/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2024/04/08/#ubuntu-release.txt

arraybolt3hmm, can't set up a Noble sbuild it seems. "dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of perl: perl depends on perl-modules-5.38 (>= 5.38.2-3.2build2); however: Version of perl-modules-5.38 on system is 5.38.2-3."00:27
arraybolt3I thought I saw something about this in here earlier but can't remember for sure.00:27
arraybolt3Ubuntu Server 24.04 installed just fine, but the mk-sbuild step bombed out with that.00:27
dbungertarraybolt3: yea, perl is sad.  if you get into the chroot an `apt -f install` should sort it out.01:02
arraybolt3awesome, thanks for confirming my fix worked :P01:04
arraybolt3(I had just apt installed the exact version of perl-modules-5.38 it wanted and it seemed to work)01:04
=== chris14_ is now known as chris14
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-wayland-cursor [armhf] (noble-proposed) [0.31.1-1]02:43
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-wayland-cursor [riscv64] (noble-proposed) [0.31.1-1]02:43
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-wayland-protocols [amd64] (noble-proposed) [0.31.0-1]02:43
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-wayland-protocols [armhf] (noble-proposed) [0.31.0-1]02:43
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-wayland-protocols [riscv64] (noble-proposed) [0.31.0-1]02:43
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-wayland-cursor [ppc64el] (noble-proposed) [0.31.1-1]02:43
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-wayland-protocols [arm64] (noble-proposed) [0.31.0-1]02:43
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-wayland-protocols [s390x] (noble-proposed) [0.31.0-1]02:43
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-wayland-cursor [s390x] (noble-proposed) [0.31.1-1]02:43
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-wayland-protocols [ppc64el] (noble-proposed) [0.31.0-1]02:43
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-wayland-cursor [amd64] (noble-proposed) [0.31.1-1]02:43
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-wayland-cursor [arm64] (noble-proposed) [0.31.1-1]02:43
vorlondid anyone get images sorted out wrt imath? it looks like it's still in noble-updates right now02:44
vorlonwell, looks like Ubuntu Kylin built, but Ubuntu Studio and Ubuntu Cinnamon have not02:46
vpa1977doing no change rebuild against go 1.22 of google-guest-agent google-osconfig-agent ipp-usb ubuntu-report zsys for zhsj02:49
liushuyuhttps://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-noble/noble/amd64/o/odin/20240408_014940_2585b@/log.gz so I discovered something strange, it failed to install libvtk9.0, but if I manually add libopenmpi3t64 to the test-depends it will work02:55
liushuyuIs this some form of apt solver issue?02:55
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted nvidia-graphics-drivers-535-server [amd64] (noble-proposed) [535.161.08-0ubuntu2]05:44
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted nvidia-graphics-drivers-535 [amd64] (noble-proposed) [535.171.04-0ubuntu2]05:44
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted nvidia-graphics-drivers-535-server [arm64] (noble-proposed) [535.161.08-0ubuntu2]05:44
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted nvidia-graphics-drivers-535 [arm64] (noble-proposed) [535.171.04-0ubuntu2]05:44
LocutusOfBorgvorlon, some i386 missing builds are: gkrellm-volume, abx avrp betaradio blktool blktrace bluez-btsco bro-aux care cbatticon cdcd ciopfs clamz connman-ui cutmp3 daemonlogger dares devilspie06:40
LocutusOfBorgdhcp-probe dnstop dvblast dynamips esniper fizmo-sdl2 fprobe gperiodic gphotofs gromit gst-plugins-espeak gtk-theme-switch gv gwaterfall gworldclock indicator-multiload ippsample06:42
LocutusOfBorgipwatchd kbdd komi kubuntu-debug-installer lazy-object-proxy lcas-lcmaps-gt4-interface lcmaps-plugins-voms libdumb libee libibtk lie lltdscan lrzsz06:43
LocutusOfBorglyskom-server madwimax matanza memstat metar moserial mspdebug multiwatch nstreams nuntius-linux obexfs06:45
ricotzhello SRU team :), please take a look at https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/205868707:07
-ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Launchpad bug 2058687 in libreoffice (Ubuntu Mantic) "[SRU] libreoffice 7.6.6 for mantic" [Medium, In Progress]07:07
LocutusOfBorgvorlon, I suspect the copy to updates bringed back lots of ppc64el and i386 binaries that were removed from release pocket07:10
LocutusOfBorghttps://paste.ubuntu.com/p/ZNcCvyGBHt/07:10
LocutusOfBorgthis is an incomplete list of stuff that will migrate if we clean it up again, but I don't know how to double check07:10
LocutusOfBorgoh lol ubuntu-archive: pyobjcryst was removed from noble, but restored in noble-updates only07:21
LocutusOfBorgthis is holding few transitions to finish07:21
LocutusOfBorgor maybe just boost to migrate, but hey07:22
LocutusOfBorgalso spek needs kick out on armhf07:26
jamespagemorning07:30
jamespageif there is an archive admin around the two syncs for python-* packages in the unapproved queue for noble will unblock the cloudkitty built, which in turn will unblock the failing autopkgtests for this package07:31
jamespageif they could be accepted that would be great - thx!07:31
jamespageand freezer-api needs rm'ing from noble (bug 2060205) - thats also failing autopkgtests and have been removed in debian07:32
-ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Bug 2060205 in freezer-api (Ubuntu) "RM freezer-api" [Undecided, New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/206020507:32
juliank<liushuyu> https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-noble/noble/amd64/o/odin/20240408_014940_2585b@/log.gz so I discovered something strange, it failed to install libvtk9.0, but if I manually add libopenmpi3t64 to the test-depends it will work07:52
juliankI think this might need some Breaks against pre-t64 libraries whacked in somewhere07:53
juliankPresumably libopenmpi3 wants a Breaks: libevent-pthreads-2.1-7 (<< t64 version)07:54
juliankNot sure why it's broken in the first place though on amd6407:55
juliankAh libopenmpi3 also got renamed07:56
juliankAnywhere somewhere further up the chain we need a rebuild and a couple of Breaks added certainly can't hurt07:56
cpaelzerhi LocutusOfBorg - I see the pyobjcryst you mention but have not yet learned the secret incantation to handle this case (-updates is immutable). Once sil2100 is around this might be a great chance to teach me to I can help on such cases as well.07:58
cpaelzeruntil then let me look at the cases of jamespage - starting on the rm bug07:58
jamespagethanks cpaelzer07:59
jamespageI'm also looking at the manila test failures - looks like an compatiblity with newer alembic that should be fixable07:59
ginggsLocutusOfBorg, cpaelzer: boost1.83 already has a hint to ignore the pyobjcryst regression, but boost1.83 is still blocked by openmpi08:12
cpaelzerthanks ginggs08:19
cpaelzerjamespage: I checked the removal, it is ok and done08:19
cpaelzerjamespage: what exactly are the python-* packages in the unapproved queue for noble to unblock cloudkitty?08:20
cpaelzerjamespage: I see python-influxdb-client and python-reactivex08:20
jamespagecpaelzer: yep those 2 - cloudkitty -> influxdb -> reactivex08:21
cpaelzerok, having a look ...08:22
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: liquidsoap (noble-proposed/primary) [2.2.4-1]08:27
LocutusOfBorgginggs, openmpi should go in next run08:28
LocutusOfBorgcpaelzer, thanks! this brings a question to release people, shouldn't we do a NCR every time we kick out an i386 binary?08:28
LocutusOfBorgthis way we have a new LP entry and we don't risk this kind of mismatches08:28
cpaelzerLocutusOfBorg: You mean NCRs to any rev-b-deps (to pick up most you could think of) or just to the pkg that no more builds the i386 binary (to have an entry there)?08:33
cpaelzerLocutusOfBorg: in case of the latter that would even serve as a nice place to hold a "here we dropped i386 binaries" message08:33
cpaelzerLocutusOfBorg: I didn't think into the problem enough to make a good call. And generally hesitate to add more builds (and the triggered tests) right now. But it might be worth to think about that as a good habit going forward08:35
cpaelzerjamespage: if this would not add support for an older version and not already be covered by influxdb3-python this check would be easier :-) Still reading details ...08:36
juliankLooking at https://magenta.jak-linux.org/ubuntu-archive/distcheck/noble/release-binaries.txt08:45
juliankWe have 2169 broken packages in noble amd64 release08:45
juliankBiggest blockers are unbound and llvm-defaults08:45
juliankThen libopenmpi3t6408:46
LocutusOfBorgthe latter08:46
schopinmkukri: if you're looking for something to do on +1 this week ^08:46
juliankin terms of package sizes08:46
juliank* counts08:46
LocutusOfBorgcpaelzer, also because many times you still see the i386 binary on launchpad package page, but the package is not anymore in devel release08:47
LocutusOfBorglook e.g. https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ocaml/4.14.1-1ubuntu108:47
mkukrii was looking at update excuses so far08:47
julianklibunbound8 breaks kubuntu and ubuntustudio08:47
