[01:11] <jbicha> yes
[02:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: grub2 [armhf] (noble-proposed/main) [2.12-1ubuntu5] (core)
[02:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: grub2 [armhf] (noble-proposed/main) [2.12-1ubuntu4] (core)
[02:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted qtbase-opensource-src [s390x] (noble-proposed) [5.15.12+dfsg-3ubuntu5]
[02:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: openjdk-23 [armhf] (noble-proposed/universe) [23~14ea-1] (i386-whitelist)
=== chris14_ is now known as chris14
[03:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: openjdk-23 [amd64] (noble-proposed/universe) [23~14ea-1] (i386-whitelist)
[03:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: openjdk-23 [arm64] (noble-proposed/universe) [23~14ea-1] (i386-whitelist)
[03:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: openjdk-23 [s390x] (noble-proposed/universe) [23~14ea-1] (i386-whitelist)
[03:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: openjdk-23 [ppc64el] (noble-proposed/universe) [23~14ea-1] (i386-whitelist)
[04:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: openjdk-23 [i386] (noble-proposed/universe) [23~14ea-1] (i386-whitelist)
[05:13] <vorlon> LocutusOfBorg: so on armhf I see that libguestfs 15.2.0-2ubuntu9 build-depends on supermin which depends on libext2fs2 still, did you have a particular plan for breaking this loop?
[05:29] <vorlon> LocutusOfBorg: hmm, hmm - maybe we have the answer here already, looks like we have a bootstrap supermin without libguestfs
[06:17] <LocutusOfBorg> zhsj, "Remove redundant libpmix2 dependency"
=== esembee_ is now known as esembee
[08:21] <LocutusOfBorg>  Depends: libglib2.0-0, libncursesw6 (>= 6), libxml2, libc6 (>= 2.38), libglib2.0-0t64 (>= 2.75.3), libtinfo6 (>= 6)
[08:21] <LocutusOfBorg> libgnt, wth, really
[09:07] <zhsj> LocutusOfBorg: i think you tagged the wrong person...
[09:09] <LocutusOfBorg> sorry!
[09:09] <LocutusOfBorg> indeed, I was speaking to https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openmpi/4.1.6-5.1ubuntu3
[09:10] <LocutusOfBorg> vorlon, libgnt fixed
[09:11] <LocutusOfBorg> (pidgin should heal now)
[09:12] <utkarsh2102> philroche, calvinmwadime: hey! I've approved those 4 uploads; they didn't really need FFe ;)
[09:16] <LocutusOfBorg> doko, please copy nodejs to archive?
[09:42] <calvinmwadime> utkarsh2102 thanks for the +1
[09:42] <utkarsh2102> \o/
[10:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted firmware-sof [source] (jammy-proposed) [2.0-1ubuntu4.6]
[11:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected software-properties [source] (xenial-proposed) [0.96.20.13]
[12:07] <doko> LocutusOfBorg: is nodejs related to the libguestfs/supermin bootstrap?
[12:08] <doko> hmm, who was just trying to copy libguestfs?
[12:08] <LocutusOfBorg> nope
[12:08] <LocutusOfBorg> not related
[12:08] <LocutusOfBorg> doko, nobody just tried to copy libguestfs
[12:09] <LocutusOfBorg> https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libguestfs/1:1.52.0-2ubuntu9/+build/27866498
[12:09] <LocutusOfBorg> the build was ongoing when you manually copied armhf :)
[12:09] <doko> I just got a message ...
[12:09] <LocutusOfBorg> yes, because it finished and failed to upload
[12:09] <doko> so my libguestfs build on armhf succeeded
[12:09] <LocutusOfBorg> your copy succeded
[12:10] <LocutusOfBorg> then the ongoing build finished and failed to upload
[12:10] <LocutusOfBorg> so, everything is good
[12:10] <LocutusOfBorg> and if we finish to build supermin, and it goes ok, we can also copy the merge
[12:10] <LocutusOfBorg> your merge I mean
[12:11] <doko> no, I have: https://launchpad.net/~doko/+archive/ubuntu/bootstrap3/+sourcepub/15857601/+listing-archive-extra
=== mfo is now known as Guest5070
=== mfo_ is now known as mfo
[12:12] <doko> LocutusOfBorg: so what is the status of supermin?
