| jbicha | yes | 01:11 |
|---|---|---|
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: grub2 [armhf] (noble-proposed/main) [2.12-1ubuntu5] (core) | 02:09 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: grub2 [armhf] (noble-proposed/main) [2.12-1ubuntu4] (core) | 02:19 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted qtbase-opensource-src [s390x] (noble-proposed) [5.15.12+dfsg-3ubuntu5] | 02:31 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: openjdk-23 [armhf] (noble-proposed/universe) [23~14ea-1] (i386-whitelist) | 02:34 | |
| === chris14_ is now known as chris14 | ||
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: openjdk-23 [amd64] (noble-proposed/universe) [23~14ea-1] (i386-whitelist) | 03:22 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: openjdk-23 [arm64] (noble-proposed/universe) [23~14ea-1] (i386-whitelist) | 03:39 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: openjdk-23 [s390x] (noble-proposed/universe) [23~14ea-1] (i386-whitelist) | 03:43 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: openjdk-23 [ppc64el] (noble-proposed/universe) [23~14ea-1] (i386-whitelist) | 03:56 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: openjdk-23 [i386] (noble-proposed/universe) [23~14ea-1] (i386-whitelist) | 04:06 | |
| vorlon | LocutusOfBorg: so on armhf I see that libguestfs 15.2.0-2ubuntu9 build-depends on supermin which depends on libext2fs2 still, did you have a particular plan for breaking this loop? | 05:13 |
| vorlon | LocutusOfBorg: hmm, hmm - maybe we have the answer here already, looks like we have a bootstrap supermin without libguestfs | 05:29 |
| LocutusOfBorg | zhsj, "Remove redundant libpmix2 dependency" | 06:17 |
| === esembee_ is now known as esembee | ||
| LocutusOfBorg | Depends: libglib2.0-0, libncursesw6 (>= 6), libxml2, libc6 (>= 2.38), libglib2.0-0t64 (>= 2.75.3), libtinfo6 (>= 6) | 08:21 |
| LocutusOfBorg | libgnt, wth, really | 08:21 |
| zhsj | LocutusOfBorg: i think you tagged the wrong person... | 09:07 |
| LocutusOfBorg | sorry! | 09:09 |
| LocutusOfBorg | indeed, I was speaking to https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openmpi/4.1.6-5.1ubuntu3 | 09:09 |
| LocutusOfBorg | vorlon, libgnt fixed | 09:10 |
| LocutusOfBorg | (pidgin should heal now) | 09:11 |
| utkarsh2102 | philroche, calvinmwadime: hey! I've approved those 4 uploads; they didn't really need FFe ;) | 09:12 |
| LocutusOfBorg | doko, please copy nodejs to archive? | 09:16 |
| calvinmwadime | utkarsh2102 thanks for the +1 | 09:42 |
| utkarsh2102 | \o/ | 09:42 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted firmware-sof [source] (jammy-proposed) [2.0-1ubuntu4.6] | 10:25 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected software-properties [source] (xenial-proposed) [0.96.20.13] | 11:57 | |
| doko | LocutusOfBorg: is nodejs related to the libguestfs/supermin bootstrap? | 12:07 |
| doko | hmm, who was just trying to copy libguestfs? | 12:08 |
| LocutusOfBorg | nope | 12:08 |
| LocutusOfBorg | not related | 12:08 |
| LocutusOfBorg | doko, nobody just tried to copy libguestfs | 12:08 |
| LocutusOfBorg | https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libguestfs/1:1.52.0-2ubuntu9/+build/27866498 | 12:09 |
| LocutusOfBorg | the build was ongoing when you manually copied armhf :) | 12:09 |
| doko | I just got a message ... | 12:09 |
| LocutusOfBorg | yes, because it finished and failed to upload | 12:09 |
| doko | so my libguestfs build on armhf succeeded | 12:09 |
| LocutusOfBorg | your copy succeded | 12:09 |
| LocutusOfBorg | then the ongoing build finished and failed to upload | 12:10 |
| LocutusOfBorg | so, everything is good | 12:10 |
| LocutusOfBorg | and if we finish to build supermin, and it goes ok, we can also copy the merge | 12:10 |
| LocutusOfBorg | your merge I mean | 12:10 |
| doko | no, I have: https://launchpad.net/~doko/+archive/ubuntu/bootstrap3/+sourcepub/15857601/+listing-archive-extra | 12:11 |
| === mfo is now known as Guest5070 | ||
| === mfo_ is now known as mfo | ||
| doko | LocutusOfBorg: so what is the status of supermin? | 12:12 |
| LocutusOfBorg | the copy was from there https://launchpad.net/~canonical-foundations/+archive/ubuntu/archive-bootstrap | 12:12 |
| LocutusOfBorg |  libguestfs1:1.52.0-2ubuntu9Matthias Klose (6 hours ago) | 12:12 |
| LocutusOfBorg | supermin is waiting to build | 12:13 |