LocutusOfBorgNoble: [FULLYBUILT] amd64 [FULLYBUILT] arm64 [FULLYBUILT] armhf [FULLYBUILT] i386 [FULLYBUILT] ppc64el [FULLYBUILT] riscv64 [FULLYBUILT] s390x08:47
LocutusOfBorgbut i386 ocaml was dropped months ago08:47
LocutusOfBorgI find it confusing08:47
schopinmkukri: well, sure, I'm just suggesting you start by working on migrating those packages ;)08:47
LocutusOfBorg(but hey! I'm not really asking more rebuilds now!)08:48
LocutusOfBorgI finished haskell foobar rebuilds, and it migrated08:48
LocutusOfBorgI'm moving and doing ocaml now08:48
mkukrischopin: suggestion taken :)08:50
mkukrii assume someone is already looking at unbound given it is top of the list?08:50
schopinNot sure?08:51
cpaelzerjamespage: python-reactivex is a general yes, but still a no due to https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=106689508:51
-ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Debian bug 1066895 in python3-reactivex "python-reactivex: duplicate of src:python-rx" [Serious, Open]08:51
mkukrii guess ill look at it than08:52
cpaelzerjamespage: would you mind uploading python-influxdb-client with a delta depending on python3-rx instead of python3-reactivex ?08:52
juliankhttps://magenta.jak-linux.org/ubuntu-archive/distcheck/noble/release-binaries.txt now has a summary08:52
juliank  * 235 packages depending on src:unbound08:52
juliank  * 179 packages depending on src:llvm-defaults08:52
juliank  * 152 packages depending on libopenmpi308:52
juliank  * 110 packages depending on libopencv-core40608:52
juliankIt lies a bit, some of those packages may be tasks08:52
dokowhy is spooles showing missing builds on i386? the i386 packages in noble-release are removed08:56
LocutusOfBorgdoko, -updates pocket08:57
LocutusOfBorgsee backlog08:57
juliankWe should have a daily freeze and cleanup updates08:57
cpaelzerjamespage: if you do not not, I have it ready and test built to act (1 reject, 1 upload, 1 accept)08:58
cpaelzerjamespage: just tell me to make it happen08:58
mkukriunbound seems to be blocked by ovn autopkgtest. which looks like it wants bzip2 from proposed08:58
jamespagecpaelzer: bah I missed that bug - apologies08:59
jamespageI'll sort that out now with a delta ontop of the synced version08:59
cpaelzerjamespage: np, just tell me if you are ok with that  approach08:59
jamespagecpaelzer: completely08:59
cpaelzerjamespage: as I said, I already have that delta and test built08:59
cpaelzerjamespage: I mostly want to hear a yes, do it that way08:59
jamespageI guess zigo just missed the existence of the package and repakaged it!08:59
jamespagecpaelzer: yes please :)08:59
cpaelzerok jamespage - the only follow up later is once zigo changed it in some way to ensure things follow accordingly in 24.10 and later09:00
jamespagethanks for the help :)09:00
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: rejected python-reactivex [sync] (noble-proposed) [4.0.4-1]09:01
mkukrilooking at ossp-uuid09:02
mkukri(while ovn test is running)09:02
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: rejected python-influxdb-client [sync] (noble-proposed) [1.40.0-1]09:02
LocutusOfBorglooking at opencv/vtk909:02
LocutusOfBorgopenmpi should be good09:02
upilsLooking at src:openvswitch09:03
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: python-influxdb-client (noble-proposed/primary) [1.40.0-1ubuntu1]09:05
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted python-influxdb-client [source] (noble-proposed) [1.40.0-1ubuntu1]09:07
mkukrihow to fix packages still depending on perlapi-5.36.0?09:08
dokomkukri: which packages, which pocket?09:10
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: python-influxdb-client [amd64] (noble-proposed/none) [1.40.0-1ubuntu1] (no packageset)09:10
mkukrii think this is a case of the rebuild against perl 5.38 not migrating09:10
mkukrilibdata-uuid-libuuid-perl it is, but it seems like fix is in proposed, so i am looking at the blockers now09:10
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted python-influxdb-client [amd64] (noble-proposed) [1.40.0-1ubuntu1]09:11
cpaelzerjamespage: fully through now09:12
mkukrihmm im not sure why libdata-uuid-libuuid-perl is uninstallable on armhf09:13
cpaelzerwaveform: thanks for checking the pemmican implications with me, resolving that now ...09:13
jamespagecpaelzer: thanks09:18
waveformcpaelzer, no problem!09:19
cpaelzerwaveform: MR merged and bug updated with step #109:19
mkukrisame deal for libdata-swap-perl as libdata-uuid-libuuid-perl09:21
mkukriapparently perl itself is uninstallable on armhf somehow?09:23
mkukrieven tho it is in -release?09:23
cpaelzerwaveform: the team bug subscription isn't yet set - do you have anyone around that can add that?09:23
mkukrii also get perl uninistallability errors when trying to deboostrap an armhf chroot09:23
upilsmkukri, it was hinted by silil2100 "force-badtest perl/5.38.2-3.2/armhf"09:24
upilsmaybe then we missed something?09:24
upils*sil210009:25
waveformcpaelzer, yes -- I'll do that now09:26
waveformdone09:27
mkukriit is specifically perl-modules-5.38 binary that seems to be the problem09:28
mkukri perl depends on perl-modules-5.38 (>= 5.38.2-3.2build2); however:  Version of perl-modules-5.38 on system is 5.38.2-3. where is the old perl-modules coming from?09:31
mkukrirmadison also says both versions exist in noble for some reason09:31
mkukriperl-modules-5.38 = 5.38.2-3 is not published according to launchpad but it is somehow getting installed?09:35
mkukriand i also get the same error on amd64? something seems broken09:37
mkukrilooking through the download log, all the other perl binaries seems to be the correct version, but it is pulling the old perl-modules-5.38 for some reason09:38
upilsCould someone with enough permission retry this build https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openvswitch/3.3.0-1build2/+build/28008804 please?09:51
upilsLoking at sendmail09:52
mkukrican someone with a better understanding of the archive provide some insight on the perl situation? the following output seems very weird:09:52
mkukriI: Retrieving perl 5.38.2-3.2build209:52
mkukriI: Validating perl 5.38.2-3.2build209:52
mkukriI: Retrieving perl-base 5.38.2-3.2build209:52
mkukriI: Validating perl-base 5.38.2-3.2build209:52
mkukriI: Retrieving perl-modules-5.38 5.38.2-309:52
mkukriI: Validating perl-modules-5.38 5.38.2-309:52
sil2100o/09:54
sil2100Let me try freezing the noble archive just for a moment to do a quick removal09:54
cpaelzersil2100: I have ruby3.1 to be removed as well, which isn't possible as long as not frozen - could you or me remove that as well while you freeze shortly?09:58
mkukriovn autopkgtest passed, unbound should be unblocked soon10:02
upilsCould someone with enough permission also retry this armhf build https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sendmail/8.18.1-1build3/+build/27994669please?10:09
upilslooking at astrometry.net meanwhile10:11
dokoupils: done10:12
dokojust went over https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?tag=ftbfs-impfuncdef;users=lucas@debian.org and synced ~140 package to fix ftbfs10:13
cpaelzerthanks waveform, done10:13
upilsdoko, thanks, can you also do this one I requested earlier https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openvswitch/3.3.0-1build2/+build/28008804 please?10:13
sil2100Ok, imath removed10:16
sil2100cpaelzer: aaaa10:16
sil2100cpaelzer: missed your message, sorry about that. Is it needed right now to unblock some builds, or can this wait when we're official in Beta freeze?10:18
cpaelzersil2100: it can wait10:21
cpaelzersil2100: I just wanted to use the chance when frozen anyway10:21
cpaelzersil2100: I can just as much keep my reminder open and act once we are there10:22
dokoupils: done. also synced https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sendmail/8.18.1-210:29
upilsThanks. Ok, thanks. Then I will for it to be synced and build to check if the armhf build failure persist10:31
dokoupils: it's always good to have a look at newer Debian uploads before investing time into a build failure10:35
LocutusOfBorgI'm syncing debian NMUs for time64_t armhf build fixes10:38
jamespagefix uploaded for alembic compat for manila - I think that should sort out the last few autopkgtest failures blocking stuff in the ubuntu-openstack package set10:50
dokosil2100: next time you freeze, please remove the spooles i386 binaries, blocking openmpi10:57
sil2100doko: is that the only thing blocking openmpi? Maybe we can just force hint it into then10:57
sil2100Uploading langpacks for Beta10:58
dokosil2100: no, still walking through packages with missing builds11:02
sil2100Rebuilding cinnamon and studio11:14
sil2100Oh no, LP died11:32
sil2100Sad, because it looked like the cinnamon and studio livefses seemed to have been building correctly up to this point11:33
fossfreedom_need to insert 50p into the launchpad meter to make it work again...11:34
sminezis launchpad dying a "we're all doomed!" situation or a "someone give it a kick" situation?11:36
sil2100Nah, just a normal outage, nothing to worry about11:44
sil2100The right people are on it right now11:44
smineznice11:46
dokoarraybolt3: there are still unity related ftbfs, like hud, indicator-*12:01
mkukriam looking at c2esp12:18