[12:12] <LocutusOfBorg> the copy was from there https://launchpad.net/~canonical-foundations/+archive/ubuntu/archive-bootstrap
[12:12] <LocutusOfBorg>  libguestfs	1:1.52.0-2ubuntu9	Matthias Klose (6 hours ago)
[12:13] <LocutusOfBorg> supermin is waiting to build
[12:13] <LocutusOfBorg> https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/supermin/5.2.2-4ubuntu3
[12:13] <LocutusOfBorg> so, should we copy nodejs from archive bootstrap too?
[12:14] <LocutusOfBorg> btw please copy source-only libguestfs if you upload the merge, we should be good now after supermin is built
[12:15] <doko> nodejs is copied
[12:16] <LocutusOfBorg> thanks
[12:17] <LocutusOfBorg> https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nodejs/18.19.1+dfsg-4ubuntu2
[12:17] <LocutusOfBorg> I don't know how builds are copied, but armhf is shown twice
[12:17] <LocutusOfBorg> Noble: [FULLYBUILT] amd64 [FULLYBUILT] arm64 [FULLYBUILT] armhf [MANUALDEPWAIT] armhf [FULLYBUILT] ppc64el [FULLYBUILT] riscv64 [FULLYBUILT] s390x
[12:17] <doko> this is normal
[12:17] <LocutusOfBorg> this means, if somebody or the system auto-retries armhf build it will fail to upload, and be notified
[12:17] <LocutusOfBorg> (this happened to libguestfs, don't know who copied it)
[12:19] <LocutusOfBorg> (thanks for rescoring supermin)
[12:19] <LocutusOfBorg> btw I'm working on ffmpeg/vlc and all the media dependencies
[12:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gramps [amd64] (noble-proposed) [5.1.6+dfsg-1ubuntu1]
[12:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted grub2 [armhf] (noble-proposed) [2.12-1ubuntu5]
[12:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted openjdk-23 [arm64] (noble-proposed) [23~14ea-1]
[12:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted openjdk-23 [i386] (noble-proposed) [23~14ea-1]
[12:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted openjdk-23 [s390x] (noble-proposed) [23~14ea-1]
[12:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted grub2 [armhf] (noble-proposed) [2.12-1ubuntu4]
[12:20] <LocutusOfBorg> prioritizing parlatype gnustep-gui sphinxtrain pocketsphinx sphinxbase
[12:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted openjdk-23 [armhf] (noble-proposed) [23~14ea-1]
[12:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted openjdk-23 [amd64] (noble-proposed) [23~14ea-1]
[12:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted openjdk-23 [ppc64el] (noble-proposed) [23~14ea-1]
[12:20] <LocutusOfBorg> might help a lot the qt/ffmpeg related dependencies
[12:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted optee-client-s32 [arm64] (noble-proposed) [3.18.0-0ubuntu1]
[12:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted optee-client-s32 [armhf] (noble-proposed) [3.18.0-0ubuntu1]
[12:21] <LocutusOfBorg> after we should unblock neatvnc wayvnc pidgin, and lots of others
[12:26] <doko> LocutusOfBorg: so now it should be safe to copy my libguestfs build to proposed?
[12:27] <LocutusOfBorg> wait please for riscv64?
