[00:27] <arraybolt3> hmm, can't set up a Noble sbuild it seems. "dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of perl: perl depends on perl-modules-5.38 (>= 5.38.2-3.2build2); however: Version of perl-modules-5.38 on system is 5.38.2-3."
[00:27] <arraybolt3> I thought I saw something about this in here earlier but can't remember for sure.
[00:27] <arraybolt3> Ubuntu Server 24.04 installed just fine, but the mk-sbuild step bombed out with that.
[01:02] <dbungert> arraybolt3: yea, perl is sad.  if you get into the chroot an `apt -f install` should sort it out.
[01:04] <arraybolt3> awesome, thanks for confirming my fix worked :P
[01:04] <arraybolt3> (I had just apt installed the exact version of perl-modules-5.38 it wanted and it seemed to work)
[02:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-wayland-cursor [armhf] (noble-proposed) [0.31.1-1]
[02:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-wayland-cursor [riscv64] (noble-proposed) [0.31.1-1]
[02:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-wayland-protocols [amd64] (noble-proposed) [0.31.0-1]
[02:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-wayland-protocols [armhf] (noble-proposed) [0.31.0-1]
[02:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-wayland-protocols [riscv64] (noble-proposed) [0.31.0-1]
[02:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-wayland-cursor [ppc64el] (noble-proposed) [0.31.1-1]
[02:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-wayland-protocols [arm64] (noble-proposed) [0.31.0-1]
[02:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-wayland-protocols [s390x] (noble-proposed) [0.31.0-1]
[02:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-wayland-cursor [s390x] (noble-proposed) [0.31.1-1]
[02:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-wayland-protocols [ppc64el] (noble-proposed) [0.31.0-1]
[02:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-wayland-cursor [amd64] (noble-proposed) [0.31.1-1]
[02:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-wayland-cursor [arm64] (noble-proposed) [0.31.1-1]
[02:44] <vorlon> did anyone get images sorted out wrt imath? it looks like it's still in noble-updates right now
[02:46] <vorlon> well, looks like Ubuntu Kylin built, but Ubuntu Studio and Ubuntu Cinnamon have not
[02:49] <vpa1977> doing no change rebuild against go 1.22 of google-guest-agent google-osconfig-agent ipp-usb ubuntu-report zsys for zhsj
[02:55] <liushuyu> https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-noble/noble/amd64/o/odin/20240408_014940_2585b@/log.gz so I discovered something strange, it failed to install libvtk9.0, but if I manually add libopenmpi3t64 to the test-depends it will work
[02:55] <liushuyu> Is this some form of apt solver issue?
[05:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted nvidia-graphics-drivers-535-server [amd64] (noble-proposed) [535.161.08-0ubuntu2]
[05:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted nvidia-graphics-drivers-535 [amd64] (noble-proposed) [535.171.04-0ubuntu2]
[05:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted nvidia-graphics-drivers-535-server [arm64] (noble-proposed) [535.161.08-0ubuntu2]
[05:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted nvidia-graphics-drivers-535 [arm64] (noble-proposed) [535.171.04-0ubuntu2]
[06:40] <LocutusOfBorg> vorlon, some i386 missing builds are: gkrellm-volume, abx avrp betaradio blktool blktrace bluez-btsco bro-aux care cbatticon cdcd ciopfs clamz connman-ui cutmp3 daemonlogger dares devilspie
[06:42] <LocutusOfBorg> dhcp-probe dnstop dvblast dynamips esniper fizmo-sdl2 fprobe gperiodic gphotofs gromit gst-plugins-espeak gtk-theme-switch gv gwaterfall gworldclock indicator-multiload ippsample
[06:43] <LocutusOfBorg> ipwatchd kbdd komi kubuntu-debug-installer lazy-object-proxy lcas-lcmaps-gt4-interface lcmaps-plugins-voms libdumb libee libibtk lie lltdscan lrzsz
[06:45] <LocutusOfBorg> lyskom-server madwimax matanza memstat metar moserial mspdebug multiwatch nstreams nuntius-linux obexfs
[07:07] <ricotz> hello SRU team :), please take a look at https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/2058687
[07:07] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Launchpad bug 2058687 in libreoffice (Ubuntu Mantic) "[SRU] libreoffice 7.6.6 for mantic" [Medium, In Progress]
[07:10] <LocutusOfBorg> vorlon, I suspect the copy to updates bringed back lots of ppc64el and i386 binaries that were removed from release pocket
[07:10] <LocutusOfBorg> https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/ZNcCvyGBHt/
[07:10] <LocutusOfBorg> this is an incomplete list of stuff that will migrate if we clean it up again, but I don't know how to double check
[07:21] <LocutusOfBorg> oh lol ubuntu-archive: pyobjcryst was removed from noble, but restored in noble-updates only
[07:21] <LocutusOfBorg> this is holding few transitions to finish
[07:22] <LocutusOfBorg> or maybe just boost to migrate, but hey
[07:26] <LocutusOfBorg> also spek needs kick out on armhf
[07:30] <jamespage> morning
[07:31] <jamespage> if there is an archive admin around the two syncs for python-* packages in the unapproved queue for noble will unblock the cloudkitty built, which in turn will unblock the failing autopkgtests for this package
[07:31] <jamespage> if they could be accepted that would be great - thx!
[07:32] <jamespage> and freezer-api needs rm'ing from noble (bug 2060205) - thats also failing autopkgtests and have been removed in debian
[07:32] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Bug 2060205 in freezer-api (Ubuntu) "RM freezer-api" [Undecided, New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/2060205
 https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-noble/noble/amd64/o/odin/20240408_014940_2585b@/log.gz so I discovered something strange, it failed to install libvtk9.0, but if I manually add libopenmpi3t64 to the test-depends it will work
[07:53] <juliank> I think this might need some Breaks against pre-t64 libraries whacked in somewhere
[07:54] <juliank> Presumably libopenmpi3 wants a Breaks: libevent-pthreads-2.1-7 (<< t64 version)
[07:55] <juliank> Not sure why it's broken in the first place though on amd64
[07:56] <juliank> Ah libopenmpi3 also got renamed
[07:56] <juliank> Anywhere somewhere further up the chain we need a rebuild and a couple of Breaks added certainly can't hurt
[07:58] <cpaelzer> hi LocutusOfBorg - I see the pyobjcryst you mention but have not yet learned the secret incantation to handle this case (-updates is immutable). Once sil2100 is around this might be a great chance to teach me to I can help on such cases as well.
[07:58] <cpaelzer> until then let me look at the cases of jamespage - starting on the rm bug
[07:59] <jamespage> thanks cpaelzer
[07:59] <jamespage> I'm also looking at the manila test failures - looks like an compatiblity with newer alembic that should be fixable
[08:12] <ginggs> LocutusOfBorg, cpaelzer: boost1.83 already has a hint to ignore the pyobjcryst regression, but boost1.83 is still blocked by openmpi
[08:19] <cpaelzer> thanks ginggs
[08:19] <cpaelzer> jamespage: I checked the removal, it is ok and done
[08:20] <cpaelzer> jamespage: what exactly are the python-* packages in the unapproved queue for noble to unblock cloudkitty?
[08:20] <cpaelzer> jamespage: I see python-influxdb-client and python-reactivex
[08:21] <jamespage> cpaelzer: yep those 2 - cloudkitty -> influxdb -> reactivex
[08:22] <cpaelzer> ok, having a look ...
[08:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: liquidsoap (noble-proposed/primary) [2.2.4-1]
[08:28] <LocutusOfBorg> ginggs, openmpi should go in next run
[08:28] <LocutusOfBorg> cpaelzer, thanks! this brings a question to release people, shouldn't we do a NCR every time we kick out an i386 binary?
[08:28] <LocutusOfBorg> this way we have a new LP entry and we don't risk this kind of mismatches
[08:33] <cpaelzer> LocutusOfBorg: You mean NCRs to any rev-b-deps (to pick up most you could think of) or just to the pkg that no more builds the i386 binary (to have an entry there)?
[08:33] <cpaelzer> LocutusOfBorg: in case of the latter that would even serve as a nice place to hold a "here we dropped i386 binaries" message
[08:35] <cpaelzer> LocutusOfBorg: I didn't think into the problem enough to make a good call. And generally hesitate to add more builds (and the triggered tests) right now. But it might be worth to think about that as a good habit going forward
[08:36] <cpaelzer> jamespage: if this would not add support for an older version and not already be covered by influxdb3-python this check would be easier :-) Still reading details ...
[08:45] <juliank> Looking at https://magenta.jak-linux.org/ubuntu-archive/distcheck/noble/release-binaries.txt
[08:45] <juliank> We have 2169 broken packages in noble amd64 release
[08:45] <juliank> Biggest blockers are unbound and llvm-defaults
[08:46] <juliank> Then libopenmpi3t64
[08:46] <LocutusOfBorg> the latter
[08:46] <schopin> mkukri: if you're looking for something to do on +1 this week ^
[08:46] <juliank> in terms of package sizes
[08:46] <juliank> * counts
[08:47] <LocutusOfBorg> cpaelzer, also because many times you still see the i386 binary on launchpad package page, but the package is not anymore in devel release
[08:47] <LocutusOfBorg> look e.g. https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ocaml/4.14.1-1ubuntu1
[08:47] <mkukri> i was looking at update excuses so far
[08:47] <juliank> libunbound8 breaks kubuntu and ubuntustudio
[08:47] <LocutusOfBorg> Noble: [FULLYBUILT] amd64 [FULLYBUILT] arm64 [FULLYBUILT] armhf [FULLYBUILT] i386 [FULLYBUILT] ppc64el [FULLYBUILT] riscv64 [FULLYBUILT] s390x
[08:47] <LocutusOfBorg> but i386 ocaml was dropped months ago
[08:47] <LocutusOfBorg> I find it confusing
[08:47] <schopin> mkukri: well, sure, I'm just suggesting you start by working on migrating those packages ;)
[08:48] <LocutusOfBorg> (but hey! I'm not really asking more rebuilds now!)
