| === RAOF_ is now known as RAOF | ||
| === JanC_ is now known as JanC | ||
| === guiverc2 is now known as guiverc | ||
| === UnivrslSuprBox_ is now known as UnivrslSuprBox | ||
| === klebers_ is now known as klebers | ||
| Odd_Bloke | o/ I've noticed that a universe package (pxe-kexec) which we use was dropped from the archive sometime between jammy and now (I think in the mantic cycle based on git-ubuntu having branches up to lunar). Where can I look to figure out why that happened? | 11:54 |
|---|---|---|
| rbasak | Odd_Bloke: start from https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pxe-kexec/+publishinghistory | 11:59 |
| rbasak | Odd_Bloke: ah the first entry. FTBFS. Debian https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=984300 | 11:59 |
| -ubottu:#ubuntu-devel- Debian bug 984300 in src:pxe-kexec "pxe-kexec: ftbfs with GCC-11" [Serious, Open] | 11:59 | |
| Odd_Bloke | rbasak: Perfect, thank you! | 12:00 |
| rbasak | Odd_Bloke: FWIW, git-ubuntu currently completely ignores deletions from the archive. There's https://bugs.launchpad.net/git-ubuntu/+bug/1852389 though it's not entirely clear what the correct thing to do would be in this case. So investigation means looking beyond git-ubuntu currently. | 12:00 |
| -ubottu:#ubuntu-devel- Launchpad bug 1852389 in git-ubuntu "Branch pointers do not follow deletions, breaking ubuntu/devel and such" [Wishlist, New] | 12:00 | |
| rbasak | You're welcome! | 12:00 |
| ginggs | @pilot in | 12:08 |
| === ChanServ changed the topic of #ubuntu-devel to: Archive: Feature Freeze | Devel of Ubuntu (not support) | Build failures: http://qa.ubuntuwire.com/ftbfs/ | #ubuntu for support and discussion of Focal-Mantic | Patch Pilots: ginggs | ||
| === halves7 is now known as halves | ||
| ginggs | @pilot out | 15:05 |
| === ChanServ changed the topic of #ubuntu-devel to: Archive: Feature Freeze | Devel of Ubuntu (not support) | Build failures: http://qa.ubuntuwire.com/ftbfs/ | #ubuntu for support and discussion of Focal-Mantic | Patch Pilots: N/A | ||
| ginggs | Thank you for flying Ubuntu Air! | 15:05 |
| jbicha | @pilot in | 15:07 |
| === ChanServ changed the topic of #ubuntu-devel to: Archive: Feature Freeze | Devel of Ubuntu (not support) | Build failures: http://qa.ubuntuwire.com/ftbfs/ | #ubuntu for support and discussion of Focal-Mantic | Patch Pilots: jbicha | ||
| genii | http://ppa.launchpad.net/ seems currently broken | 15:33 |
| cjwatson | #launchpad's topic was just changed to record that as a known issue | 15:36 |
| genii | cjwatson: OK, thanks | 15:40 |
| === JanC_ is now known as JanC | ||
| ahasenack | mwhudson: hi, are you the one driving the time_t transition this week, in vorlon's absence? | 18:07 |
| ahasenack | or is it another michael | 18:08 |
| ahasenack | and if it's you, I suppose you are not around at this time | 18:08 |
| ahasenack | (rightfully so) | 18:08 |
| mitya57 | schopin: Hi! You uploaded qtwebengine just a few minutes before I attempted to do the same :) | 18:11 |
| mitya57 | Can you explain why time-bits.diff is needed? I got a successful build without it, does it fix some runtime issues? | 18:11 |
| mitya57 | Also maybe you know upstream status of it? | 18:11 |
| jbicha | @pilot out | 20:05 |
| === ChanServ changed the topic of #ubuntu-devel to: Archive: Feature Freeze | Devel of Ubuntu (not support) | Build failures: http://qa.ubuntuwire.com/ftbfs/ | #ubuntu for support and discussion of Focal-Mantic | Patch Pilots: N/A | ||
| Eickmeyer | dbungert: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-desktop-provision/+bug/2055077/comments/17 | 20:24 |
| -ubottu:#ubuntu-devel- Launchpad bug 2055077 in livecd-rootfs (Ubuntu) "cloudinit.sources.DataSourceEc2:583 Calling 'None' failed" [Undecided, In Progress] | 20:24 | |
| Eickmeyer | TL;DR: Spinner with "Preparing Edubuntu..." but nothing else. It's stalled. Same symptoms as before. | 20:25 |
| dbungert | Eickmeyer: thanks. I have dailup speeds from cdimage right now so I will test when I can | 20:29 |
| Eickmeyer | dbungert: Oof, I know that feeling. I zsync and it gets painful with that, too. | 20:29 |