upilsI found that sendmail is part of the auto-db5.3 transition. Should I set it aside for now then?12:20
mkukrialso the old perl-modules being installed is still an issue12:21
mkukrialso looking at tree proposed migration12:31
mkukripul-lp-source is timeouting 503ing after really long timeouts currently12:38
ahasenackthere was a lp outage just a few moments ago12:44
fossfreedom_sil2100: ubuntucinnamon built! yay :) https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-cdimage/+livefs/ubuntu/noble/ubuntucinnamon/+build/602282  ... just the LP issues causing the built ISO to be transferred  properly.12:44
fossfreedom_not to be transferred...12:44
dokojamespage: openvswitch ftbfs on arm64 (test failure)12:47
upilssil2100,  sendmail/8.18.1-1build3 is now replaced with sendmail/8.18.1-2 (sync). Should we update the force-skiptest hint?12:47
jamespagefnordahl: have you got https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openvswitch/3.3.0-1build2/+build/28008804 on your todo list?12:50
fnordahljamespage: yes, looking at that atm12:51
jamespagefnordahl: great thanks :)12:51
fnordahlthe arm64 machines are quite loaded due to other release stuff, so it takes some time, the build failure reproduced over lunch so will hopefully have it patched soon12:52
upilsoh, I was also looking at it. I may have missed when it was taken.12:52
fnordahlupils: was that a comment for the openvswitch arm64 build failure or something else? I might have forgotten to switch bug status O8-) How far were you along if that was the case?12:54
upilsyes it was about openvswitch. Well I requested before launch a retry to make sure it was still broken and I was trying to understand what went wrong. So you can go ahead12:56
fnordahlack, thx upils12:56
upils*lunch12:57
schopinupils: re sendmail I wouldn't blindly change the hint since it's not a NCR.12:58
upilsschopin, good point. I guess I will wait for the next britney run to see if it migrates. If it does, then I can request for the hint to be removed or will we clean every xz-related hint at once when we are done?13:04
schopinI think we'll clean all hints afterwards.13:04
upilsok, cool13:05
* mkukri is looking at bash13:11
dokosil2100: I think I addressed all openmpi depending packages, either by removing, or fixing issues13:13
sil2100Ubuntu Cinnamon built successfully \o/13:15
sil2100Now doing the same for studio13:15
sil2100doko: checking, we can hint it in then if -updates is confusing britney13:16
dokosil2100: still needs some publisher runs13:22
sil2100hm, and I noticed I lost some of my cdimage commits, guess I again forgot a git push13:22
mkukriis faketime expected to be broken on armhf?13:41
mkukriand should i be trying to do anything about that?13:41
adrienmkukri: yes, no (I think)13:43
adrienmkukri: I think you could fix it but it's low priority13:44
adrienand mid-to-high complexity13:44
mkukriit's blocking bash migration (indirectly)13:44
schopinIs it blocking because its tests are broken? In which case a baseline test should be enough.13:46
sil2100Studio also successfully built \o/13:46
schopin\o/13:47
sil2100vorlon: I think the last one is the x13s, checking the logs13:47
mkukriit's blocking because dkim-rotate autopkgtest seems to be broken by faketime13:47
mkukriand dkim-rotate is blocking bash13:47
schopinSo, yes, faketime is broken, but the fix is pretty involved: you need to modify it to 1/ dlsym() the t64 symbols from glibc on armhf rather than the standard ones and 2/ export those symbols rather than the standard ones, but only on armhf.13:50
schopinAnd there are a *lot* of symbols.13:50
mkukrii am not sure if that is something i want to do as part of +113:51
mkukriwhat about hintign dkim-rotate test, or removing it on armhf?13:52
schopinmkukri: you can't remove it, it's arch:all.13:53
dokoLocutusOfBorg: please could you track your ftbfs at this stage? https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ferret-vis/7.6.0-7ubuntu113:54
mkukriah i see yes. it seems plausible tho that only its tests need faketime. so maybe hinting it is better?13:55
schopinmkukri: but isn't the baseline also broken?13:55
mkukrimaybe the migration-reference/0 test is out of date?13:57
mkukrii can't re-trigger it tho 'You submitted an invalid request: You are not allowed to upload dkim-rotate or migration-reference/0 to Ubuntu, thus you are not allowed to use this service.' didnt see one of these before13:57
LocutusOfBorgdoko, I am13:58
LocutusOfBorgI have like 60 tabs opened and I'll track them all13:58
LocutusOfBorgbtw, I'm syncing stuff that is already FTBFS on armhf, so there should be no risk of regressions13:59
schopinqa-help: please see mkukri's msg above as of 2mn ago13:59
upilswhere can I see if we decided not to build a given package for i386? (at looked on LP, in hints-ubuntu)? I would like to understand why the version of uw-imap in proposed was not built for i386. See https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/uw-imap13:59
upils(*I looked)14:00
fnordahlfwiw; there are some subtle differences between python3.12.2-4ubuntuX and python3.12.2-5ubuntuX which causes the build failure for openvswitch bug 206043414:00
-ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Bug 2060434 in openvswitch (Ubuntu) "[noble] FTBFS on failure in test vlog - Python3, change of behavior between Python 3.11 and 3.12" [Undecided, In Progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/206043414:00
fnordahlwe'll patch it, but worth highlihgting as this was an unexpected change to me14:00
parideandersson1234, ^^ can that be related to the charm update?14:03
mkukriwhen did that happen? i could trigger tests this morning14:04
mkukrididnt try any migration-reference/0s before this tho14:04
mkukri(that is not today, it worked in the past)14:05
dokoLocutusOfBorg: are you fixing ferret-vis? the armhf ftbfs is blocking openmpi14:05
schopinmkukri: meanwhile what's the link? :)14:06
schopin(in a meeting but I can still click things)14:06
mkukrihttps://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/request.cgi?release=noble&arch=armhf&package=dkim-rotate&trigger=migration-reference/014:06
schopindone14:07
mkukrithanks14:07
LocutusOfBorgdoko, not yet14:11
LocutusOfBorgbut it built14:11
LocutusOfBorgso yes its fixed14:11
LocutusOfBorgfix was in syncing of xgks 2.6.1+dfsg.2-1514:11
LocutusOfBorgbut slow LP was slow14:11
mkukridkim-rotate migration-reference/0 also failed now, so i guess that means bash migrating?14:17
schopinit it was the last holdout, yes.14:17
mkukriit looks like it yes14:17
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted lxml-html-clean [source] (noble-proposed) [0.1.0-0ubuntu1]14:40
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: lxml-html-clean [amd64] (noble-proposed/none) [0.1.0-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)14:42
juliankDoing 211 no-change rebuilds for time_t on amd6414:45
juliankThis will improve solver reliability14:47
juliankvorlon: ubuntu-sru: I'd like to ask for a blanket SRU exception for 24.04 until 24.04.1 or so for no-change uploads without SRU bugs14:54
juliankdoko, vorlon do we now when the gcc was published for time_t transition? I'm trying to write a report to see which packages haven't been rebuilt for time_t and frame pointers14:57
juliank* know14:57
juliank211 uploads done14:57
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected cloud-init [source] (focal-proposed) [24.1.3-0ubuntu1~20.04.1]14:58
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected cloud-init [source] (jammy-proposed) [24.1.3-0ubuntu1~22.04.1]14:58
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected cloud-init [source] (mantic-proposed) [24.1.3-0ubuntu1~23.10.1]14:58
juliankI have identified 88 source packages with binaries on armhf that still use old library names15:01
juliank  * stunnel4 depends on conflicting packages: libssl3t64=3.0.13-0ubuntu3 vs libssl3=3.0.10-1ubuntu415:02
juliank    - chain 2: libssl3:armhf (>= 3.0.0)15:02
juliankThis doesn't look nice15:02
juliankAh this still needs to migrate15:03
schopinIt's funny how some packages are recurring pains.15:04
juliankstunnel4 just didn't migrate yet15:05
juliankI'll go do the (unseeded) armhf uploads too, after all that shouldn't block anything and it makes britney sadder perhaps :)15:06
kanashirovorlon we have other packages not supporting yet ruby-rack 3.x, so we should keep thos packages just in -proposed for now. I filed some bugs to upstream projects but not all of them fixed the issues yet15:06
juliankNote I miss anything that is already in proposed15:08
juliankWhich is good for not blocking in-progress stuff15:08
juliankstunnel4 should be a priority due to being an apt test depends15:08
juliankI really want to keep/get the armhf apt tests working in noble release pocket15:09
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted lxml-html-clean [amd64] (noble-proposed) [0.1.0-0ubuntu1]15:10
tsimonq2sil2100: o/ I see you mentioned ubuntu-cdimage, and I'm actually working on an MP for Lubuntu right now. :)15:12
tsimonq2Would you be interested in reviewing?15:12
dokojuliank: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gcc-13/13.2.0-16ubuntu115:18
tsimonq2ubuntu-release: Feel free to discuss with me here or on the MP: https://code.launchpad.net/~lubuntu-dev/ubuntu-cdimage/+git/ubuntu-cdimage/+merge/46382515:18
