBorg> ack!
[20:05] <LocutusOfBorg> sadly this blocks sleuthkit and then libguestfs
[20:12] <LocutusOfBorg> so do you have an ETA for a fix?
[20:13] <LocutusOfBorg> I don't really know where to patch...
[20:14] <vorlon> LocutusOfBorg: I've only just learned of this issue now; I will be able to look at it today but it'll be a couple of hours I think
[20:14] <LocutusOfBorg> thanks!
[20:14] <LocutusOfBorg> I'm still working on supermin bootstrap
[20:14] <vorlon> LocutusOfBorg: fwiw it's probably going to be a question of changing zlib.h to define off64_t to __off64_t
[20:15] <LocutusOfBorg> I'll let you drive the fix, I never went such deep into zlib code...
[20:15] <LocutusOfBorg> I'll be fixing some guestfs* foobar in the meanwhile
[20:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: gramps (noble-proposed/primary) [5.1.6+dfsg-1ubuntu1]
[20:16] <LocutusOfBorg> (still need to do dpkg)
[20:16] <vorlon> not too deep, just headers ;)
[20:22] <vorlon> LocutusOfBorg: oh, easy-peasy, zlib already has zconf.h to handle z_off64_t defines so we just need to fix that up.  actually I'm wondering if this is a sleuthkit bug, I don't think _LARGEFILE64_SOURCE is expected to be one of the defines...
[20:24] <LocutusOfBorg> -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -D_TIME_BITS=64
[20:24] <LocutusOfBorg> this is what sleuthkit does
[20:24] <LocutusOfBorg> what about making dpkg migrate so MoM can do the job of picking it up?
[20:24] <vorlon> LocutusOfBorg: no, that's what dpkg-buildflags does; what sleuthkit does is have a bad define in tsk/base/tsk_base_i.h
[20:25] <vorlon> so that's what breaks builds against zlib
[20:25] <LocutusOfBorg> and we need to have _LARGEFILE64_SOURCE 0?
[20:25] <vorlon> no, it should not be defined at all
[20:26] <LocutusOfBorg> #if defined(_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE) && defined(Z_LFS64)
[20:26] <LocutusOfBorg> #  define Z_LARGE64
[20:26] <LocutusOfBorg> #endif
[20:26] <LocutusOfBorg> but according to zlib.h we need it defined?
[20:26] <vorlon> no
[20:26] <vorlon> defining it is what's giving it the WRONG path
[20:27] <LocutusOfBorg> #if !defined(_WIN32) && defined(Z_LARGE64)
[20:27] <LocutusOfBorg> #  define z_off64_t off64_t
[20:27] <vorlon> _LARGEFILE64_SOURCE means "support 64-bit filesystem operations but using "64" in the names"
[20:27] <LocutusOfBorg> don't we need this?
[20:27] <vorlon> no, *it's the define to off64_t that breaks it*
[20:27] <vorlon> and this is because sleuthkit is opting into _LARGEFILE64_SOURCE
[20:27] <LocutusOfBorg> LOL
[20:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cloud-init (mantic-proposed/main) [23.4.4-0ubuntu0~23.10.1 => 24.1.1-0ubuntu1~23.10.1] (core, ubuntu-cloud)
[20:28] <LocutusOfBorg> grep z_off64_t . -R returns nothing indeed
[20:28] <LocutusOfBorg> I didn't start from checking that :(
[20:28] <vorlon> it's probably definiting it for reasons unrelated to glib
[20:28] <vorlon> *zlib
[20:28] <LocutusOfBorg> so, let me upload, or will you do it?
[20:29] <vorlon> I can upload; I'm double-checking whether this causes any other problems in sleuthkit source
[20:30] <LocutusOfBorg> 1065791 is the Debian bug
[20:31] <LocutusOfBorg> I think we should start from Debian?
[20:31] <LocutusOfBorg> (uploaded in ppa in the meanwhile)
[20:32] <LocutusOfBorg> https://launchpad.net/~costamagnagianfranco/+archive/ubuntu/locutusofborg-ppa/+sourcepub/15857581/+listing-archive-extra
[20:32] <LocutusOfBorg> sadly armhf is sloooooow at picking it up
[20:32] <vorlon> turns out '64' is really annoying to search on
[20:33] <LocutusOfBorg> zhsj,
[20:33] <LocutusOfBorg> Remove redundant libpmix2 dependency
[20:33] <LocutusOfBorg> zhsj, why isn't this forwarded in Debian?
[20:40] <vorlon> LocutusOfBorg: your patch looks reasonable.  Unnecessary to explicitly add abi=+lfs however.  And I've reviewed the code, I don't see anything here that cares about _LARGEFILE64_SOURCE
[20:41] <LocutusOfBorg> oops the change in rules file was a leftover from my previous test
[20:41] <vorlon> LocutusOfBorg: so you should be fine to upload to the archive
[20:41] <LocutusOfBorg> indeed it wasn't needed
[20:42] <LocutusOfBorg> uploaded thanks
[20:43] <LocutusOfBorg> and forwarded to Debian bug
[20:49] <doko> LocutusOfBorg: building merged libguesfs in ppa:doko/bootstrap3
[20:59] <mitya57> vorlon: Hi! Are there plans to merge qtbase-opensource-src 5.15.10+dfsg-7.2 from Debian (with t64 changes)? Should I do that?