| mwhudson | ahasenack: hi and yes | 20:34 |
| ahasenack | mwhudson: ok, was wondering how I could help, if you have a list or something of actionable work | 20:35 |
| ahasenack | I could try pick some up outside my work hours to begin with | 20:35 |
| mwhudson | ahasenack: search for "missing build on armhf" on excuses and dig in? | 20:35 |
| ahasenack | any coordination going on? To avoid stepping on someone elses work | 20:36 |
| mwhudson | i was about to ask if someone wants to figure out the arm64 gtk4 failure but that's not really the highest priority right now | 20:36 |
| mwhudson | ahasenack: yeah i'm not sure on coordination. i'm not even sure who is actively working right on it right now | 20:36 |
| mwhudson | ahasenack: i'm working on shepharding my cups rebuilds | 20:37 |
| ahasenack | someone working on openssl? I saw that openssh in noble-proposed removes libssl3, in favor of libssl3t64, and that leaves the system in a bad state | 20:37 |
| ahasenack | to say the least | 20:37 |
| ahasenack | maybe pending rebuilds? | 20:37 |
| mwhudson | would be good to ponder the things that still depend on libssl3 indeed | 20:38 |
| mwhudson | i think rebuilds have been scheduled for them all so it's a matter of finding out why they didn't build | 20:38 |
| ahasenack | the builders are idle: https://launchpad.net/builders | 20:38 |
| ahasenack | autopkgtests on the other hand... | 20:39 |
| ahasenack | we will only know if a retrigger now worked, a few days later | 20:39 |
| mwhudson | i think the autopkgtests are next week's problem | 20:39 |
| ahasenack | ok, so noble-proposed containers, try installing things, see what is keeping old libs around | 20:40 |
| mwhudson | ahasenack: i find it very useful to have a noble-armhf chdist around | 20:40 |
| ahasenack | I have a pi4, but yes, it's slow | 20:40 |
| ahasenack | i/o specially | 20:40 |
| mwhudson | https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/Qg4FqgCpsC/ | 20:41 |
| mwhudson | juliank just made this as well https://magenta.jak-linux.org/ubuntu-archive/distcheck/noble.armhf/proposed-binaries.txt | 20:41 |
| mwhudson | (a report on what is currently uninstallable) | 20:41 |
| mwhudson | it's um fairly arcane but the output of this command | 20:42 |
| mwhudson | comm -23 <(chdist grep-dctrl-packages noble-armhf -FDepends -w libssl3 -nsSource:Package | sort -u) <(chdist grep-dctrl-packages noble-armhf -FDepends -w libssl3t64 -nsSource:Package | sort -u) | 20:42 |
| ahasenack | is that report continuously updated? | 20:42 |
| ahasenack | timestamp is recent enough | 20:42 |
| mwhudson | are all things that need looking into to finish the libssl3t64 transition i think | 20:42 |
| mwhudson | i think it's on a cron, juliank can confirm if he's looking at irc | 20:42 |
| juliank | Hourly cron job | 20:44 |
| ahasenack | awesome | 20:44 |
| juliank | https://magenta.jak-linux.org/ubuntu-archive/distcheck/noble.armhf/proposed.txt shows uninstallable build-depends and is smaller but perhaps less powerful | 20:45 |
| juliank | :) | 20:45 |
| juliank | I'd like to make this more meaningful somehow but I don't want to overly invest in tooling | 20:45 |
| juliank | The human readable reports now include, for missing (build-)depends, the dependency chain that leaad to the missing dependency | 20:59 |
| juliank | i.e. * lombok build-depends on missing libswt-gtk-4-java:armhf via libeclipse-jdt-ui-java:armhf -> libeclipse-compare-java:armhf | 21:01 |
| juliank | meaing libeclipse-compare-java depends on libswt-gtk-4-java:armhf causing lombok to not build | 21:02 |
| juliank | I wonder if this would be enough information for the conflicts chains at the end as well | 21:03 |
| juliank | vs including all the metadata | 21:03 |
| juliank | you can find the entire metadata in the .yml variants | 21:03 |
| juliank | Then you'd see something like | 21:04 |
| juliank | * foo build-depends X via a->b->c; but also conflicting Y via x->y->z | 21:05 |
| juliank | OK the report is now more succinct in rendering the chains | 21:14 |
