[16:38] <ChmEarl> missing amd64 versions of udev, libudev1 (255.4*)
[16:39] <ChmEarl> in noble, this is stopping installs
[16:41] <schopin> ChmEarl: Please see the communication around xz-utils on Discourse. The archive is basically broken right now, we're working to fix it.
[16:46] <quidnunc> Maybe topic should reference the xz problem
[16:54]  * ogra_ was about to suggest that, but then noticed how long it already is ... 
[21:16] <webchat78> Hi.  I would like ask about the latest status of Noble deb rebuilds due to 5.6 xz backout ?
[21:17] <BtbN> iirc noble never was on 5.6.x
[21:18] <webchat78> Is there expected time to complete the rebuilds.  GNOME and LXQT desktops are functional but KDE desktop does not update due to missing dependies.
[21:19] <webchat78> I read from Ubuntu employee devs 5.6 xv build was in proposed Noble ?
[21:20] <webchat78> My reference is https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/whats-happening-in-noble-repositories/43729/7
[21:22] <webchat78> and below ...."the compromised liblzma and xz-utils were present in the build environment of every amd64 package built since February 26. "
[21:23] <webchat78> Anyway I wanted to know if there is expected time to complete the rebuilds so I can plan out when I will be doing my test machine updates.
[21:26] <BtbN> To me that sounds like they were installed on the build hosts
[21:31] <webchat78> OK so 5.6 was never released in the Noble deb/snap packages but the servers for packaging and compiling had 5.6 xz
[21:34] <ChmEarl> cheers, udev 255.4* is in amd64 tree
[21:36] <ChmEarl> my test install passed
[21:38] <webchat78> Just curious if xz compression is the default compression for any tools with Ubuntu ?  kernel/modules/firmware/fwupd  ?