[08:48] <LocutusOfBorg> I finished haskell foobar rebuilds, and it migrated
[08:48] <LocutusOfBorg> I'm moving and doing ocaml now
[08:50] <mkukri> schopin: suggestion taken :)
[08:50] <mkukri> i assume someone is already looking at unbound given it is top of the list?
[08:51] <schopin> Not sure?
[08:51] <cpaelzer> jamespage: python-reactivex is a general yes, but still a no due to https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1066895
[08:51] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Debian bug 1066895 in python3-reactivex "python-reactivex: duplicate of src:python-rx" [Serious, Open]
[08:52] <mkukri> i guess ill look at it than
[08:52] <cpaelzer> jamespage: would you mind uploading python-influxdb-client with a delta depending on python3-rx instead of python3-reactivex ?
[08:52] <juliank> https://magenta.jak-linux.org/ubuntu-archive/distcheck/noble/release-binaries.txt now has a summary
[08:52] <juliank>   * 235 packages depending on src:unbound
[08:52] <juliank>   * 179 packages depending on src:llvm-defaults
[08:52] <juliank>   * 152 packages depending on libopenmpi3
[08:52] <juliank>   * 110 packages depending on libopencv-core406
[08:52] <juliank> It lies a bit, some of those packages may be tasks
[08:56] <doko> why is spooles showing missing builds on i386? the i386 packages in noble-release are removed
[08:57] <LocutusOfBorg> doko, -updates pocket
[08:57] <LocutusOfBorg> see backlog
[08:57] <juliank> We should have a daily freeze and cleanup updates
[08:58] <cpaelzer> jamespage: if you do not not, I have it ready and test built to act (1 reject, 1 upload, 1 accept)
[08:58] <cpaelzer> jamespage: just tell me to make it happen
[08:58] <mkukri> unbound seems to be blocked by ovn autopkgtest. which looks like it wants bzip2 from proposed
[08:59] <jamespage> cpaelzer: bah I missed that bug - apologies
[08:59] <jamespage> I'll sort that out now with a delta ontop of the synced version
[08:59] <cpaelzer> jamespage: np, just tell me if you are ok with that  approach
[08:59] <jamespage> cpaelzer: completely
[08:59] <cpaelzer> jamespage: as I said, I already have that delta and test built
[08:59] <cpaelzer> jamespage: I mostly want to hear a yes, do it that way
[08:59] <jamespage> I guess zigo just missed the existence of the package and repakaged it!
[08:59] <jamespage> cpaelzer: yes please :)
[09:00] <cpaelzer> ok jamespage - the only follow up later is once zigo changed it in some way to ensure things follow accordingly in 24.10 and later
[09:00] <jamespage> thanks for the help :)
[09:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: rejected python-reactivex [sync] (noble-proposed) [4.0.4-1]
[09:02] <mkukri> looking at ossp-uuid
[09:02] <mkukri> (while ovn test is running)
[09:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: rejected python-influxdb-client [sync] (noble-proposed) [1.40.0-1]
[09:02] <LocutusOfBorg> looking at opencv/vtk9
[09:02] <LocutusOfBorg> openmpi should be good
[09:03] <upils> Looking at src:openvswitch
[09:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: python-influxdb-client (noble-proposed/primary) [1.40.0-1ubuntu1]
[09:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted python-influxdb-client [source] (noble-proposed) [1.40.0-1ubuntu1]
[09:08] <mkukri> how to fix packages still depending on perlapi-5.36.0?
[09:10] <doko> mkukri: which packages, which pocket?
[09:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: python-influxdb-client [amd64] (noble-proposed/none) [1.40.0-1ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[09:10] <mkukri> i think this is a case of the rebuild against perl 5.38 not migrating
[09:10] <mkukri> libdata-uuid-libuuid-perl it is, but it seems like fix is in proposed, so i am looking at the blockers now
[09:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted python-influxdb-client [amd64] (noble-proposed) [1.40.0-1ubuntu1]
[09:12] <cpaelzer> jamespage: fully through now
[09:13] <mkukri> hmm im not sure why libdata-uuid-libuuid-perl is uninstallable on armhf
[09:13] <cpaelzer> waveform: thanks for checking the pemmican implications with me, resolving that now ...
[09:18] <jamespage> cpaelzer: thanks
[09:19] <waveform> cpaelzer, no problem!
[09:19] <cpaelzer> waveform: MR merged and bug updated with step #1
[09:21] <mkukri> same deal for libdata-swap-perl as libdata-uuid-libuuid-perl
[09:23] <mkukri> apparently perl itself is uninstallable on armhf somehow?
[09:23] <mkukri> even tho it is in -release?
[09:23] <cpaelzer> waveform: the team bug subscription isn't yet set - do you have anyone around that can add that?
[09:23] <mkukri> i also get perl uninistallability errors when trying to deboostrap an armhf chroot
[09:24] <upils> mkukri, it was hinted by silil2100 "force-badtest perl/5.38.2-3.2/armhf"
[09:24] <upils> maybe then we missed something?
[09:25] <upils> *sil2100
[09:26] <waveform> cpaelzer, yes -- I'll do that now
[09:27] <waveform> done
[09:28] <mkukri> it is specifically perl-modules-5.38 binary that seems to be the problem
[09:31] <mkukri>  perl depends on perl-modules-5.38 (>= 5.38.2-3.2build2); however:  Version of perl-modules-5.38 on system is 5.38.2-3. where is the old perl-modules coming from?
[09:31] <mkukri> rmadison also says both versions exist in noble for some reason
[09:35] <mkukri> perl-modules-5.38 = 5.38.2-3 is not published according to launchpad but it is somehow getting installed?
[09:37] <mkukri> and i also get the same error on amd64? something seems broken
[09:38] <mkukri> looking through the download log, all the other perl binaries seems to be the correct version, but it is pulling the old perl-modules-5.38 for some reason
[09:51] <upils> Could someone with enough permission retry this build https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openvswitch/3.3.0-1build2/+build/28008804 please?
[09:52] <upils> Loking at sendmail
[09:52] <mkukri> can someone with a better understanding of the archive provide some insight on the perl situation? the following output seems very weird:
[09:52] <mkukri> I: Retrieving perl 5.38.2-3.2build2
[09:52] <mkukri> I: Validating perl 5.38.2-3.2build2
[09:52] <mkukri> I: Retrieving perl-base 5.38.2-3.2build2
[09:52] <mkukri> I: Validating perl-base 5.38.2-3.2build2
[09:52] <mkukri> I: Retrieving perl-modules-5.38 5.38.2-3
[09:52] <mkukri> I: Validating perl-modules-5.38 5.38.2-3
[09:54] <sil2100> o/
[09:54] <sil2100> Let me try freezing the noble archive just for a moment to do a quick removal
[09:58] <cpaelzer> sil2100: I have ruby3.1 to be removed as well, which isn't possible as long as not frozen - could you or me remove that as well while you freeze shortly?
[10:02] <mkukri> ovn autopkgtest passed, unbound should be unblocked soon
[10:09] <upils> Could someone with enough permission also retry this armhf build https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sendmail/8.18.1-1build3/+build/27994669please?
[10:11] <upils> looking at astrometry.net meanwhile
[10:12] <doko> upils: done
[10:13] <doko> just went over https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?tag=ftbfs-impfuncdef;users=lucas@debian.org and synced ~140 package to fix ftbfs
[10:13] <cpaelzer> thanks waveform, done
[10:13] <upils> doko, thanks, can you also do this one I requested earlier https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openvswitch/3.3.0-1build2/+build/28008804 please?
[10:16] <sil2100> Ok, imath removed
[10:16] <sil2100> cpaelzer: aaaa
[10:18] <sil2100> cpaelzer: missed your message, sorry about that. Is it needed right now to unblock some builds, or can this wait when we're official in Beta freeze?
[10:21] <cpaelzer> sil2100: it can wait
[10:21] <cpaelzer> sil2100: I just wanted to use the chance when frozen anyway
[10:22] <cpaelzer> sil2100: I can just as much keep my reminder open and act once we are there
[10:29] <doko> upils: done. also synced https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sendmail/8.18.1-2
[10:31] <upils> Thanks. Ok, thanks. Then I will for it to be synced and build to check if the armhf build failure persist
[10:35] <doko> upils: it's always good to have a look at newer Debian uploads before investing time into a build failure
[10:38] <LocutusOfBorg> I'm syncing debian NMUs for time64_t armhf build fixes
[10:50] <jamespage> fix uploaded for alembic compat for manila - I think that should sort out the last few autopkgtest failures blocking stuff in the ubuntu-openstack package set
[10:57] <doko> sil2100: next time you freeze, please remove the spooles i386 binaries, blocking openmpi
[10:57] <sil2100> doko: is that the only thing blocking openmpi? Maybe we can just force hint it into then
[10:58] <sil2100> Uploading langpacks for Beta
[11:02] <doko> sil2100: no, still walking through packages with missing builds
[11:14] <sil2100> Rebuilding cinnamon and studio
[11:32] <sil2100> Oh no, LP died
[11:33] <sil2100> Sad, because it looked like the cinnamon and studio livefses seemed to have been building correctly up to this point
[11:34] <fossfreedom_> need to insert 50p into the launchpad meter to make it work again...