| juliank | consider: | 21:14 |
| juliank | * plasma-desktop build-depends has conflicts: libqt5core5t64=5.15.12+dfsg-3ubuntu6 vs libqt5core5a=5.15.12+dfsg-3ubuntu1 | 21:14 |
| juliank | - chain 1: libkf5sysguard-dev:armhf (>= 4:5.27.11~) -> libqt5core5t64:armhf (>= 5.15.2~) | 21:14 |
| juliank | - chain 2: kscreenlocker-dev:armhf (>= 5.27.11~) -> libkscreenlocker5:armhf (= 5.27.11-0ubuntu1) -> libkf5xmlgui5:armhf (>= 5.102.0~) -> libqt5core5a:armhf (>= 5.15.2~) | 21:14 |
| mwhudson | ahasenack: are you working on anything now? | 21:15 |
| juliank | mwhudson: can you tell me if the short chain rendering above is easier to read? are you missing anything? | 21:16 |
| mwhudson | juliank: well for example bobcat seems not to have installable b-ds but isn't on the list? | 21:16 |
| juliank | I don't know why that is | 21:17 |
| juliank | It is possible the build-depends are satisfiable but apt is too stupid | 21:17 |
| juliank | dose's solver sometimes is a bit more powerful | 21:17 |
| mwhudson | seems to be circular build deps | 21:18 |
| mwhudson | bobcat b-d on icmake depends on libbobcat6 depends on libssl3 but bobcat b-d on libssl-dev which depends on libssl3t64 | 21:19 |
| mwhudson | i don't think dose is going to solve that | 21:19 |
| dbungert | Eickmeyer: I see some exceptions from ubuntu-desktop-bootstrap that seem to be related to the slideshow. Does studio have the same problems? I wonder if something in the slideshow for edubuntu doesn't quite match assumptions in bootstrap. | 21:20 |
| mwhudson | unless it takes libssl-dev from releasw ehich would be unhelpful | 21:20 |
| juliank | I told it to only take the latest version of each package | 21:23 |
| juliank | but it may have bugs | 21:23 |
| juliank | I sent an email about the new reports and new report features | 21:25 |
| Eickmeyer | dbungert: No, not at all. | 21:27 |
| Eickmeyer | I'm not using anything out of the ordinary or otherwise presented in the default template. | 21:28 |
| Eickmeyer | It was working before. | 21:28 |
| juliank | "Trivial conflicts in the same package (probably hardcoded dependency vs shlibs): " are now shown at the top | 21:41 |
| juliank | So e.g. zurl in there had a hardcoded "Depends: libcurl4" and a libcurl4t64 via shlibs | 21:42 |
| juliank | Hope this helps | 21:42 |
| juliank | * bitlbee-plugin-facebook depends has conflicts: libglib2.0-0t64=2.79.3-3ubuntu5 vs libglib2.0-0=2.79.2-1~ubuntu1 | 21:44 |
| juliank | - chain 1: libglib2.0-0t64:armhf (>= 2.79.0) | 21:44 |
| juliank | - chain 2: libglib2.0-0:armhf (>= 2.28) | 21:44 |
| juliank | so much fun | 21:44 |
| mwhudson | well at least these are mostly very easy to fix | 21:46 |
| juliank | Yes that's why I put them at the top for people to easily pick up :) | 21:46 |
| mitya57 | schopin: Follow-up on my question above: I see that for qt6-webengine, doko added time-bits.diff because the package FTBFS without it on armhf: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/qt6-webengine/6.4.2-final+dfsg-12ubuntu4/+build/27929271. | 21:48 |
| mitya57 | However, the Qt5 version builds fine without it: https://launchpad.net/~ci-train-ppa-service/+archive/ubuntu/4979/+packages. Are you sure it's needed there? (If yes, I will commit it to my packaging repo in salsa.) | 21:48 |
| doko | mitya57: does the qt5 version build the third_party libs? for qt6 it looks like they are built and then discarded | 21:49 |
| juliank | I expect them all cleaned up when I get back to work :) | 21:49 |
| mitya57 | doko: According to the build log, breakpad and zlib/google/* are built, but not sqlite and the main part of zlib. | 21:53 |
| doko | mitya57: yes, that was a quick and dirty upload ... I was just guessing what else could go wrong ... | 22:05 |
| mitya57 | doko: no problem, I was just wondering if Simon had reasons for copying that patch to Qt 5 other than "it exists in Qt 6". | 22:20 |
| ahasenack | I'll take a look at clamav | 22:56 |
| Eickmeyer | mitya57: One of those probably trying to be proactive things.... a little TOO proactive. | 22:56 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!