[12:27] <LocutusOfBorg> and yes I guess so, but only rebuilds due to new renaming will tell us for sure
[12:28] <doko> no, cancelled riscv64, so then copy it is now
[12:29] <LocutusOfBorg> I mean supermin on riscv64
[12:29] <LocutusOfBorg> for me you can upload libguestfs source-only instead of copy
[12:30] <LocutusOfBorg> but we need supermin on riscv64 to be uploaded to make sure we don't chicken and egg again
[12:56] <doko> supermin built on riscv64, libguestfs copied into the archive
[13:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted pulseaudio [source] (mantic-proposed) [1:16.1+dfsg1-2ubuntu4.1]
[13:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted pulseaudio [source] (jammy-proposed) [1:15.99.1+dfsg1-1ubuntu2.2]
[13:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted hexchat [source] (mantic-proposed) [2.16.1-1ubuntu0.1]
[13:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted hexchat [source] (jammy-proposed) [2.16.0-4ubuntu0.1]
[13:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntu-dev-tools [source] (mantic-proposed) [0.201ubuntu2~23.10.1]
[13:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntu-dev-tools [source] (jammy-proposed) [0.201ubuntu2~22.04.1]
[13:46] <jbicha> ubuntu-archive: please remove https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-remote-desktop/46~rc-0ubuntu1~ppa1 It was meant for a PPA as I finalize the Feature Freeze Exception request
[14:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted dotnet6 [source] (mantic-proposed) [6.0.128-0ubuntu1~23.10.1]
[14:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted dotnet6 [source] (jammy-proposed) [6.0.128-0ubuntu1~22.04.1]
[14:18] <LocutusOfBorg> vorlon, imagemagick is clearly doing something wrong
[14:18] <LocutusOfBorg> https://launchpadlibrarian.net/718863610/buildlog_ubuntu-noble-armhf.imagemagick_8%3A6.9.12.98+dfsg1-5.1build2_BUILDING.txt.gz
[14:18] <LocutusOfBorg>  Depends: libc6 (>= 2.38), libgcc-s1 (>= 3.5), libmagickcore-6.q16hdri-7 (>= 8:6.9.10.2), libmagickwand-6.q16hdri-7t64 (>= 8:6.9.12.98+dfsg1-5.1build2), libstdc++6 (>= 11)
[14:22] <dviererbe> tjaalton: F.Y.I I just confirmed  a bug LP: #2057982 that affects the dotnet6 SRU, that you just accepted. I would like to include the fix with the SRU. Sorry, I was a little bit to late to stop you from accepting it.
[14:22] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Launchpad bug 2057982 in dotnet8 (Ubuntu Noble) "Is a ca-certificates dependency missing?" [Low, In Progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/2057982
[14:24] <tjaalton> dviererbe: okay..
[14:25] <tjaalton> wonder if it can still be removed before the publisher runs
[14:27] <dviererbe> That would be awsome, because the dotnet builds take hours.
[14:27] <tjaalton> bah, I need to run.. vorlon, is there a way to remove a reviewed package before it hits proposed?
[14:27] <tjaalton> sru-remove didn't seem to work
[14:29] <tjaalton> I've cancelled the builds as a first step
[14:30] <tjaalton> but I guess the upload versions are now burned
[14:30] <dviererbe> Not a big problem I just bump the version number, but thanks for trying :)
[14:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ubuntu-meta [amd64] (noble-proposed/main) [1.536] (core)
[14:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ubuntu-meta [ppc64el] (noble-proposed/main) [1.536] (core)
[14:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ubuntu-meta [s390x] (noble-proposed/main) [1.536] (core)
[14:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ubuntu-meta [arm64] (noble-proposed/main) [1.536] (core)
[14:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ubuntu-meta [armhf] (noble-proposed/main) [1.536] (core)
[14:46] <LocutusOfBorg> libmagickcore-6.q16hdri-7 should be with t64, same for others... gnustep-gui is FTBFS due to this
[14:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ubuntu-meta [riscv64] (noble-proposed/main) [1.536] (core)
[14:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ubuntu-meta [amd64] (noble-proposed) [1.536]
[14:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ubuntu-meta [armhf] (noble-proposed) [1.536]
[14:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ubuntu-meta [riscv64] (noble-proposed) [1.536]
[14:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ubuntu-meta [arm64] (noble-proposed) [1.536]
[14:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ubuntu-meta [s390x] (noble-proposed) [1.536]
[14:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ubuntu-meta [ppc64el] (noble-proposed) [1.536]
[15:11] <doko> whoever is retrying armhf builds ... please change that, checking that the last build is at least one hour old. you don't have any chance to grab any build log
=== arraybolt3_wc is now known as arraybolt3
[16:27] <vorlon> doko: if they're dep-wait, they'll be auto-retried in an interval sooner than that... and a lot of them are dep-wait right now
[16:29] <doko> got my log, idle watching ...