juliankdoko: Not really helpful15:23
juliank Superseded on 2024-02-29 by armhf build of gcc-13 13.2.0-16ubuntu1 in ubuntu noble RELEASE15:23
juliankhmm15:23
juliankI guess just taking 1st of April is fine15:24
juliank2024-02-29 23:44:37 CET ~ 22:4415:24
upilsCan someone retry the 4 failing builds for https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/astrometry.net/0.93+dfsg-1.1build3 please? I retried the arm64 one locally and it worked fine.15:29
sergiodjupils: I retriggered the arm64 one, if it passes I'll retrigger the others15:30
upilsthanks, good call!15:32
juliankschopin, bdrung, sil2100, vorlon: https://magenta.jak-linux.org/ubuntu-archive/distcheck/noble/missing-rebuilds.txt now contains packages not rebuilt since the start of the t64 transition15:37
juliank# main: 1372 old packages15:37
juliank# restricted: 5 old packages15:37
juliank# universe: 27443 old packages15:37
juliank# multiverse: 411 old packages15:37
paridebdmurray, vorlon, I would be *very* interested in checking why rust-sequoia-wot got pulled from -proposed, but it migrated in the meantime, so I can't easily try to reproduce the issue and follow what's happening there.15:38
paridebdmurray, vorlon, if you spot something similar again please raise it with me15:38
juliankCounts include packages  that have a newer version in proposed15:38
schopinjuliank: how many package do we have in the archive? 27k untouched packages seems rather big.15:38
juliank$ grep ^Package root/var/lib/apt/lists/snapshot.ubuntu.com_ubuntu_dists_noble_*_source_Sources | wc -l15:39
juliank7481815:39
juliankschopin: ^15:39
juliank75k packages total, about 29k missing builds15:40
juliankSo we rebuilt about 60%15:40
schopinHuh. That's a lot of packages...15:40
juliankschopin: Oops bug15:40
juliankI forgot a :15:40
juliankgrep ^Package: root/var/lib/apt/lists/snapshot.ubuntu.com_ubuntu_dists_noble_*_source_Sources | wc -l15:41
juliank3742215:41
schopinAh. That's more like it.15:41
juliankSo yeah we rebuild barely ~21%15:41
juliank*rebuilt15:41
schopinSure but we can filter out quite a bit.15:42
juliankMany a Perl, Go, or Rust15:42
schopinIndeed.15:42
juliankLet me filter out packages only building Architecture: all15:42
juliankmuch better15:43
schopinYou'll still get the Rust packages though, because their -dev are arch:any for some reason related to apt solver.15:43
juliank# main: 465 old packages15:43
juliank# restricted: 5 old packages15:43
juliank# universe: 9750 old packages15:43
juliank# multiverse: 152 old packages15:43
dbungertsil2100: can you remove the "xz-utils worklist" note from the topic?  Those logs are offline right now, that list of seeded packages is no longer the focus.15:44
sil2100Ah! Yes15:44
sil2100On it15:44
dbungertthanks15:44
=== sil2100 changed the topic of #ubuntu-release to: Released: 23.10 Mantic Minotaur, 22.04.4 Jammy Jellyfish | Archive: Feature Freeze | Beta Freeze delayed till 8th of April | Highlight ubuntu-archive for archive admin help | We accept payment in cash, cheque or scotch | melius malum quod cognoscis | infinity, you are missed
juliankI can filter out src:rust-* src:golang-* src:haskell-*15:45
julianksrc:r-cran-*15:45
juliank?15:45
juliankAlso I guess those that are not actually for armhf15:45
juliankBut then we lose frame pointer information for amd6415:46
juliank# main: 465 old packages15:47
juliank# restricted: 5 old packages15:47
juliank# universe: 6408 old packages15:47
juliank# multiverse: 152 old packages15:47
bdrungjuliank, upload no-change rebuilds for those now?15:49
juliankDo we want to issue additional 465 (minus ones in proposed) rebuilds for main to make sure all of main has frame pointers?15:49
juliankI need to wait for my previous round to be processed to get a new report without them I suppose15:49
bdrung465 doesn't sound too bad to not do it.15:49
juliankyeah I wonder about universe though15:50
juliank453 without newer version in proposed15:50
juliankLet's see how many rebuilds it is if we ignore the ones I just did15:51
juliankUploading15:55
juliank"No change rebuild for 64-bit time_t and frame pointers."15:55
juliankCould check seeded packages in universe but annoying hackery15:56
juliankWell slightly annoying15:56
juliankSeriously need to integrate all tooling15:57
juliankI think cpio probably was a good idea: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cpio/2.15+dfsg-1ubuntu215:59
juliankI mean that would get funny timestamps15:59
juliankAh shoot, doko I uploaded gcc-defaults no-change rebuild but that's a bit pointless16:00
juliankplease remove that :D16:00
juliankMy script could have checked maybe if we actually have ELF binaries in the binary packages to avoid uploading meta packages16:00
juliankRunning all the signing operations via the yubikey (without tap to sign turned off temporarily) takes a long time16:01
juliankIt can sign one file at a time and each file takes like 500ms or so16:02
juliankeach upload has 3 files16:02
juliankso 1.5s for signing each upload16:02
juliankso ~10 minutes to upload everything16:03
bdrungthe on-disk format for cpio uses 8 bytes for a hex representation. so you could store 4 bytes aka 32 bit in it. so the on-disk format is still affected by the year 2038 bug16:04
juliankoof16:04
juliankhopefully it is unsigned16:04
juliankthen it wouldn't be affected16:05
juliank*NOT* touching anything already in proposed (again)16:07
juliankWho volunteers to run an armhf system set to 2040?16:08
bdrungshould be unsigned. so it will be hit by the year 2106 bug. i hope i retire before that date.16:08
juliankI guess just do 2044 so you can remember the 20 year offset16:08
juliankthen you can make sure everything works :D16:08
bdrungi have a zero 2 that i can use for this kind of test16:09
bdrungmtd-utils needs to be fixed to get it updated16:10
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: fwupd-efi (noble-proposed/main) [1:1.4-1 => 1:1.4-1build1] (no packageset)16:10
juliankI expect anything that has a newer version in proposed to get picked up by people working on other reports16:10
juliankOh please reject fwupd-efi16:11
juliankOh ubuntu-archive please reject fwupd-efi16:11
juliank(and remove gcc-defaults from proposed)16:11
juliankbusybox FTBFS on arm*16:11
juliank/<<PKGBUILDDIR>>/networking/tc.c:237:27: error: ‘TCA_CBQ_MAX’ undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean ‘TCA_CBS_MAX’?16:12
juliankfun16:12
juliankbunch more similar ones16:12
juliankbdrung: icu ftbfs16:12
juliankbut with python3-distutils : Depends: python3-lib2to3 (= 3.12.2-3ubuntu1.1) but it is not going to be installed16:12
juliankthis is weird16:12
bdrungpython3-distutils was dropped16:13
bdrungwe need to get rid of that one16:13
juliankAh yes16:13
juliankbdrung: I'll graciously say that's something for you to look at :)16:13
juliankbut maybe someone else already is, idk?16:14
bdrungi can work on the icu failure, but first let me take a bike break before it gets cold and dark16:14
juliankWe had python3-distutils reverse-build-depends fixup report, no?16:14
juliankbdrung: Go bike your brains out16:14
bdrungsee you later16:14
juliankUploading all the fan favorites today; cpio, , schroot, screen16:20
juliankRegarding the blanket SRU exception: It just makes sense, then we can keep the no-change uploads in proposed right where they are and release them once they look good16:21
juliankooh valgrind I'm uploading too, i did not know16:22
juliankIt's amazing how many packages haven't been rebuild since the ppc64el baseline bump in jammy16:24
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: servicelog (noble-proposed/main) [1.1.16-1 => 1.1.16-1build1] (core)16:24
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: shadow (noble-proposed/main) [1:4.13+dfsg1-4ubuntu1 => 1:4.13+dfsg1-4ubuntu2] (core, i386-whitelist)16:24
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: skiboot (noble-proposed/main) [7.0+dfsg-1build1 => 7.0+dfsg-1build2] (core)16:24
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: sg3-utils (noble-proposed/main) [1.46-3ubuntu3 => 1.46-3ubuntu4] (core)16:24
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: simplejson (noble-proposed/main) [3.19.2-1build1 => 3.19.2-1build2] (no packageset)16:24
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: smartmontools (noble-proposed/main) [7.4-2 => 7.4-2build1] (kubuntu)16:25
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: snowball (noble-proposed/main) [2.2.0-4 => 2.2.0-4build1] (core, i386-whitelist)16:25
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: sosreport (noble-proposed/main) [4.5.6-0ubuntu2 => 4.5.6-0ubuntu3] (ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server)16:25
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: sqlalchemy (noble-proposed/main) [1.4.50+ds1-1 => 1.4.50+ds1-1build1] (ubuntu-budgie)16:25
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: startup-notification (noble-proposed/main) [0.12-6build2 => 0.12-6build3] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist)16:25
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: swedish (noble-proposed/main) [1.4.5-3 => 1.4.5-3build1] (ubuntu-desktop)16:25