[11:36] <sminez> is launchpad dying a "we're all doomed!" situation or a "someone give it a kick" situation?
[11:44] <sil2100> Nah, just a normal outage, nothing to worry about
[11:44] <sil2100> The right people are on it right now
[11:46] <sminez> nice
[12:01] <doko> arraybolt3: there are still unity related ftbfs, like hud, indicator-*
[12:18] <mkukri> am looking at c2esp
[12:20] <upils> I found that sendmail is part of the auto-db5.3 transition. Should I set it aside for now then?
[12:21] <mkukri> also the old perl-modules being installed is still an issue
[12:31] <mkukri> also looking at tree proposed migration
[12:38] <mkukri> pul-lp-source is timeouting 503ing after really long timeouts currently
[12:44] <ahasenack> there was a lp outage just a few moments ago
[12:44] <fossfreedom_> sil2100: ubuntucinnamon built! yay :) https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-cdimage/+livefs/ubuntu/noble/ubuntucinnamon/+build/602282  ... just the LP issues causing the built ISO to be transferred  properly.
[12:44] <fossfreedom_> not to be transferred...
[12:47] <doko> jamespage: openvswitch ftbfs on arm64 (test failure)
[12:47] <upils> sil2100,  sendmail/8.18.1-1build3 is now replaced with sendmail/8.18.1-2 (sync). Should we update the force-skiptest hint?
[12:50] <jamespage> fnordahl: have you got https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openvswitch/3.3.0-1build2/+build/28008804 on your todo list?
[12:51] <fnordahl> jamespage: yes, looking at that atm
[12:51] <jamespage> fnordahl: great thanks :)
[12:52] <fnordahl> the arm64 machines are quite loaded due to other release stuff, so it takes some time, the build failure reproduced over lunch so will hopefully have it patched soon
[12:52] <upils> oh, I was also looking at it. I may have missed when it was taken.
[12:54] <fnordahl> upils: was that a comment for the openvswitch arm64 build failure or something else? I might have forgotten to switch bug status O8-) How far were you along if that was the case?
[12:56] <upils> yes it was about openvswitch. Well I requested before launch a retry to make sure it was still broken and I was trying to understand what went wrong. So you can go ahead
[12:56] <fnordahl> ack, thx upils
[12:57] <upils> *lunch
[12:58] <schopin> upils: re sendmail I wouldn't blindly change the hint since it's not a NCR.
[13:04] <upils> schopin, good point. I guess I will wait for the next britney run to see if it migrates. If it does, then I can request for the hint to be removed or will we clean every xz-related hint at once when we are done?
[13:04] <schopin> I think we'll clean all hints afterwards.
[13:05] <upils> ok, cool
[13:11]  * mkukri is looking at bash
[13:13] <doko> sil2100: I think I addressed all openmpi depending packages, either by removing, or fixing issues
[13:15] <sil2100> Ubuntu Cinnamon built successfully \o/
[13:15] <sil2100> Now doing the same for studio
[13:16] <sil2100> doko: checking, we can hint it in then if -updates is confusing britney
[13:22] <doko> sil2100: still needs some publisher runs
[13:22] <sil2100> hm, and I noticed I lost some of my cdimage commits, guess I again forgot a git push
[13:41] <mkukri> is faketime expected to be broken on armhf?
[13:41] <mkukri> and should i be trying to do anything about that?
[13:43] <adrien> mkukri: yes, no (I think)
[13:44] <adrien> mkukri: I think you could fix it but it's low priority
[13:44] <adrien> and mid-to-high complexity
[13:44] <mkukri> it's blocking bash migration (indirectly)
[13:46] <schopin> Is it blocking because its tests are broken? In which case a baseline test should be enough.
[13:46] <sil2100> Studio also successfully built \o/
[13:47] <schopin> \o/
[13:47] <sil2100> vorlon: I think the last one is the x13s, checking the logs
[13:47] <mkukri> it's blocking because dkim-rotate autopkgtest seems to be broken by faketime
[13:47] <mkukri> and dkim-rotate is blocking bash
[13:50] <schopin> So, yes, faketime is broken, but the fix is pretty involved: you need to modify it to 1/ dlsym() the t64 symbols from glibc on armhf rather than the standard ones and 2/ export those symbols rather than the standard ones, but only on armhf.
[13:50] <schopin> And there are a *lot* of symbols.
[13:51] <mkukri> i am not sure if that is something i want to do as part of +1
[13:52] <mkukri> what about hintign dkim-rotate test, or removing it on armhf?
[13:53] <schopin> mkukri: you can't remove it, it's arch:all.
[13:54] <doko> LocutusOfBorg: please could you track your ftbfs at this stage? https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ferret-vis/7.6.0-7ubuntu1
[13:55] <mkukri> ah i see yes. it seems plausible tho that only its tests need faketime. so maybe hinting it is better?
[13:55] <schopin> mkukri: but isn't the baseline also broken?
[13:57] <mkukri> maybe the migration-reference/0 test is out of date?
[13:57] <mkukri> i can't re-trigger it tho 'You submitted an invalid request: You are not allowed to upload dkim-rotate or migration-reference/0 to Ubuntu, thus you are not allowed to use this service.' didnt see one of these before
[13:58] <LocutusOfBorg> doko, I am
[13:58] <LocutusOfBorg> I have like 60 tabs opened and I'll track them all
[13:59] <LocutusOfBorg> btw, I'm syncing stuff that is already FTBFS on armhf, so there should be no risk of regressions
[13:59] <schopin> qa-help: please see mkukri's msg above as of 2mn ago
[13:59] <upils> where can I see if we decided not to build a given package for i386? (at looked on LP, in hints-ubuntu)? I would like to understand why the version of uw-imap in proposed was not built for i386. See https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/uw-imap
[14:00] <upils> (*I looked)
[14:00] <fnordahl> fwiw; there are some subtle differences between python3.12.2-4ubuntuX and python3.12.2-5ubuntuX which causes the build failure for openvswitch bug 2060434
[14:00] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Bug 2060434 in openvswitch (Ubuntu) "[noble] FTBFS on failure in test vlog - Python3, change of behavior between Python 3.11 and 3.12" [Undecided, In Progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/2060434
[14:00] <fnordahl> we'll patch it, but worth highlihgting as this was an unexpected change to me
[14:03] <paride> andersson1234, ^^ can that be related to the charm update?
[14:04] <mkukri> when did that happen? i could trigger tests this morning
[14:04] <mkukri> didnt try any migration-reference/0s before this tho
[14:05] <mkukri> (that is not today, it worked in the past)
[14:05] <doko> LocutusOfBorg: are you fixing ferret-vis? the armhf ftbfs is blocking openmpi
[14:06] <schopin> mkukri: meanwhile what's the link? :)
[14:06] <schopin> (in a meeting but I can still click things)
[14:06] <mkukri> https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/request.cgi?release=noble&arch=armhf&package=dkim-rotate&trigger=migration-reference/0
[14:07] <schopin> done
[14:07] <mkukri> thanks
[14:11] <LocutusOfBorg> doko, not yet
[14:11] <LocutusOfBorg> but it built
[14:11] <LocutusOfBorg> so yes its fixed
[14:11] <LocutusOfBorg> fix was in syncing of xgks 2.6.1+dfsg.2-15
[14:11] <LocutusOfBorg> but slow LP was slow
[14:17] <mkukri> dkim-rotate migration-reference/0 also failed now, so i guess that means bash migrating?
[14:17] <schopin> it it was the last holdout, yes.
[14:17] <mkukri> it looks like it yes
[14:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted lxml-html-clean [source] (noble-proposed) [0.1.0-0ubuntu1]
[14:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: lxml-html-clean [amd64] (noble-proposed/none) [0.1.0-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[14:45] <juliank> Doing 211 no-change rebuilds for time_t on amd64
[14:47] <juliank> This will improve solver reliability
[14:54] <juliank> vorlon: ubuntu-sru: I'd like to ask for a blanket SRU exception for 24.04 until 24.04.1 or so for no-change uploads without SRU bugs
[14:57] <juliank> doko, vorlon do we now when the gcc was published for time_t transition? I'm trying to write a report to see which packages haven't been rebuilt for time_t and frame pointers
[14:57] <juliank> * know
[14:57] <juliank> 211 uploads done
[14:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected cloud-init [source] (focal-proposed) [24.1.3-0ubuntu1~20.04.1]
[14:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected cloud-init [source] (jammy-proposed) [24.1.3-0ubuntu1~22.04.1]
[14:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected cloud-init [source] (mantic-proposed) [24.1.3-0ubuntu1~23.10.1]
[15:01] <juliank> I have identified 88 source packages with binaries on armhf that still use old library names
[15:02] <juliank>   * stunnel4 depends on conflicting packages: libssl3t64=3.0.13-0ubuntu3 vs libssl3=3.0.10-1ubuntu4
[15:02] <juliank>     - chain 2: libssl3:armhf (>= 3.0.0)
[15:02] <juliank> This doesn't look nice
[15:03] <juliank> Ah this still needs to migrate
[15:04] <schopin> It's funny how some packages are recurring pains.