[16:36] <vorlon> jbicha: gnome-remote-desktop removed
[16:36] <vorlon> tjaalton: "remove a reviewed package before it hits proposed" you should be able to do this with remove-package; but the upload versions are burned in any case once it has been accepted
[16:37] <vorlon> LocutusOfBorg: imagemagick was one of the worse packages to try to convert :/
[16:38] <vorlon> LocutusOfBorg: debian/control is generated via parameterized logic in debian/rules, it's not pretty and I'm not surprised I managed to miss something
[17:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: cppdb [amd64] (noble-proposed/universe) [0.3.1+dfsg-9.1ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[17:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: cppdb [armhf] (noble-proposed/universe) [0.3.1+dfsg-9.1ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[17:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: cppdb [s390x] (noble-proposed/universe) [0.3.1+dfsg-9.1ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[17:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: cppdb [ppc64el] (noble-proposed/universe) [0.3.1+dfsg-9.1ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[17:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: cppdb [arm64] (noble-proposed/universe) [0.3.1+dfsg-9.1ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[17:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted cppdb [amd64] (noble-proposed) [0.3.1+dfsg-9.1ubuntu1]
[17:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted cppdb [armhf] (noble-proposed) [0.3.1+dfsg-9.1ubuntu1]
[17:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted cppdb [s390x] (noble-proposed) [0.3.1+dfsg-9.1ubuntu1]
[17:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted cppdb [arm64] (noble-proposed) [0.3.1+dfsg-9.1ubuntu1]
[17:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted cppdb [ppc64el] (noble-proposed) [0.3.1+dfsg-9.1ubuntu1]
[17:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: curl [i386] (noble-proposed/main) [8.5.0-2ubuntu7] (core, i386-whitelist)
[17:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: curl [amd64] (noble-proposed/main) [8.5.0-2ubuntu7] (core, i386-whitelist)
[17:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: curl [ppc64el] (noble-proposed/main) [8.5.0-2ubuntu7] (core, i386-whitelist)
[17:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: curl [s390x] (noble-proposed/main) [8.5.0-2ubuntu7] (core, i386-whitelist)
[17:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: rejected nemos-dev-key [source] (noble-proposed) [1.2]
[17:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: python-django-tagging [amd64] (noble-proposed/universe) [1:0.5.0-5.1] (no packageset)
[18:05] <LocutusOfBorg> vorlon, I *think* I fixed it :)
[18:05] <vorlon> \o/
[18:06] <vorlon> LocutusOfBorg: better you than me
[18:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted curl [amd64] (noble-proposed) [8.5.0-2ubuntu7]
[18:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted curl [ppc64el] (noble-proposed) [8.5.0-2ubuntu7]
[18:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted curl [i386] (noble-proposed) [8.5.0-2ubuntu7]
[18:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted curl [s390x] (noble-proposed) [8.5.0-2ubuntu7]
[18:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted python-django-tagging [amd64] (noble-proposed) [1:0.5.0-5.1]
[18:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: curl [armhf] (noble-proposed/main) [8.5.0-2ubuntu7] (core, i386-whitelist)
[18:08] <LocutusOfBorg> vorlon, since my eyes are still bleeding for having opened imagemagick packaging directory, feel free to add your eye on the diff... https://launchpadlibrarian.net/719522225/imagemagick_8%3A6.9.12.98+dfsg1-5.1build3_8%3A6.9.12.98+dfsg1-5.1ubuntu1.diff.gz
[18:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: rejected involflt [source] (noble-proposed) [0.1.0-0ubuntu5]
[18:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: curl [arm64] (noble-proposed/main) [8.5.0-2ubuntu7] (core, i386-whitelist)
[18:10] <vorlon> LocutusOfBorg: I'm not going to attempt to trace it, I'll be happy if what comes out the other end looks correct
[18:13] <LocutusOfBorg> melding build logs and generated control files looks good
[18:13] <LocutusOfBorg> I'll do the NCR now
[18:14] <LocutusOfBorg> and submittodebian
[18:14] <LocutusOfBorg> (feel free to NMU there)
[18:22] <LocutusOfBorg> (uploaded in sid)(
[18:22] <LocutusOfBorg> also libgnt
[18:28] <doko> LocutusOfBorg: removing your nbdkit upload, which makes my bootstrap invalid again
[18:59] <athos> hi ubuntu-release, could anyone have a look at https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/symfony/+bug/2057636 ? This is a symfony 6 FFe request to fix some incompatibilities in our php stack.
[18:59] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Launchpad bug 2057636 in symfony (Ubuntu) "[FFe] Symfony 6" [Undecided, New]
[19:04] <vorlon> bdmurray: ^^
[19:15] <bdmurray> I'm wrestling with various autopkgtest workers but will try and look at it today
[19:22] <doko> jbicha, vorlon: is anybody of you working on webkit2gtk?