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: sysfsutils (noble-proposed/main) [2.1.1-6 => 2.1.1-6build1] (core, i386-whitelist)16:25
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: sysstat (noble-proposed/main) [12.6.1-1ubuntu1 => 12.6.1-1ubuntu2] (ubuntu-server)16:25
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: tar (noble-proposed/main) [1.35+dfsg-3 => 1.35+dfsg-3build1] (core, i386-whitelist)16:25
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: tidy-html5 (noble-proposed/main) [2:5.6.0-11ubuntu1 => 2:5.6.0-11ubuntu2] (ubuntu-server)16:25
juliankOh did someone turn on freeze during this batch of uploads, huh16:25
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: snappy (noble-proposed/main) [1.1.10-1 => 1.1.10-1build1] (core, i386-whitelist)16:25
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: speex (noble-proposed/main) [1.2.1-2ubuntu1 => 1.2.1-2ubuntu2] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist, ubuntu-server)16:25
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: strace (noble-proposed/main) [6.6-0ubuntu1 => 6.6-0ubuntu2] (core, i386-whitelist)16:25
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: syslinux (noble-proposed/main) [3:6.04~git20190206.bf6db5b4+dfsg1-3ubuntu2 => 3:6.04~git20190206.bf6db5b4+dfsg1-3ubuntu3] (no packageset)16:25
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: tftp-hpa (noble-proposed/main) [5.2+20150808-1.4 => 5.2+20150808-1.4build1] (ubuntu-server)16:25
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: sonic (noble-proposed/main) [0.2.0-13 => 0.2.0-13build1] (i386-whitelist, ubuntu-desktop)16:25
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: sysconfig (noble-proposed/main) [0.0.14ubuntu2 => 0.0.14ubuntu3] (core)16:25
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: time (noble-proposed/main) [1.9-0.2 => 1.9-0.2build1] (core, i386-whitelist)16:25
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: squashfs-tools (noble-proposed/main) [1:4.6.1-1 => 1:4.6.1-1build1] (core, i386-whitelist)16:25
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: t1utils (noble-proposed/main) [1.41-4build2 => 1.41-4build3] (core, i386-whitelist)16:25
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: sysvinit (noble-proposed/main) [3.08-6ubuntu2 => 3.08-6ubuntu3] (core, i386-whitelist)16:25
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: tdb (noble-proposed/main) [1.4.10-1 => 1.4.10-1build1] (core, i386-whitelist)16:25
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: twolame (noble-proposed/main) [0.4.0-2build2 => 0.4.0-2build3] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist, ubuntu-server)16:25
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: unzip (noble-proposed/main) [6.0-28ubuntu3 => 6.0-28ubuntu4] (core, i386-whitelist)16:25
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: usbutils (noble-proposed/main) [1:017-3 => 1:017-3build1] (core, i386-whitelist)16:25
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: vulkan-loader (noble-proposed/main) [1.3.275.0-1 => 1.3.275.0-1build1] (core, i386-whitelist)16:25
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: taglib (noble-proposed/main) [1.13.1-1 => 1.13.1-1build1] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist, ubuntu-server)16:25
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: uchardet (noble-proposed/main) [0.0.8-1 => 0.0.8-1build1] (core, i386-whitelist)16:25
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: voikko-fi (noble-proposed/main) [2.5-1 => 2.5-1build1] (ubuntu-desktop)16:25
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: tinycdb (noble-proposed/main) [0.81-1 => 0.81-1build1] (ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server)16:25
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: wdiff (noble-proposed/main) [1.2.2-6 => 1.2.2-6build1] (core, i386-whitelist)16:25
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: usb-modeswitch (noble-proposed/main) [2.6.1-3ubuntu2 => 2.6.1-3ubuntu3] (desktop-core)16:25
juliankwc -l rebuild-for.log16:26
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: uucp (noble-proposed/main) [1.07-28 => 1.07-28build1] (core)16:26
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: virglrenderer (noble-proposed/main) [1.0.0-1ubuntu1 => 1.0.0-1ubuntu2] (ubuntu-server)16:26
juliank446 rebuild-for.log16:26
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: wayland (noble-proposed/main) [1.22.0-2.1 => 1.22.0-2.1build1] (core, i386-whitelist, xorg)16:26
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: websockify (noble-proposed/main) [0.10.0+dfsg1-5build1 => 0.10.0+dfsg1-5build2] (no packageset)16:26
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: valgrind (noble-proposed/main) [1:3.22.0-0ubuntu2 => 1:3.22.0-0ubuntu3] (i386-whitelist, ubuntu-desktop)16:26
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: webrtc-audio-processing (noble-proposed/main) [0.3.1-0ubuntu5 => 0.3.1-0ubuntu6] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist)16:26
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: wavpack (noble-proposed/main) [5.6.0-1 => 5.6.0-1build1] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist, ubuntu-server)16:26
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: wireguard (noble-proposed/main) [1.0.20210914-1ubuntu3 => 1.0.20210914-1ubuntu4] (no packageset)16:26
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: xauth (noble-proposed/main) [1:1.1.2-1 => 1:1.1.2-1build1] (core, i386-whitelist)16:26
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: xcb-util-keysyms (noble-proposed/main) [0.4.0-1build3 => 0.4.0-1build4] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist)16:26
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: xcb-util (noble-proposed/main) [0.4.0-1build2 => 0.4.0-1build3] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist)16:26
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: woff2 (noble-proposed/main) [1.0.2-2 => 1.0.2-2build1] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist)16:26
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: xcb-util-renderutil (noble-proposed/main) [0.3.9-1build3 => 0.3.9-1build4] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist)16:26
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: xcb-util-image (noble-proposed/main) [0.4.0-2 => 0.4.0-2build1] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist)16:26
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: fwupd-efi (noble-proposed/main) [1:1.4-1build1 => 1:1.4-1build1] (no packageset)16:27
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: xdg-user-dirs (noble-proposed/main) [0.18-1 => 0.18-1build1] (core)16:27
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: xfonts-utils (noble-proposed/main) [1:7.7+6build2 => 1:7.7+6build3] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist)16:27
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: xft (noble-proposed/main) [2.3.6-1 => 2.3.6-1build1] (core, i386-whitelist, xorg)16:27
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: xinput (noble-proposed/main) [1.6.4-1 => 1.6.4-1build1] (desktop-core)16:27
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: xserver-xorg-video-amdgpu (noble-proposed/main) [23.0.0-1 => 23.0.0-1build1] (desktop-core)16:27
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: xserver-xorg-video-dummy (noble-proposed/main) [1:0.4.0-1 => 1:0.4.0-1build1] (desktop-core, xorg)16:27
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: xserver-xorg-video-qxl (noble-proposed/main) [0.1.6-1 => 0.1.6-1build1] (desktop-core, xorg)16:27
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: xserver-xorg-video-vmware (noble-proposed/main) [1:13.4.0-1 => 1:13.4.0-1build1] (desktop-core, xorg)16:27
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: yajl (noble-proposed/main) [2.1.0-5 => 2.1.0-5build1] (ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server)16:27
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: xcb-util-wm (noble-proposed/main) [0.4.1-1.1build2 => 0.4.1-1.1build3] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist)16:27
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: xfsdump (noble-proposed/main) [3.1.11-0.1 => 3.1.11-0.1build1] (core)16:27
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: xorg (noble-proposed/main) [1:7.7+23ubuntu2 => 1:7.7+23ubuntu3] (core, xorg)16:27
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: xserver-xorg-video-fbdev (noble-proposed/main) [1:0.5.0-2build1 => 1:0.5.0-2build2] (desktop-core, xorg)16:27
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: xxhash (noble-proposed/main) [0.8.2-2 => 0.8.2-2build1] (core, i386-whitelist)16:27
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: zip (noble-proposed/main) [3.0-13 => 3.0-13build1] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist, ubuntu-server)16:27
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: xf86-input-wacom (noble-proposed/main) [1:1.2.0-1ubuntu1 => 1:1.2.0-1ubuntu2] (desktop-core, xorg)16:27
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: xserver-xorg-video-ati (noble-proposed/main) [1:22.0.0-1 => 1:22.0.0-1build1] (desktop-core, xorg)16:27
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: yaml-cpp (noble-proposed/main) [0.8.0+dfsg-6 => 0.8.0+dfsg-6build1] (ubuntu-desktop)16:27