[15:05] <juliank> stunnel4 just didn't migrate yet
[15:06] <juliank> I'll go do the (unseeded) armhf uploads too, after all that shouldn't block anything and it makes britney sadder perhaps :)
[15:06] <kanashiro> vorlon we have other packages not supporting yet ruby-rack 3.x, so we should keep thos packages just in -proposed for now. I filed some bugs to upstream projects but not all of them fixed the issues yet
[15:08] <juliank> Note I miss anything that is already in proposed
[15:08] <juliank> Which is good for not blocking in-progress stuff
[15:08] <juliank> stunnel4 should be a priority due to being an apt test depends
[15:09] <juliank> I really want to keep/get the armhf apt tests working in noble release pocket
[15:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted lxml-html-clean [amd64] (noble-proposed) [0.1.0-0ubuntu1]
[15:12] <tsimonq2> sil2100: o/ I see you mentioned ubuntu-cdimage, and I'm actually working on an MP for Lubuntu right now. :)
[15:12] <tsimonq2> Would you be interested in reviewing?
[15:18] <doko> juliank: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gcc-13/13.2.0-16ubuntu1
[15:18] <tsimonq2> ubuntu-release: Feel free to discuss with me here or on the MP: https://code.launchpad.net/~lubuntu-dev/ubuntu-cdimage/+git/ubuntu-cdimage/+merge/463825
[15:23] <juliank> doko: Not really helpful
[15:23] <juliank>  Superseded on 2024-02-29 by armhf build of gcc-13 13.2.0-16ubuntu1 in ubuntu noble RELEASE
[15:23] <juliank> hmm
[15:24] <juliank> I guess just taking 1st of April is fine
[15:24] <juliank> 2024-02-29 23:44:37 CET ~ 22:44
[15:29] <upils> Can someone retry the 4 failing builds for https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/astrometry.net/0.93+dfsg-1.1build3 please? I retried the arm64 one locally and it worked fine.
[15:30] <sergiodj> upils: I retriggered the arm64 one, if it passes I'll retrigger the others
[15:32] <upils> thanks, good call!
[15:37] <juliank> schopin, bdrung, sil2100, vorlon: https://magenta.jak-linux.org/ubuntu-archive/distcheck/noble/missing-rebuilds.txt now contains packages not rebuilt since the start of the t64 transition
[15:37] <juliank> # main: 1372 old packages
[15:37] <juliank> # restricted: 5 old packages
[15:37] <juliank> # universe: 27443 old packages
[15:37] <juliank> # multiverse: 411 old packages
[15:38] <paride> bdmurray, vorlon, I would be *very* interested in checking why rust-sequoia-wot got pulled from -proposed, but it migrated in the meantime, so I can't easily try to reproduce the issue and follow what's happening there.
[15:38] <paride> bdmurray, vorlon, if you spot something similar again please raise it with me
[15:38] <juliank> Counts include packages  that have a newer version in proposed
[15:38] <schopin> juliank: how many package do we have in the archive? 27k untouched packages seems rather big.
[15:39] <juliank> $ grep ^Package root/var/lib/apt/lists/snapshot.ubuntu.com_ubuntu_dists_noble_*_source_Sources | wc -l
[15:39] <juliank> 74818
[15:39] <juliank> schopin: ^
[15:40] <juliank> 75k packages total, about 29k missing builds
[15:40] <juliank> So we rebuilt about 60%
[15:40] <schopin> Huh. That's a lot of packages...
[15:40] <juliank> schopin: Oops bug
[15:40] <juliank> I forgot a :
[15:41] <juliank> grep ^Package: root/var/lib/apt/lists/snapshot.ubuntu.com_ubuntu_dists_noble_*_source_Sources | wc -l
[15:41] <juliank> 37422
[15:41] <schopin> Ah. That's more like it.
[15:41] <juliank> So yeah we rebuild barely ~21%
[15:41] <juliank> *rebuilt
[15:42] <schopin> Sure but we can filter out quite a bit.
[15:42] <juliank> Many a Perl, Go, or Rust
[15:42] <schopin> Indeed.
[15:42] <juliank> Let me filter out packages only building Architecture: all
[15:43] <juliank> much better
[15:43] <schopin> You'll still get the Rust packages though, because their -dev are arch:any for some reason related to apt solver.
[15:43] <juliank> # main: 465 old packages
[15:43] <juliank> # restricted: 5 old packages
[15:43] <juliank> # universe: 9750 old packages
[15:43] <juliank> # multiverse: 152 old packages
[15:44] <dbungert> sil2100: can you remove the "xz-utils worklist" note from the topic?  Those logs are offline right now, that list of seeded packages is no longer the focus.
[15:44] <sil2100> Ah! Yes
[15:44] <sil2100> On it
[15:44] <dbungert> thanks
[15:45] <juliank> I can filter out src:rust-* src:golang-* src:haskell-*
[15:45] <juliank> src:r-cran-*
[15:45] <juliank> ?
[15:45] <juliank> Also I guess those that are not actually for armhf
[15:46] <juliank> But then we lose frame pointer information for amd64
[15:47] <juliank> # main: 465 old packages
[15:47] <juliank> # restricted: 5 old packages
[15:47] <juliank> # universe: 6408 old packages
[15:47] <juliank> # multiverse: 152 old packages
[15:49] <bdrung> juliank, upload no-change rebuilds for those now?
[15:49] <juliank> Do we want to issue additional 465 (minus ones in proposed) rebuilds for main to make sure all of main has frame pointers?
[15:49] <juliank> I need to wait for my previous round to be processed to get a new report without them I suppose
[15:49] <bdrung> 465 doesn't sound too bad to not do it.
[15:50] <juliank> yeah I wonder about universe though
[15:50] <juliank> 453 without newer version in proposed
[15:51] <juliank> Let's see how many rebuilds it is if we ignore the ones I just did
[15:55] <juliank> Uploading
[15:55] <juliank> "No change rebuild for 64-bit time_t and frame pointers."
[15:56] <juliank> Could check seeded packages in universe but annoying hackery
[15:56] <juliank> Well slightly annoying
[15:57] <juliank> Seriously need to integrate all tooling
[15:59] <juliank> I think cpio probably was a good idea: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cpio/2.15+dfsg-1ubuntu2
[15:59] <juliank> I mean that would get funny timestamps
[16:00] <juliank> Ah shoot, doko I uploaded gcc-defaults no-change rebuild but that's a bit pointless
[16:00] <juliank> please remove that :D
[16:00] <juliank> My script could have checked maybe if we actually have ELF binaries in the binary packages to avoid uploading meta packages
[16:01] <juliank> Running all the signing operations via the yubikey (without tap to sign turned off temporarily) takes a long time
[16:02] <juliank> It can sign one file at a time and each file takes like 500ms or so
[16:02] <juliank> each upload has 3 files
[16:02] <juliank> so 1.5s for signing each upload
[16:03] <juliank> so ~10 minutes to upload everything
[16:04] <bdrung> the on-disk format for cpio uses 8 bytes for a hex representation. so you could store 4 bytes aka 32 bit in it. so the on-disk format is still affected by the year 2038 bug
[16:04] <juliank> oof
[16:04] <juliank> hopefully it is unsigned
[16:05] <juliank> then it wouldn't be affected
[16:07] <juliank> *NOT* touching anything already in proposed (again)
[16:08] <juliank> Who volunteers to run an armhf system set to 2040?
[16:08] <bdrung> should be unsigned. so it will be hit by the year 2106 bug. i hope i retire before that date.
[16:08] <juliank> I guess just do 2044 so you can remember the 20 year offset
[16:08] <juliank> then you can make sure everything works :D
[16:09] <bdrung> i have a zero 2 that i can use for this kind of test
[16:10] <bdrung> mtd-utils needs to be fixed to get it updated
[16:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: fwupd-efi (noble-proposed/main) [1:1.4-1 => 1:1.4-1build1] (no packageset)
[16:10] <juliank> I expect anything that has a newer version in proposed to get picked up by people working on other reports
[16:11] <juliank> Oh please reject fwupd-efi
[16:11] <juliank> Oh ubuntu-archive please reject fwupd-efi
[16:11] <juliank> (and remove gcc-defaults from proposed)
[16:11] <juliank> busybox FTBFS on arm*
[16:12] <juliank> /<<PKGBUILDDIR>>/networking/tc.c:237:27: error: ‘TCA_CBQ_MAX’ undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean ‘TCA_CBS_MAX’?
[16:12] <juliank> fun
[16:12] <juliank> bunch more similar ones
[16:12] <juliank> bdrung: icu ftbfs
[16:12] <juliank> but with python3-distutils : Depends: python3-lib2to3 (= 3.12.2-3ubuntu1.1) but it is not going to be installed
[16:12] <juliank> this is weird
[16:13] <bdrung> python3-distutils was dropped
[16:13] <bdrung> we need to get rid of that one
[16:13] <juliank> Ah yes
[16:13] <juliank> bdrung: I'll graciously say that's something for you to look at :)
[16:14] <juliank> but maybe someone else already is, idk?