| LocutusOfBorg | https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/supermin/5.2.2-4ubuntu3 | 12:13 |
| LocutusOfBorg | so, should we copy nodejs from archive bootstrap too? | 12:13 |
| LocutusOfBorg | btw please copy source-only libguestfs if you upload the merge, we should be good now after supermin is built | 12:14 |
| doko | nodejs is copied | 12:15 |
| LocutusOfBorg | thanks | 12:16 |
| LocutusOfBorg | https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nodejs/18.19.1+dfsg-4ubuntu2 | 12:17 |
| LocutusOfBorg | I don't know how builds are copied, but armhf is shown twice | 12:17 |
| LocutusOfBorg | Noble: [FULLYBUILT] amd64 [FULLYBUILT] arm64 [FULLYBUILT] armhf [MANUALDEPWAIT] armhf [FULLYBUILT] ppc64el [FULLYBUILT] riscv64 [FULLYBUILT] s390x | 12:17 |
| doko | this is normal | 12:17 |
| LocutusOfBorg | this means, if somebody or the system auto-retries armhf build it will fail to upload, and be notified | 12:17 |
| LocutusOfBorg | (this happened to libguestfs, don't know who copied it) | 12:17 |
| LocutusOfBorg | (thanks for rescoring supermin) | 12:19 |
| LocutusOfBorg | btw I'm working on ffmpeg/vlc and all the media dependencies | 12:19 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gramps [amd64] (noble-proposed) [5.1.6+dfsg-1ubuntu1] | 12:20 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted grub2 [armhf] (noble-proposed) [2.12-1ubuntu5] | 12:20 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted openjdk-23 [arm64] (noble-proposed) [23~14ea-1] | 12:20 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted openjdk-23 [i386] (noble-proposed) [23~14ea-1] | 12:20 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted openjdk-23 [s390x] (noble-proposed) [23~14ea-1] | 12:20 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted grub2 [armhf] (noble-proposed) [2.12-1ubuntu4] | 12:20 | |
| LocutusOfBorg | prioritizing parlatype gnustep-gui sphinxtrain pocketsphinx sphinxbase | 12:20 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted openjdk-23 [armhf] (noble-proposed) [23~14ea-1] | 12:20 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted openjdk-23 [amd64] (noble-proposed) [23~14ea-1] | 12:20 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted openjdk-23 [ppc64el] (noble-proposed) [23~14ea-1] | 12:20 | |
| LocutusOfBorg | might help a lot the qt/ffmpeg related dependencies | 12:20 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted optee-client-s32 [arm64] (noble-proposed) [3.18.0-0ubuntu1] | 12:20 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted optee-client-s32 [armhf] (noble-proposed) [3.18.0-0ubuntu1] | 12:20 | |
| LocutusOfBorg | after we should unblock neatvnc wayvnc pidgin, and lots of others | 12:21 |
| doko | LocutusOfBorg: so now it should be safe to copy my libguestfs build to proposed? | 12:26 |
| LocutusOfBorg | wait please for riscv64? | 12:27 |
| LocutusOfBorg | and yes I guess so, but only rebuilds due to new renaming will tell us for sure | 12:27 |
| doko | no, cancelled riscv64, so then copy it is now | 12:28 |
| LocutusOfBorg | I mean supermin on riscv64 | 12:29 |
| LocutusOfBorg | for me you can upload libguestfs source-only instead of copy | 12:29 |
| LocutusOfBorg | but we need supermin on riscv64 to be uploaded to make sure we don't chicken and egg again | 12:30 |
| doko | supermin built on riscv64, libguestfs copied into the archive | 12:56 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted pulseaudio [source] (mantic-proposed) [1:16.1+dfsg1-2ubuntu4.1] | 13:02 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted pulseaudio [source] (jammy-proposed) [1:15.99.1+dfsg1-1ubuntu2.2] | 13:03 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted hexchat [source] (mantic-proposed) [2.16.1-1ubuntu0.1] | 13:18 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted hexchat [source] (jammy-proposed) [2.16.0-4ubuntu0.1] | 13:19 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntu-dev-tools [source] (mantic-proposed) [0.201ubuntu2~23.10.1] | 13:22 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntu-dev-tools [source] (jammy-proposed) [0.201ubuntu2~22.04.1] | 13:25 | |