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: xinit (noble-proposed/main) [1.4.1-0ubuntu4 => 1.4.1-0ubuntu5] (desktop-core)16:27
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: zope.interface (noble-proposed/main) [6.1-1 => 6.1-1build1] (ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server, zope)16:27
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: xserver-xorg-video-vesa (noble-proposed/main) [1:2.6.0-1 => 1:2.6.0-1build1] (desktop-core, xorg)16:27
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: xserver-xorg-video-intel (noble-proposed/main) [2:2.99.917+git20210115-1 => 2:2.99.917+git20210115-1build1] (desktop-core, xorg)16:27
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: zsh (noble-proposed/main) [5.9-6ubuntu1 => 5.9-6ubuntu2] (core, i386-whitelist)16:27
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: fwupd-efi (noble-proposed/main) [1:1.4-1build1 => 1:1.4-1build1] (no packageset)16:32
vorlonubiquity currently build-depends on NBS gir1.2-webkit2-4.0.  as far as I can see, all flavors are now migrated to a different installer than ubiquity for noble.  Should I just drop building of ubiquity-frontend-gtk in noble? leaving only oem-config16:35
Eickmeyervorlon: I believe that's correct, we discussed that a lot during flavor sync with seb128 and jbicha.16:36
juliankIf it's wrong we'll see either way :D16:37
Eickmeyerjuliank: If it's wrong I'm sure someone is getting bonked. :D16:37
EickmeyerOne warning: even oem-config uses the slideshow, so I'm not sure if that needs all of the webkit components or not.16:38
=== halves8 is now known as halves
juliankbusybox ftbfs everywhere16:43
juliankit's very bad16:43
juliankmain: src:linux-ibm16:44
juliankmain: src:linux-laptop16:44
juliankmain: src:linux-meta-ibm16:44
juliankmain: src:linux-meta-starfive16:44
juliankmain: src:linux-signed-ibm16:44
juliankmain: src:linux-starfive16:44
juliankeek16:44
julianklinux-ibm clearly FTBAS16:46
juliankbut I guess the others did get uploaed16:46
juliankwell the -signed one at least did not :)16:47
juliankDoesn't seem intentional that we release noble with older versions of linux-laptop and linux-starfive than mantic16:48
juliankshould they be dropped from noble and come back in -updates?16:49
juliankShould we copy the mantic ones up?16:49
juliankI cancelled their builds at least16:50
dokojuliank: do you want to have the gcc-defaults upload removed?16:52
juliankdoko: yes please16:52
juliankdoko: and linux-laptop  linux-starfive linux-meta-starfive if you are so inclined :)16:53
dokojuliank: it's a shame that you're backing out so quickly from kernel and toolchain maintenance ;p16:54
julianklibeatmydata FTBFS with /usr/include/features-time64.h:26:5: error: #error "_TIME_BITS=64 is allowed only with _FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64"16:55
juliankpeculiar16:55
juliank(on armhf)16:55
ginggsjuliank: do you still need fwupd-efi rejected?16:56
juliankit literally says  -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -D_TIME_BITS=64  right before16:56
juliankginggs: Ah yes, and archive admin removal of the source upload16:56
arraybolt3doko: (re unity related build failures) Understood.16:57
dokojuliank: fixing libeatmydata16:57
juliankThe linux-starfive kernel should be dropped from Noble.16:58
juliank[1~16:58
juliank(from kernel team)16:58
juliankso we should drop  src:linux-meta-starfive src:linux-starfive from release pocket too16:58
dokojuliank: is there an issue open about that?16:59
juliankAh let me file issue17:00
juliankI forgot17:00
ginggsjuliank: i see fwupd-efi armhf, arm64 and amd64 in the unapproved queue, which i can probably reject, but i can't do anything about the source upload17:00
juliankginggs: yes thanks, reject those17:00
juliankdoko: please remove fwupd-efi upload in proposed?17:00
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected fwupd-efi [amd64] (noble-proposed) [1:1.4-1build1]17:01
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected fwupd-efi [arm64] (noble-proposed) [1:1.4-1build1]17:01
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: servicelog (noble-proposed/main) [1.1.16-1 => 1.1.16-1build1] (core)17:01
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected fwupd-efi [armhf] (noble-proposed) [1:1.4-1build1]17:02
dokojuliank: done17:02
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libeatmydata (noble-proposed/main) [131-1build1 => 131-1ubuntu1] (core, i386-whitelist)17:02
juliankdoko: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-meta-starfive/+bug/206056017:03
-ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Launchpad bug 2060560 in linux-starfive (Ubuntu) "Remove obsolete kernels from noble" [Undecided, New]17:03
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: livecd-rootfs (noble-proposed/main) [24.04.57 => 24.04.58] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist)17:03
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted livecd-rootfs [source] (noble-proposed) [24.04.58]17:05
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: servicelog (noble-proposed/main) [1.1.16-1 => 1.1.16-1build1] (core)17:05
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: trace-cmd (noble-proposed/universe) [3.2-1ubuntu1 => 3.2-1ubuntu2] (no packageset)17:08
dokojuliank: libeatmydata uploaded, waiting: ^^^17:08
juliankack17:08
juliankthanks17:09
philrocheWe found another issue in livecd-rootfs https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/livecd-rootfs/+bug/2060558 which will block noble cloud-images with snaps preseeded from being seeded correctly. Fix MP @ https://code.launchpad.net/~philroche/livecd-rootfs/+git/livecd-rootfs/+merge/463836 . Could a core-dev review please?17:15
-ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Launchpad bug 2060558 in livecd-rootfs (Ubuntu Noble) "AppArmor profile `unconfined_restrictions` missing for noble 6.8 kernel" [Undecided, New]17:15
=== alucardromero7 is now known as alucardromero
juliankjbicha: Maybe you want to look at this FTBFS https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libsigc++-2.0/2.12.1-1build1 - your the Debian maintainer after all17:21
juliankjamespage: It seems this also is solely a python3-distutils issue, though17:22
juliankjbicha: : It seems this also is solely a python3-distutils issue, though17:22
julianksorry about that17:22
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cloud-init (focal-proposed/main) [23.4.4-0ubuntu0~20.04.1 => 24.1.3-0ubuntu1~20.04.1] (core, edubuntu, ubuntu-cloud)17:28
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cloud-init (jammy-proposed/main) [23.4.4-0ubuntu0~22.04.1 => 24.1.3-0ubuntu1~22.04.1] (core, ubuntu-cloud)17:28
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cloud-init (mantic-proposed/main) [23.4.4-0ubuntu0~23.10.1 => 24.1.3-0ubuntu1~23.10.2] (core, ubuntu-cloud)17:30
vorlonjuliank: linux-laptop is obsolete and merged into linux-generic in noble17:37
vorlondoko: so noble has ghdl 2.0, noble-updates has ghdl 3.0, and noble-proposed has ghdl 4.0 which fails its tests.  How do we proceed on this?17:58
vorlontsimonq2: would you be ok with rounding these lubuntu size limits up to the nearest 100MB? I've tried to avoid going any more fine-grained than that as I think it just contributes to greater churn on the limit code while providing no value18:02
tsimonq2vorlon: Works for me :)18:06
tsimonq2vorlon: Do you want to do it when merging, or would you like me to do it? no preference18:06
vorlontsimonq2: faster if you do it I think18:07
tsimonq2vorlon: . :)18:09
vorlonoh, oem-config-gtk depends on ubiquity-frontend-gtk? that's not very nice18:18
vorlonguess I'll bump the webkit dependency instead18:18
bdrungback after 34.6 km in 100 min. i'll work on icu now.18:18
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted xserver-xorg-video-intel [source] (noble-proposed) [2:2.99.917+git20210115-1build1]18:20
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted xserver-xorg-video-vmware [source] (noble-proposed) [1:13.4.0-1build1]18:21
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted zsh [source] (noble-proposed) [5.9-6ubuntu2]18:21
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted zope.interface [source] (noble-proposed) [6.1-1build1]18:21
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted xserver-xorg-video-qxl [source] (noble-proposed) [0.1.6-1build1]18:23
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted yajl [source] (noble-proposed) [2.1.0-5build1]18:23
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted zip [source] (noble-proposed) [3.0-13build1]18:23
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted xxhash [source] (noble-proposed) [0.8.2-2build1]18:23
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted yaml-cpp [source] (noble-proposed) [0.8.0+dfsg-6build1]18:23
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted xserver-xorg-video-amdgpu [source] (noble-proposed) [23.0.0-1build1]18:26
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted xserver-xorg-video-dummy [source] (noble-proposed) [1:0.4.0-1build1]18:26
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted xserver-xorg-video-vesa [source] (noble-proposed) [1:2.6.0-1build1]18:26