[16:14] <bdrung> i can work on the icu failure, but first let me take a bike break before it gets cold and dark
[16:14] <juliank> We had python3-distutils reverse-build-depends fixup report, no?
[16:14] <juliank> bdrung: Go bike your brains out
[16:14] <bdrung> see you later
[16:20] <juliank> Uploading all the fan favorites today; cpio, , schroot, screen
[16:21] <juliank> Regarding the blanket SRU exception: It just makes sense, then we can keep the no-change uploads in proposed right where they are and release them once they look good
[16:22] <juliank> ooh valgrind I'm uploading too, i did not know
[16:24] <juliank> It's amazing how many packages haven't been rebuild since the ppc64el baseline bump in jammy
[16:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: servicelog (noble-proposed/main) [1.1.16-1 => 1.1.16-1build1] (core)
[16:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: shadow (noble-proposed/main) [1:4.13+dfsg1-4ubuntu1 => 1:4.13+dfsg1-4ubuntu2] (core, i386-whitelist)
[16:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: skiboot (noble-proposed/main) [7.0+dfsg-1build1 => 7.0+dfsg-1build2] (core)
[16:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: sg3-utils (noble-proposed/main) [1.46-3ubuntu3 => 1.46-3ubuntu4] (core)
[16:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: simplejson (noble-proposed/main) [3.19.2-1build1 => 3.19.2-1build2] (no packageset)
[16:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: smartmontools (noble-proposed/main) [7.4-2 => 7.4-2build1] (kubuntu)
[16:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: snowball (noble-proposed/main) [2.2.0-4 => 2.2.0-4build1] (core, i386-whitelist)
[16:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: sosreport (noble-proposed/main) [4.5.6-0ubuntu2 => 4.5.6-0ubuntu3] (ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server)
[16:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: sqlalchemy (noble-proposed/main) [1.4.50+ds1-1 => 1.4.50+ds1-1build1] (ubuntu-budgie)
[16:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: startup-notification (noble-proposed/main) [0.12-6build2 => 0.12-6build3] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist)
[16:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: swedish (noble-proposed/main) [1.4.5-3 => 1.4.5-3build1] (ubuntu-desktop)
[16:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: sysfsutils (noble-proposed/main) [2.1.1-6 => 2.1.1-6build1] (core, i386-whitelist)
[16:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: sysstat (noble-proposed/main) [12.6.1-1ubuntu1 => 12.6.1-1ubuntu2] (ubuntu-server)
[16:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: tar (noble-proposed/main) [1.35+dfsg-3 => 1.35+dfsg-3build1] (core, i386-whitelist)
[16:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: tidy-html5 (noble-proposed/main) [2:5.6.0-11ubuntu1 => 2:5.6.0-11ubuntu2] (ubuntu-server)
[16:25] <juliank> Oh did someone turn on freeze during this batch of uploads, huh
[16:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: snappy (noble-proposed/main) [1.1.10-1 => 1.1.10-1build1] (core, i386-whitelist)
[16:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: speex (noble-proposed/main) [1.2.1-2ubuntu1 => 1.2.1-2ubuntu2] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist, ubuntu-server)
[16:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: strace (noble-proposed/main) [6.6-0ubuntu1 => 6.6-0ubuntu2] (core, i386-whitelist)
[16:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: syslinux (noble-proposed/main) [3:6.04~git20190206.bf6db5b4+dfsg1-3ubuntu2 => 3:6.04~git20190206.bf6db5b4+dfsg1-3ubuntu3] (no packageset)
[16:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: tftp-hpa (noble-proposed/main) [5.2+20150808-1.4 => 5.2+20150808-1.4build1] (ubuntu-server)
[16:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: sonic (noble-proposed/main) [0.2.0-13 => 0.2.0-13build1] (i386-whitelist, ubuntu-desktop)
[16:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: sysconfig (noble-proposed/main) [0.0.14ubuntu2 => 0.0.14ubuntu3] (core)
[16:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: time (noble-proposed/main) [1.9-0.2 => 1.9-0.2build1] (core, i386-whitelist)
[16:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: squashfs-tools (noble-proposed/main) [1:4.6.1-1 => 1:4.6.1-1build1] (core, i386-whitelist)
[16:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: t1utils (noble-proposed/main) [1.41-4build2 => 1.41-4build3] (core, i386-whitelist)
[16:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: sysvinit (noble-proposed/main) [3.08-6ubuntu2 => 3.08-6ubuntu3] (core, i386-whitelist)
[16:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: tdb (noble-proposed/main) [1.4.10-1 => 1.4.10-1build1] (core, i386-whitelist)
[16:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: twolame (noble-proposed/main) [0.4.0-2build2 => 0.4.0-2build3] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist, ubuntu-server)
[16:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: unzip (noble-proposed/main) [6.0-28ubuntu3 => 6.0-28ubuntu4] (core, i386-whitelist)
[16:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: usbutils (noble-proposed/main) [1:017-3 => 1:017-3build1] (core, i386-whitelist)
[16:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: vulkan-loader (noble-proposed/main) [1.3.275.0-1 => 1.3.275.0-1build1] (core, i386-whitelist)
[16:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: taglib (noble-proposed/main) [1.13.1-1 => 1.13.1-1build1] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist, ubuntu-server)
[16:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: uchardet (noble-proposed/main) [0.0.8-1 => 0.0.8-1build1] (core, i386-whitelist)
[16:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: voikko-fi (noble-proposed/main) [2.5-1 => 2.5-1build1] (ubuntu-desktop)
[16:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: tinycdb (noble-proposed/main) [0.81-1 => 0.81-1build1] (ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server)
[16:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: wdiff (noble-proposed/main) [1.2.2-6 => 1.2.2-6build1] (core, i386-whitelist)
[16:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: usb-modeswitch (noble-proposed/main) [2.6.1-3ubuntu2 => 2.6.1-3ubuntu3] (desktop-core)
[16:26] <juliank> wc -l rebuild-for.log
[16:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: uucp (noble-proposed/main) [1.07-28 => 1.07-28build1] (core)
[16:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: virglrenderer (noble-proposed/main) [1.0.0-1ubuntu1 => 1.0.0-1ubuntu2] (ubuntu-server)
[16:26] <juliank> 446 rebuild-for.log
[16:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: wayland (noble-proposed/main) [1.22.0-2.1 => 1.22.0-2.1build1] (core, i386-whitelist, xorg)
[16:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: websockify (noble-proposed/main) [0.10.0+dfsg1-5build1 => 0.10.0+dfsg1-5build2] (no packageset)
[16:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: valgrind (noble-proposed/main) [1:3.22.0-0ubuntu2 => 1:3.22.0-0ubuntu3] (i386-whitelist, ubuntu-desktop)
[16:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: webrtc-audio-processing (noble-proposed/main) [0.3.1-0ubuntu5 => 0.3.1-0ubuntu6] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist)
[16:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: wavpack (noble-proposed/main) [5.6.0-1 => 5.6.0-1build1] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist, ubuntu-server)
[16:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: wireguard (noble-proposed/main) [1.0.20210914-1ubuntu3 => 1.0.20210914-1ubuntu4] (no packageset)
[16:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: xauth (noble-proposed/main) [1:1.1.2-1 => 1:1.1.2-1build1] (core, i386-whitelist)
[16:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: xcb-util-keysyms (noble-proposed/main) [0.4.0-1build3 => 0.4.0-1build4] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist)
[16:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: xcb-util (noble-proposed/main) [0.4.0-1build2 => 0.4.0-1build3] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist)
[16:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: woff2 (noble-proposed/main) [1.0.2-2 => 1.0.2-2build1] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist)
[16:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: xcb-util-renderutil (noble-proposed/main) [0.3.9-1build3 => 0.3.9-1build4] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist)
[16:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: xcb-util-image (noble-proposed/main) [0.4.0-2 => 0.4.0-2build1] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist)
[16:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: fwupd-efi (noble-proposed/main) [1:1.4-1build1 => 1:1.4-1build1] (no packageset)
[16:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: xdg-user-dirs (noble-proposed/main) [0.18-1 => 0.18-1build1] (core)
[16:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: xfonts-utils (noble-proposed/main) [1:7.7+6build2 => 1:7.7+6build3] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist)
[16:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: xft (noble-proposed/main) [2.3.6-1 => 2.3.6-1build1] (core, i386-whitelist, xorg)
[16:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: xinput (noble-proposed/main) [1.6.4-1 => 1.6.4-1build1] (desktop-core)
[16:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: xserver-xorg-video-amdgpu (noble-proposed/main) [23.0.0-1 => 23.0.0-1build1] (desktop-core)
[16:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: xserver-xorg-video-dummy (noble-proposed/main) [1:0.4.0-1 => 1:0.4.0-1build1] (desktop-core, xorg)
[16:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: xserver-xorg-video-qxl (noble-proposed/main) [0.1.6-1 => 0.1.6-1build1] (desktop-core, xorg)
[16:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: xserver-xorg-video-vmware (noble-proposed/main) [1:13.4.0-1 => 1:13.4.0-1build1] (desktop-core, xorg)
[16:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: yajl (noble-proposed/main) [2.1.0-5 => 2.1.0-5build1] (ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server)
[16:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: xcb-util-wm (noble-proposed/main) [0.4.1-1.1build2 => 0.4.1-1.1build3] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist)
[16:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: xfsdump (noble-proposed/main) [3.1.11-0.1 => 3.1.11-0.1build1] (core)
[16:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: xorg (noble-proposed/main) [1:7.7+23ubuntu2 => 1:7.7+23ubuntu3] (core, xorg)
[16:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: xserver-xorg-video-fbdev (noble-proposed/main) [1:0.5.0-2build1 => 1:0.5.0-2build2] (desktop-core, xorg)
[16:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: xxhash (noble-proposed/main) [0.8.2-2 => 0.8.2-2build1] (core, i386-whitelist)
[16:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: zip (noble-proposed/main) [3.0-13 => 3.0-13build1] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist, ubuntu-server)
[16:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: xf86-input-wacom (noble-proposed/main) [1:1.2.0-1ubuntu1 => 1:1.2.0-1ubuntu2] (desktop-core, xorg)
[16:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: xserver-xorg-video-ati (noble-proposed/main) [1:22.0.0-1 => 1:22.0.0-1build1] (desktop-core, xorg)
[16:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: yaml-cpp (noble-proposed/main) [0.8.0+dfsg-6 => 0.8.0+dfsg-6build1] (ubuntu-desktop)
[16:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: xinit (noble-proposed/main) [1.4.1-0ubuntu4 => 1.4.1-0ubuntu5] (desktop-core)
[16:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: zope.interface (noble-proposed/main) [6.1-1 => 6.1-1build1] (ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server, zope)
[16:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: xserver-xorg-video-vesa (noble-proposed/main) [1:2.6.0-1 => 1:2.6.0-1build1] (desktop-core, xorg)
[16:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: xserver-xorg-video-intel (noble-proposed/main) [2:2.99.917+git20210115-1 => 2:2.99.917+git20210115-1build1] (desktop-core, xorg)
[16:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: zsh (noble-proposed/main) [5.9-6ubuntu1 => 5.9-6ubuntu2] (core, i386-whitelist)
[16:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: fwupd-efi (noble-proposed/main) [1:1.4-1build1 => 1:1.4-1build1] (no packageset)
[16:35] <vorlon> ubiquity currently build-depends on NBS gir1.2-webkit2-4.0.  as far as I can see, all flavors are now migrated to a different installer than ubiquity for noble.  Should I just drop building of ubiquity-frontend-gtk in noble? leaving only oem-config
[16:36] <Eickmeyer> vorlon: I believe that's correct, we discussed that a lot during flavor sync with seb128 and jbicha.