| jbicha | ubuntu-archive: please remove https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-remote-desktop/46~rc-0ubuntu1~ppa1 It was meant for a PPA as I finalize the Feature Freeze Exception request | 13:46 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted dotnet6 [source] (mantic-proposed) [6.0.128-0ubuntu1~23.10.1] | 14:12 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted dotnet6 [source] (jammy-proposed) [6.0.128-0ubuntu1~22.04.1] | 14:14 | |
| LocutusOfBorg | vorlon, imagemagick is clearly doing something wrong | 14:18 |
| LocutusOfBorg | https://launchpadlibrarian.net/718863610/buildlog_ubuntu-noble-armhf.imagemagick_8%3A6.9.12.98+dfsg1-5.1build2_BUILDING.txt.gz | 14:18 |
| LocutusOfBorg | Depends: libc6 (>= 2.38), libgcc-s1 (>= 3.5), libmagickcore-6.q16hdri-7 (>= 8:6.9.10.2), libmagickwand-6.q16hdri-7t64 (>= 8:6.9.12.98+dfsg1-5.1build2), libstdc++6 (>= 11) | 14:18 |
| dviererbe | tjaalton: F.Y.I I just confirmed a bug LP: #2057982 that affects the dotnet6 SRU, that you just accepted. I would like to include the fix with the SRU. Sorry, I was a little bit to late to stop you from accepting it. | 14:22 |
| -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Launchpad bug 2057982 in dotnet8 (Ubuntu Noble) "Is a ca-certificates dependency missing?" [Low, In Progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/2057982 | 14:22 | |
| tjaalton | dviererbe: okay.. | 14:24 |
| tjaalton | wonder if it can still be removed before the publisher runs | 14:25 |
| dviererbe | That would be awsome, because the dotnet builds take hours. | 14:27 |
| tjaalton | bah, I need to run.. vorlon, is there a way to remove a reviewed package before it hits proposed? | 14:27 |
| tjaalton | sru-remove didn't seem to work | 14:27 |
| tjaalton | I've cancelled the builds as a first step | 14:29 |
| tjaalton | but I guess the upload versions are now burned | 14:30 |
| dviererbe | Not a big problem I just bump the version number, but thanks for trying :) | 14:30 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ubuntu-meta [amd64] (noble-proposed/main) [1.536] (core) | 14:34 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ubuntu-meta [ppc64el] (noble-proposed/main) [1.536] (core) | 14:37 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ubuntu-meta [s390x] (noble-proposed/main) [1.536] (core) | 14:37 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ubuntu-meta [arm64] (noble-proposed/main) [1.536] (core) | 14:44 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ubuntu-meta [armhf] (noble-proposed/main) [1.536] (core) | 14:44 | |
| LocutusOfBorg | libmagickcore-6.q16hdri-7 should be with t64, same for others... gnustep-gui is FTBFS due to this | 14:46 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ubuntu-meta [riscv64] (noble-proposed/main) [1.536] (core) | 14:50 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ubuntu-meta [amd64] (noble-proposed) [1.536] | 14:58 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ubuntu-meta [armhf] (noble-proposed) [1.536] | 14:58 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ubuntu-meta [riscv64] (noble-proposed) [1.536] | 14:58 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ubuntu-meta [arm64] (noble-proposed) [1.536] | 14:58 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ubuntu-meta [s390x] (noble-proposed) [1.536] | 14:58 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ubuntu-meta [ppc64el] (noble-proposed) [1.536] | 14:58 | |
| doko | whoever is retrying armhf builds ... please change that, checking that the last build is at least one hour old. you don't have any chance to grab any build log | 15:11 |
| === arraybolt3_wc is now known as arraybolt3 | ||
| vorlon | doko: if they're dep-wait, they'll be auto-retried in an interval sooner than that... and a lot of them are dep-wait right now | 16:27 |
| doko | got my log, idle watching ... | 16:29 |
| vorlon | jbicha: gnome-remote-desktop removed | 16:36 |
| vorlon | tjaalton: "remove a reviewed package before it hits proposed" you should be able to do this with remove-package; but the upload versions are burned in any case once it has been accepted | 16:36 |
| vorlon | LocutusOfBorg: imagemagick was one of the worse packages to try to convert :/ | 16:37 |