[20:59] <mitya57> That will require tons of rebuilds and I don't have resources to do that, that's why I'm wondering.
[21:00] <vorlon> mitya57: I didn't realize this hadn't already landed.  can you take care of the merge?  The rebuilds will be handled
[21:00] <vorlon> mitya57: if you can't do the merge then I will queue it up
[21:01] <mitya57> I can do the merge, yes.
[21:01] <vorlon> thanks
[21:01] <vorlon> I don't know if it will build on armhf or if it will end up in a bootstrap loop again, but we can take care of that also
[21:02] <mitya57> If needed I can test-build in a PPA first
[21:19] <vorlon> mitya57: no need
[21:19] <mitya57> Ok.
[21:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted update-manager [source] (xenial-proposed) [1:16.04.21]
[22:00] <vorlon> jbicha: hi, it looks like gir1.2-soup-2.4 is picking up wrong dependencies on the old library names (libsoup2.4-1 vs libsoup-2.4-1, libsoup-gnome2.4-1 vs libsoup-gnome-2.4-1, I went around in circles for a while before catching this)
[22:00] <vorlon> jbicha: looks like this is due to shlibs.local (grr)
[22:01] <vorlon> jbicha: uploading to Ubuntu shortly because it's critical path on the bootstrap right now; do you want a bug for Debian or do you just want to upload?
[22:05] <mitya57> vorlon: uploaded https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/qtbase-opensource-src/5.15.12+dfsg-3ubuntu5
[22:09] <vorlon> mitya57: perfect, thanks! watching to see if https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/qtbase-opensource-src/5.15.12+dfsg-3ubuntu5/+build/27918829 gets its build-deps satisfied
[22:10] <mitya57> Looks like it did
[22:11] <vorlon> yep! no bootstrapping needed (but I'm sure we'll need some of revdeps)
[22:12] <mitya57> Oh, right, Qt has a B-D loop for docs
[22:13] <mitya57> All Qt modules B-D on qttools, and qttools needs qtwebkit and qtdeclarative.
[22:14] <mitya57> I can handle that in a PPA as I usually do for all Qt transitions.
[22:14] <mitya57> Although, my problem is on amd64 only, you probably meant something else.
[22:17] <vorlon> yes, I meant armhf specific bootstrap issues
[22:24] <mitya57> Ok, let me handle mine (tomorrow, bedtime now) and I will let you handle the rest.
[22:28] <mitya57> Although, if we have t64:Provides in place on amd64, then maybe there is no loop actually.
[22:33] <mitya57> Yeah. I was wrong, there will be no problem with the docs.
[22:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted optee-client-s32 [source] (noble-proposed) [3.18.0-0ubuntu1]
[22:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: optee-client-s32 [arm64] (noble-proposed/none) [3.18.0-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[22:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: optee-client-s32 [armhf] (noble-proposed/none) [3.18.0-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[22:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: rejected dfx-mgr [source] (noble-proposed) [2023.2-0ubuntu1]
[22:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gramps [source] (noble-proposed) [5.1.6+dfsg-1ubuntu1]
[23:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: qtbase-opensource-src [arm64] (noble-proposed/universe) [5.15.12+dfsg-3ubuntu5] (i386-whitelist, kubuntu, qt5)
[23:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: qtbase-opensource-src [ppc64el] (noble-proposed/universe) [5.15.12+dfsg-3ubuntu5] (i386-whitelist, kubuntu, qt5)
[23:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: qtbase-opensource-src [amd64] (noble-proposed/universe) [5.15.12+dfsg-3ubuntu5] (i386-whitelist, kubuntu, qt5)
[23:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: qtbase-opensource-src [i386] (noble-proposed/universe) [5.15.12+dfsg-3ubuntu5] (i386-whitelist, kubuntu, qt5)
[23:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted qtbase-opensource-src [amd64] (noble-proposed) [5.15.12+dfsg-3ubuntu5]
[23:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted qtbase-opensource-src [i386] (noble-proposed) [5.15.12+dfsg-3ubuntu5]
[23:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted qtbase-opensource-src [arm64] (noble-proposed) [5.15.12+dfsg-3ubuntu5]
[23:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted qtbase-opensource-src [ppc64el] (noble-proposed) [5.15.12+dfsg-3ubuntu5]
[23:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: qtbase-opensource-src [s390x] (noble-proposed/universe) [5.15.12+dfsg-3ubuntu5] (i386-whitelist, kubuntu, qt5)
[23:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gramps [amd64] (noble-proposed/none) [5.1.6+dfsg-1ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[23:12] <jbicha> vorlon: I can handle the Debian side. Thanks for identifying
[23:16] <zhsj> LocutusOfBorg: which patch is not forwarded to debian?
[23:28] <jbicha> vorlon: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libsoup2.4/2.74.3-6
[23:32] <vorlon> jbicha: fakesync then?