[16:37] <juliank> If it's wrong we'll see either way :D
[16:37] <Eickmeyer> juliank: If it's wrong I'm sure someone is getting bonked. :D
[16:38] <Eickmeyer> One warning: even oem-config uses the slideshow, so I'm not sure if that needs all of the webkit components or not.
[16:43] <juliank> busybox ftbfs everywhere
[16:43] <juliank> it's very bad
[16:44] <juliank> main: src:linux-ibm
[16:44] <juliank> main: src:linux-laptop
[16:44] <juliank> main: src:linux-meta-ibm
[16:44] <juliank> main: src:linux-meta-starfive
[16:44] <juliank> main: src:linux-signed-ibm
[16:44] <juliank> main: src:linux-starfive
[16:44] <juliank> eek
[16:46] <juliank> linux-ibm clearly FTBAS
[16:46] <juliank> but I guess the others did get uploaed
[16:47] <juliank> well the -signed one at least did not :)
[16:48] <juliank> Doesn't seem intentional that we release noble with older versions of linux-laptop and linux-starfive than mantic
[16:49] <juliank> should they be dropped from noble and come back in -updates?
[16:49] <juliank> Should we copy the mantic ones up?
[16:50] <juliank> I cancelled their builds at least
[16:52] <doko> juliank: do you want to have the gcc-defaults upload removed?
[16:52] <juliank> doko: yes please
[16:53] <juliank> doko: and linux-laptop  linux-starfive linux-meta-starfive if you are so inclined :)
[16:54] <doko> juliank: it's a shame that you're backing out so quickly from kernel and toolchain maintenance ;p
[16:55] <juliank> libeatmydata FTBFS with /usr/include/features-time64.h:26:5: error: #error "_TIME_BITS=64 is allowed only with _FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64"
[16:55] <juliank> peculiar
[16:55] <juliank> (on armhf)
[16:56] <ginggs> juliank: do you still need fwupd-efi rejected?
[16:56] <juliank> it literally says  -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -D_TIME_BITS=64  right before
[16:56] <juliank> ginggs: Ah yes, and archive admin removal of the source upload
[16:57] <arraybolt3> doko: (re unity related build failures) Understood.
[16:57] <doko> juliank: fixing libeatmydata
[16:58] <juliank> The linux-starfive kernel should be dropped from Noble.
[16:58] <juliank> [1~
[16:58] <juliank> (from kernel team)
[16:58] <juliank> so we should drop  src:linux-meta-starfive src:linux-starfive from release pocket too
[16:59] <doko> juliank: is there an issue open about that?
[17:00] <juliank> Ah let me file issue
[17:00] <juliank> I forgot
[17:00] <ginggs> juliank: i see fwupd-efi armhf, arm64 and amd64 in the unapproved queue, which i can probably reject, but i can't do anything about the source upload
[17:00] <juliank> ginggs: yes thanks, reject those
[17:00] <juliank> doko: please remove fwupd-efi upload in proposed?
[17:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected fwupd-efi [amd64] (noble-proposed) [1:1.4-1build1]
[17:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected fwupd-efi [arm64] (noble-proposed) [1:1.4-1build1]
[17:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: servicelog (noble-proposed/main) [1.1.16-1 => 1.1.16-1build1] (core)
[17:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected fwupd-efi [armhf] (noble-proposed) [1:1.4-1build1]
[17:02] <doko> juliank: done
[17:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libeatmydata (noble-proposed/main) [131-1build1 => 131-1ubuntu1] (core, i386-whitelist)
[17:03] <juliank> doko: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-meta-starfive/+bug/2060560
[17:03] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Launchpad bug 2060560 in linux-starfive (Ubuntu) "Remove obsolete kernels from noble" [Undecided, New]
[17:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: livecd-rootfs (noble-proposed/main) [24.04.57 => 24.04.58] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist)
[17:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted livecd-rootfs [source] (noble-proposed) [24.04.58]
[17:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: servicelog (noble-proposed/main) [1.1.16-1 => 1.1.16-1build1] (core)
[17:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: trace-cmd (noble-proposed/universe) [3.2-1ubuntu1 => 3.2-1ubuntu2] (no packageset)
[17:08] <doko> juliank: libeatmydata uploaded, waiting: ^^^
[17:08] <juliank> ack
[17:09] <juliank> thanks
[17:15] <philroche> We found another issue in livecd-rootfs https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/livecd-rootfs/+bug/2060558 which will block noble cloud-images with snaps preseeded from being seeded correctly. Fix MP @ https://code.launchpad.net/~philroche/livecd-rootfs/+git/livecd-rootfs/+merge/463836 . Could a core-dev review please?
[17:15] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Launchpad bug 2060558 in livecd-rootfs (Ubuntu Noble) "AppArmor profile `unconfined_restrictions` missing  for noble 6.8 kernel" [Undecided, New]
[17:21] <juliank> jbicha: Maybe you want to look at this FTBFS https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libsigc++-2.0/2.12.1-1build1 - your the Debian maintainer after all
[17:22] <juliank> jamespage: It seems this also is solely a python3-distutils issue, though
[17:22] <juliank> jbicha: : It seems this also is solely a python3-distutils issue, though
[17:22] <juliank> sorry about that
[17:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cloud-init (focal-proposed/main) [23.4.4-0ubuntu0~20.04.1 => 24.1.3-0ubuntu1~20.04.1] (core, edubuntu, ubuntu-cloud)
[17:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cloud-init (jammy-proposed/main) [23.4.4-0ubuntu0~22.04.1 => 24.1.3-0ubuntu1~22.04.1] (core, ubuntu-cloud)
[17:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cloud-init (mantic-proposed/main) [23.4.4-0ubuntu0~23.10.1 => 24.1.3-0ubuntu1~23.10.2] (core, ubuntu-cloud)
[17:37] <vorlon> juliank: linux-laptop is obsolete and merged into linux-generic in noble
[17:58] <vorlon> doko: so noble has ghdl 2.0, noble-updates has ghdl 3.0, and noble-proposed has ghdl 4.0 which fails its tests.  How do we proceed on this?
[18:02] <vorlon> tsimonq2: would you be ok with rounding these lubuntu size limits up to the nearest 100MB? I've tried to avoid going any more fine-grained than that as I think it just contributes to greater churn on the limit code while providing no value
[18:06] <tsimonq2> vorlon: Works for me :)
[18:06] <tsimonq2> vorlon: Do you want to do it when merging, or would you like me to do it? no preference
[18:07] <vorlon> tsimonq2: faster if you do it I think
[18:09] <tsimonq2> vorlon: . :)
[18:18] <vorlon> oh, oem-config-gtk depends on ubiquity-frontend-gtk? that's not very nice
[18:18] <vorlon> guess I'll bump the webkit dependency instead
[18:18] <bdrung> back after 34.6 km in 100 min. i'll work on icu now.