| vorlon | LocutusOfBorg: debian/control is generated via parameterized logic in debian/rules, it's not pretty and I'm not surprised I managed to miss something | 16:38 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: cppdb [amd64] (noble-proposed/universe) [0.3.1+dfsg-9.1ubuntu1] (no packageset) | 17:25 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: cppdb [armhf] (noble-proposed/universe) [0.3.1+dfsg-9.1ubuntu1] (no packageset) | 17:28 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: cppdb [s390x] (noble-proposed/universe) [0.3.1+dfsg-9.1ubuntu1] (no packageset) | 17:28 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: cppdb [ppc64el] (noble-proposed/universe) [0.3.1+dfsg-9.1ubuntu1] (no packageset) | 17:28 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: cppdb [arm64] (noble-proposed/universe) [0.3.1+dfsg-9.1ubuntu1] (no packageset) | 17:29 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted cppdb [amd64] (noble-proposed) [0.3.1+dfsg-9.1ubuntu1] | 17:32 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted cppdb [armhf] (noble-proposed) [0.3.1+dfsg-9.1ubuntu1] | 17:32 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted cppdb [s390x] (noble-proposed) [0.3.1+dfsg-9.1ubuntu1] | 17:32 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted cppdb [arm64] (noble-proposed) [0.3.1+dfsg-9.1ubuntu1] | 17:32 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted cppdb [ppc64el] (noble-proposed) [0.3.1+dfsg-9.1ubuntu1] | 17:32 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: curl [i386] (noble-proposed/main) [8.5.0-2ubuntu7] (core, i386-whitelist) | 17:54 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: curl [amd64] (noble-proposed/main) [8.5.0-2ubuntu7] (core, i386-whitelist) | 17:54 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: curl [ppc64el] (noble-proposed/main) [8.5.0-2ubuntu7] (core, i386-whitelist) | 17:54 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: curl [s390x] (noble-proposed/main) [8.5.0-2ubuntu7] (core, i386-whitelist) | 17:55 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: rejected nemos-dev-key [source] (noble-proposed) [1.2] | 17:57 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: python-django-tagging [amd64] (noble-proposed/universe) [1:0.5.0-5.1] (no packageset) | 17:58 | |
| LocutusOfBorg | vorlon, I *think* I fixed it :) | 18:05 |
| vorlon | \o/ | 18:05 |
| vorlon | LocutusOfBorg: better you than me | 18:06 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted curl [amd64] (noble-proposed) [8.5.0-2ubuntu7] | 18:06 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted curl [ppc64el] (noble-proposed) [8.5.0-2ubuntu7] | 18:06 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted curl [i386] (noble-proposed) [8.5.0-2ubuntu7] | 18:06 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted curl [s390x] (noble-proposed) [8.5.0-2ubuntu7] | 18:06 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted python-django-tagging [amd64] (noble-proposed) [1:0.5.0-5.1] | 18:08 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: curl [armhf] (noble-proposed/main) [8.5.0-2ubuntu7] (core, i386-whitelist) | 18:08 | |
| LocutusOfBorg | vorlon, since my eyes are still bleeding for having opened imagemagick packaging directory, feel free to add your eye on the diff... https://launchpadlibrarian.net/719522225/imagemagick_8%3A6.9.12.98+dfsg1-5.1build3_8%3A6.9.12.98+dfsg1-5.1ubuntu1.diff.gz | 18:08 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: rejected involflt [source] (noble-proposed) [0.1.0-0ubuntu5] | 18:08 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: curl [arm64] (noble-proposed/main) [8.5.0-2ubuntu7] (core, i386-whitelist) | 18:08 | |
| vorlon | LocutusOfBorg: I'm not going to attempt to trace it, I'll be happy if what comes out the other end looks correct | 18:10 |
| LocutusOfBorg | melding build logs and generated control files looks good | 18:13 |
| LocutusOfBorg | I'll do the NCR now | 18:13 |
| LocutusOfBorg | and submittodebian | 18:14 |
| LocutusOfBorg | (feel free to NMU there) | 18:14 |
| LocutusOfBorg | (uploaded in sid)( | 18:22 |
| LocutusOfBorg | also libgnt | 18:22 |
| doko | LocutusOfBorg: removing your nbdkit upload, which makes my bootstrap invalid again | 18:28 |
| athos | hi ubuntu-release, could anyone have a look at https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/symfony/+bug/2057636 ? This is a symfony 6 FFe request to fix some incompatibilities in our php stack. | 18:59 |
| -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Launchpad bug 2057636 in symfony (Ubuntu) "[FFe] Symfony 6" [Undecided, New] | 18:59 | |