[19:23] <vorlon> yes
[19:23] <vorlon> doko: it's actually bootstrapped and I'm just waiting for publication
[19:24] <vorlon> then it's wxwidget3.2 -> gnuplot -> opencv -> libproxy, I think
[19:25] <jbicha> ubuntu-release: I've completed my testing of FFe bug 2057842 and it's ready for review
[19:25] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Bug 2057842 in remmina (Ubuntu) "FFe: freedp2 -> freerdp3 in main" [Undecided, New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/2057842
[19:26] <vorlon> I'm also working up the chain on qt/kde rather than leaving it to eventually get there via automatic dep-wait retries, because this chain also needs kconfig
[19:31] <doko> I was looking at gtksourceview
[19:32] <vorlon> doko: which is built in -proposed; what am I missing?
[20:19] <doko> vorlon: gktsourceview -> glade -> webkit2gtk
[20:20] <doko> copying glade to the ppa
[20:31] <vorlon> doko: I do not see glade anywhere impacting webkit2gtk build-deps
[20:33] <vorlon> jbicha: libproxy 0.5.4-3 shouldn't have been necessary in Ubuntu; we already have the bootstrap done in the foundations bootstrap ppa and will be in a position to publish a full build today after the dep chain works its way through the builders
[20:35] <vorlon> doko: ftr the only things I see missing for webkit2gtk in the archive are vtk9 (just finished building in ppa, will copy over now) and opencv (builds in the archive once vtk9 is published)
[20:36] <doko> ahh, so then glade should build in the archive?
[20:37] <vorlon> doko: I expect so
[20:38] <jbicha> vorlon: ok, libproxy is on my list to undo later along with cairo
[20:38] <vorlon> jbicha: well I'm undoing it right now ;)
[20:40] <vorlon> jbicha: the long pole in the tent looks like qtwebkit-opensource-src -> qttools-opensource-src -> kconfig -> libproxy, I think
[20:47] <ginggs> athos, vorlon, bdmurray: utkarsh2102 is looking at symfony now
[20:48] <utkarsh2102> yes
[20:50] <bdmurray> that's music to my ears
[20:50]  * bdmurray made a dad joke
[20:51] <utkarsh2102> athos: hey! approved :)
[20:55] <ginggs> utkarsh2102: please set the bug status to 'triaged'
[20:56] <utkarsh2102> ginggs: I thought I had done that
[20:56] <utkarsh2102> but hadn't; done now
[21:25] <athos> oh, thanks, utkarsh2102 (I thought it was quite late there for you!)
[22:20] <doko> vorlon: copied now?
[22:20] <vorlon> doko: sorry, copied which?
[22:20] <vorlon> opencv finally building in archive now
[22:21] <doko> vtk9 and webkit
[22:21] <vorlon> doko: yes
[22:28] <doko> LocutusOfBorg: why is the nodejs build canceled?
[22:28] <doko> armhf
[22:34] <vorlon> doing mass-retries now of ftbfs + depwait packages on armhf
[22:34] <vorlon> (because of the qtdeclarative stack having moved along)
[22:35] <vorlon> doko: the in-archive one is cancelled, the bootstrap ppa one is published
[22:37] <vorlon> why does gem2deb depend on devscripts
[22:46] <doko> it's an odd thing, nothing relevant for package building
[22:47] <doko> devscripts seems to be a dependency just because of lib/gem2deb/dh_make_ruby.rb which, it uses wrap-and-sort and dch from devscripts. Dropping it for bootstrapping seems fine AFAICS
[22:47] <doko> that's why it was in the bootstrap ppa
[23:02] <vorlon> wrap-and-sort and dch shouldn't be in the build dep pipeline :/
[23:02] <vorlon> well anyway
[23:03] <vorlon> opencv built
[23:18] <vorlon> looks like there may have been one last bit missed in the bootstrap, glib-networking is in a build-dep loop with libproxy; uploaded now to the bootstrap ppa
[23:20] <vorlon> oh; the problem isn't with glib-networking itself, but with the fact that the libproxy1v5 in the archive was linked against libglib2.0-0.  So I guess libproxy should go back to the bootstrap ppa for building, doing that
[23:59] <vorlon> doko: gtksourceview4 is affected by the libproxy rebootstrap
[23:59] <doko> 4, not 3?
[23:59] <vorlon> you didn't specify