[18:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted xserver-xorg-video-intel [source] (noble-proposed) [2:2.99.917+git20210115-1build1]
[18:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted xserver-xorg-video-vmware [source] (noble-proposed) [1:13.4.0-1build1]
[18:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted zsh [source] (noble-proposed) [5.9-6ubuntu2]
[18:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted zope.interface [source] (noble-proposed) [6.1-1build1]
[18:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted xserver-xorg-video-qxl [source] (noble-proposed) [0.1.6-1build1]
[18:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted yajl [source] (noble-proposed) [2.1.0-5build1]
[18:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted zip [source] (noble-proposed) [3.0-13build1]
[18:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted xxhash [source] (noble-proposed) [0.8.2-2build1]
[18:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted yaml-cpp [source] (noble-proposed) [0.8.0+dfsg-6build1]
[18:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted xserver-xorg-video-amdgpu [source] (noble-proposed) [23.0.0-1build1]
[18:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted xserver-xorg-video-dummy [source] (noble-proposed) [1:0.4.0-1build1]
[18:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted xserver-xorg-video-vesa [source] (noble-proposed) [1:2.6.0-1build1]
[18:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted xserver-xorg-video-ati [source] (noble-proposed) [1:22.0.0-1build1]
[18:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted xserver-xorg-video-fbdev [source] (noble-proposed) [1:0.5.0-2build2]
[18:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted xfonts-utils [source] (noble-proposed) [1:7.7+6build3]
[18:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted xft [source] (noble-proposed) [2.3.6-1build1]
[18:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted xorg [source] (noble-proposed) [1:7.7+23ubuntu3]
[18:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted xfsdump [source] (noble-proposed) [3.1.11-0.1build1]
[18:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted xinput [source] (noble-proposed) [1.6.4-1build1]
[18:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted xcb-util-renderutil [source] (noble-proposed) [0.3.9-1build4]
[18:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted xdg-user-dirs [source] (noble-proposed) [0.18-1build1]
[18:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted xinit [source] (noble-proposed) [1.4.1-0ubuntu5]
[18:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted xcb-util-wm [source] (noble-proposed) [0.4.1-1.1build3]
[18:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted xf86-input-wacom [source] (noble-proposed) [1:1.2.0-1ubuntu2]
[18:31] <vorlon> trying a manual hint for pmix+openmpi, the autohint has binary removals and is hitting the exception again
[18:31] <vorlon> +vtk9+opencv
[18:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted woff2 [source] (noble-proposed) [1.0.2-2build1]
[18:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted xcb-util-image [source] (noble-proposed) [0.4.0-2build1]
[18:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted xcb-util [source] (noble-proposed) [0.4.0-1build3]
[18:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted xauth [source] (noble-proposed) [1:1.1.2-1build1]
[18:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted xcb-util-keysyms [source] (noble-proposed) [0.4.0-1build4]
[18:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted uucp [source] (noble-proposed) [1.07-28build1]
[18:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted wayland [source] (noble-proposed) [1.22.0-2.1build1]
[18:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted wireguard [source] (noble-proposed) [1.0.20210914-1ubuntu4]
[18:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted virglrenderer [source] (noble-proposed) [1.0.0-1ubuntu2]
[18:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted webrtc-audio-processing [source] (noble-proposed) [0.3.1-0ubuntu6]
[18:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted valgrind [source] (noble-proposed) [1:3.22.0-0ubuntu3]
[18:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted wavpack [source] (noble-proposed) [5.6.0-1build1]
[18:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted websockify [source] (noble-proposed) [0.10.0+dfsg1-5build2]
[18:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted vulkan-loader [source] (noble-proposed) [1.3.275.0-1build1]
[18:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted wdiff [source] (noble-proposed) [1.2.2-6build1]
[18:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted sysvinit [source] (noble-proposed) [3.08-6ubuntu3]
[18:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted usb-modeswitch [source] (noble-proposed) [2.6.1-3ubuntu3]
[18:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted voikko-fi [source] (noble-proposed) [2.5-1build1]
[18:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted twolame [source] (noble-proposed) [0.4.0-2build3]
[18:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted usbutils [source] (noble-proposed) [1:017-3build1]
[18:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted taglib [source] (noble-proposed) [1.13.1-1build1]
[18:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted tinycdb [source] (noble-proposed) [0.81-1build1]
[18:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted unzip [source] (noble-proposed) [6.0-28ubuntu4]
[18:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted tdb [source] (noble-proposed) [1.4.10-1build1]
[18:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted uchardet [source] (noble-proposed) [0.0.8-1build1]
[18:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted sysfsutils [source] (noble-proposed) [2.1.1-6build1]
[18:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted t1utils [source] (noble-proposed) [1.41-4build3]
[18:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted time [source] (noble-proposed) [1.9-0.2build1]
[18:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted sysstat [source] (noble-proposed) [12.6.1-1ubuntu2]
[18:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted tar [source] (noble-proposed) [1.35+dfsg-3build1]
[18:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted speex [source] (noble-proposed) [1.2.1-2ubuntu2]
[18:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted sysconfig [source] (noble-proposed) [0.0.14ubuntu3]
[18:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted tftp-hpa [source] (noble-proposed) [5.2+20150808-1.4build1]
[18:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted swedish [source] (noble-proposed) [1.4.5-3build1]
[18:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted tidy-html5 [source] (noble-proposed) [2:5.6.0-11ubuntu2]
[18:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted syslinux [source] (noble-proposed) [3:6.04~git20190206.bf6db5b4+dfsg1-3ubuntu3]
[18:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted snowball [source] (noble-proposed) [2.2.0-4build1]
[18:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted squashfs-tools [source] (noble-proposed) [1:4.6.1-1build1]
[18:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted strace [source] (noble-proposed) [6.6-0ubuntu2]
[18:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted sonic [source] (noble-proposed) [0.2.0-13build1]
[18:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted startup-notification [source] (noble-proposed) [0.12-6build3]
[18:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: icu (noble-proposed/main) [74.2-1ubuntu2 => 74.2-1ubuntu3] (core, i386-whitelist)
[18:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted sg3-utils [source] (noble-proposed) [1.46-3ubuntu4]
[18:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted snappy [source] (noble-proposed) [1.1.10-1build1]
[18:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted sqlalchemy [source] (noble-proposed) [1.4.50+ds1-1build1]
[18:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted smartmontools [source] (noble-proposed) [7.4-2build1]
[18:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted sosreport [source] (noble-proposed) [4.5.6-0ubuntu3]
[19:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted servicelog [source] (noble-proposed) [1.1.16-1build1]
[19:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted simplejson [source] (noble-proposed) [3.19.2-1build2]
[19:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted shadow [source] (noble-proposed) [1:4.13+dfsg1-4ubuntu2]
[19:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted skiboot [source] (noble-proposed) [7.0+dfsg-1build2]
[19:02] <doko> vorlon: I filed upstream bugs for ghdl. the good thing is that at least one of the backends passes it's tests on each arch. feel free to accpt these now. I can mark these reported issues as flaky on these archs, or just stop building them
[19:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted icu [source] (noble-proposed) [74.2-1ubuntu3]
[19:47] <dbungert> fossfreedom_: https://code.launchpad.net/~dbungert/livecd-rootfs/+git/livecd-rootfs/+merge/463841 - I assume yes but would you confirm?
[19:55] <bdmurray> dbungert: philroche is also working on a livecd-rootfs upload if you want to mash them up https://code.launchpad.net/~philroche/livecd-rootfs/+git/livecd-rootfs/+merge/463836
[19:58] <dbungert> bdmurray: agree, batching livecd-rootfs uploads makes sense
[19:59] <fossfreedom_> dbungert nice find. Yes ... 💯
[20:00] <dbungert> thanks!
[20:10] <vorlon> doko: do you think the tests are actually flaky?