| vorlon | bdmurray: ^^ | 19:04 |
| bdmurray | I'm wrestling with various autopkgtest workers but will try and look at it today | 19:15 |
| doko | jbicha, vorlon: is anybody of you working on webkit2gtk? | 19:22 |
| vorlon | yes | 19:23 |
| vorlon | doko: it's actually bootstrapped and I'm just waiting for publication | 19:23 |
| vorlon | then it's wxwidget3.2 -> gnuplot -> opencv -> libproxy, I think | 19:24 |
| jbicha | ubuntu-release: I've completed my testing of FFe bug 2057842 and it's ready for review | 19:25 |
| -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Bug 2057842 in remmina (Ubuntu) "FFe: freedp2 -> freerdp3 in main" [Undecided, New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/2057842 | 19:25 | |
| vorlon | I'm also working up the chain on qt/kde rather than leaving it to eventually get there via automatic dep-wait retries, because this chain also needs kconfig | 19:26 |
| doko | I was looking at gtksourceview | 19:31 |
| vorlon | doko: which is built in -proposed; what am I missing? | 19:32 |
| doko | vorlon: gktsourceview -> glade -> webkit2gtk | 20:19 |
| doko | copying glade to the ppa | 20:20 |
| vorlon | doko: I do not see glade anywhere impacting webkit2gtk build-deps | 20:31 |
| vorlon | jbicha: libproxy 0.5.4-3 shouldn't have been necessary in Ubuntu; we already have the bootstrap done in the foundations bootstrap ppa and will be in a position to publish a full build today after the dep chain works its way through the builders | 20:33 |
| vorlon | doko: ftr the only things I see missing for webkit2gtk in the archive are vtk9 (just finished building in ppa, will copy over now) and opencv (builds in the archive once vtk9 is published) | 20:35 |
| doko | ahh, so then glade should build in the archive? | 20:36 |
| vorlon | doko: I expect so | 20:37 |
| jbicha | vorlon: ok, libproxy is on my list to undo later along with cairo | 20:38 |
| vorlon | jbicha: well I'm undoing it right now ;) | 20:38 |
| vorlon | jbicha: the long pole in the tent looks like qtwebkit-opensource-src -> qttools-opensource-src -> kconfig -> libproxy, I think | 20:40 |
| ginggs | athos, vorlon, bdmurray: utkarsh2102 is looking at symfony now | 20:47 |
| utkarsh2102 | yes | 20:48 |
| bdmurray | that's music to my ears | 20:50 |
| * bdmurray made a dad joke | 20:50 | |
| utkarsh2102 | athos: hey! approved :) | 20:51 |
| ginggs | utkarsh2102: please set the bug status to 'triaged' | 20:55 |
| utkarsh2102 | ginggs: I thought I had done that | 20:56 |
| utkarsh2102 | but hadn't; done now | 20:56 |
| athos | oh, thanks, utkarsh2102 (I thought it was quite late there for you!) | 21:25 |
| doko | vorlon: copied now? | 22:20 |
| vorlon | doko: sorry, copied which? | 22:20 |
| vorlon | opencv finally building in archive now | 22:20 |
| doko | vtk9 and webkit | 22:21 |
| vorlon | doko: yes | 22:21 |
| doko | LocutusOfBorg: why is the nodejs build canceled? | 22:28 |
| doko | armhf | 22:28 |
| vorlon | doing mass-retries now of ftbfs + depwait packages on armhf | 22:34 |
| vorlon | (because of the qtdeclarative stack having moved along) | 22:34 |
| vorlon | doko: the in-archive one is cancelled, the bootstrap ppa one is published | 22:35 |
| vorlon | why does gem2deb depend on devscripts | 22:37 |
| doko | it's an odd thing, nothing relevant for package building | 22:46 |
| doko | devscripts seems to be a dependency just because of lib/gem2deb/dh_make_ruby.rb which, it uses wrap-and-sort and dch from devscripts. Dropping it for bootstrapping seems fine AFAICS | 22:47 |
| doko | that's why it was in the bootstrap ppa | 22:47 |
| vorlon | wrap-and-sort and dch shouldn't be in the build dep pipeline :/ | 23:02 |
| vorlon | well anyway | 23:02 |
| vorlon | opencv built | 23:03 |
| vorlon | looks like there may have been one last bit missed in the bootstrap, glib-networking is in a build-dep loop with libproxy; uploaded now to the bootstrap ppa | 23:18 |
| vorlon | oh; the problem isn't with glib-networking itself, but with the fact that the libproxy1v5 in the archive was linked against libglib2.0-0. So I guess libproxy should go back to the bootstrap ppa for building, doing that | 23:20 |
| vorlon | doko: gtksourceview4 is affected by the libproxy rebootstrap | 23:59 |
| doko | 4, not 3? | 23:59 |
| vorlon | you didn't specify | 23:59 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!