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted xserver-xorg-video-ati [source] (noble-proposed) [1:22.0.0-1build1]18:26
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted xserver-xorg-video-fbdev [source] (noble-proposed) [1:0.5.0-2build2]18:26
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted xfonts-utils [source] (noble-proposed) [1:7.7+6build3]18:28
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted xft [source] (noble-proposed) [2.3.6-1build1]18:28
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted xorg [source] (noble-proposed) [1:7.7+23ubuntu3]18:28
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted xfsdump [source] (noble-proposed) [3.1.11-0.1build1]18:28
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted xinput [source] (noble-proposed) [1.6.4-1build1]18:28
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted xcb-util-renderutil [source] (noble-proposed) [0.3.9-1build4]18:30
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted xdg-user-dirs [source] (noble-proposed) [0.18-1build1]18:30
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted xinit [source] (noble-proposed) [1.4.1-0ubuntu5]18:30
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted xcb-util-wm [source] (noble-proposed) [0.4.1-1.1build3]18:30
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted xf86-input-wacom [source] (noble-proposed) [1:1.2.0-1ubuntu2]18:30
vorlontrying a manual hint for pmix+openmpi, the autohint has binary removals and is hitting the exception again18:31
vorlon+vtk9+opencv18:31
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted woff2 [source] (noble-proposed) [1.0.2-2build1]18:32
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted xcb-util-image [source] (noble-proposed) [0.4.0-2build1]18:32
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted xcb-util [source] (noble-proposed) [0.4.0-1build3]18:32
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted xauth [source] (noble-proposed) [1:1.1.2-1build1]18:32
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted xcb-util-keysyms [source] (noble-proposed) [0.4.0-1build4]18:32
=== sergiodj_ is now known as sergiodj
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted uucp [source] (noble-proposed) [1.07-28build1]18:36
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted wayland [source] (noble-proposed) [1.22.0-2.1build1]18:36
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted wireguard [source] (noble-proposed) [1.0.20210914-1ubuntu4]18:36
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted virglrenderer [source] (noble-proposed) [1.0.0-1ubuntu2]18:36
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted webrtc-audio-processing [source] (noble-proposed) [0.3.1-0ubuntu6]18:36
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted valgrind [source] (noble-proposed) [1:3.22.0-0ubuntu3]18:39
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted wavpack [source] (noble-proposed) [5.6.0-1build1]18:39
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted websockify [source] (noble-proposed) [0.10.0+dfsg1-5build2]18:39
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted vulkan-loader [source] (noble-proposed) [1.3.275.0-1build1]18:39
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted wdiff [source] (noble-proposed) [1.2.2-6build1]18:39
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted sysvinit [source] (noble-proposed) [3.08-6ubuntu3]18:40
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted usb-modeswitch [source] (noble-proposed) [2.6.1-3ubuntu3]18:40
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted voikko-fi [source] (noble-proposed) [2.5-1build1]18:40
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted twolame [source] (noble-proposed) [0.4.0-2build3]18:40
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted usbutils [source] (noble-proposed) [1:017-3build1]18:40
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted taglib [source] (noble-proposed) [1.13.1-1build1]18:47
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted tinycdb [source] (noble-proposed) [0.81-1build1]18:47
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted unzip [source] (noble-proposed) [6.0-28ubuntu4]18:47
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted tdb [source] (noble-proposed) [1.4.10-1build1]18:47
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted uchardet [source] (noble-proposed) [0.0.8-1build1]18:47
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted sysfsutils [source] (noble-proposed) [2.1.1-6build1]18:50
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted t1utils [source] (noble-proposed) [1.41-4build3]18:50
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted time [source] (noble-proposed) [1.9-0.2build1]18:50
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted sysstat [source] (noble-proposed) [12.6.1-1ubuntu2]18:50
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted tar [source] (noble-proposed) [1.35+dfsg-3build1]18:50
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted speex [source] (noble-proposed) [1.2.1-2ubuntu2]18:54
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted sysconfig [source] (noble-proposed) [0.0.14ubuntu3]18:54
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted tftp-hpa [source] (noble-proposed) [5.2+20150808-1.4build1]18:54
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted swedish [source] (noble-proposed) [1.4.5-3build1]18:54
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted tidy-html5 [source] (noble-proposed) [2:5.6.0-11ubuntu2]18:54
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted syslinux [source] (noble-proposed) [3:6.04~git20190206.bf6db5b4+dfsg1-3ubuntu3]18:54
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted snowball [source] (noble-proposed) [2.2.0-4build1]18:57
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted squashfs-tools [source] (noble-proposed) [1:4.6.1-1build1]18:57
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted strace [source] (noble-proposed) [6.6-0ubuntu2]18:57
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted sonic [source] (noble-proposed) [0.2.0-13build1]18:57
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted startup-notification [source] (noble-proposed) [0.12-6build3]18:57
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: icu (noble-proposed/main) [74.2-1ubuntu2 => 74.2-1ubuntu3] (core, i386-whitelist)18:58
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted sg3-utils [source] (noble-proposed) [1.46-3ubuntu4]18:59
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted snappy [source] (noble-proposed) [1.1.10-1build1]18:59
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted sqlalchemy [source] (noble-proposed) [1.4.50+ds1-1build1]18:59
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted smartmontools [source] (noble-proposed) [7.4-2build1]18:59
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted sosreport [source] (noble-proposed) [4.5.6-0ubuntu3]18:59
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted servicelog [source] (noble-proposed) [1.1.16-1build1]19:00
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted simplejson [source] (noble-proposed) [3.19.2-1build2]19:00
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted shadow [source] (noble-proposed) [1:4.13+dfsg1-4ubuntu2]19:00
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted skiboot [source] (noble-proposed) [7.0+dfsg-1build2]19:00
dokovorlon: I filed upstream bugs for ghdl. the good thing is that at least one of the backends passes it's tests on each arch. feel free to accpt these now. I can mark these reported issues as flaky on these archs, or just stop building them19:02
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted icu [source] (noble-proposed) [74.2-1ubuntu3]19:09
dbungertfossfreedom_: https://code.launchpad.net/~dbungert/livecd-rootfs/+git/livecd-rootfs/+merge/463841 - I assume yes but would you confirm?19:47
bdmurraydbungert: philroche is also working on a livecd-rootfs upload if you want to mash them up https://code.launchpad.net/~philroche/livecd-rootfs/+git/livecd-rootfs/+merge/46383619:55
dbungertbdmurray: agree, batching livecd-rootfs uploads makes sense19:58
fossfreedom_dbungert nice find. Yes ... 💯19:59
dbungertthanks!20:00
vorlondoko: do you think the tests are actually flaky?20:10
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: livecd-rootfs (noble-proposed/main) [24.04.58 => 24.04.59] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist)20:13
dokovorlon: https://github.com/ghdl/ghdl/issues/2642#issuecomment-204353556120:16
-ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Issue 2642 in ghdl/ghdl "4.0.0: issue880 and ticket24 tests fail on amd64 with the mcode backend" [Open]20:16
dbungertubuntu-release: please approve livecd-rootfs 24.04.5920:25
bdmurraylooking20:26
juliankSomething is wrong with libquazip5-120:27
juliankAh I see lol https://git.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libquazip/tree/debian/libquazip5-1t64.symbols.amd6420:29
juliankthey use an amd64-only symbols file that says libquazip5-1 still20:29
juliankCouple of awkward bits as I just realized my report wants to rebuild e2fsprogs against itself it doesn't quite understand a rename being undone20:31
