| SamuelMarks | tomreyn: hmmmmmm | 00:34 |
|---|---|---|
| SamuelMarks | nautilus : Depends: nautilus-data (= 1:46~beta-0ubuntu3) but 1:46.0-0ubuntu1 is to be installed | 00:35 |
| Bashing-om | SamuelMarks: Due to backdoor in upstream xz/liblzma - downgrading the dependencies. | 00:43 |
| SamuelMarks | Bashing-om - ahhh | 01:48 |
| Bashing-om | SamuelMarks: See: What’s happening in Noble repositories? - https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/whats-happening-in-noble-repositories/43729 for greater info. | 01:51 |
| SamuelMarks | ahhh | 01:59 |
| alkisg | Hi all; should I be able to use secureboot=on with ubuntu 24.04? | 06:31 |
| alkisg | Also, what replaced http://packages.ubuntu.com/shim-signed in 24.04? | 06:31 |
| lotuspsychje | alkisg: currently noble is in a bit of flaky stage, due the xz you surely heared about | 09:05 |
| lotuspsychje | the installers are also being reworked, theres a lot going on | 09:06 |
| alkisg | lotuspsychje: I've had it installed since December, I'm not installing it now. But I can't invoke the secure boot configuration dialog for some reason | 09:07 |
| alkisg | I think that something has changed regarding shim, but I don't know what | 09:08 |
| lotuspsychje | i havent played much with the setups myself, maybe guiverc might know something^ | 09:09 |
| RikMills | alkisg: some amd64 binaries have been removed from the archive due to the xz issue and will be rebuild in time | 09:11 |
| RikMills | ahim-signed may have been one of those | 09:11 |
| RikMills | *shim | 09:12 |
| RikMills | if not that, then *shrug* | 09:13 |
| lotuspsychje | :p | 09:13 |
| alkisg | Thank you RikMills, that might explain it... | 09:14 |
| lotuspsychje | lets just wait until the storm is over | 09:15 |
| lotuspsychje | and apt drags in updates in | 09:15 |
| RikMills | yeah, at the moment even ISOs fail to build on basic deps | 09:16 |
| lotuspsychje | better be safe then sorry | 09:17 |
| guiverc | I've had secure boot on at times & off at others (virtualbox is easier with it off) but haven't probably had secure-boot enabled since before 28-March (I can't recall setting but suspect it's off currently) | 09:34 |
| lotuspsychje | ok tnx guiverc | 09:39 |
| ogra_ | alkisg, you can also not "enable" secureboot after installation (not sure what that parameter above refers to) it need to happen at install time since the setup is completely different | 11:10 |
| alkisg | ogra_: in the past, by just removing and reinstalling shim and grub-efi, it worked fine; is there an additional step now? How would one enable it afterwards? | 13:59 |
| alkisg | E.g. suppose you replaced a motherboard, you wouldn't want to reinstall.. | 13:59 |
| ogra_ | alkisg, if you use TPM based sceboot+full disk encryption your kernel comes as a snap package ... if you do not have that setup from the installer you can not switch | 14:01 |
| alkisg | Sure a new board wouldn't have the necessary TPM keys; I'm talking without involving encryption... | 14:02 |
| ogra_ | well, there the old way should still work i figure ... i dont think that was touched ... sorry, i thought you mean TPM based | 14:07 |
| alkisg | 👍 👍 👍 | 14:18 |
| ChmEarl | counted 298 t64 libs in Noble main, it won't be long till full migration from proposed, perhaps 24 more hours | 16:00 |
| RikMills | update on xz https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/xz-liblzma-security-update-post-2/43801 | 18:53 |
| === JanC is now known as Guest856 | ||
| cgmb | "pbuilder-dist noble amd64 create" is failing for me with the message "E: Couldn't find these debs: apt" from debootstrap | 22:31 |
| cgmb | Is that something I'm doing wrong, or is apt legitimately missing from the noble repos right now? | 22:32 |
| cgmb | full log: https://gist.github.com/cgmb/e19faab9d8e9348998884327801cc656 | 22:32 |
| quidnunc | cgmb: I don't know but apparently there is chaos due to the xz vulnerability and mass package rebuilding | 23:31 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!