[20:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: livecd-rootfs (noble-proposed/main) [24.04.58 => 24.04.59] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist)
[20:16] <doko> vorlon: https://github.com/ghdl/ghdl/issues/2642#issuecomment-2043535561
[20:16] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Issue 2642 in ghdl/ghdl "4.0.0: issue880 and ticket24 tests fail on amd64 with the mcode backend" [Open]
[20:25] <dbungert> ubuntu-release: please approve livecd-rootfs 24.04.59
[20:26] <bdmurray> looking
[20:27] <juliank> Something is wrong with libquazip5-1
[20:29] <juliank> Ah I see lol https://git.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libquazip/tree/debian/libquazip5-1t64.symbols.amd64
[20:29] <juliank> they use an amd64-only symbols file that says libquazip5-1 still
[20:31] <juliank> Couple of awkward bits as I just realized my report wants to rebuild e2fsprogs against itself it doesn't quite understand a rename being undone
[20:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted livecd-rootfs [source] (noble-proposed) [24.04.59]
[20:32] <juliank> It somehow missed the Tasks for krb5, not sure why though
[20:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: timidity (noble-proposed/universe) [2.14.0-8.2 => 2.14.0-8.2ubuntu1] (kubuntu)
[20:33] <juliank> Apologies this is fixed now, I only rebuilt seeded packages where seeded binary name == source name by accident
[20:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: c2esp (noble-proposed/main) [27-11ubuntu5 => 27-11ubuntu6] (desktop-core)
[20:34] <juliank> got some more now https://magenta.jak-linux.org/ubuntu-archive/distcheck/noble/global-ben.rebuild-for.txt
[20:34] <juliank> but maybe it hasn't picked up all the uploads yet
[20:40] <juliank> I'll have a look at the report tomorrow morning or maybe vorlon wants to look at the report; I think uuid migrated and that causes new rebuilds to appear on amd64
[20:41] <juliank> s/migrated/built/
[20:41] <juliank> You can grep task: it
[20:41] <juliank> or like grep task:minimal
[20:42] <juliank> Ah ooh so it shows you the task if any of the binaries is affected, but it's not necessarily the seeded binary
[20:42] <juliank> It's bolting tasks back on after calculating source packages in the transition
[20:45] <vorlon> lol ubiquity ftbfs because of mixed soup2.4/soup3 symbols, and timezonemap still uses soup2.4
[20:47] <juliank> ok so https://magenta.jak-linux.org/ubuntu-archive/distcheck/noble/global-ben.rebuild-for.txt now tracks tasks correctly in the comments
[20:47] <juliank> So it only shows task: comments if the binary causing the rebuild is seeded in that task
[20:48] <juliank> e.g. if src:foo has foo-1, foo-2; and foo-1 is seeded in T and foo-2 is not, but foo-2 depends on libssl3, it doesn't show task:T anymore
[20:48] <juliank> It only shows task:T if foo1 is causing the rebuild :)
[20:51] <juliank> outstanding are 5 packages in standard, 7 in minimal, and 63 in ubuntu-desktop picked up bad library names during xz-utils mitigation
[20:51] <juliank> and 57 for ubuntu-desktop-minimal
[20:51] <juliank> not sure if overlap
[20:51] <juliank> overlap is 6
[20:52] <juliank> ugh that is 310 packages in total that are seeded and did not pick up t64 names
[20:53] <juliank> I think it still has problems with reverted transitions though
[20:56] <juliank> much better now
[20:56] <juliank> It got messed up by me adding Provides handling for perlapi and so on
[20:57] <juliank> Anyway not much difference
[20:58] <mwhudson> juliank: fwiw i have a ticket called "finalize time_t migration" for this pulse, feel free to brain dump anything i can help with on it (https://warthogs.atlassian.net/browse/FR-7271)
[20:59] <juliank> mwhudson: I think it's a bit optimistically named
[21:00] <vladimirp> juliank: same https://warthogs.atlassian.net/browse/FR-7336
[21:00] <juliank> mwhudson: Albeit if you just think about armhf it's looking ok https://magenta.jak-linux.org/ubuntu-archive/distcheck/noble.armhf/global-ben.rebuild-for.txt
[21:01] <juliank> https://magenta.jak-linux.org/ubuntu-archive/distcheck/noble.armhf/global-ben.txt is much unhappier
[21:01] <juliank> As is https://magenta.jak-linux.org/ubuntu-archive/distcheck/noble/global-ben.rebuild-for.txt
[21:01] <juliank> it says we have 269 seeded packages now that still depend on the old names in amd64
[21:01] <juliank> due to xz-utils regressions
[21:02] <juliank> I don't think we want to start rebuilds for them now, but I don't know
[21:02] <juliank> I just literally did `curl https://magenta.jak-linux.org/ubuntu-archive/distcheck/noble/global-ben.rebuild-for.txt  | grep task: | parallel` earlier (with gnu parallel), but I had missed some tasks as explained
[21:02] <juliank> We can do more targeted fixes for the solver for these
[21:02] <mwhudson> juliank: yes probably
[21:03] <juliank> I think right now it's sort out anything that is in -updates and lower in release first
[21:03] <juliank> Then fix other FTBFS in proposed
[21:04] <juliank> But I also uploaded uploads for everything not rebuilt in main since March
[21:04] <juliank> so even if we missed some libraries in main, they'd all get rebuilt
[21:04] <juliank> So main should be fully t64 safe in the end if we can get everything to migrate
[21:04] <juliank> Not for 3rd party debs
[21:05] <juliank> But safe within the archive; and this will give us a solid base for Core and snaps
[21:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted c2esp [source] (noble-proposed) [27-11ubuntu6]
[21:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: openvswitch (noble-proposed/main) [3.3.0-1build2 => 3.3.0-1ubuntu1] (core)
[21:29] <fnordahl> ^ fixes FTBFS for openvswitch introduced by update to the python3.12 package ref bug 2060434
[21:29] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Bug 2060434 in openvswitch (Ubuntu) "[noble] FTBFS on failure in test vlog - Python3, change of behavior in Python 3.13, backported to 3.12 and 3.11" [Undecided, In Progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/2060434
[21:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted trace-cmd [source] (noble-proposed) [3.2-1ubuntu2]
[21:30] <vorlon> what's nice is that every refresh of the NBS page gives me more packages to remove
[21:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: c2esp (noble-proposed/main) [27-11ubuntu5 => 27-11ubuntu7] (desktop-core)
[22:12] <mwhudson> vorlon: is there a reason linux-firmware hasn't been rebuilt yet?
[22:13] <mwhudson> oh wait it has and it migrated
[22:14] <mwhudson> same for gdb
[22:19] <mwhudson> vorlon, doko: uh what's going on here https://ubuntu-archive-team.ubuntu.com/proposed-migration/update_excuses.html#gcc-14-cross
[22:21] <mwhudson> ubuntu-archive: i think gdb, linux-firmware, unbound can be removed from noble-updates
[22:22] <mwhudson> looks like c2esp and nullboot we just need to wait
[22:23] <mwhudson> lftp has a build failure on armhf, there are patches in debian, openvswitch has a fix in unapproved
[22:23] <mwhudson> is s390-tools waiting on an AA to accept something for signing?
[22:29] <vladimirp> ubuntu-archive: rebootstrapped openjdk-8 is ready in bootstrap ppa https://launchpad.net/~canonical-foundations/+archive/ubuntu/archive-bootstrap/+sourcepub/15917579/+listing-archive-extra . openjdk-lts waiting on the final version of time_t patch.
[22:46] <vladimirp> is it a good moment to upload fix for test regression in cmake? upstream merged the change.
[22:49] <mwhudson> vladimirp: i think it will go into the unapproved queue so no real harm in uploading
[22:49] <vladimirp> mwhudson: thanks !!!
[22:54] <Eickmeyer> It's not even EOD Pacific. -_-
[22:58] <liushuyu> What is the disk requirement for Ubuntu Studio? 30GiB?
[22:58] <Eickmeyer> liushuyu: I'd say that's minimum.
[22:59] <liushuyu> Eickmeyer: I am currently testing the installation for all Ubuntu flavours. It seems like Ubuntu Studio needs a lot of space
[22:59] <Eickmeyer> It and Edubuntu both.
[23:00] <Eickmeyer> Included applications requirement, not so much a DE thing.
[23:00] <Eickmeyer> Hoping to do a minimal install for 24.10, didn't have time this release.
[23:01] <liushuyu> Okay, maybe the installer should check the available disk space instead of freezing mid-installation
[23:01] <bdmurray> Eickmeyer: It's been frozen for a bit anyway so we could remove packages from noble-updates and as we mentioned elsewhere we are here to accept any packages necessary.
[23:09] <Eickmeyer> bdmurray: I've already made my case, we'll just wait and see.
[23:11] <bdmurray> I don't disagree with your argument but we also need to proceed with the plan of record.
[23:13] <Eickmeyer> I understand that as well.
[23:14] <Eickmeyer> On a personal note, I only got done downloading the ISO images within the past hour for Edubuntu and Ubuntu Studio, and only just got done with a very brief VM cursory test of Ubuntu Studio.
[23:14] <Eickmeyer> That's partially why my comment.
[23:43] <vorlon> juliank: well your NCRs have set britney back a fair bit wrt the current run, having to schedule a lot of tests
[23:47] <vorlon> mwhudson: s390-tools has nothing waiting in unapproved
[23:47] <mwhudson> "s390-tools/s390x has unsatisfiable dependency" would be nice if you said _what_ britney
[23:49] <mwhudson> ah does someone need to upload s390-tools-signed?
[23:49] <mwhudson> i don't know how this stuff works
[23:51] <vorlon> mwhudson: I thought the deps were in the other direction?
[23:51] <mwhudson> https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/noble/s390x/s390-tools/2.31.0-0ubuntu4 -> "s390-tools-signed (= 2.31.0-0ubuntu4)" in depends on\
[23:51] <vorlon> so who wants to review my take 2 of porting libtimezonemap to libsoup3
[23:53] <mwhudson> vorlon: i can take a look
[23:53] <mwhudson> i don't know anything about libtimezonemap or libsoup though
[23:53] <vorlon> mwhudson: haha
[23:53] <vorlon> mwhudson well https://code.launchpad.net/~vorlon/ubuntu/+source/libtimezonemap/+git/libtimezonemap/+ref/ubuntu/devel , I'm uploading direct so it can also be reviewed by the release team in parallel or something
[23:56] <vorlon> I had to adjust a ubiquity timezone test to make it pass, but that was basically just because it was mocking an obsolete Soup api
[23:56] <mwhudson> gotta love reading diffs of diffs
[23:59] <mwhudson> lala s390-tools-signed installs directly to /lib