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted livecd-rootfs [source] (noble-proposed) [24.04.59]20:31
juliankIt somehow missed the Tasks for krb5, not sure why though20:32
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: timidity (noble-proposed/universe) [2.14.0-8.2 => 2.14.0-8.2ubuntu1] (kubuntu)20:33
juliankApologies this is fixed now, I only rebuilt seeded packages where seeded binary name == source name by accident20:33
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: c2esp (noble-proposed/main) [27-11ubuntu5 => 27-11ubuntu6] (desktop-core)20:34
juliankgot some more now https://magenta.jak-linux.org/ubuntu-archive/distcheck/noble/global-ben.rebuild-for.txt20:34
juliankbut maybe it hasn't picked up all the uploads yet20:34
juliankI'll have a look at the report tomorrow morning or maybe vorlon wants to look at the report; I think uuid migrated and that causes new rebuilds to appear on amd6420:40
julianks/migrated/built/20:41
juliankYou can grep task: it20:41
juliankor like grep task:minimal20:41
juliankAh ooh so it shows you the task if any of the binaries is affected, but it's not necessarily the seeded binary20:42
juliankIt's bolting tasks back on after calculating source packages in the transition20:42
vorlonlol ubiquity ftbfs because of mixed soup2.4/soup3 symbols, and timezonemap still uses soup2.420:45
juliankok so https://magenta.jak-linux.org/ubuntu-archive/distcheck/noble/global-ben.rebuild-for.txt now tracks tasks correctly in the comments20:47
juliankSo it only shows task: comments if the binary causing the rebuild is seeded in that task20:47
julianke.g. if src:foo has foo-1, foo-2; and foo-1 is seeded in T and foo-2 is not, but foo-2 depends on libssl3, it doesn't show task:T anymore20:48
juliankIt only shows task:T if foo1 is causing the rebuild :)20:48
juliankoutstanding are 5 packages in standard, 7 in minimal, and 63 in ubuntu-desktop picked up bad library names during xz-utils mitigation20:51
juliankand 57 for ubuntu-desktop-minimal20:51
julianknot sure if overlap20:51
juliankoverlap is 620:51
juliankugh that is 310 packages in total that are seeded and did not pick up t64 names20:52
juliankI think it still has problems with reverted transitions though20:53
juliankmuch better now20:56
juliankIt got messed up by me adding Provides handling for perlapi and so on20:56
juliankAnyway not much difference20:57
mwhudsonjuliank: fwiw i have a ticket called "finalize time_t migration" for this pulse, feel free to brain dump anything i can help with on it (https://warthogs.atlassian.net/browse/FR-7271)20:58
juliankmwhudson: I think it's a bit optimistically named20:59
vladimirpjuliank: same https://warthogs.atlassian.net/browse/FR-733621:00
juliankmwhudson: Albeit if you just think about armhf it's looking ok https://magenta.jak-linux.org/ubuntu-archive/distcheck/noble.armhf/global-ben.rebuild-for.txt21:00
juliankhttps://magenta.jak-linux.org/ubuntu-archive/distcheck/noble.armhf/global-ben.txt is much unhappier21:01
juliankAs is https://magenta.jak-linux.org/ubuntu-archive/distcheck/noble/global-ben.rebuild-for.txt21:01
juliankit says we have 269 seeded packages now that still depend on the old names in amd6421:01
juliankdue to xz-utils regressions21:01
juliankI don't think we want to start rebuilds for them now, but I don't know21:02
juliankI just literally did `curl https://magenta.jak-linux.org/ubuntu-archive/distcheck/noble/global-ben.rebuild-for.txt  | grep task: | parallel` earlier (with gnu parallel), but I had missed some tasks as explained21:02
juliankWe can do more targeted fixes for the solver for these21:02
mwhudsonjuliank: yes probably21:02
juliankI think right now it's sort out anything that is in -updates and lower in release first21:03
juliankThen fix other FTBFS in proposed21:03
juliankBut I also uploaded uploads for everything not rebuilt in main since March21:04
juliankso even if we missed some libraries in main, they'd all get rebuilt21:04
juliankSo main should be fully t64 safe in the end if we can get everything to migrate21:04
juliankNot for 3rd party debs21:04
juliankBut safe within the archive; and this will give us a solid base for Core and snaps21:05
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted c2esp [source] (noble-proposed) [27-11ubuntu6]21:25
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: openvswitch (noble-proposed/main) [3.3.0-1build2 => 3.3.0-1ubuntu1] (core)21:26
fnordahl^ fixes FTBFS for openvswitch introduced by update to the python3.12 package ref bug 206043421:29
-ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Bug 2060434 in openvswitch (Ubuntu) "[noble] FTBFS on failure in test vlog - Python3, change of behavior in Python 3.13, backported to 3.12 and 3.11" [Undecided, In Progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/206043421:29
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted trace-cmd [source] (noble-proposed) [3.2-1ubuntu2]21:30
vorlonwhat's nice is that every refresh of the NBS page gives me more packages to remove21:30
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: c2esp (noble-proposed/main) [27-11ubuntu5 => 27-11ubuntu7] (desktop-core)21:42
mwhudsonvorlon: is there a reason linux-firmware hasn't been rebuilt yet?22:12
mwhudsonoh wait it has and it migrated22:13
mwhudsonsame for gdb22:14
mwhudsonvorlon, doko: uh what's going on here https://ubuntu-archive-team.ubuntu.com/proposed-migration/update_excuses.html#gcc-14-cross22:19
mwhudsonubuntu-archive: i think gdb, linux-firmware, unbound can be removed from noble-updates22:21
mwhudsonlooks like c2esp and nullboot we just need to wait22:22
mwhudsonlftp has a build failure on armhf, there are patches in debian, openvswitch has a fix in unapproved22:23
mwhudsonis s390-tools waiting on an AA to accept something for signing?22:23
vladimirpubuntu-archive: rebootstrapped openjdk-8 is ready in bootstrap ppa https://launchpad.net/~canonical-foundations/+archive/ubuntu/archive-bootstrap/+sourcepub/15917579/+listing-archive-extra . openjdk-lts waiting on the final version of time_t patch.22:29
=== bdmurray changed the topic of #ubuntu-release to: Released: 23.10 Mantic Minotaur, 22.04.4 Jammy Jellyfish | Archive: Beta Freeze | Highlight ubuntu-archive for archive admin help | We accept payment in cash, cheque or scotch | melius malum quod cognoscis | infinity, you are missed
vladimirpis it a good moment to upload fix for test regression in cmake? upstream merged the change.22:46
mwhudsonvladimirp: i think it will go into the unapproved queue so no real harm in uploading22:49
vladimirpmwhudson: thanks !!!22:49
EickmeyerIt's not even EOD Pacific. -_-22:54
liushuyuWhat is the disk requirement for Ubuntu Studio? 30GiB?22:58
Eickmeyerliushuyu: I'd say that's minimum.22:58
liushuyuEickmeyer: I am currently testing the installation for all Ubuntu flavours. It seems like Ubuntu Studio needs a lot of space22:59
EickmeyerIt and Edubuntu both.22:59
EickmeyerIncluded applications requirement, not so much a DE thing.23:00
EickmeyerHoping to do a minimal install for 24.10, didn't have time this release.23:00
liushuyuOkay, maybe the installer should check the available disk space instead of freezing mid-installation23:01
bdmurrayEickmeyer: It's been frozen for a bit anyway so we could remove packages from noble-updates and as we mentioned elsewhere we are here to accept any packages necessary.23:01
Eickmeyerbdmurray: I've already made my case, we'll just wait and see.23:09
bdmurrayI don't disagree with your argument but we also need to proceed with the plan of record.23:11
EickmeyerI understand that as well.23:13
EickmeyerOn a personal note, I only got done downloading the ISO images within the past hour for Edubuntu and Ubuntu Studio, and only just got done with a very brief VM cursory test of Ubuntu Studio.23:14
EickmeyerThat's partially why my comment.23:14
vorlonjuliank: well your NCRs have set britney back a fair bit wrt the current run, having to schedule a lot of tests23:43
vorlonmwhudson: s390-tools has nothing waiting in unapproved23:47
mwhudson"s390-tools/s390x has unsatisfiable dependency" would be nice if you said _what_ britney23:47
mwhudsonah does someone need to upload s390-tools-signed?23:49
mwhudsoni don't know how this stuff works23:49
vorlonmwhudson: I thought the deps were in the other direction?23:51
mwhudsonhttps://launchpad.net/ubuntu/noble/s390x/s390-tools/2.31.0-0ubuntu4 -> "s390-tools-signed (= 2.31.0-0ubuntu4)" in depends on\23:51
vorlonso who wants to review my take 2 of porting libtimezonemap to libsoup323:51
mwhudsonvorlon: i can take a look23:53
mwhudsoni don't know anything about libtimezonemap or libsoup though23:53
vorlonmwhudson: haha23:53
vorlonmwhudson well https://code.launchpad.net/~vorlon/ubuntu/+source/libtimezonemap/+git/libtimezonemap/+ref/ubuntu/devel , I'm uploading direct so it can also be reviewed by the release team in parallel or something23:53
vorlonI had to adjust a ubiquity timezone test to make it pass, but that was basically just because it was mocking an obsolete Soup api23:56
mwhudsongotta love reading diffs of diffs23:56
mwhudsonlala s390-tools-signed installs directly to /lib23:59

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!