| === JanC_ is now known as JanC | ||
| ChmEarl | missing amd64 versions of udev, libudev1 (255.4*) | 16:38 |
|---|---|---|
| ChmEarl | in noble, this is stopping installs | 16:39 |
| schopin | ChmEarl: Please see the communication around xz-utils on Discourse. The archive is basically broken right now, we're working to fix it. | 16:41 |
| quidnunc | Maybe topic should reference the xz problem | 16:46 |
| * ogra_ was about to suggest that, but then noticed how long it already is ... | 16:54 | |
| webchat78 | Hi. I would like ask about the latest status of Noble deb rebuilds due to 5.6 xz backout ? | 21:16 |
| BtbN | iirc noble never was on 5.6.x | 21:17 |
| webchat78 | Is there expected time to complete the rebuilds. GNOME and LXQT desktops are functional but KDE desktop does not update due to missing dependies. | 21:18 |
| webchat78 | I read from Ubuntu employee devs 5.6 xv build was in proposed Noble ? | 21:19 |
| webchat78 | My reference is https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/whats-happening-in-noble-repositories/43729/7 | 21:20 |
| webchat78 | and below ...."the compromised liblzma and xz-utils were present in the build environment of every amd64 package built since February 26. " | 21:22 |
| webchat78 | Anyway I wanted to know if there is expected time to complete the rebuilds so I can plan out when I will be doing my test machine updates. | 21:23 |
| BtbN | To me that sounds like they were installed on the build hosts | 21:26 |
| webchat78 | OK so 5.6 was never released in the Noble deb/snap packages but the servers for packaging and compiling had 5.6 xz | 21:31 |
| ChmEarl | cheers, udev 255.4* is in amd64 tree | 21:34 |
| ChmEarl | my test install passed | 21:36 |
| webchat78 | Just curious if xz compression is the default compression for any tools with Ubuntu ? kernel/modules/firmware/fwupd ? | 21:38 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!